Dispensing Study for the Phenacite Project
30 oktober 2020 uppdaterad av: CooperVision, Inc.
Dispensing Study for the Phenacite Project.
The investigational test lens was not the final optical design and the study was not used for design validation.
Studieöversikt
Detaljerad beskrivning
Evaluate the objective and patient-reported visual acceptability of the Phenacite contact lens.
Studietyp
Interventionell
Inskrivning (Faktisk)
25
Fas
- Inte tillämpbar
Kontakter och platser
Det här avsnittet innehåller kontaktuppgifter för dem som genomför studien och information om var denna studie genomförs.
Studieorter
-
-
Indiana
-
Bloomington, Indiana, Förenta staterna, 47405
- Clinical Optics Research Lab (CORL) Indiana University School of Optometry, Indiana University
-
-
Deltagandekriterier
Forskare letar efter personer som passar en viss beskrivning, så kallade behörighetskriterier. Några exempel på dessa kriterier är en persons allmänna hälsotillstånd eller tidigare behandlingar.
Urvalskriterier
Åldrar som är berättigade till studier
18 år till 35 år (Vuxen)
Tar emot friska volontärer
Nej
Kön som är behöriga för studier
Allt
Beskrivning
Inclusion Criteria:
- Oculo-visual examination in the last two years
- Between 18 and 35 years of age and has full legal capacity to volunteer
- Has read and understood the informed consent letter
- Is willing and able to follow instructions and maintain the appointment schedule
- Is correctable to a visual acuity of 20/25 or better (in each eye) with their habitual correction or 20/20 best corrected
- Currently wears, or has previously successfully worn, soft contact lenses between -1.00D and -4.00D
- Spherical Contact Lens Rx between -1.00 and -4.00 and spectacle cylinder ≤-0.75
- Has not worn lenses for at least 12 hours before the initial visit
- Has a subjective response at baseline, which indicates suitability for this study
- Currently spends a minimum of 4 hours a day; 5 days a week on digital devices and can replicate this time during the study period
- Is willing and able to wear the study contact lenses a minimum of 10 hours per day; 5 days a week.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Has never worn contact lenses before
- Any systemic disease affecting ocular health
- Is using any systemic or topical medications that will affect ocular health
- Has known sensitivity to the diagnostic pharmaceuticals or study products used in this study.
- Has any ocular pathology or anomaly that would affect the wearing of the lenses
- Has persistent, clinically significant corneal or conjunctival staining using sodium fluorescein dye
- Is aphakic
- Has anisometropia of >1.00
- Has undergone corneal refractive surgery
- Has strabismus
- Has any ocular amblyopia >= 1line of HC Visual Acuity
- Is participating in any other type of eye related clinical or research study
- Has participated in study CV-14-32.
Studieplan
Det här avsnittet ger detaljer om studieplanen, inklusive hur studien är utformad och vad studien mäter.
Hur är studien utformad?
Designdetaljer
- Primärt syfte: Behandling
- Tilldelning: Randomiserad
- Interventionsmodell: Crossover tilldelning
- Maskning: Dubbel
Vapen och interventioner
Deltagargrupp / Arm |
Intervention / Behandling |
|---|---|
|
Experimentell: Phenacite
Subjects will be randomized to wear the Phenacite contact lenses binocularly.
|
Subjects will be randomized to wear the Phenacite contact lenses binocularly.
Subjects will be randomized to wear the comfilcon A contact lenses binocularly.
|
|
Aktiv komparator: comfilcon A
Subjects will be randomized to wear the comfilcon A contact lenses binocularly.
|
Subjects will be randomized to wear the Phenacite contact lenses binocularly.
Subjects will be randomized to wear the comfilcon A contact lenses binocularly.
|
Vad mäter studien?
Primära resultatmått
Resultatmått |
Åtgärdsbeskrivning |
Tidsram |
|---|---|---|
|
Subjective Ratings of Lens Comfort
Tidsram: Baseline (after 15 minutes of lens dispense)
|
Subjective ratings of lens comfort.
