Esta página foi traduzida automaticamente e a precisão da tradução não é garantida. Por favor, consulte o versão em inglês para um texto fonte.

Full-Thickness Macular Hole Surgery: A Comparison of Ten Techniques (FTMH-10)

29 de maio de 2026 atualizado por: Kairat Ruslanuly, Kazakh Eye Research Institute

Vitreoretinal Surgery for Full-Thickness Macular Hole: A Comparative Study of Ten Techniques

This study compares ten modern vitreoretinal surgical techniques for full-thickness macular hole repair. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of the surgical approaches during pars plana vitrectomy, using stratified randomization based on macular hole size to ensure balanced groups. The main goal is to determine which technique provides the highest anatomical closure rate on optical coherence tomography (OCT) and the best visual outcomes. Follow-up visits are scheduled at Day 7, Month 1, and Year 1 after surgery to assess OCT findings, visual acuity, safety outcomes, and the need for reoperation.

Visão geral do estudo

Descrição detalhada

Full-thickness macular hole is a vision-threatening condition that is commonly treated with pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) and internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling. While standard approaches achieve high closure rates in many cases, outcomes may vary depending on macular hole size and OCT morphology, and advanced surgical strategies (e.g., different ILM flap configurations, adjunctive biologic augmentation, hydrodissection, or grafting techniques) are increasingly used in clinical practice.

This single-center, randomized, parallel-group interventional study will compare ten PPV-based surgical techniques for full-thickness macular hole repair. Eligible participants will include adults with full-thickness macular hole across a broad range of minimum linear diameter (MLD), including MLD <250 µm. After eligibility confirmation and informed consent, participants will be randomized to one of the ten procedure groups. Randomization will be stratified by macular hole size into five predefined MLD strata to ensure balanced distribution of hole sizes across all intervention groups. Postoperative care and follow-up procedures will be standardized across groups according to the study protocol.

Follow-up visits are scheduled at Day 7, Month 1, and Year 1 after surgery and will include clinical examinations and OCT imaging. The primary endpoint is anatomical macular hole closure on OCT at the prespecified primary time point. Secondary endpoints include best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), OCT-based morphologic recovery parameters, intraoperative and postoperative complication rates, reoperation rates, and adverse event information through Year 1. The study aims to generate evidence to guide selection of surgical technique based on macular hole morphometric and clinical characteristics while maintaining patient safety.

Tipo de estudo

Intervencional

Inscrição (Estimado)

120

Estágio

  • Não aplicável

Contactos e Locais

Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.

Contato de estudo

Estude backup de contato

  • Nome: Sanzhar Sambet, MD
  • Número de telefone: +77758719834
  • E-mail: sanzhrs@gmail.com

Locais de estudo

    • Almaty
      • Almaty, Almaty, Cazaquistão, 050042
        • Recrutamento
        • Kazakh Eye Research Institute
        • Contato:

Critérios de participação

Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.

Critérios de elegibilidade

Idades elegíveis para estudo

  • Adulto
  • Adulto mais velho

Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis

Não

Descrição

Inclusion Criteria:

Adults aged ≥18 years.

Full-thickness macular hole (FTMH) eligible for pars plana vitrectomy (PPV).

Symptom duration ≤12 months.

Clear ocular media sufficient for high-quality OCT imaging.

No prior pars plana vitrectomy in the study eye.

No severe foveal atrophy on OCT.

Able and willing to comply with postoperative positioning and follow-up visits.

Written informed consent provided.

Exclusion Criteria:

A. Etiology-Related / Secondary Macular Holes:

Traumatic macular hole.

High myopia with posterior staphyloma (axial length >28 mm and/or spherical equivalent ≤-8.0 D).

Diabetic tractional retinal detachment (TRD) or significant tractional maculopathy.

Retinal vascular occlusion-related macular hole.

Uveitis-related macular hole.

Advanced age-related macular degeneration (AMD) with foveal atrophy.

B. Prior Interventions:

Any prior pars plana vitrectomy in the study eye.

C. Ocular Conditions That May Affect Outcomes or Safety:

Active or recent ocular infection or inflammation (e.g., uveitis, endophthalmitis, keratitis).

Uncontrolled glaucoma (intraocular pressure >28 mmHg despite treatment).

Media opacity precluding adequate OCT (e.g., dense cataract or corneal opacity).

Geographic atrophy involving the fovea.

Plano de estudo

Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.

Como o estudo é projetado?

Detalhes do projeto

  • Finalidade Principal: Tratamento
  • Alocação: Randomizado
  • Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição Paralela
  • Mascaramento: Dobro

