Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Pain Beliefs and Intracortical Excitability During Experimental Pain

2 de julio de 2026 actualizado por: Guillaume Léonard, Université de Sherbrooke

Influence Of Pain-Related Beliefs On The Modulation Of Intracortical Circuits During Experimental Pain Induced By Topical Capsaicin

Pain can influence the way the motor system functions. However, responses to pain vary widely between individuals, and this variability may be partly related to pain-related beliefs such as kinesiophobia.

This study examines whether temporary experimental pain changes intracortical excitability in the motor cortex, and whether this response differs according to baseline kinesiophobia. Healthy adults will complete one experimental session. Motor cortex excitability will first be assessed at baseline using transcranial magnetic stimulation, a non-invasive brain stimulation technique. A topical capsaicin cream will then be applied to the forearm to induce temporary, moderate experimental pain. Once pain is established, the same neurophysiological assessments will be repeated.

The main objective is to measure changes in short-interval intracortical inhibition before and during capsaicin-induced pain, with particular attention to whether these changes are associated with baseline kinesiophobia.

Secondary objectives are to characterize other markers of motor cortex excitability, including long-interval intracortical inhibition, short-interval intracortical facilitation, intracortical facilitation, and corticospinal excitability assessed using input-output recruitment curves. Pain intensity will be monitored using a visual analog scale to characterize the experimental pain response. Baseline kinesiophobia will be assessed using the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia and examined as a factor associated with interindividual variability in neurophysiological responses to experimental pain.

The researchers expect that changes in motor cortex excitability during experimental pain will vary between individuals, and that individuals with higher kinesiophobia may show smaller changes in motor cortex excitability during capsaicin-induced pain.

Descripción general del estudio

Estado

Aún no reclutando

Intervención / Tratamiento

Descripción detallada

Pain is not only a sensory experience. It is also influenced by psychological, emotional, and contextual factors, including how people interpret pain and the threat they associate with movement. In the presence of pain, individuals often modify the way they move. These adaptations may be protective in the short term, but when maintained over time, they may contribute to persistent movement avoidance and disability.

Within the fear-avoidance framework, kinesiophobia, or fear of movement, is considered an important factor in the relationship between pain, movement, and disability. Individuals with higher kinesiophobia may perceive movement as threatening or potentially harmful. This may influence not only motor behavior, but also the way the nervous system prepares and controls movement. However, the neurophysiological mechanisms linking pain-related beliefs, experimental pain, and motor control remain incompletely understood.

The primary motor cortex is a key brain region involved in voluntary movement. Its excitability can be assessed using transcranial magnetic stimulation, a non-invasive brain stimulation technique. When applied over the primary motor cortex, transcranial magnetic stimulation can evoke motor responses that are recorded from a target muscle using surface electromyography. These responses provide information about corticospinal excitability and about intracortical inhibitory and facilitatory mechanisms.

Previous studies suggest that experimental pain can modify motor cortex excitability, but the direction and magnitude of these changes vary considerably between individuals. Pain-related beliefs, especially kinesiophobia, may partly explain this variability. This study therefore focuses on whether experimental pain changes intracortical excitability in the motor cortex and whether this response differs according to baseline kinesiophobia.

The main objective is to quantify changes in short-interval intracortical inhibition before and during experimental pain induced by topical capsaicin, with particular attention to whether these changes vary according to the participant's baseline level of kinesiophobia. Short-interval intracortical inhibition is used as the primary neurophysiological measure because it reflects inhibitory activity within the motor cortex.

Secondary objectives are to characterize other markers of motor cortex excitability during experimental pain. These include long-interval intracortical inhibition, intracortical facilitation, and corticospinal excitability assessed using input-output recruitment curves. These complementary measures are included to provide a broader characterization of inhibitory, facilitatory, and corticospinal responses to experimental pain.

Healthy adults will complete one experimental session. At the beginning of the session, participants will complete questionnaires assessing pain-related beliefs, including kinesiophobia. Baseline neurophysiological assessments will then be performed using transcranial magnetic stimulation applied over the primary motor cortex, with electromyographic recordings from the first dorsal interosseous muscle of the hand.

After baseline measurements, topical capsaicin cream will be applied to the forearm to induce temporary, moderate experimental pain. Pain intensity will be monitored using a visual analog scale. Once experimental pain is established, the same transcranial magnetic stimulation assessments will be repeated.