Comfort Scale (0,100; 0=extremely uncomfortable/cannot tolerate; 100 = extremely comfortable/cannot be felt)
|
Baseline (after 15 minutes of lens dispense)
|
|
Subjective Ratings of Lens Comfort
Tidsram: 2 Weeks
|
Subjective ratings of lens comfort.
Comfort Scale (0,100; 0=extremely uncomfortable/cannot tolerate; 100 = extremely comfortable/cannot be felt)
|
2 Weeks
|
|
Over Refraction for Optimized Distance Acuity
Tidsram: 2 weeks
|
Over Refraction for optimized distance acuity measured using logMAR
|
2 weeks
|
|
Binocular Distance Visual Acuity - High Illumination High Contrast
Tidsram: Baseline (after 5 minutes of lens dispense)
|
Binocular Distance Visual Acuity - High Illumination High Contrast was measured using logMAR
|
Baseline (after 5 minutes of lens dispense)
|
|
Binocular Distance Visual Acuity - High Illumination High Contrast
Tidsram: 2 weeks
|
Binocular Distance Visual Acuity - High Illumination High Contrast was measured using logMAR
|
2 weeks
|
|
Binocular Distance Visual Acuity - Low Illumination High Contrast
Tidsram: Baseline (after 5 minutes of lens dispense)
|
Binocular Distance Visual Acuity - Low Illumination High Contrast was measured using logMAR
|
Baseline (after 5 minutes of lens dispense)
|
|
Binocular Distance Visual Acuity - Low Illumination High Contrast
Tidsram: 2 weeks
|
Binocular Distance Visual Acuity - Low Illumination High Contrast was measured using logMAR
|
2 weeks
|
|
Binocular Near Visual Acuity - High Illumination High Contrast
Tidsram: Baseline (after 5 minutes of lens dispense)
|
Binocular Near Visual Acuity - High Illumination High Contrast was measured using logMAR
|
Baseline (after 5 minutes of lens dispense)
|
|
Binocular Near Visual Acuity - High Illumination High Contrast
Tidsram: 2 weeks
|
Binocular Near Visual Acuity - High Illumination High Contrast was measured using logMAR
|
2 weeks
|
|
Binocular Near Visual Acuity - Low Illumination High Contrast
Tidsram: Baseline (after 5 minutes of lens dispense)
|
Binocular Near Visual Acuity - Low Illumination High Contrast was measured using logMAR
|
Baseline (after 5 minutes of lens dispense)
|
|
Binocular Near Visual Acuity - Low Illumination High Contrast
Tidsram: 2 weeks
|
Binocular Near Visual Acuity - Low Illumination High Contrast was measured using logMAR
|
2 weeks
|
Sekundära resultatmått
Resultatmått |
Åtgärdsbeskrivning |
Tidsram |
|---|---|---|
|
Lens Fit - Post Blink Movement
Tidsram: Baseline (after 15 minutes of lens dispense)
|
Investigator assessment of Amount of movement (to the nearest 0.1mm) immediately after the blink (0.1mm steps)
|
Baseline (after 15 minutes of lens dispense)
|
|
Lens Fit - Post Blink Movement
Tidsram: 2 weeks
|
Investigator assessment of Amount of movement (to the nearest 0.1mm) immediately after the blink (0.1mm steps)
|
2 weeks
|
|
Push - Up Test for Lens Tightness
Tidsram: Baseline (after 15 minutes of lens dispense)
|
Investigator assessment using Continuous Scale 0-100% (1% steps): 0%=Falls from cornea without lid support, 50%=Optimum, 100%=No movement
|
Baseline (after 15 minutes of lens dispense)
|
|
Push - Up Test for Lens Tightness
Tidsram: 2 weeks
|
Investigator assessment using Continuous Scale 0-100% (1% steps): 0%=Falls from cornea without lid support, 50%=Optimum, 100%=No movement
|
2 weeks
|
|
Lens Mobility Rating
Tidsram: Baseline (after 15 minutes of lens dispense)
|
