Effectiveness of a Cognitive Training Program (UMAM Method) in Elderly People Without Dementia
25. januar 2020 oppdatert av: Madrid Salud
Cognitive Training in Elders Without Dementia Using UMAM Method. Genetic, Brain Volume and Cognitive Reserve Predictors: A Randomized Controlled Study
The study is oriented to analyze the effectiveness of a cognitive training method (UMAM) on cognitive functions, subjective memory and mood state in elderly people without dementia.
On the other hand, the study aims to examine whether variables such as cognitive reserve (e.g.
educational level), APOE genotype and intracranial volume are related to increased benefit after the intervention.
The researchers hope to find that greater cognitive reserve, not having the APOE allele ε4, and a greater volume of memory-related brain areas, are associated with better outcomes after the cognitive intervention.
Studieoversikt
Status
Fullført
Intervensjon / Behandling
Studietype
Intervensjonell
Registrering (Faktiske)
199
Fase
- Ikke aktuelt
Kontakter og plasseringer
Denne delen inneholder kontaktinformasjon for de som utfører studien, og informasjon om hvor denne studien blir utført.
Studiesteder
-
-
-
Madrid, Spania, 28006
- Centro de Prevención del Deterioro Cognitivo
-
-
Deltakelseskriterier
Forskere ser etter personer som passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kalt kvalifikasjonskriterier. Noen eksempler på disse kriteriene er en persons generelle helsetilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.
Kvalifikasjonskriterier
Alder som er kvalifisert for studier
60 år og eldre (Voksen, Eldre voksen)
Tar imot friske frivillige
Nei
Kjønn som er kvalifisert for studier
Alle
Beskrivelse
Inclusion Criteria:
- Being over 60 years old.
- Having a global cognitive performance > 23 in the Mini Mental State Examination Test.
- Having no history of neurological or serious psychiatric disorders (severe psycho-affective disorders and psychosis or other psychiatric disorders like alcoholism).
Exclusion Criteria:
- Chronic use of anxiolytics.
- Chronic use of neuroleptics.
- Chronic use of anticonvulsants.
- Having hearing or vision impairments that would preclude testing.
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) contraindications.
Studieplan
Denne delen gir detaljer om studieplanen, inkludert hvordan studien er utformet og hva studien måler.
Hvordan er studiet utformet?
Designdetaljer
- Primært formål: Forebygging
- Tildeling: Randomisert
- Intervensjonsmodell: Parallell tildeling
- Masking: Ingen (Open Label)
Våpen og intervensjoner
Deltakergruppe / Arm |
Intervensjon / Behandling |
|---|---|
|
Eksperimentell: Experimental Group
The experimental group carried out a 30-session multi-factorial group memory training program (UMAM method), with a frequency of three weekly sessions of 90 minutes each. The training program consists of four modules: 1- Stimulation of cognitive processes; learning and practicing internal memory strategies and solving everyday forgetfulness; 2- Instruction in basic concepts about memory; 3- Intervention on daily living and forgetting experiences, using internal and external strategies to solve everyday memory failures; 4- Metacognition or metamemory: the subjects were to reflect about their cognitive failures by analyzing the causes and variables of those failures. In addition, the experimental group followed the standard activities in which all users attending the Center are involved (planned interviews, dialogue-conferences, general health recommendations, etc.). |
|
|
Ingen inngripen: Control Group
The Control Group followed the standard activities in which all users attending the Center are involved (planned interviews, dialogue-conferences, general health recommendations, etc.).
|
Hva måler studien?
Primære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Tiltaksbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in general cognition
Tidsramme: This cognitive variable was assessed before and after the intervention. The interval between the pre and post-intervention assessment was 6 months.
|
The measure of the post-intervention change in general cognition, assessed with the Mini Mental State Examination Test (MMSE) and the 7 Minutes Test (7M).The score ranges from 0 to 30 points (MMSE) and from 0 to 89 points (7M).
In both cases, the higher scores indicate a better outcome.
|
This cognitive variable was assessed before and after the intervention. The interval between the pre and post-intervention assessment was 6 months.
|
|
Change in verbal memory
Tidsramme: This cognitive variable was assessed before and after the intervention. The interval between the pre and post-intervention assessment was 6 months.
|
The measure of the post-intervention change in verbal memory, assessed with the Word List Test of the Wechsler Memory Scale-III.
The score ranges from 0 to 48 points.
Higher scores indicate a better outcome.
|
This cognitive variable was assessed before and after the intervention. The interval between the pre and post-intervention assessment was 6 months.
|
|
Change in logical memory
Tidsramme: This cognitive variable was assessed before and after the intervention. The interval between the pre and post-intervention assessment was 6 months.
|
The measure of the post-intervention change in immediate and delayed logical memory, assessed with the Logical Memory Test (immediate and delayed units) of the Wechsler Memory Scale-III.
The score ranges from 0 to 75 points (immediate units) and from 0 to 50 (delayed units).
Higher scores indicate a better outcome.
|
This cognitive variable was assessed before and after the intervention. The interval between the pre and post-intervention assessment was 6 months.
|
|
Change in visual memory
Tidsramme: This cognitive variable was assessed before and after the intervention. The interval between the pre and post-intervention assessment was 6 months.
|
The measure of the post-intervention change in visual memory, assessed with the Rey memory test (form B).
The score ranges from 0 to 22 points.
Higher scores indicate a better outcome.
|
This cognitive variable was assessed before and after the intervention. The interval between the pre and post-intervention assessment was 6 months.
|
|
Change in daily memory
Tidsramme: This cognitive variable was assessed before and after the intervention. The interval between the pre and post-intervention assessment was 6 months.
|
The measure of the post-intervention change in daily memory, assessed with the Rivermead Behavioral Memory Test.
The score ranges from 0 to 24 points.
Higher scores indicate a better outcome.
|
This cognitive variable was assessed before and after the intervention. The interval between the pre and post-intervention assessment was 6 months.
|
|
Change in attentional amplitude
Tidsramme: This cognitive variable was assessed before and after the intervention. The interval between the pre and post-intervention assessment was 6 months.
|
The measure of the post-intervention change in attentional amplitude, assessed with the Direct Digit Test of the Wechsler Memory Scale-III.
The score ranges from 0 to 16 points.
Higher scores indicate a better outcome.
|
This cognitive variable was assessed before and after the intervention. The interval between the pre and post-intervention assessment was 6 months.
|
|
Change in attentional control
Tidsramme: This cognitive variable was assessed before and after the intervention. The interval between the pre and post-intervention assessment was 6 months.
|
The measure of the post-intervention change in attentional control, assessed with the Inverse Digit Test of the Wechsler Memory Scale-III.
The score ranges from 0 to 14 points.
Higher scores indicate a better outcome.
|
This cognitive variable was assessed before and after the intervention. The interval between the pre and post-intervention assessment was 6 months.
|
|
Change in attention and processing speed
Tidsramme: This cognitive variable was assessed before and after the intervention. The interval between the pre and post-intervention assessment was 6 months.
|
The measure of the post-intervention change in attention, assessed with the Trail Making Test, form A. The score ranges from 0 to 200 points.
Higher scores indicate a worse outcome.
|
This cognitive variable was assessed before and after the intervention. The interval between the pre and post-intervention assessment was 6 months.
|
|
Change in alternating attention and planning
Tidsramme: This cognitive variable was assessed before and after the intervention. The interval between the pre and post-intervention assessment was 6 months.
|
The measure of the post-intervention change in alternating attention and planning, assessed with the Trail Making Test, form B. The score ranges from 0 to 400 points.
Higher scores indicate a worse outcome.
|
This cognitive variable was assessed before and after the intervention. The interval between the pre and post-intervention assessment was 6 months.
|
|
Change in naming ability (language)
Tidsramme: This cognitive variable was assessed before and after the intervention. The interval between the pre and post-intervention assessment was 6 months.
|
The measure of the post-intervention change in naming ability, assessed with the Boston Naming Test.
The score ranges from 0 to 60 points.
Higher scores indicate a better outcome.
|
This cognitive variable was assessed before and after the intervention. The interval between the pre and post-intervention assessment was 6 months.
|
|
Change in verbal fluency (language)
Tidsramme: This cognitive variable was assessed before and after the intervention. The interval between the pre and post-intervention assessment was 6 months.
|
The measure of the post-intervention change in phonologic and semantic verbal fluency, assessed with the Phonological Verbal Fluency Test and the Semantic Fluency Test respectively.
The score goes from zero onwards (there is no upper limit).
Higher scores indicate a better outcome.
|
This cognitive variable was assessed before and after the intervention. The interval between the pre and post-intervention assessment was 6 months.
|
|
Change in subjective memory
Tidsramme: This variable was assessed before and after the intervention. The interval between the pre and post-intervention assessment was 6 months.
|
The measure of the post-intervention change in Subjective Memory, assessed with the Memory Failures of Everyday Questionnaire.The score ranges from 0 to 56 points.
Higher scores indicate a worse outcome.
|
This variable was assessed before and after the intervention. The interval between the pre and post-intervention assessment was 6 months.
|
|
Change in mood
Tidsramme: This variable was assessed before and after the intervention. The interval between the pre and post-intervention assessment was 6 months.
|
The measure of the post-intervention change in mood, assessed with the Geriatric Depression Scale.
The score ranges from 0 to 15 points.
Higher scores indicate a worse outcome.
|
This variable was assessed before and after the intervention. The interval between the pre and post-intervention assessment was 6 months.
|
|
The Cognitive Reserve as a predictor of change.
Tidsramme: Cognitive Reserve was assessed in the pre-intervention assessment.
|
The Cognitive Reserve was assessed with Rami Test.
The score ranges from 0 to 25 points.
|
Cognitive Reserve was assessed in the pre-intervention assessment.
|
|
The Genetic Profile as a predictor of change.
Tidsramme: The Genetic Profile was assessed in the pre-intervention assessment.
|
The Genetic Profile was obtained by genetic analysis employing a blood test.
APOE gene has been coded as 1 (meaning no ε4 allele), or 0 (for at least one ε4 allele).
|
The Genetic Profile was assessed in the pre-intervention assessment.
|
|
The Brain Volume as a predictor of change.
Tidsramme: The Brain Volume was assessed in the pre-intervention assessment.
|
The Brain Volume (total gray volume, left hippocampus, right hippocampus and total intracranial volume) was assessed by magnetic resonance imaging.
Unit of measure: mm3.
|
The Brain Volume was assessed in the pre-intervention assessment.
|
Samarbeidspartnere og etterforskere
Det er her du vil finne personer og organisasjoner som er involvert i denne studien.
Sponsor
Studierekorddatoer
Disse datoene sporer fremdriften for innsending av studieposter og sammendragsresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieposter og rapporterte resultater gjennomgås av National Library of Medicine (NLM) for å sikre at de oppfyller spesifikke kvalitetskontrollstandarder før de legges ut på det offentlige nettstedet.
Studer hoveddatoer
Studiestart (Faktiske)
1. oktober 2013
Primær fullføring (Faktiske)
1. mai 2015
Studiet fullført (Faktiske)
1. mai 2015
Datoer for studieregistrering
Først innsendt
22. desember 2019
Først innsendt som oppfylte QC-kriteriene
25. januar 2020
Først lagt ut (Faktiske)
29. januar 2020
Oppdateringer av studieposter
Sist oppdatering lagt ut (Faktiske)
29. januar 2020
Siste oppdatering sendt inn som oppfylte QC-kriteriene
25. januar 2020
Sist bekreftet
1. januar 2020
Mer informasjon
Begreper knyttet til denne studien
Ytterligere relevante MeSH-vilkår
Andre studie-ID-numre
- 15/382-E_BS
Plan for individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)
Planlegger du å dele individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)?
Nei
Legemiddel- og utstyrsinformasjon, studiedokumenter
Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert medikamentprodukt
Nei
Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert enhetsprodukt
Nei
produkt produsert i og eksportert fra USA
Nei
Denne informasjonen ble hentet direkte fra nettstedet clinicaltrials.gov uten noen endringer. Hvis du har noen forespørsler om å endre, fjerne eller oppdatere studiedetaljene dine, vennligst kontakt register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en endring er implementert på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også bli oppdatert automatisk på nettstedet vårt. .