Each participant serves as their own control, with neurophysiological measures compared between the baseline condition and the experimental pain condition. The investigators hypothesize that changes in motor cortex excitability during experimental pain will vary between individuals. This variability is expected to be partly related to kinesiophobia, with individuals reporting higher kinesiophobia showing smaller changes in motor cortex excitability during capsaicin-induced pain.

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Estimado)

30

Fase

  • No aplica

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Estudio Contacto

Copia de seguridad de contactos de estudio

Ubicaciones de estudio

    • Quebec
      • Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canadá, J1H 5H3
        • Université de Sherbrooke - Campus de la santé
        • Contacto:
        • Contacto:
        • Investigador principal:
          • Guillaume Léonard, Ph.D.

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

  • Adulto

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

Sí

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged 18 to 35 years, inclusive
  • Healthy
  • Able to understand the study information and experimental procedures
  • Able to provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of psychiatric disorders (including intellectual disability or severe cognitive, behavioral, or affective impairment) that could interfere with understanding the study or providing informed consent.
  • History of neurological disorders, including epilepsy, stroke, brain or spinal cord surgery, or any neurological disease affecting motor or sensory function.

Inability to provide informed consent (e.g., dementia, significant hearing impairment, insufficient language proficiency).

  • Any pain condition within the past 3 months, regardless of origin.
  • Recent musculoskeletal injury or surgery within the past 3 months.
  • Contraindications to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), including a history of epilepsy or the presence of intracranial metallic objects, cochlear implants, or other non-removable metallic implants in or near the head.
  • Use of analgesic or psychotropic medications.
  • Individuals under legal guardianship or curatorship.
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women.
  • Presence of a cardiac pacemaker or other implanted electronic medical device.
  • Known allergy or previous skin reaction to capsaicin

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Ciencia básica
  • Asignación: N / A
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación de un solo grupo
  • Enmascaramiento: Ninguno (etiqueta abierta)

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Experimental: Experimental pain
Participants complete one experimental session. Motor cortex excitability is first assessed at baseline using transcranial magnetic stimulation with electromyographic recordings from the first dorsal interosseous muscle. Topical capsaicin cream is then applied to the forearm to induce temporary, moderate experimental pain. Once pain is established, the same neurophysiological assessments are repeated during the pain condition.
Topical capsaicin cream (1%) is applied to the forearm to induce temporary, moderate experimental pain. Motor cortex excitability is assessed before and during capsaicin-induced pain using transcranial magnetic stimulation.

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Change in Short-Interval Intracortical Inhibition
Periodo de tiempo: At baseline (before capsaicin cream application); at pain stabilization (after capsaicin cream application)
Short-interval intracortical inhibition will be assessed using paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation over the primary motor cortex, with electromyographic recordings from the first dorsal interosseous muscle. A subthreshold conditioning stimulus set at 80% of resting motor threshold will be followed by a suprathreshold test stimulus set at 120% of resting motor threshold, with an interstimulus interval of 3 ms. Fifteen conditioned trials will be recorded for this measure. The outcome will be expressed as the change in conditioned motor evoked potential amplitude relative to the unconditioned test response from pre- to post-application of topical capsaicin cream.
At baseline (before capsaicin cream application); at pain stabilization (after capsaicin cream application)