Investigator assessment using 5 Categories in 0.50 steps: 0=Immobile - no lag in any versions, 1=Restricted - no lag in some directions but slight lag (0-0.25mm) in others, 2=Secure - slight lag (0.25-0.5mm in each version), 3=Unrestricted - freely lags in a controlled manner on all versions, but not excessive (0.5-1.0mm), 4=Very mobile - excessive lag (>1mm) on versions in all directions in 0.25 steps
|
Baseline (after 15 minutes of lens dispense)
|
|
Lens Mobility Rating
Tidsram: 2 weeks
|
Investigator assessment using 5 Categories in 0.50 steps: 0=Immobile - no lag in any versions, 1=Restricted - no lag in some directions but slight lag (0-0.25mm) in others, 2=Secure - slight lag (0.25-0.5mm in each version), 3=Unrestricted - freely lags in a controlled manner on all versions, but not excessive (0.5-1.0mm), 4=Very mobile - excessive lag (>1mm) on versions in all directions in 0.25 steps
|
2 weeks
|
|
Overall Lens Fit Acceptance
Tidsram: Baseline (after 15 minutes of lens dispense)
|
Investigator assessment using 5 Categories in 0.25 steps: 0=Can't be worn, 1=Poor - should not be dispensed although no immediate danger, 2=Fair, 3=Good, 4=Optimum in 0.25 steps
|
Baseline (after 15 minutes of lens dispense)
|
|
Overall Lens Fit Acceptance
Tidsram: 2 weeks
|
Investigator assessment using 5 Categories in 0.25 steps: 0=Can't be worn, 1=Poor - should not be dispensed although no immediate danger, 2=Fair, 3=Good, 4=Optimum in 0.25 steps
|
2 weeks
|
|
Subjective Ratings for Vision Quality - Distance Vision
Tidsram: Baseline (after 15 minutes of lens dispense)
|
Patient subjective scoring using 0-100 continuous scale for Distance Quality of Vision: 0=extremely poor vision all of the time.
Cannot function; 20= Frequently annoying vision problems; 40=Occasionally annoying vision problems; 60=occasionally noticeable but not annoying vision problems; 80=rarely noticeable vision problems; 100=excellent vision all of the time
|
Baseline (after 15 minutes of lens dispense)
|
|
Subjective Ratings for Vision Quality - Distance Vision
Tidsram: 2 weeks
|
Patient subjective scoring using 0-100 continuous scale for Distance Quality of Vision: 0=extremely poor vision all of the time.
Cannot function; 20= Frequently annoying vision problems; 40=Occasionally annoying vision problems; 60=occasionally noticeable but not annoying vision problems; 80=rarely noticeable vision problems; 100=excellent vision all of the time
|
2 weeks
|
|
Subjective Ratings for Vision Quality - Near Vision
Tidsram: Baseline (after 15 minutes of lens dispense)
|
Patient subjective scoring using 0-100 continuous scale for Near Quality of Vision: 0=extremely poor vision all of the time.
Cannot function; 20= Frequently annoying vision problems; 40=Occasionally annoying vision problems; 60=occasionally noticeable but not annoying vision problems; 80=rarely noticeable vision problems; 100=excellent vision all of the time
|
Baseline (after 15 minutes of lens dispense)
|
|
Subjective Ratings for Vision Quality - Near Vision
Tidsram: 2 weeks
|
Patient subjective scoring using 0-100 continuous scale for Near Quality of Vision: 0=extremely poor vision all of the time.
Cannot function; 20= Frequently annoying vision problems; 40=Occasionally annoying vision problems; 60=occasionally noticeable but not annoying vision problems; 80=rarely noticeable vision problems; 100=excellent vision all of the time
|
2 weeks
|
|
Subjective Ratings for Vision Quality - Computer Vision
Tidsram: Baseline (after 15 minutes of lens dispense)
|
Patient subjective scoring using 0-100 continuous scale for Computer Vision: 0=extremely poor vision all of the time.
