Ta strona została przetłumaczona automatycznie i dokładność tłumaczenia nie jest gwarantowana. Proszę odnieść się do angielska wersja za tekst źródłowy.

EWSs and 28-Day Mortality in Geriatric ED Patients (EWSsGer)

3 maja 2026 zaktualizowane przez: Adem Az, Haseki Training and Research Hospital

Performance of Different Early Warning Systems in Predicting 28-day Mortality Among Geriatric Emergency Department Patients

This prospective observational cohort study evaluated the prognostic performance of commonly used early warning scores for predicting 28-day all-cause mortality among geriatric patients presenting to the emergency department with non-traumatic conditions. Patients aged 65 years and older were consecutively screened during the study period. Demographic characteristics, comorbidities, vital signs, level of consciousness, blood gas parameters, complete blood count parameters, frailty status, and early warning scores were recorded at emergency department presentation or within the first hour of admission. The evaluated scoring systems included National Early Warning Score (NEWS/NEWS2), Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS), quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA), Rapid Emergency Medicine Score (REMS), Cardiac Arrest Risk Triage (CART), and Hamilton Early Warning Score (HEWS) score. The primary outcome was 28-day all-cause mortality. The study also examined whether age, comorbidity burden, frailty, laboratory markers, and hemodynamic parameters were independently associated with 28-day mortality in this population.

Przegląd badań

Szczegółowy opis

Emergency departments are high-acuity clinical settings in which early recognition of patients at risk of deterioration is essential. Early warning scores are widely used to support risk stratification by converting abnormalities in physiological parameters into structured clinical scores. However, the prognostic performance of these tools may be limited in older adults because of age-related physiological changes, reduced physiological reserve, atypical clinical presentation, polypharmacy, and high comorbidity burden.

This prospective, single-center observational cohort study was conducted in the emergency department of Haseki Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye. Consecutive patients aged 65 years and older who presented with non-traumatic conditions were screened for eligibility. Data were recorded in real time using a standardized case report form. The evaluated early warning scores included the National Early Warning Score, National Early Warning Score 2, Modified Early Warning Score, quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome criteria, Rapid Emergency Medicine Score, Hamilton Early Warning Score, Triage Early Warning Score, Rapid Acute Physiology Score, and Cardiac Arrest Risk Triage score. The Clinical Frailty Scale was also assessed.

The primary objective was to evaluate the ability of these scores to predict 28-day all-cause mortality. Secondary analyses assessed comparative score performance and explored whether advanced age, comorbidity burden, frailty, laboratory parameters, and hemodynamic variables were independently associated with mortality.

Typ studiów

Obserwacyjny

Zapisy (Rzeczywisty)

2744

Kontakty i lokalizacje

Ta sekcja zawiera dane kontaktowe osób prowadzących badanie oraz informacje o tym, gdzie badanie jest przeprowadzane.

Lokalizacje studiów

    • Istanbul
      • Istanbul, Istanbul, Turcja (Türkiye), 34265
        • Haseki Training and Research Hospital

Kryteria uczestnictwa

Badacze szukają osób, które pasują do określonego opisu, zwanego kryteriami kwalifikacyjnymi. Niektóre przykłady tych kryteriów to ogólny stan zdrowia danej osoby lub wcześniejsze leczenie.

Kryteria kwalifikacji

Wiek uprawniający do nauki

  • Starszy dorosły

Akceptuje zdrowych ochotników

Nie

Metoda próbkowania

Próbka prawdopodobieństwa

Badana populacja

Patients aged 65 years and older presenting to the emergency department with non-traumatic conditions who met the eligibility criteria and had complete data for early warning score calculation and 28-day follow-up.

Opis

Inclusion Criteria:

Participants will be eligible for inclusion if they meet all of the following criteria:

  • Age 65 years or older
  • Presentation to the emergency department during the study period
  • Non-traumatic emergency department presentation
  • Availability of clinical data required for early warning score calculation
  • Availability of 28-day follow-up data
  • Written informed consent provided by the patient or, when applicable, by a legal representative

Exclusion Criteria:

Participants will be excluded if they meet any of the following criteria:

  • Trauma-related presentation
  • Insufficient clinical data for calculation of early warning scores
  • Incomplete 28-day follow-up data
  • Presentation in cardiac arrest
  • Death within the first hour after emergency department presentation
  • Known hematologic malignancy
  • Presentation for palliative support only
  • Inability to obtain informed consent from the patient or a legal representative

Plan studiów

Ta sekcja zawiera szczegółowe informacje na temat planu badania, w tym sposób zaprojektowania badania i jego pomiary.

