Ta strona została przetłumaczona automatycznie i dokładność tłumaczenia nie jest gwarantowana. Proszę odnieść się do angielska wersja za tekst źródłowy.

Auto-calibrating System for Upper Limb Disability Assessment, Neurological and Occupational Rehabilitation (ASULDAR)

3 czerwca 2026 zaktualizowane przez: University of Pavia

Auto-calibrating System for Upper Limb Disability Assessment, Neurological and Occupational Rehabilitation (AS-ULDAR)

This interventional, multicenter, low-intervention clinical trial aims to evaluate the usability, feasibility, safety, and preliminary clinical impact of a robotic rehabilitation system designed for upper limb rehabilitation in adults with neurological disorders, including Parkinson's disease (PD), Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS), post-stroke sequelae, and Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI).

The system under study combines a collaborative robot (cobot), inertial sensors, and a graphical user interface capable of supporting reaching exercises, trajectory tracking activities, and cognitive exergames, while also enabling automatic acquisition and visualization of patient performance data.

The main questions the study aims to answer are:

Is the investigational robotic rehabilitation system usable and feasible in neurological patients undergoing upper limb rehabilitation? Is the use of the device safe for both patients and healthcare operators? Does the addition of robotic-assisted rehabilitation to conventional therapy improve upper limb motor performance, cognitive function, and quality of life compared with conventional rehabilitation alone? Do movement measurements collected by the system correlate with standard clinical assessment scales?

Researchers will compare conventional rehabilitation therapy plus robotic-assisted rehabilitation with conventional rehabilitation therapy alone to evaluate the impact of the device on motor, cognitive, and psychosocial outcomes.

Thirty participants will be randomized into two parallel treatment groups. Both groups will receive 12 sessions of conventional rehabilitation therapy lasting 60 minutes each, three times per week. Participants assigned to the experimental group will additionally receive robotic-assisted rehabilitation sessions of up to 30 minutes supervised by rehabilitation staff.

Participants will undergo:

Baseline collection of demographic and clinical information; Motor, cognitive, and activities of daily living assessments using standardized clinical scales; Conventional rehabilitation therapy sessions; Robotic-assisted upper limb rehabilitation exercises, including task-oriented and trajectory-tracking activities (experimental group only); Monitoring of vital parameters and adverse events during device use; Final evaluation of usability, psychosocial impact, patient satisfaction, motor and cognitive outcomes, and safety.

Przegląd badań

Status

Jeszcze nie rekrutacja

Warunki

Interwencja / Leczenie

Typ studiów

Interwencyjne

Zapisy (Szacowany)

30

Faza

  • Nie dotyczy

Kontakty i lokalizacje

Ta sekcja zawiera dane kontaktowe osób prowadzących badanie oraz informacje o tym, gdzie badanie jest przeprowadzane.

Kontakt w sprawie studiów

Kryteria uczestnictwa

Badacze szukają osób, które pasują do określonego opisu, zwanego kryteriami kwalifikacyjnymi. Niektóre przykłady tych kryteriów to ogólny stan zdrowia danej osoby lub wcześniejsze leczenie.

Kryteria kwalifikacji

Wiek uprawniający do nauki

  • Dorosły
  • Starszy dorosły

Akceptuje zdrowych ochotników

Nie

Opis

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients aged between 18 and 80 years.
  • Confirmed diagnosis of one of the following neurological conditions: stroke, Parkinson's disease, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS), or Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI).
  • Presence of upper limb motor impairment defined by QuickDASH scores ranging from 20 to 90.
  • Ability to understand and follow the study protocol instructions.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with severe psychiatric disorders or cognitive impairments that interfere with the ability to complete cognitive tests and self-assessment scales.
  • Individuals unable to provide informed consent.
  • Subjects with moderate to severe cognitive impairment, defined by an ECAS score lower than 81.92 (ALS patients) or a MoCA score between 18 and 25.
  • Physical conditions significantly limiting upper limb use (e.g., severe concomitant orthopedic disorders affecting shoulder movement).
  • Current or recent participation (within the previous three months) in other rehabilitation programs or interventions that could influence study outcomes.
  • Unstable health conditions that could make device use unsafe or inappropriate, including unstable medical conditions or severe visual impairments.

