Denne siden ble automatisk oversatt og nøyaktigheten av oversettelsen er ikke garantert. Vennligst referer til engelsk versjon for en kildetekst.

Intravascular Lithotripsy Versus Rotational Atherectomy for Severe Coronary Artery Calcification: A Prospective, Multicenter, Non-inferiority Randomized Controlled Trial (LIRAC)

3. august 2026 oppdatert av: Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, School of Medicine

Severely calcified coronary lesions represent one of the major challenges in interventional cardiology. Severe coronary calcification increases the difficulty and complexity of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), impedes device delivery, and may even lead to device failure. Moreover, stent underexpansion further elevates the risks of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization, and in-stent thrombosis. Rotational atherectomy (RA) is an effective modality for treating severely calcified coronary lesions, as it adequately modifies calcific plaques, facilitates luminal enlargement, and improves device deliverability. However, RA fragments calcific plaques into microparticles that are subsequently cleared by the reticuloendothelial system in the distal microvasculature, potentially inducing microvascular dysfunction.

In recent years, intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) has emerged as an innovative calcium-modification technique in clinical practice. This technology employs acoustic pressure waves to selectively disrupt deep-seated calcific plaques, inducing fractures within the calcium while sparing the soft tissue of the vessel wall from substantial injury. IVL is performed with low-pressure balloon inflation (4-6 atm), which helps to minimize the risk of vascular injury; its mechanism of action does not produce macroscopic debris, theoretically obviating distal embolization and associated microcirculatory disturbances. Recently published prospective observational studies-the REPLICA-EPIC18 and BENELUX-IVL registries-have demonstrated that IVL is feasible and safe in "real-world" severely calcified lesions, effectively facilitating stent implantation.

Although both RA and IVL are important tools for managing severe calcific lesions, there remains a paucity of high-level, head-to-head evidence directly comparing post-procedural minimal stent area between the two modalities. Clarifying this issue is of significant clinical importance for guiding clinicians in selecting optimal revascularization strategies tailored to distinct pathological characteristics and patient profiles, thereby improving procedural safety and patient outcomes. To this end, we plan to conduct a prospective, multicenter, randomized clinical trial (RCT) aimed at comparing the minimal stent area between intravascular lithotripsy and rotational atherectomy in patients with severely calcified lesions.

Studieoversikt

Status

Har ikke rekruttert ennå

Forhold

Intervensjon / Behandling

Studietype

Intervensjonell

Registrering (Antatt)

190

Fase

  • Ikke aktuelt

Kontakter og plasseringer

Denne delen inneholder kontaktinformasjon for de som utfører studien, og informasjon om hvor denne studien blir utført.

Studiekontakt

Deltakelseskriterier

Forskere ser etter personer som passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kalt kvalifikasjonskriterier. Noen eksempler på disse kriteriene er en persons generelle helsetilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Kvalifikasjonskriterier

Alder som er kvalifisert for studier

  • Voksen
  • Eldre voksen

Tar imot friske frivillige

Nei

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age ≥ 18 years;
  2. Target lesion with diameter stenosis ≥ 50% (visual estimation) associated with evidence of myocardial ischemia;
  3. Target lesion must be a de novo, in-situ severely calcified coronary lesion, where severe calcification is defined as: radiopacity visible prior to contrast injection and in the absence of cardiac pulsation, typically involving both sides of the vessel wall; and ≥270° circumferential calcification as evidenced by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS);
  4. Target vessel reference diameter between 2.5 and 4.0 mm, with successful guidewire traversal;
  5. A maximum of two non-target lesions requiring interventional treatment, which must be successfully treated prior to the target lesion;
  6. Patients presenting with evidence of symptomatic or asymptomatic myocardial ischemia, stable or unstable angina pectoris, or prior myocardial infarction;
  7. Signed written informed consent obtained.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Cardiogenic shock or hemodynamic instability;
  2. Chronic total occlusion (CTO);
  3. Requirement for intraprocedural mechanical circulatory support, such as intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) or Impella device;
  4. Acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) occurring within 1 month prior to enrollment;
  5. Angiographically visible thrombus at the target lesion site;
  6. Left main ostial lesion with stenosis ≥ 50%;
  7. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 40%;
  8. New-onset stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) within 90 days;
  9. Bypass graft lesion;
  10. Coronary artery dissection of type B or greater (NHLBI classification);
  11. Pregnant or lactating patients;
  12. Life expectancy < 1 year;
  13. Active bleeding;
  14. Renal insufficiency, defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 60 mL/min/1.73 m²;
  15. Presence of cognitive or psychiatric disorders, as confirmed by clinical diagnosis or investigator assessment;
  16. Illiteracy, semi-literacy, or any visual impairment, reading/writing disability that prevents the patient from independently reading the patient information sheet and personally providing written informed consent without assistance.

