Ta strona została przetłumaczona automatycznie i dokładność tłumaczenia nie jest gwarantowana. Proszę odnieść się do angielska wersja za tekst źródłowy.

Comparison Between FFR Guided Revascularization Versus Conventional Strategy in Acute STEMI Patients With MVD. (CompareAcute)

31 lipca 2020 zaktualizowane przez: Maasstad Hospital

Fractional Flow Reserve Guided Primary Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention to Improve Guideline Indexed Actual Standard of Care for Treatment of ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Disease

The Compare-Acute trial is a prospective randomised trial in patients with multivessel disease, who are admitted into hospital with a ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction. The purpose of the study is to compare a FFR guided multivessel PCI taking place during the primary PCI with a primary PCI of the culprit vessel only.

Patients will be enrolled after successful revascularisation of the culprit vessel. Patients that have at least one lesion with a diameter of stenosis of more than 50% on visual estimation, feasible (operators judgement) for treatment with PCI in a non-infarct related artery, will be randomised either to the FFR guided complete revascularisation arm or staged revascularisation by proven ischemia or persistence of symptoms of angina.

Approximately 885 patients will be entered in the study.

Study hypothesis: FFR-guided complete percutaneous revascularisation of all flow-limiting stenoses in the non-IRA performed within the same procedure as the primary PCI or within the same hospitalisation will improve clinical outcomes compared to the staged revascularisation, guided by prove of ischemia or clinical judgment, as recommended from the guidelines.

Przegląd badań

Szczegółowy opis

Background of the study: At the moment the general opinion is divided over the way the non culprit lesions in patients presenting with STEMI should be treated. While the previous guidelines stead that these lesions should be treated in a second time ( ie not during the primary intervention) the actual guidelines do not touch this argument. The reason is that the studies where the previous guidelines were based are old. Meanwhile small sized randomised trials from EU region have proven favourable outcomes with NON infarct related artery during the primary procedure while registers (non randomised trials) from USA still recommend the staged treatment. For this reason we have decided to perform a randomised study to address this issue incorporating the state of the art diagnosis and treatment, as well as the new medical therapy and PCI techniques.

Objective of the study: FFR-guided complete percutaneous revascularisation of all flow-limiting stenoses in the non-IRA performed within the same procedure as the primary PCI or within the same hospitalisation will improve clinical outcomes compared to the staged revascularisation, guided by prove of ischemia or clinical judgment, as recommended from the guidelines

Study design: Prospective, 1: 2 randomisation. FFR guided revascularisation during primary PCI (1) versus following actual guidelines (2)

Study population: All STEMI patients between 18-85 years who will be treated with primary PCI in < 12 h (more than 12 hr if persisting pain allowed) after the onset of symptoms and have at least one stenosis of >50% in a non-IRA judged feasible for treatment with PCI.

Intervention (if applicable): FFR-guided complete percutaneous revascularisation of all flow-limiting stenoses in the non-IRA performed within the same procedure as the primary PCI or within the same hospitalisation will improve clinical outcomes compared to the staged revascularisation, guided by prove of ischemia or clinical judgment, as recommended from the guidelines

Primary study parameters/outcome of the study: Composite endpoint of all cause mortality non-fatal Myocardial Infarction, any Revascularisation and Stroke (MACCE) at 12 months

Typ studiów

Interwencyjne

Zapisy (Rzeczywisty)

885

Faza

  • Nie dotyczy

Kontakty i lokalizacje

Ta sekcja zawiera dane kontaktowe osób prowadzących badanie oraz informacje o tym, gdzie badanie jest przeprowadzane.

Lokalizacje studiów

      • Brno, Czechy
        • University Hospital Brno
      • Hradec Králové, Czechy
        • University Hospital Hradec Kralove
      • Liberec, Czechy
        • Liberec Regional Hospital
      • Arnhem, Holandia
        • Rijnstate Hospital
      • Groningen, Holandia
        • University Medical Center Groningen
      • Heerlen, Holandia
        • Atrium MC Parkstad
      • Maastricht, Holandia
        • Maastricht Universitair Medical center
      • Rotterdam, Holandia, 3079DZ
        • Maasstadhospital
      • The Hague, Holandia, 2512 VA
        • Medisch Centrum Haaglanden
      • Bad Krozingen, Niemcy, 79189
        • Herz-Zentrum Bad Krozingen
      • Bad Segeberg, Niemcy, 23795
        • Herzzentrum Bad Segeberger Klinik
      • Bremen, Niemcy, 28277
        • Klinikum Links der Weser
      • Ingolstadt, Niemcy, 85049
        • Medizinische Klinik IV
      • Rostock, Niemcy, 18057
        • Medical University Rostock
      • Oslo, Norwegia
        • Oslo University Hospital
      • Lubin, Polska
        • Miedziowe Centrum Zdrowia Lubin
      • Warsaw, Polska
        • Centralny Szpital Kliniczny MSWiA w Warszawie
      • Warsaw, Polska
        • Kliniki Kardiologii Allenort
      • Wroclaw, Polska
        • 4 Wojskowy Szpital Kliniczny Z Poliklinika SP ZOZ
      • Singapore, Singapur, 308433
        • Tan Tock Seng Hospital
      • Singapore, Singapur, 768828
        • Khoo Teck Puat Hospital
      • Goteborg, Szwecja, 41315
        • Sahlgrenska Götheborg University Hospital
      • Budapest, Węgry
        • Gottsegen György Országos Kardiológiai Intézet
      • Nyíregyháza, Węgry
        • Szabolcs - Szatmár - Bereg County Hospitals and University Teaching Hospital
      • Szeged, Węgry
        • Szent-Györgyi Albert Klinika
      • Zalaegerszeg, Węgry
        • Zala Megyei Kórház