Jak projektuje się badanie?

Szczegóły projektu

Kohorty i interwencje

Grupa / Kohorta
Interwencja / Leczenie
Survivors
Survivors were defined as eligible geriatric emergency department patients who remained alive within 28 days after the index emergency department presentation.
Baseline demographic characteristics were recorded at emergency department presentation. These included age and sex. Age was analyzed as a continuous variable and was also considered clinically relevant because the study population consisted of geriatric patients aged 65 years and older.
Pre-existing comorbid conditions were recorded for each participant based on medical history and available clinical records at emergency department presentation. The assessed comorbidities included hypertension, diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease, chronic kidney disease, heart failure, ischemic stroke, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and malignancy. Comorbidity status was evaluated as part of baseline clinical risk assessment.
Vital signs were measured at emergency department presentation or within the first hour after admission. The recorded vital signs included systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, body temperature, and peripheral oxygen saturation when available. These parameters were used both as individual clinical variables and as components of early warning score calculations.

Initial laboratory parameters obtained during emergency department evaluation were recorded. These included blood gas parameters and complete blood count results. Laboratory variables were assessed as potential predictors of 28-day all-cause mortality and were also evaluated in relation to acute physiological deterioration and metabolic stress.

Parameters included, pH, partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO₂, mmHg), bicarbonate (HCO₃-, mmol/L), base excess (BE, mmol/L), leukocyte count (10³/µL), and lactate level (mmol/L).

Severity-related clinical scores, including Glasgow Coma Scale, quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, and Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome criteria, were calculated using data obtained at emergency department presentation or within the first hour after admission. These scores were used to assess acute illness severity and early clinical deterioration risk in geriatric emergency department patients.
Frailty status was assessed using the Clinical Frailty Scale at emergency department presentation. The Clinical Frailty Scale was used to evaluate baseline vulnerability and physiological reserve in older adults. Its association with 28-day all-cause mortality was examined as part of geriatric risk stratification.
Early warning scores were calculated for each participant using clinical data obtained at emergency department presentation or within the first hour after admission. These scores were evaluated for their ability to predict 28-day all-cause mortality among geriatric patients presenting to the emergency department with non-traumatic conditions. The prognostic performance of each score was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and diagnostic performance measures. Scores included National Early Warning Score, National Early Warning Score 2, Modified Early Warning Score, Rapid Emergency Medicine Score, Cardiac Arrest Risk Triage score, Hamilton Early Warning Score, Triage Early Warning Score, and Rapid Acute Physiology Score.
Non-survivors
Non-survivors were defined as eligible geriatric emergency department patients who experienced all-cause mortality within 28 days after the index emergency department presentation.
Baseline demographic characteristics were recorded at emergency department presentation. These included age and sex. Age was analyzed as a continuous variable and was also considered clinically relevant because the study population consisted of geriatric patients aged 65 years and older.
Pre-existing comorbid conditions were recorded for each participant based on medical history and available clinical records at emergency department presentation. The assessed comorbidities included hypertension, diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease, chronic kidney disease, heart failure, ischemic stroke, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and malignancy. Comorbidity status was evaluated as part of baseline clinical risk assessment.
Vital signs were measured at emergency department presentation or within the first hour after admission. The recorded vital signs included systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, body temperature, and peripheral oxygen saturation when available. These parameters were used both as individual clinical variables and as components of early warning score calculations.

Initial laboratory parameters obtained during emergency department evaluation were recorded. These included blood gas parameters and complete blood count results. Laboratory variables were assessed as potential predictors of 28-day all-cause mortality and were also evaluated in relation to acute physiological deterioration and metabolic stress.

Parameters included, pH, partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO₂, mmHg), bicarbonate (HCO₃-, mmol/L), base excess (BE, mmol/L), leukocyte count (10³/µL), and lactate level (mmol/L).

Severity-related clinical scores, including Glasgow Coma Scale, quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, and Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome criteria, were calculated using data obtained at emergency department presentation or within the first hour after admission. These scores were used to assess acute illness severity and early clinical deterioration risk in geriatric emergency department patients.
Frailty status was assessed using the Clinical Frailty Scale at emergency department presentation. The Clinical Frailty Scale was used to evaluate baseline vulnerability and physiological reserve in older adults. Its association with 28-day all-cause mortality was examined as part of geriatric risk stratification.
Early warning scores were calculated for each participant using clinical data obtained at emergency department presentation or within the first hour after admission. These scores were evaluated for their ability to predict 28-day all-cause mortality among geriatric patients presenting to the emergency department with non-traumatic conditions. The prognostic performance of each score was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and diagnostic performance measures. Scores included National Early Warning Score, National Early Warning Score 2, Modified Early Warning Score, Rapid Emergency Medicine Score, Cardiac Arrest Risk Triage score, Hamilton Early Warning Score, Triage Early Warning Score, and Rapid Acute Physiology Score.