Cannot function; 20= Frequently annoying vision problems; 40=Occasionally annoying vision problems; 60=occasionally noticeable but not annoying vision problems; 80=rarely noticeable vision problems; 100=excellent vision all of the time
|
Baseline (after 15 minutes of lens dispense)
|
|
Subjective Ratings for Vision Quality - Computer Vision
Tidsram: 2 weeks
|
Patient subjective scoring using 0-100 continuous scale for Computer Vision: 0=extremely poor vision all of the time.
Cannot function; 20= Frequently annoying vision problems; 40=Occasionally annoying vision problems; 60=occasionally noticeable but not annoying vision problems; 80=rarely noticeable vision problems; 100=excellent vision all of the time
|
2 weeks
|
|
Subjective Ratings for Vision Quality - Overall Vision
Tidsram: Baseline (after 15 minutes of lens dispense)
|
Patient subjective scoring using 0-100 continuous scale for Overall Vision: 0=extremely poor vision all of the time.
Cannot function; 20= Frequently annoying vision problems; 40=Occasionally annoying vision problems; 60=occasionally noticeable but not annoying vision problems; 80=rarely noticeable vision problems; 100=excellent vision all of the time
|
Baseline (after 15 minutes of lens dispense)
|
|
Subjective Ratings for Vision Quality - Overall Vision
Tidsram: 2 weeks
|
Patient subjective scoring using 0-100 continuous scale for Overall Vision: 0=extremely poor vision all of the time.
Cannot function; 20= Frequently annoying vision problems; 40=Occasionally annoying vision problems; 60=occasionally noticeable but not annoying vision problems; 80=rarely noticeable vision problems; 100=excellent vision all of the time
|
2 weeks
|
|
Corneal Staining Extent
Tidsram: 2 weeks
|
Corneal staining extent was assessed on a scale of 0-4 (0-No Staining, 1 - 1-15% of area, 2- 16-30% of area, 3- 31-45% of area, 4- >45% of area
|
2 weeks
|
|
Conjunctival Staining
Tidsram: 2 weeks
|
Conjunctival staining was assessed on a scale of 0-4, 0.50 steps (0-None, 1 - Minimal diffuse punctuate, 2- Coalescent Punctuate, 3- confluent, 4- Deep confluent
|
2 weeks
|
Samarbetspartners och utredare
Det är här du hittar personer och organisationer som är involverade i denna studie.
Sponsor
Utredare
- Huvudutredare: Pete Kollbaun, OD PhD, CORL Indiana University
Studieavstämningsdatum
Dessa datum spårar framstegen för inlämningar av studieposter och sammanfattande resultat till ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieposter och rapporterade resultat granskas av National Library of Medicine (NLM) för att säkerställa att de uppfyller specifika kvalitetskontrollstandarder innan de publiceras på den offentliga webbplatsen.
Studera stora datum
Studiestart
1 april 2015
Primärt slutförande (Faktisk)
1 juli 2015
Avslutad studie (Faktisk)
1 juli 2015
Studieregistreringsdatum
Först inskickad
1 maj 2015
Först inskickad som uppfyllde QC-kriterierna
1 maj 2015
Första postat (Uppskatta)
6 maj 2015
Uppdateringar av studier
Senaste uppdatering publicerad (Faktisk)
18 november 2020
Senaste inskickade uppdateringen som uppfyllde QC-kriterierna
30 oktober 2020
Senast verifierad
1 oktober 2020
Mer information
Termer relaterade till denna studie
Ytterligare relevanta MeSH-villkor
Andra studie-ID-nummer
- CV-15-16
Läkemedels- och apparatinformation, studiedokument
Studerar en amerikansk FDA-reglerad läkemedelsprodukt
Nej
Studerar en amerikansk FDA-reglerad produktprodukt
Ja
Denna information hämtades direkt från webbplatsen clinicaltrials.gov utan några ändringar. Om du har några önskemål om att ändra, ta bort eller uppdatera dina studieuppgifter, vänligen kontakta register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ändring har implementerats på clinicaltrials.gov, kommer denna att uppdateras automatiskt även på vår webbplats .