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Change in Short-Interval Intracortical Facilitation
Periodo de tiempo: At baseline (before capsaicin cream application); at pain stabilization (after capsaicin cream application)
Short-interval intracortical facilitation will be assessed using paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation over the primary motor cortex, with electromyographic recordings from the first dorsal interosseous muscle. A suprathreshold conditioning stimulus set at 120% of resting motor threshold will be followed by a subthreshold test stimulus set at 80% of resting motor threshold, with an interstimulus interval of 2 ms. Fifteen conditioned trials will be recorded for this measure. The outcome will be expressed as the change in conditioned motor evoked potential amplitude relative to the unconditioned test response from pre- to post-application of topical capsaicin cream.
At baseline (before capsaicin cream application); at pain stabilization (after capsaicin cream application)
Change in Pain Intensity
Periodo de tiempo: From baseline through completion of the experimental session, an average of 2 hours
Pain intensity will be assessed using a visual analog scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst imaginable pain. The outcome will be expressed as the change in pain intensity from pre- to post-application of topical capsaicin cream.
From baseline through completion of the experimental session, an average of 2 hours
Change in Intracortical Facilitation
Periodo de tiempo: At baseline (before capsaicin cream application); at pain stabilization (after capsaicin cream application)
Intracortical facilitation will be assessed using paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation over the primary motor cortex, with electromyographic recordings from the first dorsal interosseous muscle. A subthreshold conditioning stimulus set at 80% of resting motor threshold will be followed by a suprathreshold test stimulus set at 120% of resting motor threshold, with an interstimulus interval of 15 ms. Fifteen conditioned trials will be recorded for this measure. The outcome will be expressed as the change in conditioned motor evoked potential amplitude relative to the unconditioned test response from pre- to post-application of topical capsaicin cream.
At baseline (before capsaicin cream application); at pain stabilization (after capsaicin cream application)
Change in Long-Interval Intracortical Inhibition
Periodo de tiempo: At baseline (before capsaicin cream application); at pain stabilization (after capsaicin cream application)
Long-interval intracortical inhibition will be assessed using paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation over the primary motor cortex, with electromyographic recordings from the first dorsal interosseous muscle. A suprathreshold conditioning stimulus set at 120% of resting motor threshold will be followed by a suprathreshold test stimulus set at 120% of resting motor threshold, with an interstimulus interval of 100 ms. Fifteen conditioned trials will be recorded for this measure. The outcome will be expressed as the change in conditioned motor evoked potential amplitude relative to the unconditioned test response from pre- to post-application of topical capsaicin cream.
At baseline (before capsaicin cream application); at pain stabilization (after capsaicin cream application)
Change from baseline in corticospinal excitability
Periodo de tiempo: At baseline (before capsaicin cream application); at pain stabilization (after capsaicin cream application)
Corticospinal excitability will be assessed using single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation applied over the primary motor cortex, with electromyographic recordings from the first dorsal interosseous muscle. Single magnetic pulses of increasing intensity will be delivered to construct input-output recruitment curves for each participant. Stimulation intensity will be increased in 5% steps, and 10 stimuli will be delivered at each intensity level. Motor evoked potentials will be recorded using surface electromyography. Input-output curves will be modeled using a Boltzmann sigmoidal function, and the slope, plateau, and S50 parameters will be extracted. The outcome will be expressed as the change in these input-output curve parameters from pre- to post-application of topical capsaicin cream.
At baseline (before capsaicin cream application); at pain stabilization (after capsaicin cream application)

Otras medidas de resultado

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Catastrofización del dolor relacionada con el dolor
Periodo de tiempo: Línea base
La catastrofización del dolor se evaluará utilizando la versión francocanadiense de la Escala de Catastrofización del Dolor (PCS-CF), un cuestionario autoadministrado diseñado para medir pensamientos catastróficos relacionados con el dolor. La PCS-CF incluye 13 ítems calificados en una escala Likert de 0 ("nada en absoluto") a 4 ("todo el tiempo"), que abarcan tres dimensiones: rumiación, magnificación e impotencia. Las puntuaciones de los ítems se suman para obtener una puntuación total que oscila entre 0 y 52, donde puntuaciones más altas indican una mayor catastrofización del dolor. Se ha propuesto una puntuación total ≥30 para identificar niveles clínicamente relevantes de catastrofización del dolor.
Línea base
Kinesiophobia
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline
Kinesiophobia will be assessed using the French-Canadian version of the Tampa Kinesiophobia Questionnaire (EKT-CF). It takes the form of a self-reported questionnaire of 17 items using a Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree), with an acceptable degree of internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.71), satisfactory construct validity, and high sensitivity to change (intra-class correlation coefficient > 0.7). The total score is obtained by adding the value of the responses and is between 17 and 68. The value of 37/68 is considered as the threshold value at which kinesiophobia becomes significant.
Baseline

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Guillaume Léonard, Ph.D., Université de Sherbrooke

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Estimado)

1 de agosto de 2026

Finalización primaria (Estimado)

30 de noviembre de 2026

Finalización del estudio (Estimado)

31 de diciembre de 2026

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

25 de junio de 2026

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

2 de julio de 2026

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

7 de julio de 2026

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

7 de julio de 2026

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

2 de julio de 2026

Última verificación

1 de julio de 2026

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

NO

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir