Questa pagina è stata tradotta automaticamente e l'accuratezza della traduzione non è garantita. Si prega di fare riferimento al Versione inglese per un testo di partenza.

Change in Cognition and Frailty After Shunt Surgery in Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus (iNPH)

5 giugno 2026 aggiornato da: Magnhild Skråmestø Dejgaard, Oslo University Hospital
The goal of this observational study is to describe changes in cognitive profile and frailty from pre shunt to one year after the shunt surgery and to identify clinical predictors of an improvement in terms of cognition and frailty during the same period. The main objective is to identify predictors of the effect on the planned shunt surgery on cognition and frailty.

Panoramica dello studio

Descrizione dettagliata

Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) is characterized by one or more of the symptoms gait disturbance, cognitive decline and urinary incontinence. The pathophysiology is not fully understood, but disturbed cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) circulation is considered one of the contributing factors. The CSF disturbance can be treated by shunt surgery with significant improvement in gait velocity and balance, whereas improvements in cognitive function are more uncertain.

Frailty is a consequence of cumulative decline in many physiological systems during a lifetime and implies an increased vulnerability to poor resolution of homoeostasis after a stressor event. Frailty is emerging as an important risk factor for mortality and postoperative complications but has to a limited degree been studied in iNPH.

We have previously, in a cross-sectional design, described cognitive profile and frailty status in patients with iNPH accepted for shunt surgery at Oslo University Hospital. The aims of this longitudinal follow-up of the same patient cohort are twofold:

  1. to describe changes in cognitive profile and frailty from pre shunt to one year after the shunt surgery, and
  2. to identify clinical predictors of an improvement in terms of cognition and frailty during the same period.

The patient sample consists of 276 patients that were accepted for shunt surgery at Oslo University Hospital in the period from September 2018 to December 2023. Their mean age was 73.1 years (range 52-85), 61% were men, and their mean length of education was 12.5 years. For the cognitive tests, we utilised z-scores (number of standard deviations (SD) from the age and education adjusted mean in a normative dataset).

For frailty, we used a 35 items Frailty Index (FI). Most of the items (frailty indicators) are scored 0 (not present) or 1 (present), while some of them have a graded score. The index is the sum score divided by the number of items, varying from 0.0 (no frailty) to 1.0 (extreme frailty). We used the same approach for assessment of the degree of frailty within each frailty domain. Cognitive decline is considered as one component of frailty. Accordingly, the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) is part of the FI and has a graded score. MMSE sum score <21 gives a score of 1 at this particular FI item, an MMSE score of 21-23 gives an item score of 0.7, an MMSE score of 24-26 gives an item score of 0.3, whereas an MMSE score of 27-30 does not contribute to the FI. MMSE is a screening test covering several cognitive domains. We will use MMSE to evaluate the cognitive dimension of frailty as described here, whereas more specific cognitive tests are utilised to assess failure in particular cognitive domains.

Preoperatively, the mean FI score was 0.23, and the most common frailty markers were in the domains of physical function and instrumental activities of daily living (iADL). On the group level, the iNPH patients were impaired on all cognitive domains preoperatively, but compared to patients with Alzheimer's disease, they had relatively better-preserved memory and more severe impairments in phonemic fluency.

220 (80%) patients were assessed one year postoperatively. The same cognitive tests and frailty assessments were carried out, making it possible to calculate simple change scores as score(postop) - score(preop). We will compare baseline characteristics of patients lost to follow-up descriptively with those followed, to assess potential attrition bias.

A detailed Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP) describes the planned analytical approach.

Tipo di studio

Osservativo

Iscrizione (Effettivo)

276

Contatti e Sedi

Questa sezione fornisce i recapiti di coloro che conducono lo studio e informazioni su dove viene condotto lo studio.

Luoghi di studio

      • Oslo, Norvegia
        • Department of Geriatric Medicine, Oslo University Hospital

Criteri di partecipazione

I ricercatori cercano persone che corrispondano a una certa descrizione, chiamata criteri di ammissibilità. Alcuni esempi di questi criteri sono le condizioni generali di salute di una persona o trattamenti precedenti.

Criteri di ammissibilità

Età idonea allo studio

  • Bambino
  • Adulto
  • Adulto più anziano

Accetta volontari sani

No

Metodo di campionamento

Campione non probabilistico

Popolazione di studio

see inclusion criteria

Descrizione

Inclusion Criteria:

• Diagnosed with iNPH and accepted for shunt surgery according to the American-European guidelines at Department of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Non-native speakers of Norwegian
  • Patients who had completed ≤ 3 cognitive tests

Piano di studio

Questa sezione fornisce i dettagli del piano di studio, compreso il modo in cui lo studio è progettato e ciò che lo studio sta misurando.

Come è strutturato lo studio?

Dettagli di progettazione

Coorti e interventi

Gruppo / Coorte
Intervento / Trattamento
Patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus accepted for shunt surgery
Patients are already accepted for shunt surgery. We will describe changes in cognitve profile and frailty from pre shunt to one year after to identify clinical predictors for shunt response.

Cosa sta misurando lo studio?

Misure di risultato primarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Change in Trail Making Test A (TMT A) from preoperative to postoperative in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH).
Lasso di tempo: 12 month
TMT A is a cognitive test assessing attention and psychomotor speed and z-scores are calculated using age and educational adjusted norms. The lowest/highest possible z-score is - 3/+ 3 and indicates - 3/+ 3 SD from the mean. Higher z-score reflects better performance. We have defined a Minimum Clinically Important Difference (MCID) as an increase in the z-score (number of standard deviations (SD)) from the age and education adjusted mean in a normative dataset of 0.5 or more for TMT A.
12 month
Change in Frailty Index (FI) from preoperative to postoperative in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH).
Lasso di tempo: 12 months
For frailty, a 35 items FI was used. Most of the items (frailty indicators) are scored 0 (not present) or 1 (present), while some of them have a graded score. The index is the sum score divided by the numbers of items, varying from 0.0 (no frailty) to 1.0 (extreme frailty). We have defined a Minimum Clinically Important Difference (MCID) as a decrease in the FI of 0.05 (5 %) or more.
12 months

Misure di risultato secondarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Other measures of cognition and frailty
Lasso di tempo: 12 months

Cognitive variables:

For assessing memory, delayed word recall (z score from either Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's disease (CERAD) ten words memory test or the Rey Auditory Learning Test were used. The lowest/highest possible z-score is - 3/+ 3 and indicates - 3/+ 3 SD from the mean. Higher z-score reflects better performance. MCID: Z-score difference 0.5.

12 months
Other measures of cognition and frailty
Lasso di tempo: 12 months
Figure Construction Test from CERAD is a cognitive test assessing visuoconstructive abilities. The lowest/highest possible z-score is - 3/+ 3 and indicates - 3/+ 3 SD from the mean. Higher z-score reflects better performance. MCID: Z-score difference 0.5.
12 months
Other measures of cognition and frailty
Lasso di tempo: 12 months
Trail Making Test B is a cognitive test assessing attention, psychomotor speed and executive function. The lowest/highest possible z-score is - 3/+ 3 and indicates - 3/+ 3 SD from the mean. Higher z-score reflects better performance. MCID: Z-score difference 0.5.
12 months
Other measures of cognition and frailty
Lasso di tempo: 12 months
The Phonemic Fluency Test is a cognitive test assessing language abilities and executive function. The lowest/highest possible z-score is - 3/+ 3 and indicates - 3/+ 3 SD from the mean. Higher z-score reflects better performance. MCID: Z-score difference 0.5.
12 months
Other measures of cognition and frailty
Lasso di tempo: 12 months
Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE-NR3) is a cognitive screening test from 0 - 30 covering several cognitive domains. Higher score indicates better function. MMSE is part of the FI and has a graded score. MMSE sum score <21 gives a score of 1 at this particular FI item, an MMSE score of 21-23 gives an item score of 0.7, an MMSE score of 24-26 gives an item score of 0.3, whereas an MMSE score of 27-30 does not contribute to the FI. MCID: 2 points.
12 months
Other measures of cognition and frailty
Lasso di tempo: 12 months
Personal activities in daily living (pADL) are subscales of the FI and are scored from 0-7, higher score indicates more need for help in daily living. An improvement is set to at least 5 % for subscale as a limit for MCID.
12 months
Other measures of cognition and frailty
Lasso di tempo: 12 months
Instrumental activities in daily living (iADL) are subscales of the FI and are scored from 0-7, higher score indicates more need for help in daily living. An improvement is set to at least 5 % for subscale as a limit for MCID.
12 months
Other measures of cognition and frailty
Lasso di tempo: 12 months
Gait speed (m/s) is measured from 10 m walk and 0.1 m/s or more is accepted as clinically meaningful. MCID is set to 0.1 m/s.
12 months

Altre misure di risultato

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Responder analysis
Lasso di tempo: 12 months

Based on the MCID limits for each outcome, we will define a responder for each outcome as a patient improving that much or more from the preoperative to the one-year postoperative assessment and will calculate the percentage of responders for each of the outcomes.

We will then analyse predictors for shunt response on each of the ten outcome variables.

Candidate variables in the prediction models are:

1. Age. 2. Sex. 3. MMSE-NR3 score. 4. Gait speed. 5. FI score. 6. Difference in z-score between phonemic fluency and delayed recall at baseline. 7. Cluster affiliation (based on a previously published cluster analysis. The analytic strategy is described in detail in the Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP) that is uploaded as a separate document.

12 months

Collaboratori e investigatori

Qui è dove troverai le persone e le organizzazioni coinvolte in questo studio.

Pubblicazioni e link utili

La persona responsabile dell'inserimento delle informazioni sullo studio fornisce volontariamente queste pubblicazioni. Questi possono riguardare qualsiasi cosa relativa allo studio.

Studiare le date dei record

Queste date tengono traccia dell'avanzamento della registrazione dello studio e dell'invio dei risultati di sintesi a ClinicalTrials.gov. I record degli studi e i risultati riportati vengono esaminati dalla National Library of Medicine (NLM) per assicurarsi che soddisfino specifici standard di controllo della qualità prima di essere pubblicati sul sito Web pubblico.

Studia le date principali

Inizio studio (Effettivo)

1 settembre 2018

Completamento primario (Effettivo)

19 giugno 2025

Completamento dello studio (Effettivo)

19 giugno 2025

Date di iscrizione allo studio

Primo inviato

27 maggio 2026

Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità

5 giugno 2026

Primo Inserito (Effettivo)

11 giugno 2026

Aggiornamenti dei record di studio

Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)

11 giugno 2026

Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC

5 giugno 2026

Ultimo verificato

1 giugno 2026

Maggiori informazioni

Termini relativi a questo studio

Piano per i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)

Hai intenzione di condividere i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)?

Descrizione del piano IPD

The raw data supporting the conclsion of the article will be made available, following ethic committee guidelines on resonable request from any qualified investigators.

Criteri di accesso alla condivisione IPD

Data sets are available from the PI on request.

Tipo di informazioni di supporto alla condivisione IPD

  • STUDIO_PROTOCOLLO
  • LINFA

Informazioni su farmaci e dispositivi, documenti di studio

Studia un prodotto farmaceutico regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Studia un dispositivo regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .

Prove cliniche su Ventriculoperitoneal shunt

Sottoscrivi