Denne siden ble automatisk oversatt og nøyaktigheten av oversettelsen er ikke garantert. Vennligst referer til engelsk versjon for en kildetekst.

Pain Beliefs and Intracortical Excitability During Experimental Pain

2. juli 2026 oppdatert av: Guillaume Léonard, Université de Sherbrooke

Influence Of Pain-Related Beliefs On The Modulation Of Intracortical Circuits During Experimental Pain Induced By Topical Capsaicin

Pain can influence the way the motor system functions. However, responses to pain vary widely between individuals, and this variability may be partly related to pain-related beliefs such as kinesiophobia.

This study examines whether temporary experimental pain changes intracortical excitability in the motor cortex, and whether this response differs according to baseline kinesiophobia. Healthy adults will complete one experimental session. Motor cortex excitability will first be assessed at baseline using transcranial magnetic stimulation, a non-invasive brain stimulation technique. A topical capsaicin cream will then be applied to the forearm to induce temporary, moderate experimental pain. Once pain is established, the same neurophysiological assessments will be repeated.

The main objective is to measure changes in short-interval intracortical inhibition before and during capsaicin-induced pain, with particular attention to whether these changes are associated with baseline kinesiophobia.

Secondary objectives are to characterize other markers of motor cortex excitability, including long-interval intracortical inhibition, short-interval intracortical facilitation, intracortical facilitation, and corticospinal excitability assessed using input-output recruitment curves. Pain intensity will be monitored using a visual analog scale to characterize the experimental pain response. Baseline kinesiophobia will be assessed using the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia and examined as a factor associated with interindividual variability in neurophysiological responses to experimental pain.

The researchers expect that changes in motor cortex excitability during experimental pain will vary between individuals, and that individuals with higher kinesiophobia may show smaller changes in motor cortex excitability during capsaicin-induced pain.

Studieoversikt

Status

Har ikke rekruttert ennå

Detaljert beskrivelse

Pain is not only a sensory experience. It is also influenced by psychological, emotional, and contextual factors, including how people interpret pain and the threat they associate with movement. In the presence of pain, individuals often modify the way they move. These adaptations may be protective in the short term, but when maintained over time, they may contribute to persistent movement avoidance and disability.

Within the fear-avoidance framework, kinesiophobia, or fear of movement, is considered an important factor in the relationship between pain, movement, and disability. Individuals with higher kinesiophobia may perceive movement as threatening or potentially harmful. This may influence not only motor behavior, but also the way the nervous system prepares and controls movement. However, the neurophysiological mechanisms linking pain-related beliefs, experimental pain, and motor control remain incompletely understood.

The primary motor cortex is a key brain region involved in voluntary movement. Its excitability can be assessed using transcranial magnetic stimulation, a non-invasive brain stimulation technique. When applied over the primary motor cortex, transcranial magnetic stimulation can evoke motor responses that are recorded from a target muscle using surface electromyography. These responses provide information about corticospinal excitability and about intracortical inhibitory and facilitatory mechanisms.

Previous studies suggest that experimental pain can modify motor cortex excitability, but the direction and magnitude of these changes vary considerably between individuals. Pain-related beliefs, especially kinesiophobia, may partly explain this variability. This study therefore focuses on whether experimental pain changes intracortical excitability in the motor cortex and whether this response differs according to baseline kinesiophobia.

The main objective is to quantify changes in short-interval intracortical inhibition before and during experimental pain induced by topical capsaicin, with particular attention to whether these changes vary according to the participant's baseline level of kinesiophobia. Short-interval intracortical inhibition is used as the primary neurophysiological measure because it reflects inhibitory activity within the motor cortex.

Secondary objectives are to characterize other markers of motor cortex excitability during experimental pain. These include long-interval intracortical inhibition, intracortical facilitation, and corticospinal excitability assessed using input-output recruitment curves. These complementary measures are included to provide a broader characterization of inhibitory, facilitatory, and corticospinal responses to experimental pain.

Healthy adults will complete one experimental session. At the beginning of the session, participants will complete questionnaires assessing pain-related beliefs, including kinesiophobia. Baseline neurophysiological assessments will then be performed using transcranial magnetic stimulation applied over the primary motor cortex, with electromyographic recordings from the first dorsal interosseous muscle of the hand.

After baseline measurements, topical capsaicin cream will be applied to the forearm to induce temporary, moderate experimental pain. Pain intensity will be monitored using a visual analog scale. Once experimental pain is established, the same transcranial magnetic stimulation assessments will be repeated.

Each participant serves as their own control, with neurophysiological measures compared between the baseline condition and the experimental pain condition. The investigators hypothesize that changes in motor cortex excitability during experimental pain will vary between individuals. This variability is expected to be partly related to kinesiophobia, with individuals reporting higher kinesiophobia showing smaller changes in motor cortex excitability during capsaicin-induced pain.

Studietype

Intervensjonell

Registrering (Antatt)

30

Fase

  • Ikke aktuelt

Kontakter og plasseringer

Denne delen inneholder kontaktinformasjon for de som utfører studien, og informasjon om hvor denne studien blir utført.

Studiekontakt

Studer Kontakt Backup

Studiesteder

    • Quebec
      • Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada, J1H 5H3

Deltakelseskriterier

Forskere ser etter personer som passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kalt kvalifikasjonskriterier. Noen eksempler på disse kriteriene er en persons generelle helsetilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Kvalifikasjonskriterier

Alder som er kvalifisert for studier

  • Voksen

Tar imot friske frivillige

Ja

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged 18 to 35 years, inclusive
  • Healthy
  • Able to understand the study information and experimental procedures
  • Able to provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of psychiatric disorders (including intellectual disability or severe cognitive, behavioral, or affective impairment) that could interfere with understanding the study or providing informed consent.
  • History of neurological disorders, including epilepsy, stroke, brain or spinal cord surgery, or any neurological disease affecting motor or sensory function.

Inability to provide informed consent (e.g., dementia, significant hearing impairment, insufficient language proficiency).

  • Any pain condition within the past 3 months, regardless of origin.
  • Recent musculoskeletal injury or surgery within the past 3 months.
  • Contraindications to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), including a history of epilepsy or the presence of intracranial metallic objects, cochlear implants, or other non-removable metallic implants in or near the head.
  • Use of analgesic or psychotropic medications.
  • Individuals under legal guardianship or curatorship.
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women.
  • Presence of a cardiac pacemaker or other implanted electronic medical device.
  • Known allergy or previous skin reaction to capsaicin

Studieplan

Denne delen gir detaljer om studieplanen, inkludert hvordan studien er utformet og hva studien måler.

Hvordan er studiet utformet?

Designdetaljer

  • Primært formål: Grunnvitenskap
  • Tildeling: N/A
  • Intervensjonsmodell: Enkeltgruppeoppdrag
  • Masking: Ingen (Open Label)

Våpen og intervensjoner

Deltakergruppe / Arm
Intervensjon / Behandling
Eksperimentell: Experimental pain
Participants complete one experimental session. Motor cortex excitability is first assessed at baseline using transcranial magnetic stimulation with electromyographic recordings from the first dorsal interosseous muscle. Topical capsaicin cream is then applied to the forearm to induce temporary, moderate experimental pain. Once pain is established, the same neurophysiological assessments are repeated during the pain condition.
Topical capsaicin cream (1%) is applied to the forearm to induce temporary, moderate experimental pain. Motor cortex excitability is assessed before and during capsaicin-induced pain using transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Hva måler studien?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Tiltaksbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Change in Short-Interval Intracortical Inhibition
Tidsramme: At baseline (before capsaicin cream application); at pain stabilization (after capsaicin cream application)
Short-interval intracortical inhibition will be assessed using paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation over the primary motor cortex, with electromyographic recordings from the first dorsal interosseous muscle. A subthreshold conditioning stimulus set at 80% of resting motor threshold will be followed by a suprathreshold test stimulus set at 120% of resting motor threshold, with an interstimulus interval of 3 ms. Fifteen conditioned trials will be recorded for this measure. The outcome will be expressed as the change in conditioned motor evoked potential amplitude relative to the unconditioned test response from pre- to post-application of topical capsaicin cream.
At baseline (before capsaicin cream application); at pain stabilization (after capsaicin cream application)