Studieplan

Denne delen gir detaljer om studieplanen, inkludert hvordan studien er utformet og hva studien måler.

Hvordan er studiet utformet?

Designdetaljer

  • Primært formål: Behandling
  • Tildeling: Randomisert
  • Intervensjonsmodell: Parallell tildeling
  • Masking: Ingen (Open Label)

Våpen og intervensjoner

Deltakergruppe / Arm
Intervensjon / Behandling
Aktiv komparator: Intravascular lithotripsy group
IVL:Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) balloon is used to dilate severely calcified plaques. Pre-dilatation with a balloon ≤2.0 mm is permitted. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) with automated pullback must be performed both after lithotripsy and at the end of the procedure
Fremgangsmåte: intravascular lithotripsy
The procedure entails the use of a lithotripsy balloon for dilation of severely calcified plaques. Pre-dilatation may be performed with a balloon up to 2.0 mm in diameter. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) with automated pullback is mandatory immediately following lithotripsy and upon completion of the procedur
Aktiv komparator: Rotational atherectomy group
RA:The procedure involves using a rotational atherectomy burr to modify severely calcified plaques. After the burr has traversed the lesion, three to five additional polishing runs are required to achieve optimal plaque modification. If 1:1 balloon dilatation at the target lesion is performed with satisfactory expansion, rotational atherectomy is terminated. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) with automatic pullback must be performed both immediately after rotational atherectomy and at the end of the procedure
Fremgangsmåte: rotational atherectomy
The procedure involves using a rotational atherectomy burr to modify severely calcified plaques. After the burr has traversed the lesion, three to five additional polishing runs are required to achieve optimal plaque modification. If 1:1 balloon dilatation at the target lesion is performed with satisfactory expansion, rotational atherectomy is terminated. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) with automatic pullback must be performed both immediately after rotational atherectomy and at the end of the procedure.

Hva måler studien?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Tidsramme
minimal stent area
Tidsramme: Within one hour post-percutaneous coronary intervention
Within one hour post-percutaneous coronary intervention

Andre resultatmål

Resultatmål
Tidsramme
feil på målfartøyet
Tidsramme: 1 år
1 år
major adverse cardiac event
Tidsramme: 1 year
1 year
success rate of PCI
Tidsramme: Within one hour post-percutaneous coronary intervention
Within one hour post-percutaneous coronary intervention
complications during perioperative period
Tidsramme: during perioperative period
during perioperative period
IVUS image feature analysis
Tidsramme: Within one hour post-percutaneous coronary intervention
Within one hour post-percutaneous coronary intervention
TnT+CK/CKMB
Tidsramme: 24 hours post-PCI
24 hours post-PCI
The dosage of contrast agent, the amount of X-rays exposed and the operation time
Tidsramme: during the PCI
during the PCI
Subgroup analysis of gender, age, diabetes, etc
Tidsramme: 1 year
1 year
The differences and influences of computational physiology and microcirculation between the two groups of patients
Tidsramme: 1 year
1 year

Samarbeidspartnere og etterforskere

Det er her du vil finne personer og organisasjoner som er involvert i denne studien.

Sponsor

Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, School of Medicine

Studierekorddatoer

Disse datoene sporer fremdriften for innsending av studieposter og sammendragsresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieposter og rapporterte resultater gjennomgås av National Library of Medicine (NLM) for å sikre at de oppfyller spesifikke kvalitetskontrollstandarder før de legges ut på det offentlige nettstedet.

Studer hoveddatoer

Studiestart (Antatt)

1. oktober 2026

Primær fullføring (Antatt)

30. september 2029

Studiet fullført (Antatt)

30. juni 2030

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først innsendt

15. juli 2026

Først innsendt som oppfylte QC-kriteriene

3. august 2026

Først lagt ut (Faktiske)

6. august 2026

Oppdateringer av studieposter

Sist oppdatering lagt ut (Faktiske)

6. august 2026

Siste oppdatering sendt inn som oppfylte QC-kriteriene

3. august 2026

Sist bekreftet

1. juli 2026

Mer informasjon

Begreper knyttet til denne studien

Ytterligere relevante MeSH-vilkår

Andre studie-ID-numre

  • 2026-0688

Plan for individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)

Planlegger du å dele individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)?

NEI

Legemiddel- og utstyrsinformasjon, studiedokumenter

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert medikamentprodukt

Nei

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert enhetsprodukt

Nei

Denne informasjonen ble hentet direkte fra nettstedet clinicaltrials.gov uten noen endringer. Hvis du har noen forespørsler om å endre, fjerne eller oppdatere studiedetaljene dine, vennligst kontakt register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en endring er implementert på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også bli oppdatert automatisk på nettstedet vårt. .

Abonnere