Denne siden ble automatisk oversatt og nøyaktigheten av oversettelsen er ikke garantert. Vennligst referer til engelsk versjon for en kildetekst.

Full-Thickness Macular Hole Surgery: A Comparison of Ten Techniques (FTMH-10)

29. mai 2026 oppdatert av: Kairat Ruslanuly, Kazakh Eye Research Institute

Vitreoretinal Surgery for Full-Thickness Macular Hole: A Comparative Study of Ten Techniques

This study compares ten modern vitreoretinal surgical techniques for full-thickness macular hole repair. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of the surgical approaches during pars plana vitrectomy, using stratified randomization based on macular hole size to ensure balanced groups. The main goal is to determine which technique provides the highest anatomical closure rate on optical coherence tomography (OCT) and the best visual outcomes. Follow-up visits are scheduled at Day 7, Month 1, and Year 1 after surgery to assess OCT findings, visual acuity, safety outcomes, and the need for reoperation.

Studieoversikt

Detaljert beskrivelse

Full-thickness macular hole is a vision-threatening condition that is commonly treated with pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) and internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling. While standard approaches achieve high closure rates in many cases, outcomes may vary depending on macular hole size and OCT morphology, and advanced surgical strategies (e.g., different ILM flap configurations, adjunctive biologic augmentation, hydrodissection, or grafting techniques) are increasingly used in clinical practice.

This single-center, randomized, parallel-group interventional study will compare ten PPV-based surgical techniques for full-thickness macular hole repair. Eligible participants will include adults with full-thickness macular hole across a broad range of minimum linear diameter (MLD), including MLD <250 µm. After eligibility confirmation and informed consent, participants will be randomized to one of the ten procedure groups. Randomization will be stratified by macular hole size into five predefined MLD strata to ensure balanced distribution of hole sizes across all intervention groups. Postoperative care and follow-up procedures will be standardized across groups according to the study protocol.

Follow-up visits are scheduled at Day 7, Month 1, and Year 1 after surgery and will include clinical examinations and OCT imaging. The primary endpoint is anatomical macular hole closure on OCT at the prespecified primary time point. Secondary endpoints include best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), OCT-based morphologic recovery parameters, intraoperative and postoperative complication rates, reoperation rates, and adverse event information through Year 1. The study aims to generate evidence to guide selection of surgical technique based on macular hole morphometric and clinical characteristics while maintaining patient safety.

Studietype

Intervensjonell

Registrering (Antatt)

120

Fase

  • Ikke aktuelt

Kontakter og plasseringer

Denne delen inneholder kontaktinformasjon for de som utfører studien, og informasjon om hvor denne studien blir utført.

Studiekontakt

Studer Kontakt Backup

Studiesteder

    • Almaty
      • Almaty, Almaty, Kasakhstan, 050042
        • Rekruttering
        • Kazakh Eye Research Institute
        • Ta kontakt med:

Deltakelseskriterier

Forskere ser etter personer som passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kalt kvalifikasjonskriterier. Noen eksempler på disse kriteriene er en persons generelle helsetilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Kvalifikasjonskriterier

Alder som er kvalifisert for studier

  • Voksen
  • Eldre voksen

Tar imot friske frivillige

Nei

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

Adults aged ≥18 years.

Full-thickness macular hole (FTMH) eligible for pars plana vitrectomy (PPV).

Symptom duration ≤12 months.

Clear ocular media sufficient for high-quality OCT imaging.

No prior pars plana vitrectomy in the study eye.

No severe foveal atrophy on OCT.

Able and willing to comply with postoperative positioning and follow-up visits.

Written informed consent provided.

Exclusion Criteria:

A. Etiology-Related / Secondary Macular Holes:

Traumatic macular hole.

High myopia with posterior staphyloma (axial length >28 mm and/or spherical equivalent ≤-8.0 D).

Diabetic tractional retinal detachment (TRD) or significant tractional maculopathy.

Retinal vascular occlusion-related macular hole.

Uveitis-related macular hole.

Advanced age-related macular degeneration (AMD) with foveal atrophy.

B. Prior Interventions:

Any prior pars plana vitrectomy in the study eye.

C. Ocular Conditions That May Affect Outcomes or Safety:

Active or recent ocular infection or inflammation (e.g., uveitis, endophthalmitis, keratitis).

Uncontrolled glaucoma (intraocular pressure >28 mmHg despite treatment).

Media opacity precluding adequate OCT (e.g., dense cataract or corneal opacity).

Geographic atrophy involving the fovea.

Studieplan

Denne delen gir detaljer om studieplanen, inkludert hvordan studien er utformet og hva studien måler.

Hvordan er studiet utformet?

Designdetaljer

  • Primært formål: Behandling
  • Tildeling: Randomisert
  • Intervensjonsmodell: Parallell tildeling
  • Masking: Dobbelt

Våpen og intervensjoner

Deltakergruppe / Arm
Intervensjon / Behandling
Aktiv komparator: PPV + PVD Induction Without ILM Peel/Flap
Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with induction of posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) performed without internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling and without an ILM flap.
Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for full-thickness macular hole repair performed according to the randomized assigned technique (e.g., ERM peel, ILM peeling, ILM flap configurations, or macular edge hydrodissection), as specified in the protocol.
Aktiv komparator: PPV + ERM peel + circular ILM peel (classic)
Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with epiretinal membrane (ERM) peeling (if present) followed by standard circular internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling around the fovea (classic technique).
Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for full-thickness macular hole repair performed according to the randomized assigned technique (e.g., ERM peel, ILM peeling, ILM flap configurations, or macular edge hydrodissection), as specified in the protocol.
Aktiv komparator: PPV + 360° Inverted ILM Flap
Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with creation of a circumferential (360°) internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap that is inverted to cover the macular hole, according to the study protocol.
Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for full-thickness macular hole repair performed according to the randomized assigned technique (e.g., ERM peel, ILM peeling, ILM flap configurations, or macular edge hydrodissection), as specified in the protocol.
Aktiv komparator: PPV + Superior Hinged ILM Flap
Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with creation of a superior hinged internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap left attached at the superior edge and inverted to cover the macular hole, according to the study protocol.
Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for full-thickness macular hole repair performed according to the randomized assigned technique (e.g., ERM peel, ILM peeling, ILM flap configurations, or macular edge hydrodissection), as specified in the protocol.
Aktiv komparator: PPV + Temporal Hinged ILM Flap
Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with creation of a temporal hinged internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap, left attached at the temporal edge, and inverted to cover the macular hole, according to the study protocol.
Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for full-thickness macular hole repair performed according to the randomized assigned technique (e.g., ERM peel, ILM peeling, ILM flap configurations, or macular edge hydrodissection), as specified in the protocol.
Aktiv komparator: PPV + Multiflap ILM Flap (Cabbage Leaf/Star)
Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with creation of multiple small internal limiting membrane (ILM) flaps (multiflap "cabbage leaf/star" technique) positioned to cover the macular hole, according to the study protocol.
Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for full-thickness macular hole repair performed according to the randomized assigned technique (e.g., ERM peel, ILM peeling, ILM flap configurations, or macular edge hydrodissection), as specified in the protocol.
Aktiv komparator: PPV + ILM removal + inverted flap + PRP
Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with internal limiting membrane (ILM) removal and an inverted ILM flap technique. Autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is applied to the macular hole area as an adjunct, according to the study protocol.
Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for full-thickness macular hole repair performed according to the randomized assigned technique (e.g., ERM peel, ILM peeling, ILM flap configurations, or macular edge hydrodissection), as specified in the protocol.
Autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) applied intraoperatively to the macular hole area as an adjunct to surgery, according to the study protocol.
Aktiv komparator: PPV + ILM removal + PRP
Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with standard internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling (no ILM flap technique). Autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is applied to the macular hole area as an adjunct, according to the study protocol.
Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for full-thickness macular hole repair performed according to the randomized assigned technique (e.g., ERM peel, ILM peeling, ILM flap configurations, or macular edge hydrodissection), as specified in the protocol.
Autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) applied intraoperatively to the macular hole area as an adjunct to surgery, according to the study protocol.
Aktiv komparator: PPV + ILM Peeling + Human Amniotic Membrane (hAM) Graft
Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with standard internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling followed by placement of a human amniotic membrane (hAM) graft for full-thickness macular hole repair, according to the study protocol.
Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for full-thickness macular hole repair performed according to the randomized assigned technique (e.g., ERM peel, ILM peeling, ILM flap configurations, or macular edge hydrodissection), as specified in the protocol.
Human amniotic membrane (hAM) graft placed intraoperatively for macular hole repair, according to the study protocol.
Aktiv komparator: PPV + Macular Edge Hydrodissection
Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with controlled hydrodissection (hydromobilization) of the macular hole edges using balanced salt solution to gently separate and mobilize the retinal margins before macular hole closure, according to the study protocol.
Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for full-thickness macular hole repair performed according to the randomized assigned technique (e.g., ERM peel, ILM peeling, ILM flap configurations, or macular edge hydrodissection), as specified in the protocol.

