- ICH GCP
- US-Register für klinische Studien
- Klinische Studie NCT01634269
Clinical Evaluation of MDT-2111 in Subjects With Small Aortic Annuli and Symptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis
Medtronic MDT-2111 CoreValve Japan 23mm Study
Studienübersicht
Status
Bedingungen
Intervention / Behandlung
Detaillierte Beschreibung
Studientyp
Einschreibung (Tatsächlich)
Phase
- Unzutreffend
Kontakte und Standorte
Studienorte
-
-
Kanagawa
-
Kamakura, Kanagawa, Japan
- Shonan Kamakura General Hospital
-
-
Osaka
-
Suita, Osaka, Japan
- Osaka University Hospital
-
Suita, Osaka, Japan
- National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center
-
-
Saitama
-
Hidaka, Saitama, Japan
- Saitama Medical University
-
-
Teilnahmekriterien
Zulassungskriterien
Studienberechtigtes Alter
- Kind
- Erwachsene
- Älterer Erwachsener
Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige
Studienberechtigte Geschlechter
Beschreibung
Inclusion Criteria:
- Subject must have co-morbidities such that one cardiologist and one cardiac surgeon agree that medical factors preclude operation, based on a conclusion that the probability of death or serious morbidity exceeds the probability of meaningful improvement.
Subject has senile degenerative aortic valve stenosis with:
mean gradient > 40 mmHg or jet velocity greater than 4.0 m/s by either resting or dobutamine stress echocardiogram, or simultaneous pressure recordings at cardiac catheterization (either resting or dobutamine stress), AND an initial aortic valve area of ≤ 0.8 cm² (or aortic valve area index ≤ 0.5 cm²/m²) by resting echocardiogram.
- Subject is symptomatic from his/her aortic valve stenosis, as demonstrated by NYHA Functional Class Class III or greater. If screening committee agrees the eligibility of a patient with class II , based on medical factors, he/she can be enrolled.
- Patient has been informed of the nature of the trial and has signed an Informed Consent Form.
- Patient agrees to comply with specified follow-up evaluations and to return to the same investigational site where the procedure was performed.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Evidence of an acute myocardial infarction ≤ 30 days prior to the intended treatment.
- Any percutaneous coronary or peripheral interventional procedure performed within 30 days prior to the procedure.
Blood dyscrasias as defined:
- Leukopenia (WBC count < 1,000 cells/mm³)
- Thrombocytopenia (platelet count <50,000 cells/mm³)
- History of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy
- Hypercoagulable states
- Untreated clinically significant coronary artery disease requiring revascularization.
- Cardiogenic shock manifested by low cardiac output, vasopressor dependence, or mechanical hemodynamic support.
- Need for emergency surgery for any reason.
- Severe ventricular dysfunction with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 20% as measured by resting echocardiogram.
- Recent (within 6 months) cerebrovascular accident (CVA) or transient ischemic attack(TIA).
- End stage renal disease requiring chronic dialysis.
- GI bleeding within the past 3 months.
A known hypersensitivity or contraindication to any of the following which cannot be adequately pre-medicated:
- Aspirin
- Ticlopidine
- Heparin
- Contrast media
- Nitinol (titanium and nickel alloy)
- Ongoing sepsis, including active endocarditis.
- Subject refuses a blood transfusion.
- Life expectancy < 12 months due to associated non-cardiac co-morbid conditions.
- Other medical, social, or psychological conditions that in the opinion of an Investigator precludes the subject from appropriate consent.
- Severe dementia (resulting in either inability to provide informed consent for the trial/procedure, prevents independent lifestyle outside of a chronic care facility, or will fundamentally complicate rehabilitation from the procedure or compliance with follow-up visits).
- Currently participating in an investigational drug or another device trial. Note: Trials requiring extended follow-up for products that were investigational, but have since become commercially available, are not considered investigational trials.
- Symptomatic carotid or vertebral artery disease.
- Native aortic annulus size < 18 mm or > 20 mm per the screening diagnostic imaging.
