Denne siden ble automatisk oversatt og nøyaktigheten av oversettelsen er ikke garantert. Vennligst referer til engelsk versjon for en kildetekst.

Change in Cognition and Frailty After Shunt Surgery in Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus (iNPH)

2. september 2026 oppdatert av: Magnhild Skråmestø Dejgaard, Oslo University Hospital
The goal of this observational study is to describe changes in cognitive profile and frailty from pre shunt to one year after the shunt surgery and to identify clinical predictors of an improvement in terms of cognition and frailty during the same period. The main objective is to identify predictors of the effect on the planned shunt surgery on cognition and frailty.

Studieoversikt

Detaljert beskrivelse

Frailty is a consequence of cumulative decline in many physiological systems during a lifetime and implies an increased vulnerability to poor resolution of homoeostasis after a stressor event. Frailty is emerging as an important risk factor for mortality and postoperative complications but has to a limited degree been studied in iNPH.

The investigators have previously, in a cross-sectional design, described cognitive profile and frailty status in patients with iNPH accepted for shunt surgery at Oslo University Hospital. The aims of this longitudinal follow-up of the same patient cohort are twofold:

  1. to describe changes in cognitive profile and frailty from pre shunt to one year after the shunt surgery, and
  2. to identify clinical predictors of an improvement in terms of cognition and frailty during the same period.

The patient sample consists of 276 patients that were accepted for shunt surgery at Oslo University Hospital in the period from September 2018 to December 2023. Their mean age was 73.1 years (range 52-85), 61% were men, and their mean length of education was 12.5 years.

For frailty, the investigators used a 35 items Frailty Index (FI). Most of the items (frailty indicators) are scored 0 (not present) or 1 (present), while some of them have a graded score. The index is the sum score divided by the number of items, varying from 0.0 (no frailty) to 1.0 (extreme frailty). The investigators used the same approach for assessment of the degree of frailty within each frailty domain. Cognitive decline is considered as one component of frailty. Accordingly, the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) is part of the FI and has a graded score. MMSE sum score <21 gives a score of 1 at this particular FI item, an MMSE score of 21-23 gives an item score of 0.7, an MMSE score of 24-26 gives an item score of 0.3, whereas an MMSE score of 27-30 does not contribute to the FI. MMSE is a screening test covering several cognitive domains. The investigators will use MMSE to evaluate the cognitive dimension of frailty as described here, whereas more specific cognitive tests are utilised to assess failure in particular cognitive domains.

Preoperatively, the mean FI score was 0.23, and the most common frailty markers were in the domains of physical function and instrumental activities of daily living (iADL). On the group level, the iNPH patients were impaired on all cognitive domains preoperatively, but compared to patients with Alzheimer's disease, they had relatively better-preserved memory and more severe impairments in phonemic fluency.

224 (83%) patients were assessed one year postoperatively. The same cognitive tests and frailty assessments were carried out, making it possible to calculate simple change scores as score(postop) - score(preop). The investigators will compare baseline characteristics of patients lost to follow-up descriptively with those followed, to assess potential attrition bias.

A detailed Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP) describes the planned analytical approach.

Studietype

Observasjonsmessig

Registrering (Faktiske)

276

Kontakter og plasseringer

Denne delen inneholder kontaktinformasjon for de som utfører studien, og informasjon om hvor denne studien blir utført.

Studiesteder

      • Oslo, Norge
        • Department of Geriatric Medicine, Oslo University Hospital

Deltakelseskriterier

Forskere ser etter personer som passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kalt kvalifikasjonskriterier. Noen eksempler på disse kriteriene er en persons generelle helsetilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Kvalifikasjonskriterier

Alder som er kvalifisert for studier

  • Barn
  • Voksen
  • Eldre voksen

Tar imot friske frivillige

Nei

Prøvetakingsmetode

Ikke-sannsynlighetsprøve

Studiepopulasjon

see inclusion criteria

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

• Diagnosed with iNPH and accepted for shunt surgery according to the American-European guidelines at Department of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Non-native speakers of Norwegian
  • Patients who had completed ≤ 3 cognitive tests

Studieplan

Denne delen gir detaljer om studieplanen, inkludert hvordan studien er utformet og hva studien måler.

Hvordan er studiet utformet?

Designdetaljer

Kohorter og intervensjoner

Gruppe / Kohort
Intervensjon / Behandling
Patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus accepted for shunt surgery
Patients are already accepted for shunt surgery. The investigators will describe changes in cognitve profile and frailty from pre shunt to one year after to identify clinical predictors for shunt response.