Kryteria uczestnictwa

Badacze szukają osób, które pasują do określonego opisu, zwanego kryteriami kwalifikacyjnymi. Niektóre przykłady tych kryteriów to ogólny stan zdrowia danej osoby lub wcześniejsze leczenie.

Kryteria kwalifikacji

Wiek uprawniający do nauki

18 lat do 85 lat (Dorosły, Starszy dorosły)

Akceptuje zdrowych ochotników

Nie

Płeć kwalifikująca się do nauki

Wszystko

Opis

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All patients between 18-85 years presenting with STEMI who will be treated with primary PCI in < 12 h after the onset of symptoms* and have at least one stenosis of >50% in a non-IRA on QCA or visual estimation of baseline angiography and judged feasible for treatment with PCI by the operator.

    • Patients with symptoms for more than 12 hr but ongoing angina complaints can be randomised

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Left main stem disease (stenosis > 50%)
  2. STEMI due to in-stent thrombosis
  3. Chronic total occlusion of a non-IRA
  4. Severe stenosis with TIMI flow ≤ II of the non-IRA artery.
  5. Non-IRA stenosis not amenable for PCI treatment (operators decision)
  6. Complicated IRA treatment, with one or more of the following;

    • Extravasation,
    • Permanent no re-flow after IRA treatment (TIMI flow 0-1),
    • Inability to implant a stent
  7. Known severe cardiac valve dysfunction that will require surgery in the follow-up period.
  8. Killip class III or IV already at presentation or at the completion of culprit lesion treatment.
  9. Life expectancy of < 2 years.
  10. Intolerance to Aspirin, Clopidogrel, Prasugrel, Ticagrelor, Heparin, Bivaluridin, or Everolimus and known true anaphylaxis to prior contrast media of bleeding diathesis or known coagulopathy.
  11. Gastrointestinal or genitourinary bleeding within the prior 3 months,
  12. Planned elective surgical procedure necessitating interruption of thienopyridines during the first 6 months post enrolment.
  13. Patients who are actively participating in another drug or device investigational study, which have not completed the primary endpoint follow-up period.
  14. Pregnancy or planning to become pregnant any time after enrolment into this study.
  15. Inability to obtain informed consent.
  16. Expected lost to follow-up.

Plan studiów

Ta sekcja zawiera szczegółowe informacje na temat planu badania, w tym sposób zaprojektowania badania i jego pomiary.

Jak projektuje się badanie?

Szczegóły projektu

  • Główny cel: Leczenie
  • Przydział: Randomizowane
  • Model interwencyjny: Przydział równoległy
  • Maskowanie: Brak (otwarta etykieta)

Broń i interwencje

Grupa uczestników / Arm
Interwencja / Leczenie
Aktywny komparator: FFR-guided revascularisation strategy
In the FFR-group all flow limiting (FFR≤0.80) lesions will receive treatment by PCI and stenting. The non-IRA PCI should be performed during the same intervention. Exceptions can be made for complex lesions where the operator estimates that the revascularisation procedure will require significant contrast overload which may lead to deterioration of cardiac and renal function of the patient. Such procedures can be performed in a second procedure which should take place within the same hospitalisation. All lesions with a FFR measurement of >0.80 will not be treated.
FFR-guided revascularisation strategy
Komparator placebo: randomised to guidelines group
In the randomised to guidelines group the procedure will stop after the FFR measurements and the patient will be referred to his treating cardiologist who will decide whether a staged PCI of the non-IRA artery should take place. The treating cardiologist will be blinded for the FFR measurements (but not angiographic imaging) and must make a decision based on conventional non-invasive ischemia detecting tests or clinical signs and symptoms i.e. very typical angina symptoms in patients with angiographic significant stenosis).
Staged revascularisation by proven ischemia or persistence of symptoms of angina

Co mierzy badanie?

Podstawowe miary wyniku

Miara wyniku
Opis środka
Ramy czasowe
Number of Participants With the Composite Endpoint of MACCE
Ramy czasowe: 12 months
Number of participants with the composite endpoint of all cause mortality non-fatal Myocardial Infarction, any Revascularisation and Cerebrovascular Events (MACCE) at 12 months between groups
12 months
Number of Participants With Death From Any Cause
Ramy czasowe: 12 months
Number of participants with all cause mortality at 12 months between groups
12 months
Number of Participants With Cardiac Death
Ramy czasowe: 12 months
Number of participants with Cardiac mortality at 12 months between groups
12 months
Number of Participants With Spontaneous MI
Ramy czasowe: 12 months
Number of participants with Spontaneous Myocardial Infarction at 12 months between groups
12 months
Number of Participants With Periprocedural MI
Ramy czasowe: 12 months
Number of participants with Periprocedural Myocardial Infarction at 12 months between groups
12 months
Number of Participants With Revascularization - PCI
Ramy czasowe: 12 months
Number of participants with revascularization PCI at 12 months between groups
12 months
Number of Participants With Revascularization - CABG
Ramy czasowe: 12 months
Number of participants with revascularization CABG at 12 months between groups
12 months
Number of Participants With Cerebrovascular Event
Ramy czasowe: 12 months
Number of participants with Cerebrovascular event at 12 months between groups
12 months

Miary wyników drugorzędnych

Miara wyniku
Opis środka
Ramy czasowe
Number of Participants With Composite Endpoint of NACE (Any First Event)
Ramy czasowe: 12 months
Number of participants with Composite endpoint of Cardiac death, Myocardial Infarction, any Revascularisation, Stroke and Major bleeding at 12 months (NACE i.e. Net Adverse Clinical Events)
12 months
Number of Participants With Death From Any Cause or MI
Ramy czasowe: 12 months
Number of participants with Part of composite NACE-Death from any cause or Myocardial Infarction at 12 months
12 months
Number of Participants With Major Bleeding
Ramy czasowe: 12 months
Number of participants with Major bleeding at 12 months - Part of composite NACE
12 months
Number of Participants With Any Bleeding at 12 Months
Ramy czasowe: 12 months
Number of participants with any bleeding at 12 months - part of composite endpoint NACE
12 months
Number of Participants With Any Bleeding at 48 Hours
Ramy czasowe: 48 hours
Number of participants with any bleeding at 48 hours - part of composite endpoint NACE
48 hours
Number of Participants With Hospitalization
Ramy czasowe: 12 months
Number of participants with hospitalization for heart failure, unstable angina or chest pain
12 months
Number of Participants With Revascularization
Ramy czasowe: 12 months
Number of participants with any revascularization-Part of composite endpoint NACE
12 months
Number of Participants With Stent Thrombosis
Ramy czasowe: 12 months
Number of participants with Stent Thrombosis - Part of composite endpoint NACE
12 months
Number of Participants With Primary Endpoint Outcome MACCE (Any First Event) at 3 Year
Ramy czasowe: 3 year
Number of participants with Composite primary endpoint MACCE (any first event) at 3 year
3 year
Number of Participants With All Cause Death at 3 Year
Ramy czasowe: 3 year
Number of participants with Composite endpoint MACCE (any first event) at 3 year - all cause death
3 year
Number of Participants With Cardiac Death at 3 Year
Ramy czasowe: 3 year
Number of participants with Composite endpoint MACCE (any first event) at 3 year - Cardiac death
3 year
Number of Participants With Spontaneous MI at 3 Year
Ramy czasowe: 3 year
Number of participants with Composite endpoint MACCE (any first event) at 3 year - Spontaneous MI
3 year
Number of Participants With Peri-procedural MI at 3 Year
Ramy czasowe: 3 year
Number of participants with Composite endpoint MACCE (any first event) at 3 year - Peri-procedural MI
3 year
Number of Participants With Urgent Revascularization at 3 Year
Ramy czasowe: 3 year
Number of participants with Composite endpoint MACCE (any first event) at 3 year - urgent revascularisation
3 year
Number of Participants With Elective Revascularization at 3 Year
Ramy czasowe: 3 year
Number of participants with Composite endpoint MACCE (any first event) at 3 year -elective revascularisation
3 year
Number of Participants With Cerebrovascular Event
Ramy czasowe: 3 year
Number of participants with Composite endpoint MACCE (any first event) at 3 year -Cerebrovascular event
3 year
Number of Participants With Composite Endpoint of NACE (Any First Event) at 3 Year
Ramy czasowe: 3 years
Number of participants with Composite endpoint of Cardiac death, Myocardial Infarction, any Revascularisation, Stroke and Major bleeding at 3 year (NACE i.e. Net Adverse Clinical Events)
3 years
Number of Participants With Death From Any Cause or MI
Ramy czasowe: 3 year
Number of participants with Part of composite NACE-Death from any cause or Myocardial Infarction at 3 year
3 year
Number of Participants With Major Bleeding at 3 Year
Ramy czasowe: 3 year
Number of participants with Part of composite endpoint NACE- Major bleeding at 3 year
3 year
Number of Participants With Hospitalization
Ramy czasowe: 3 year
Number of participants with Hospitalization for heart failure, unstable angina, MI
3 year
Number of Participants With Hospitalization at 3 Year
Ramy czasowe: 3 year
Number of participants with Hospitalization for heart failure, unstable angina, MI and/or chest pain
3 year
Number of Participants With Stent Thrombosis at 3 Year
Ramy czasowe: 3 year
Number of participants with Stent Thrombosis at 3 year - Part of composite endpoint NACE
3 year
Number of Participants With Any Bleeding at 3 Year
Ramy czasowe: 3 year
Number of participants with any bleeding at 3 year - Part of composite endpoint NACE
3 year