- Pre-existing prosthetic heart valve in any position.
- Mixed aortic valve disease (aortic stenosis and aortic regurgitation with predominant aortic regurgitation).
- Mitral regurgitation (moderate to severe) or severe tricuspid regurgitation.
- Moderate to severe mitral stenosis.
- Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy.
- Echocardiographic evidence of intracardiac mass, thrombus or vegetation.
- Severe basal septal hypertrophy with an outflow gradient.
- Ascending aorta diameter > 34 mm
- Congenital bicuspid or unicuspid valve verified by echocardiography.
For patients with native coronary artery dependent circulation:
- Sinus of valsalva width < 25 mm OR
- Height of the left or right coronary sinus of valsalva (to the tubular aorta) < 15mm.
Femoral or iliac artery of the first choice corresponding to any one of the following:
- Angle at aortic root (the angle between aortic valve annulus plane and horizontal plane/vertebra) exceeds 70°.
- Vessel diameter of femoral or iliac artery is less than 6 mm.
- Aorta has severe calcification, excess tortuosity or severe atherosclerosis.
- Transarterial access not able to accommodate an 18Fr sheath.
Subclavian artery of the second choice corresponding to any one of the following:
- Angle at aortic root (the angle between aortic valve annulus plane and horizontal plane/vertebra) exceeds 70° (in the case of left subclavian artery) and 30° (in the case of right subclavian artery).
- Vessel diameter of subclavian artery is less than 6 mm.
- Transarterial access not able to accommodate an 18Fr sheath.
Direct Aortic Artery as third line choice of access. Patients are excluded from Direct Aortic access if:
- Access site is less than 6 cm from the aortic valve basal plane
- Access site has calcification or porcelain aorta
- Access site and delivery trajectory contain RIMA or patent RIMA graft
Studienplan
Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?
Designdetails
- Hauptzweck: Behandlung
- Zuteilung: N / A
- Interventionsmodell: Einzelgruppenzuweisung
- Maskierung: Keine (Offenes Etikett)
Waffen und Interventionen
Teilnehmergruppe / Arm |
Intervention / Behandlung |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: MDT-2111 TAVI 23 mm
Subjects with small annuli and symptomatic severe AS deemed difficult for surgical intervention.
|
Device: 23 mm MDT-2111 System for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) using the 23 mm MDT-2111 system.
|
Was misst die Studie?
Primäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
Composite Score of Change in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class and Effective Orifice Area (EOA).
Zeitfenster: baseline and 6 months
|
The primary endpoint is a composite of functional effectiveness as measured by improvement of at least 1 NYHA class from baseline to 6 months and anatomical effectiveness as measured by Effective Orifice Area (EOA) ≥1.0 cm² at 6 months.
|
baseline and 6 months
|
Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
New York Heart Classification (NYHA) Over Time
Zeitfenster: 30 days
|
NEW YORK HEART ASSOCIATION CLASSIFICATION (NYHA) Class I: Subject with cardiac disease but without resulting limitations of physical activity. Class II: Subjects with cardiac disease resulting in slight limitation of physical activity. Class III: Subjects with cardiac disease resulting in marked limitation of physical activity. Class IV: Subjects with cardiac disease resulting in inability to carry on any physical activity without discomfort. |
30 days
|
|
New York Heart Classification (NYHA) Over Time
Zeitfenster: 6 months
|
NEW YORK HEART ASSOCIATION CLASSIFICATION (NYHA) Class I: Subject with cardiac disease but without resulting limitations of physical activity. Class II: Subjects with cardiac disease resulting in slight limitation of physical activity. Class III: Subjects with cardiac disease resulting in marked limitation of physical activity. Class IV: Subjects with cardiac disease resulting in inability to carry on any physical activity without discomfort. |
6 months
|
|
New York Heart Classification (NYHA) Over Time
Zeitfenster: 12 months
|
NEW YORK HEART ASSOCIATION CLASSIFICATION (NYHA) Class I: Subject with cardiac disease but without resulting limitations of physical activity. Class II: Subjects with cardiac disease resulting in slight limitation of physical activity. Class III: Subjects with cardiac disease resulting in marked limitation of physical activity. Class IV: Subjects with cardiac disease resulting in inability to carry on any physical activity without discomfort. |
12 months
|
|
New York Heart Classification (NYHA) Over Time
Zeitfenster: 24 months
|
NEW YORK HEART ASSOCIATION CLASSIFICATION (NYHA) Class I: Subject with cardiac disease but without resulting limitations of physical activity. Class II: Subjects with cardiac disease resulting in slight limitation of physical activity. Class III: Subjects with cardiac disease resulting in marked limitation of physical activity. Class IV: Subjects with cardiac disease resulting in inability to carry on any physical activity without discomfort. |
24 months
|
|
Schwerwiegendes unerwünschtes kardiovaskuläres und zerebrovaskuläres Ereignis (MACCE)
Zeitfenster: 0 Tag bis 30 Tage
|
MACCE ist definiert als eine Zusammensetzung aus:
|
0 Tag bis 30 Tage
|
|
Schwerwiegendes unerwünschtes kardiovaskuläres und zerebrovaskuläres Ereignis (MACCE)
Zeitfenster: 0 Tag bis 6 Monate
|
MACCE ist definiert als eine Zusammensetzung aus:
|
0 Tag bis 6 Monate
|
|
Schwerwiegendes unerwünschtes kardiovaskuläres und zerebrovaskuläres Ereignis (MACCE)
Zeitfenster: 0 Tag bis 12 Monate
|
MACCE ist definiert als eine Zusammensetzung aus:
|
0 Tag bis 12 Monate
|
|
Schwerwiegendes unerwünschtes kardiovaskuläres und zerebrovaskuläres Ereignis (MACCE)
Zeitfenster: 0 Tag bis 24 Monate
|
MACCE ist definiert als eine Zusammensetzung aus:
|
0 Tag bis 24 Monate
|
|
Device Success as Defined in the Description.
Zeitfenster: after procedure or discharge
|
The following components must be satisfied for device success:
|
after procedure or discharge
|
|
Procedural Success, Defined as Device Success and Absence of In-hospital MACCE
Zeitfenster: from admission for procedure to discharge
|
Procedural success is defined as device success and absence of in-hospital MACCE.
|
from admission for procedure to discharge
|
|
Echokardiographische Beurteilung der Leistung einer Klappenprothese – mittlerer Gradient
Zeitfenster: 30 Tage
|
30 Tage
|
|
|
Echocardiographic Assessment of Prosthetic Valve Performance - Mean Gradient
Zeitfenster: 6 months
|
6 months
|
|
|
Echokardiographische Beurteilung der Leistung einer Klappenprothese – mittlerer Gradient
Zeitfenster: 12 Monate
|
12 Monate
|
|
|
Echokardiographische Beurteilung der Leistung einer Klappenprothese – mittlerer Gradient
Zeitfenster: 24 Monate
|
24 Monate
|
|
|
Echocardiographic Assessment of Prosthetic Valve Performance - Effective Orifice Area (EOA)
Zeitfenster: 30 days
|
30 days
|
|
|
Echocardiographic Assessment of Prosthetic Valve Performance - Effective Orifice Area (EOA)
Zeitfenster: 6 months
|
6 months
|
|
|
Echocardiographic Assessment of Prosthetic Valve Performance - Effective Orifice Area (EOA)
Zeitfenster: 12 months
|
12 months
|
|
|
Echocardiographic Assessment of Prosthetic Valve Performance - Effective Orifice Area (EOA)