Armas e Intervenções

Grupo de Participantes / Braço
Intervenção / Tratamento
Comparador Ativo: PPV + PVD Induction Without ILM Peel/Flap
Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with induction of posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) performed without internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling and without an ILM flap.
Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for full-thickness macular hole repair performed according to the randomized assigned technique (e.g., ERM peel, ILM peeling, ILM flap configurations, or macular edge hydrodissection), as specified in the protocol.
Comparador Ativo: PPV + ERM peel + circular ILM peel (classic)
Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with epiretinal membrane (ERM) peeling (if present) followed by standard circular internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling around the fovea (classic technique).
Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for full-thickness macular hole repair performed according to the randomized assigned technique (e.g., ERM peel, ILM peeling, ILM flap configurations, or macular edge hydrodissection), as specified in the protocol.
Comparador Ativo: PPV + 360° Inverted ILM Flap
Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with creation of a circumferential (360°) internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap that is inverted to cover the macular hole, according to the study protocol.
Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for full-thickness macular hole repair performed according to the randomized assigned technique (e.g., ERM peel, ILM peeling, ILM flap configurations, or macular edge hydrodissection), as specified in the protocol.
Comparador Ativo: PPV + Superior Hinged ILM Flap
Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with creation of a superior hinged internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap left attached at the superior edge and inverted to cover the macular hole, according to the study protocol.
Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for full-thickness macular hole repair performed according to the randomized assigned technique (e.g., ERM peel, ILM peeling, ILM flap configurations, or macular edge hydrodissection), as specified in the protocol.
Comparador Ativo: PPV + Temporal Hinged ILM Flap
Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with creation of a temporal hinged internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap, left attached at the temporal edge, and inverted to cover the macular hole, according to the study protocol.
Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for full-thickness macular hole repair performed according to the randomized assigned technique (e.g., ERM peel, ILM peeling, ILM flap configurations, or macular edge hydrodissection), as specified in the protocol.
Comparador Ativo: PPV + Multiflap ILM Flap (Cabbage Leaf/Star)
Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with creation of multiple small internal limiting membrane (ILM) flaps (multiflap "cabbage leaf/star" technique) positioned to cover the macular hole, according to the study protocol.
Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for full-thickness macular hole repair performed according to the randomized assigned technique (e.g., ERM peel, ILM peeling, ILM flap configurations, or macular edge hydrodissection), as specified in the protocol.
Comparador Ativo: PPV + ILM removal + inverted flap + PRP
Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with internal limiting membrane (ILM) removal and an inverted ILM flap technique. Autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is applied to the macular hole area as an adjunct, according to the study protocol.
Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for full-thickness macular hole repair performed according to the randomized assigned technique (e.g., ERM peel, ILM peeling, ILM flap configurations, or macular edge hydrodissection), as specified in the protocol.
Autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) applied intraoperatively to the macular hole area as an adjunct to surgery, according to the study protocol.
Comparador Ativo: PPV + ILM removal + PRP
Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with standard internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling (no ILM flap technique). Autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is applied to the macular hole area as an adjunct, according to the study protocol.
Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for full-thickness macular hole repair performed according to the randomized assigned technique (e.g., ERM peel, ILM peeling, ILM flap configurations, or macular edge hydrodissection), as specified in the protocol.
Autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) applied intraoperatively to the macular hole area as an adjunct to surgery, according to the study protocol.
Comparador Ativo: PPV + ILM Peeling + Human Amniotic Membrane (hAM) Graft
Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with standard internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling followed by placement of a human amniotic membrane (hAM) graft for full-thickness macular hole repair, according to the study protocol.
Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for full-thickness macular hole repair performed according to the randomized assigned technique (e.g., ERM peel, ILM peeling, ILM flap configurations, or macular edge hydrodissection), as specified in the protocol.
Human amniotic membrane (hAM) graft placed intraoperatively for macular hole repair, according to the study protocol.
Comparador Ativo: PPV + Macular Edge Hydrodissection
Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with controlled hydrodissection (hydromobilization) of the macular hole edges using balanced salt solution to gently separate and mobilize the retinal margins before macular hole closure, according to the study protocol.
Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for full-thickness macular hole repair performed according to the randomized assigned technique (e.g., ERM peel, ILM peeling, ILM flap configurations, or macular edge hydrodissection), as specified in the protocol.

O que o estudo está medindo?

Medidas de resultados primários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Macular Hole Closure at 7 days
Prazo: 7 day
Proportion of participants with OCT-confirmed anatomical macular hole closure.
7 day
Macular Hole Closure at 1month
Prazo: 1 month
Proportion of participants with OCT-confirmed anatomical macular hole closure.
1 month
Macular Hole Closure at 1 Year
Prazo: 1 year
Proportion of participants with OCT-confirmed anatomical macular hole closure.
1 year

Medidas de resultados secundários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
BCVA at Day 7
Prazo: 7 days
Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) measured at Day 7 after surgery and recorded in logMAR units.
7 days
BCVA at 1 Month
Prazo: 1 month
Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) measured at 1 month after surgery and recorded in logMAR units.
1 month
BCVA at 1 Year
Prazo: 1 year
Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) measured at 1 year after surgery and recorded in logMAR units.
1 year

Colaboradores e Investigadores

É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Sanzhar Sambet Sambet, MD, Kazakh Eye Research Institute

Datas de registro do estudo

Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados ​​pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.

Datas Principais do Estudo

Início do estudo (Real)

25 de maio de 2026

Conclusão Primária (Estimado)

27 de maio de 2027

Conclusão do estudo (Estimado)

27 de maio de 2028

Datas de inscrição no estudo

Enviado pela primeira vez

15 de maio de 2026

Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ

19 de maio de 2026

Primeira postagem (Real)

26 de maio de 2026

Atualizações de registro de estudo

Última Atualização Postada (Real)

2 de junho de 2026

Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade

29 de maio de 2026

Última verificação

1 de maio de 2026

Mais Informações

Termos relacionados a este estudo

Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)

Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?

NÃO

Descrição do plano IPD

This study does not plan to share individual participant data (IPD) publicly. De-identified aggregated results may be shared in publications and presentations.

Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo

Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .

Se inscrever