Sekundære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Tiltaksbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Change in Short-Interval Intracortical Facilitation
Tidsramme: At baseline (before capsaicin cream application); at pain stabilization (after capsaicin cream application)
Short-interval intracortical facilitation will be assessed using paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation over the primary motor cortex, with electromyographic recordings from the first dorsal interosseous muscle. A suprathreshold conditioning stimulus set at 120% of resting motor threshold will be followed by a subthreshold test stimulus set at 80% of resting motor threshold, with an interstimulus interval of 2 ms. Fifteen conditioned trials will be recorded for this measure. The outcome will be expressed as the change in conditioned motor evoked potential amplitude relative to the unconditioned test response from pre- to post-application of topical capsaicin cream.
At baseline (before capsaicin cream application); at pain stabilization (after capsaicin cream application)
Change in Pain Intensity
Tidsramme: From baseline through completion of the experimental session, an average of 2 hours
Pain intensity will be assessed using a visual analog scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst imaginable pain. The outcome will be expressed as the change in pain intensity from pre- to post-application of topical capsaicin cream.
From baseline through completion of the experimental session, an average of 2 hours
Change in Intracortical Facilitation
Tidsramme: At baseline (before capsaicin cream application); at pain stabilization (after capsaicin cream application)
Intracortical facilitation will be assessed using paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation over the primary motor cortex, with electromyographic recordings from the first dorsal interosseous muscle. A subthreshold conditioning stimulus set at 80% of resting motor threshold will be followed by a suprathreshold test stimulus set at 120% of resting motor threshold, with an interstimulus interval of 15 ms. Fifteen conditioned trials will be recorded for this measure. The outcome will be expressed as the change in conditioned motor evoked potential amplitude relative to the unconditioned test response from pre- to post-application of topical capsaicin cream.
At baseline (before capsaicin cream application); at pain stabilization (after capsaicin cream application)
Change in Long-Interval Intracortical Inhibition
Tidsramme: At baseline (before capsaicin cream application); at pain stabilization (after capsaicin cream application)
Long-interval intracortical inhibition will be assessed using paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation over the primary motor cortex, with electromyographic recordings from the first dorsal interosseous muscle. A suprathreshold conditioning stimulus set at 120% of resting motor threshold will be followed by a suprathreshold test stimulus set at 120% of resting motor threshold, with an interstimulus interval of 100 ms. Fifteen conditioned trials will be recorded for this measure. The outcome will be expressed as the change in conditioned motor evoked potential amplitude relative to the unconditioned test response from pre- to post-application of topical capsaicin cream.
At baseline (before capsaicin cream application); at pain stabilization (after capsaicin cream application)
Change from baseline in corticospinal excitability
Tidsramme: At baseline (before capsaicin cream application); at pain stabilization (after capsaicin cream application)
Corticospinal excitability will be assessed using single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation applied over the primary motor cortex, with electromyographic recordings from the first dorsal interosseous muscle. Single magnetic pulses of increasing intensity will be delivered to construct input-output recruitment curves for each participant. Stimulation intensity will be increased in 5% steps, and 10 stimuli will be delivered at each intensity level. Motor evoked potentials will be recorded using surface electromyography. Input-output curves will be modeled using a Boltzmann sigmoidal function, and the slope, plateau, and S50 parameters will be extracted. The outcome will be expressed as the change in these input-output curve parameters from pre- to post-application of topical capsaicin cream.
At baseline (before capsaicin cream application); at pain stabilization (after capsaicin cream application)

Andre resultatmål

Resultatmål
Tiltaksbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Smertekatastrofisering relatert til smerte
Tidsramme: Utgangspunkt
Smertekatastrofisering vil bli vurdert ved bruk av den fransk-canadiske versjonen av Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS-CF), et selvrapporteringsspørreskjema designet for å måle katastrofetanker relatert til smerte.
PCS-CF inkluderer 13 spørsmål vurdert på en Likert-skala fra 0 ("ikke i det hele tatt") til 4 ("hele tiden"), som dekker tre dimensjoner: grubling, forstørrelse og hjelpeløshet.
Spørsmålspoengene summeres for å gi en totalscore fra 0 til 52, hvor høyere poengsum indikerer større smertekatastrofisering.
En totalscore ≥30 har blitt foreslått for å identifisere klinisk relevante nivåer av smertekatastrofisering.
Utgangspunkt
Kinesiophobia
Tidsramme: Baseline
Kinesiophobia will be assessed using the French-Canadian version of the Tampa Kinesiophobia Questionnaire (EKT-CF). It takes the form of a self-reported questionnaire of 17 items using a Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree), with an acceptable degree of internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.71), satisfactory construct validity, and high sensitivity to change (intra-class correlation coefficient > 0.7). The total score is obtained by adding the value of the responses and is between 17 and 68. The value of 37/68 is considered as the threshold value at which kinesiophobia becomes significant.
Baseline

Samarbeidspartnere og etterforskere

Det er her du vil finne personer og organisasjoner som er involvert i denne studien.

Etterforskere

  • Hovedetterforsker: Guillaume Léonard, Ph.D., Université de Sherbrooke

Studierekorddatoer

Disse datoene sporer fremdriften for innsending av studieposter og sammendragsresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieposter og rapporterte resultater gjennomgås av National Library of Medicine (NLM) for å sikre at de oppfyller spesifikke kvalitetskontrollstandarder før de legges ut på det offentlige nettstedet.

Studer hoveddatoer

Studiestart (Antatt)

1. august 2026

Primær fullføring (Antatt)

30. november 2026

Studiet fullført (Antatt)

31. desember 2026

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først innsendt

25. juni 2026

Først innsendt som oppfylte QC-kriteriene

2. juli 2026

Først lagt ut (Faktiske)

7. juli 2026

Oppdateringer av studieposter

Sist oppdatering lagt ut (Faktiske)

7. juli 2026

Siste oppdatering sendt inn som oppfylte QC-kriteriene

2. juli 2026

Sist bekreftet

1. juli 2026

Mer informasjon

Begreper knyttet til denne studien

Plan for individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)

Planlegger du å dele individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)?

NEI

Legemiddel- og utstyrsinformasjon, studiedokumenter

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert medikamentprodukt

Nei

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert enhetsprodukt

Nei

Denne informasjonen ble hentet direkte fra nettstedet clinicaltrials.gov uten noen endringer. Hvis du har noen forespørsler om å endre, fjerne eller oppdatere studiedetaljene dine, vennligst kontakt register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en endring er implementert på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også bli oppdatert automatisk på nettstedet vårt. .

Abonnere