Zeitfenster: 24 months
|
24 months
|
|
|
Echokardiographische Beurteilung der Leistung einer Klappenprothese – linksventrikuläre Ejektionsfraktion (LVEF)
Zeitfenster: 30 Tage
|
30 Tage
|
|
|
Echokardiographische Beurteilung der Leistung einer Klappenprothese – linksventrikuläre Ejektionsfraktion (LVEF)
Zeitfenster: 6 Monate
|
6 Monate
|
|
|
Echokardiographische Beurteilung der Leistung einer Klappenprothese – linksventrikuläre Ejektionsfraktion (LVEF)
Zeitfenster: 12 Monate
|
12 Monate
|
|
|
Echokardiographische Beurteilung der Leistung einer Klappenprothese – linksventrikuläre Ejektionsfraktion (LVEF)
Zeitfenster: 24 Monate
|
24 Monate
|
|
|
Echocardiographic Assessment of Prosthetic Valve Performance - Total Aortic Regurgitation (Transvalvular & Paravalvular) (Total AR)
Zeitfenster: 30 days
|
30 days
|
|
|
Echocardiographic Assessment of Prosthetic Valve Performance - Total Aortic Regurgitation (Transvalvular & Paravalvular) (Total AR)
Zeitfenster: 6 months
|
6 months
|
|
|
Echocardiographic Assessment of Prosthetic Valve Performance - Total Aortic Regurgitation (Transvalvular & Paravalvular) (Total AR)
Zeitfenster: 12 months
|
12 months
|
|
|
Echocardiographic Assessment of Prosthetic Valve Performance - Total Aortic Regurgitation (Transvalvular & Paravalvular) (Total AR)
Zeitfenster: 24 months
|
24 months
|
|
|
Wiederholen Sie den Krankenhausaufenthalt
Zeitfenster: 0 Tag bis 30 Tage
|
0 Tag bis 30 Tage
|
|
|
Wiederholen Sie den Krankenhausaufenthalt
Zeitfenster: 0 Tag bis 6 Monate
|
0 Tag bis 6 Monate
|
|
|
Wiederholen Sie den Krankenhausaufenthalt
Zeitfenster: 0 Tag bis 12 Monate
|
0 Tag bis 12 Monate
|
|
|
Wiederholen Sie den Krankenhausaufenthalt
Zeitfenster: 0 Tag bis 24 Monate
|
0 Tag bis 24 Monate
|
|
|
Ventilbedingte Todesfälle
Zeitfenster: 0 Tag bis 30 Tage
|
0 Tag bis 30 Tage
|
|
|
Ventilbedingte Todesfälle
Zeitfenster: 0 Tag bis 6 Monate
|
0 Tag bis 6 Monate
|
|
|
Valve-related Deaths
Zeitfenster: 0 day to 12 months
|
0 day to 12 months
|
|
|
Ventilbedingte Todesfälle
Zeitfenster: 0 Tag bis 24 Monate
|
0 Tag bis 24 Monate
|
|
|
Quality of Life Assessment Using SF-36 Questionnaire - Physical Component Summary (Paired Change From Baseline)
Zeitfenster: Baseline to 30 days
|
The SF-36 assessment was used to evaluate subject Quality of life (QoL) by assessing change in physical function and general health status.
The SF-36 v2 ͭ ͫ Scoring Program was used to convert raw scores ranging from 0 to 100 into norm-based scores, allowing direct comparison to the reference values for the Japanese population.
The Z-score of each subdomain is calculated as the numbers of standard deviation away from the Japanese population mean of the corresponding raw score.
Norm-based score is then derived as fifty plus 10 times of the z-score.
A norm-based score of less than 50 was interpreted as below average when compared to the Japanese population whereas norm-based scores greater than 50 were interpreted as above average.
|
Baseline to 30 days
|
|
Quality of Life Assessment Using SF-36 Questionnaire - Physical Component Summary (Paired Change From Baseline)
Zeitfenster: Baseline to 6 months
|
The SF-36 assessment was used to evaluate subject Quality of life (QoL) by assessing change in physical function and general health status.
The SF-36 v2 ͭ ͫ Scoring Program was used to convert raw scores ranging from 0 to 100 into norm-based scores, allowing direct comparison to the reference values for the Japanese population.
The Z-score of each subdomain is calculated as the numbers of standard deviation away from the Japanese population mean of the corresponding raw score.