Plan studiów

Ta sekcja zawiera szczegółowe informacje na temat planu badania, w tym sposób zaprojektowania badania i jego pomiary.

Jak projektuje się badanie?

Szczegóły projektu

  • Główny cel: Wykonalność urządzenia
  • Przydział: Randomizowane
  • Model interwencyjny: Przydział równoległy
  • Maskowanie: Brak (otwarta etykieta)

Broń i interwencje

Grupa uczestników / Arm
Interwencja / Leczenie
Aktywny komparator: Conventional Therapy
Ten patients with similar upper limb functional impairment (Parkinson's Disease, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, and post-stroke sequelae) and five patients with or without upper limb functional impairment but affected by early cognitive impairment (Mild Cognitive Impairment, MCI) will undergo conventional rehabilitation therapy only. In particular, they will receive 12 sessions of conventional rehabilitation therapy (60 minutes each, three times per week).
Inny: conventional therapy
Participants will receive conventional rehabilitation therapy according to standard clinical practice for upper limb motor rehabilitation. Treatment sessions will last 60 minutes, three times per week, for a total of 12 sessions.
Eksperymentalny: Robotic Therapy
Ten patients with upper limb motor functional impairment, as assessed by the QuickDASH scale with scores ranging from 20 to 90, due to chronic neurological diseases (Parkinson's Disease and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis) or post-acute conditions (post-stroke sequelae), and five patients with or without upper limb motor functional impairment but affected by early cognitive impairment (Mild Cognitive Impairment, MCI), will receive treatment sessions using the investigational device in addition to conventional rehabilitation therapy sessions. In particular, they will receive 12 sessions of conventional rehabilitation therapy (60 minutes each, three times per week) in addition to training sessions with the investigational robotic device. Device sessions will last up to 30 minutes and will be supervised by rehabilitation staff. Exercise difficulty will be adapted according to the participant's performance.
Urządzenie: Auto-calibrating System for Upper Limb disability Assessment, neurological and occupational Rehabilitation
Participants will receive 12 sessions of conventional rehabilitation therapy (60 minutes each, three times per week) in addition to training sessions with the investigational robotic device. Device sessions will last up to 30 minutes and will be supervised by rehabilitation staff. The investigational robotic system provides adaptive upper limb rehabilitation exercises tailored to the patient's motor performance. Training includes task-oriented reaching exercises combined with cognitive tasks requiring target sequence memorization, as well as trajectory-tracking exercises in which the robot guides the patient's hand along predefined movements recorded by the therapist. Exercise difficulty is progressively adjusted according to patient performance during previous sessions.

Co mierzy badanie?

Podstawowe miary wyniku

Miara wyniku
Opis środka
Ramy czasowe
System Usability Scale (SUS) score
Ramy czasowe: at the end of treatment (after 12 sessions)

Usability of the investigational device will be assessed using the System Usability Scale (SUS).

Minimum Value: 0. Maximum Value: 100. Interpretation: Higher scores indicate greater perceived usability and therefore a better outcome.
at the end of treatment (after 12 sessions)
Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0) Score
Ramy czasowe: At the end of treatment (after 12 sessions)

Participant satisfaction and usability assessment using the QUEST 2.0 questionnaire.

Minimum Value: 1 Maximum Value: 5 Interpretation: Higher scores indicate greater user satisfaction with the assistive technology and therefore a better outcome.
At the end of treatment (after 12 sessions)
Incidence of Adverse Events
Ramy czasowe: Throughout the study period (up to 12 sessions)
Safety assessment based on the frequency of adverse events reported by participants or observed by operators during device use.
Throughout the study period (up to 12 sessions)
State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) score
Ramy czasowe: Baseline and end of treatment

Anxiety associated with device use assessed through self-reported scale, State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI).

Scale Title: State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). Minimum Value: 20. Maximum Value: 80. Interpretation: Higher scores indicate greater anxiety and therefore a worse outcome.
Baseline and end of treatment
Technology Assisted Rehabilitation Patient Perception Questionnaire (TARPP-Q) Usability Questionnaire Score
Ramy czasowe: At the end of treatment (after 12 sessions)

Usability assessment evaluating the ability of users to safely, effectively, and efficiently interact with the system.