Hva måler studien?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Tiltaksbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Macular Hole Closure at 7 days
Tidsramme: 7 day
Proportion of participants with OCT-confirmed anatomical macular hole closure.
7 day
Macular Hole Closure at 1month
Tidsramme: 1 month
Proportion of participants with OCT-confirmed anatomical macular hole closure.
1 month
Macular Hole Closure at 1 Year
Tidsramme: 1 year
Proportion of participants with OCT-confirmed anatomical macular hole closure.
1 year

Sekundære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Tiltaksbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
BCVA at Day 7
Tidsramme: 7 days
Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) measured at Day 7 after surgery and recorded in logMAR units.
7 days
BCVA at 1 Month
Tidsramme: 1 month
Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) measured at 1 month after surgery and recorded in logMAR units.
1 month
BCVA at 1 Year
Tidsramme: 1 year
Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) measured at 1 year after surgery and recorded in logMAR units.
1 year

Samarbeidspartnere og etterforskere

Det er her du vil finne personer og organisasjoner som er involvert i denne studien.

Etterforskere

  • Hovedetterforsker: Sanzhar Sambet Sambet, MD, Kazakh Eye Research Institute

Studierekorddatoer

Disse datoene sporer fremdriften for innsending av studieposter og sammendragsresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieposter og rapporterte resultater gjennomgås av National Library of Medicine (NLM) for å sikre at de oppfyller spesifikke kvalitetskontrollstandarder før de legges ut på det offentlige nettstedet.

Studer hoveddatoer

Studiestart (Faktiske)

25. mai 2026

Primær fullføring (Antatt)

27. mai 2027

Studiet fullført (Antatt)

27. mai 2028

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først innsendt

15. mai 2026

Først innsendt som oppfylte QC-kriteriene

19. mai 2026

Først lagt ut (Faktiske)

26. mai 2026

Oppdateringer av studieposter

Sist oppdatering lagt ut (Faktiske)

2. juni 2026

Siste oppdatering sendt inn som oppfylte QC-kriteriene

29. mai 2026

Sist bekreftet

1. mai 2026

Mer informasjon

Begreper knyttet til denne studien

Plan for individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)

Planlegger du å dele individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)?

NEI

IPD-planbeskrivelse

This study does not plan to share individual participant data (IPD) publicly. De-identified aggregated results may be shared in publications and presentations.

Legemiddel- og utstyrsinformasjon, studiedokumenter

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert medikamentprodukt

Nei

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert enhetsprodukt

Nei

Denne informasjonen ble hentet direkte fra nettstedet clinicaltrials.gov uten noen endringer. Hvis du har noen forespørsler om å endre, fjerne eller oppdatere studiedetaljene dine, vennligst kontakt register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en endring er implementert på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også bli oppdatert automatisk på nettstedet vårt. .

Abonnere