Norm-based score is then derived as fifty plus 10 times of the z-score.
A norm-based score of less than 50 was interpreted as below average when compared to the Japanese population whereas norm-based scores greater than 50 were interpreted as above average.
|
Baseline to 6 months
|
|
Quality of Life Assessment Using SF-36 Questionnaire - Physical Component Summary (Paired Change From Baseline)
Zeitfenster: Baseline to 12 months
|
The SF-36 assessment was used to evaluate subject Quality of life (QoL) by assessing change in physical function and general health status.
The SF-36 v2 ͭ ͫ Scoring Program was used to convert raw scores ranging from 0 to 100 into norm-based scores, allowing direct comparison to the reference values for the Japanese population.
The Z-score of each subdomain is calculated as the numbers of standard deviation away from the Japanese population mean of the corresponding raw score.
Norm-based score is then derived as fifty plus 10 times of the z-score.
A norm-based score of less than 50 was interpreted as below average when compared to the Japanese population whereas norm-based scores greater than 50 were interpreted as above average.
|
Baseline to 12 months
|
|
Quality of Life Assessment Using SF-36 Questionnaire - Physical Component Summary (Paired Change From Baseline)
Zeitfenster: Baseline to 24 months
|
The SF-36 assessment was used to evaluate subject Quality of life (QoL) by assessing change in physical function and general health status.
The SF-36 v2 ͭ ͫ Scoring Program was used to convert raw scores ranging from 0 to 100 into norm-based scores, allowing direct comparison to the reference values for the Japanese population.
The Z-score of each subdomain is calculated as the numbers of standard deviation away from the Japanese population mean of the corresponding raw score.
Norm-based score is then derived as fifty plus 10 times of the z-score.
A norm-based score of less than 50 was interpreted as below average when compared to the Japanese population whereas norm-based scores greater than 50 were interpreted as above average.
|
Baseline to 24 months
|
Mitarbeiter und Ermittler
Sponsor
Ermittler
- Hauptermittler: Yoshi Sawa, Professor, Osaka University Hospital
Publikationen und hilfreiche Links
Studienaufzeichnungsdaten
Haupttermine studieren
Studienbeginn
Primärer Abschluss (Tatsächlich)
Studienabschluss (Tatsächlich)
Studienanmeldedaten
Zuerst eingereicht
Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat
Zuerst gepostet (Schätzen)
Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen
Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)
Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt
Zuletzt verifiziert
Mehr Informationen
Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie
Schlüsselwörter
Zusätzliche relevante MeSH-Bedingungen
Andere Studien-ID-Nummern
- MDT-2111 23 mm trial
Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)
Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?
Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .
Klinische Studien zur Aortenklappenstenose
-
University of ZurichAktiv, nicht rekrutierendBecken- und Para-Aortic-LymphknotenmetastasenSchweiz
-
Samsun UniversityAktiv, nicht rekrutierendKoronararterien-Bypass-Operation (CABG) | Aufsteigendes Aortenaneurysma | Aortic Adventitial Pathology | Borderline AortendilatationTruthahn
-
Qun ZhaoFirst Hospital of Shijiazhuang City; Baoding First Central Hospital; Hengshui...Anmeldung auf EinladungMagenkrebs | Lymphatische Metastasierung | Künstliche Intelligenz | Radiomics | Para-Aortic-Lymphknotenmetastasierung | Präoperative BildgebungsbewertungChina
Klinische Studien zur MDT-2111 TAVI 23 mm
-
Medtronic CardiovascularAbgeschlossenAortenklappenstenoseJapan
-
Institut für Pharmakologie und Präventive MedizinEdwards LifesciencesAbgeschlossenAortenklappenstenoseÖsterreich, Kanada, Frankreich, Deutschland, Italien, Spanien, Vereinigtes Königreich
-
On-X Life Technologies, Inc.BeendetHerzklappenerkrankungVereinigte Staaten, Puerto Rico, Spanien
-
University Hospital, Basel, SwitzerlandAbgeschlossenAortenklappenstenoseSchweiz