Inne miary wyników

Miara wyniku
Opis środka
Ramy czasowe
A Comparison of the Number of Patients in Both Groups With Treated Lesions With FFR ≤ 0.80 Versus Patients With Untreated Lesions With FFR ≤ 0.80;
Ramy czasowe: 3 year
FFR+/PCI+ vs FFR+/PCI- Comparison of patients having FFR positive lesions that underwent revascularization during index procedure or in staged procedures within 45 days (groups A+C, n=202 patients) with patients having FFR positive lesions that did not undergo revascularization (group D, n=231 patients),
3 year
Comparison of Acute Versus Staged PCI for Lesions With FFR ≤ 0.80
Ramy czasowe: 3 year
Comparison of acute versus staged PCI treatment for lesions with FFR
3 year
Comparison of PCI vs Medical Therapy in FFR Negative Lesions
Ramy czasowe: 3 year
comparison of patients receiving staged PCI treatment of FFR-negative lesions in the non-IRA (decision made by referring physician who was blinded to FFR results) and patients receiving medical therapy for FFR-negative lesions in the non-IRA
3 year

Współpracownicy i badacze

Tutaj znajdziesz osoby i organizacje zaangażowane w to badanie.

Współpracownicy

Śledczy

  • Główny śledczy: Peter Smits, MD. PHD, Maastadhospital / MCR
  • Krzesło do nauki: Elmir Omerovic, MD PhD, Sahlgrenska Hospital Götheborg
  • Krzesło do nauki: Gert Richardt, MD PhD, Herzzentrum Segeberger Kliniken
  • Krzesło do nauki: Franz-Josef Neumann, MD PhD, Herz-Zentrum Bad Krozingen

Publikacje i pomocne linki

Osoba odpowiedzialna za wprowadzenie informacji o badaniu dobrowolnie udostępnia te publikacje. Mogą one dotyczyć wszystkiego, co jest związane z badaniem.

Daty zapisu na studia

Daty te śledzą postęp w przesyłaniu rekordów badań i podsumowań wyników do ClinicalTrials.gov. Zapisy badań i zgłoszone wyniki są przeglądane przez National Library of Medicine (NLM), aby upewnić się, że spełniają określone standardy kontroli jakości, zanim zostaną opublikowane na publicznej stronie internetowej.

Główne daty studiów

Rozpoczęcie studiów

1 lipca 2011

Zakończenie podstawowe (Rzeczywisty)

31 października 2016

Ukończenie studiów (Rzeczywisty)

31 października 2018

Daty rejestracji na studia

Pierwszy przesłany

20 lipca 2011

Pierwszy przesłany, który spełnia kryteria kontroli jakości

21 lipca 2011

Pierwszy wysłany (Oszacować)

22 lipca 2011

Aktualizacje rekordów badań

Ostatnia wysłana aktualizacja (Rzeczywisty)

11 sierpnia 2020

Ostatnia przesłana aktualizacja, która spełniała kryteria kontroli jakości

31 lipca 2020

Ostatnia weryfikacja

1 maja 2020

Więcej informacji

Terminy związane z tym badaniem

Plan dla danych uczestnika indywidualnego (IPD)

Planujesz udostępniać dane poszczególnych uczestników (IPD)?

NIE

Te informacje zostały pobrane bezpośrednio ze strony internetowej clinicaltrials.gov bez żadnych zmian. Jeśli chcesz zmienić, usunąć lub zaktualizować dane swojego badania, skontaktuj się z register@clinicaltrials.gov. Gdy tylko zmiana zostanie wprowadzona na stronie clinicaltrials.gov, zostanie ona automatycznie zaktualizowana również na naszej stronie internetowej .

Subskrybuj