Scale Title: Technology Assisted Rehabilitation Patient Perception Questionnaire (TARPP-Q) - Usability Domain.

Minimum Value: 5. Maximum Value: 20. Interpretation: Higher scores indicate better perceived usability of the technology-assisted rehabilitation device and therefore a better outcome.
At the end of treatment (after 12 sessions)
Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) score
Ramy czasowe: At the end of the treatment (after 12 sessions).

Perceived stress due to the use of the device assessed via Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) score.

Scale Title: Perceived Stress Scale (PSS). Minimum Value: 0. Maximum Value: 40. Interpretation: Higher scores indicate greater perceived stress and therefore a worse outcome.
At the end of the treatment (after 12 sessions).

Miary wyników drugorzędnych

Miara wyniku
Opis środka
Ramy czasowe
Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) Score
Ramy czasowe: Baseline and end of treatment (after 12 sessions)

Assessment of upper limb disability and motor function using the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) questionnaire.

Scale Title: Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) Questionnaire Minimum Value: 0. Maximum Value: 100. Interpretation: Higher scores indicate greater disability and symptoms of the upper extremity and therefore a worse outcome.
Baseline and end of treatment (after 12 sessions)
Fugl-Meyer Assessment Score
Ramy czasowe: Baseline and end of treatment (after 12 sessions)
Evaluation of upper limb motor performance using the Fugl-Meyer Assessment. Minimum Value: 0. Maximum Value: 226. Interpretation: Higher scores indicate better sensorimotor function and therefore a better outcome.
Baseline and end of treatment (after 12 sessions)
ABILHAND Scale Score
Ramy czasowe: Baseline and end of treatment (after 12 sessions)

Assessment of manual ability in activities of daily living using the ABILHAND scale.

Minimum Value: 0 . Maximum Value: Not strictly bounded. Interpretation: Higher scores indicate better perceived manual ability in performing daily activities and therefore a better outcome.
Baseline and end of treatment (after 12 sessions)
Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) Score
Ramy czasowe: Baseline and end of treatment (after 12 sessions)
Evaluation of upper limb motor function using the Action Research Arm Test. Scale Title: Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) Minimum Value: 0. Maximum Value: 57. Interpretation: Higher scores indicate better upper limb function and dexterity and therefore a better outcome.
Baseline and end of treatment (after 12 sessions)
Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) Score
Ramy czasowe: Baseline and end of treatment (after 12 sessions)
Assessment of muscle spasticity using the Modified Ashworth Scale. Scale Title: Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) Minimum Value: 0. Maximum Value: 4. Interpretation: Higher scores indicate increased muscle tone/spasticity and therefore a worse outcome.
Baseline and end of treatment (after 12 sessions)
Bradykinesia Scale Score
Ramy czasowe: Baseline and end of treatment (after 12 sessions)

Motor performance assessment using the Bradykinesia Scale for Parkinson's disease.

Scale Title: Bradykinesia Scale (specify instrument/version used, e.g., UPDRS-III bradykinesia items or a dedicated bradykinesia rating scale).

Minimum Value: 0. Maximum Value: 132. Interpretation: Higher scores indicate greater bradykinesia (slower and more impaired voluntary movement) and therefore a worse outcome.
Baseline and end of treatment (after 12 sessions)
EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) Score
Ramy czasowe: Baseline and end of treatment (after 12 sessions)
Assessment of perceived quality of life using the EuroQol-5D questionnaire. Scale Title: EuroQol 5-Dimension Questionnaire (EQ-5D) Minimum Value: 0. Maximum Value: 100. Interpretation: Higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life and therefore a better outcome.
Baseline and end of treatment (after 12 sessions)
Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale (PIADS) Score
Ramy czasowe: End of treatment (after 12 sessions)

Evaluation of the psychosocial impact of the assistive device on participants' daily life via PIADS score.

Scale Title: Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale (PIADS) Minimum Value: -3. Maximum Value: +3. Interpretation: Higher scores indicate a more positive psychosocial impact of the assistive device and therefore a better outcome.
End of treatment (after 12 sessions)
Trail Making Test A score
Ramy czasowe: Baseline and end of treatment (after 12 sessions)
Cognitive performance assessment using the Trail Making Test A. Scale Title: Trail Making Test Part A (TMT-A) Minimum Value: 0 seconds. Maximum Value: No fixed maximum (time to completion in seconds; can be unbounded) Interpretation: Higher scores (longer completion time) indicate worse performance and therefore a worse outcome.
Baseline and end of treatment (after 12 sessions)
Stroop Test score
Ramy czasowe: Baseline and end of the treatment (after 12 sessions)

Brain's processing speed, attention control, and cognitive flexibility assessed via Stroop Test score.

Scale Title: Stroop Color and Word Test (Stroop Test) Minimum Value: 0. Maximum Value: No fixed maximum (time in seconds; unbounded) Interpretation: Higher scores indicate worse performance, therefore a worse outcome.
Baseline and end of the treatment (after 12 sessions)
Digit Span Test score
Ramy czasowe: Baseline and end of the treatment (after 12 sessions).

Short-term memory, attention, and working memory capacity assessed via Digit Span score.

Scale Title: Digit Span Test Minimum Value: 0 (no correct spans recalled). Maximum Value: 18 total items correct. Interpretation: Higher scores indicate better attention and working memory performance and therefore a better outcome.
Baseline and end of the treatment (after 12 sessions).
Revised Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS-R) score
Ramy czasowe: Baseline and End of the Treatment (after 12 sessions).

Motor performance assessment using Revised Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS-R) for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.

Scale Title: Revised Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS-R) Minimum Value: 0. Maximum Value: 48. Interpretation: Higher scores indicate better functional status and therefore a better outcome.
Baseline and End of the Treatment (after 12 sessions).

Współpracownicy i badacze

Tutaj znajdziesz osoby i organizacje zaangażowane w to badanie.

Sponsor

University of Pavia

Współpracownicy

Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri SpA

Śledczy

  • Dyrektor Studium: Antonella Ferrara, PhD, University of Pavia
  • Główny śledczy: Cira Fundarò, MD, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri SpA

Daty zapisu na studia

Daty te śledzą postęp w przesyłaniu rekordów badań i podsumowań wyników do ClinicalTrials.gov. Zapisy badań i zgłoszone wyniki są przeglądane przez National Library of Medicine (NLM), aby upewnić się, że spełniają określone standardy kontroli jakości, zanim zostaną opublikowane na publicznej stronie internetowej.

Główne daty studiów

Rozpoczęcie studiów (Szacowany)

1 czerwca 2026

Zakończenie podstawowe (Szacowany)

1 lipca 2026

Ukończenie studiów (Szacowany)

1 października 2026

Daty rejestracji na studia

Pierwszy przesłany

25 maja 2026

Pierwszy przesłany, który spełnia kryteria kontroli jakości

3 czerwca 2026

Pierwszy wysłany (Rzeczywisty)

9 czerwca 2026

Aktualizacje rekordów badań

Ostatnia wysłana aktualizacja (Rzeczywisty)

9 czerwca 2026

Ostatnia przesłana aktualizacja, która spełniała kryteria kontroli jakości

3 czerwca 2026

Ostatnia weryfikacja

1 maja 2026

Więcej informacji

Terminy związane z tym badaniem

Słowa kluczowe

Dodatkowe istotne warunki MeSH

Inne numery identyfikacyjne badania

  • ASULDAR

Plan dla danych uczestnika indywidualnego (IPD)

Planujesz udostępniać dane poszczególnych uczestników (IPD)?

NIE

Informacje o lekach i urządzeniach, dokumenty badawcze

Bada produkt leczniczy regulowany przez amerykańską FDA

Nie

Bada produkt urządzenia regulowany przez amerykańską FDA

Nie

Te informacje zostały pobrane bezpośrednio ze strony internetowej clinicaltrials.gov bez żadnych zmian. Jeśli chcesz zmienić, usunąć lub zaktualizować dane swojego badania, skontaktuj się z register@clinicaltrials.gov. Gdy tylko zmiana zostanie wprowadzona na stronie clinicaltrials.gov, zostanie ona automatycznie zaktualizowana również na naszej stronie internetowej .

Subskrybuj