Co mierzy badanie?

Podstawowe miary wyniku

Miara wyniku
Opis środka
Ramy czasowe
Discriminatory Performance of Early Warning Scores for 28-Day Mortality
Ramy czasowe: At emergency department presentation, with outcome assessment at 28 days
The prognostic performance of each early warning score for predicting 28-day all-cause mortality will be evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. The area under the curve will be calculated for each score, including NEWS, NEWS2, MEWS, qSOFA, SIRS, REMS, HEWS, TREWS, RAPS, and CART.
At emergency department presentation, with outcome assessment at 28 days

Miary wyników drugorzędnych

Miara wyniku
Opis środka
Ramy czasowe
Diagnostic Performance Measures of Early Warning Score Cut-Off Values
Ramy czasowe: At emergency department presentation, with outcome assessment at 28 days
Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value will be calculated for relevant cut-off values of the evaluated early warning scores for predicting 28-day all-cause mortality.
At emergency department presentation, with outcome assessment at 28 days
Independent Predictors of 28-Day Mortality in Geriatric Emergency Department Patients
Ramy czasowe: At emergency department presentation, with outcome assessment at 28 days
The independent association of demographic variables, comorbidities, frailty, vital signs, laboratory parameters, and early warning scores with 28-day all-cause mortality will be assessed using multivariable logistic regression analysis.
At emergency department presentation, with outcome assessment at 28 days
Effect of Frailty on 28-Day Mortality Prediction
Ramy czasowe: At emergency department presentation, with outcome assessment at 28 days
Frailty will be assessed using the Clinical Frailty Scale, and its association with 28-day all-cause mortality will be evaluated. The incremental clinical relevance of frailty in geriatric risk stratification will also be explored.
At emergency department presentation, with outcome assessment at 28 days

Współpracownicy i badacze

Tutaj znajdziesz osoby i organizacje zaangażowane w to badanie.

Śledczy

  • Główny śledczy: Adem Az, Sultangazi Haseki Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Başhekimlik

Publikacje i pomocne linki

Osoba odpowiedzialna za wprowadzenie informacji o badaniu dobrowolnie udostępnia te publikacje. Mogą one dotyczyć wszystkiego, co jest związane z badaniem.

Publikacje ogólne

Daty zapisu na studia

Daty te śledzą postęp w przesyłaniu rekordów badań i podsumowań wyników do ClinicalTrials.gov. Zapisy badań i zgłoszone wyniki są przeglądane przez National Library of Medicine (NLM), aby upewnić się, że spełniają określone standardy kontroli jakości, zanim zostaną opublikowane na publicznej stronie internetowej.

Główne daty studiów

Rozpoczęcie studiów (Rzeczywisty)

1 lipca 2025

Zakończenie podstawowe (Rzeczywisty)

29 stycznia 2026

Ukończenie studiów (Rzeczywisty)

29 stycznia 2026

Daty rejestracji na studia

Pierwszy przesłany

3 maja 2026

Pierwszy przesłany, który spełnia kryteria kontroli jakości

3 maja 2026

Pierwszy wysłany (Rzeczywisty)

11 maja 2026

Aktualizacje rekordów badań

Ostatnia wysłana aktualizacja (Rzeczywisty)

11 maja 2026

Ostatnia przesłana aktualizacja, która spełniała kryteria kontroli jakości

3 maja 2026

Ostatnia weryfikacja

1 maja 2026

Więcej informacji

Terminy związane z tym badaniem

Plan dla danych uczestnika indywidualnego (IPD)

Planujesz udostępniać dane poszczególnych uczestników (IPD)?

NIE

Opis planu IPD

Stored in non-publicly avaliableAvaliable on request

Informacje o lekach i urządzeniach, dokumenty badawcze

Bada produkt leczniczy regulowany przez amerykańską FDA

Nie

Bada produkt urządzenia regulowany przez amerykańską FDA

Nie

Te informacje zostały pobrane bezpośrednio ze strony internetowej clinicaltrials.gov bez żadnych zmian. Jeśli chcesz zmienić, usunąć lub zaktualizować dane swojego badania, skontaktuj się z register@clinicaltrials.gov. Gdy tylko zmiana zostanie wprowadzona na stronie clinicaltrials.gov, zostanie ona automatycznie zaktualizowana również na naszej stronie internetowej .

Subskrybuj