Hva måler studien?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Tiltaksbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Change in Trail Making Test A (TMT A) from preoperative to postoperative in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH).
Tidsramme: 12 month
TMT A is a cognitive test assessing attention and psychomotor speed and is scored in seconds. The investigators have defined a Minimum Clinically Important Difference (MCID) as an improvement of 20 seconds.
12 month
Change in Frailty Index (FI) from preoperative to postoperative in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH).
Tidsramme: 12 months
For frailty, a 35 items FI was used. Most of the items (frailty indicators) are scored 0 (not present) or 1 (present), while some of them have a graded score. The index is the sum score divided by the numbers of items, varying from 0.0 (no frailty) to 1.0 (extreme frailty). The investigators have defined a Minimum Clinically Important Difference (MCID) as a decrease in the FI of 0.05 (5 %) or more.
12 months

Sekundære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Tiltaksbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Other measures of cognition and frailty
Tidsramme: 12 months
Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE-NR3) is a cognitive screening test from 0 - 30 covering several cognitive domains. Higher score indicates better function. MMSE is part of the FI and has a graded score. MMSE sum score <21 gives a score of 1 at this particular FI item, an MMSE score of 21-23 gives an item score of 0.7, an MMSE score of 24-26 gives an item score of 0.3, whereas an MMSE score of 27-30 does not contribute to the FI. MCID: 2 points.
12 months
Other measures of cognition and frailty
Tidsramme: 12 months
Personal activities in daily living (pADL) are subscales of the FI and are scored from 0-7, higher score indicates more need for help in daily living. An improvement is set to at least 5 % for subscale as a limit for MCID.
12 months
Other measures of cognition and frailty
Tidsramme: 12 months
Instrumental activities in daily living (iADL) are subscales of the FI and are scored from 0-7, higher score indicates more need for help in daily living. An improvement is set to at least 5 % for subscale as a limit for MCID.
12 months
Other measures of cognition and frailty
Tidsramme: 12 months
Gait speed (m/s) is measured from 10 m walk and 0.1 m/s or more is accepted as clinically meaningful. MCID is set to 0.1 m/s.
12 months
Other measures of cognition and frailty
Tidsramme: 12 months

Cognitive variables:

For assessing memory, delayed word recall is assessed using a normalized score ranging from 0 to 1. This score is derived from either the Ten-Word Test from Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's disease (CERAD) or the Rey Auditory Learning Test. These scores are min/max normalized in order to achieve one common measure of delayed word recall: Normalized score = (raw score - lowest possible score)/(higest possible score - lowest possible score). The investigators have defined MCID of 0.2 words.

12 months
Other measures of cognition and frailty
Tidsramme: 12 months
Figure Construction Test from CERAD is a cognitive test assessing visuoconstructive abilities and its scored from 0 to 11. Higher score reflects better performance. MCID: 2 points.
12 months
Other measures of cognition and frailty
Tidsramme: 12 months
Trail Making Test B is a cognitive test assessing attention, psychomotor speed and executive function and is scored in seconds. MCID: 60 seconds.
12 months
Other measures of cognition and frailty
Tidsramme: 12 months
The Phonemic Fluency Test is a cognitive test assessing language abilities and executive function. Higher score reflects better performance. MCID:10 words.
12 months

Andre resultatmål

Resultatmål
Tiltaksbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Responder analysis
Tidsramme: 12 months

Based on the MCID limits for each outcome, the investigators will define a responder for each outcome as a patient improving that much or more from the preoperative to the one-year postoperative assessment and will calculate the percentage of responders for each of the outcomes.

The investigators will then analyse predictors for shunt response on each of the ten outcome variables.

Candidate variables in the prediction models are:

1. Age. 2. Sex. 3. Education. 4. MMSE-NR3 score. 5. Gait speed. 6. FI score. 7. Difference in z-score between phonemic fluency and delayed recall at baseline. 8. Cluster affiliation (based on a previously published cluster analysis. The analytic strategy is described in detail in the Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP) that is uploaded as a separate document.

12 months

Samarbeidspartnere og etterforskere

Det er her du vil finne personer og organisasjoner som er involvert i denne studien.

Publikasjoner og nyttige lenker

Den som er ansvarlig for å legge inn informasjon om studien leverer frivillig disse publikasjonene. Disse kan handle om alt relatert til studiet.

Studierekorddatoer

Disse datoene sporer fremdriften for innsending av studieposter og sammendragsresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieposter og rapporterte resultater gjennomgås av National Library of Medicine (NLM) for å sikre at de oppfyller spesifikke kvalitetskontrollstandarder før de legges ut på det offentlige nettstedet.

Studer hoveddatoer

Studiestart (Faktiske)

1. september 2018

Primær fullføring (Faktiske)

19. juni 2025

Studiet fullført (Faktiske)

19. juni 2025

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først innsendt

27. mai 2026

Først innsendt som oppfylte QC-kriteriene

5. juni 2026

Først lagt ut (Faktiske)

11. juni 2026

Oppdateringer av studieposter

Sist oppdatering lagt ut (Faktiske)

8. september 2026

Siste oppdatering sendt inn som oppfylte QC-kriteriene

2. september 2026

Sist bekreftet

1. juni 2026

Mer informasjon

Begreper knyttet til denne studien

Plan for individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)

Planlegger du å dele individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)?

JA

IPD-planbeskrivelse

The raw data supporting the conclsion of the article will be made available, following ethic committee guidelines on resonable request from any qualified investigators.

Tilgangskriterier for IPD-deling

Data sets are available from the PI on request.

IPD-deling Støtteinformasjonstype

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SEVJE

Legemiddel- og utstyrsinformasjon, studiedokumenter

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert medikamentprodukt

Nei

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert enhetsprodukt

Nei

Denne informasjonen ble hentet direkte fra nettstedet clinicaltrials.gov uten noen endringer. Hvis du har noen forespørsler om å endre, fjerne eller oppdatere studiedetaljene dine, vennligst kontakt register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en endring er implementert på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også bli oppdatert automatisk på nettstedet vårt. .

Abonnere