Denna sida har översatts automatiskt och översättningens korrekthet kan inte garanteras. Vänligen se engelsk version för en källtext.

Application-Enabled Shared Decision-Making

21 april 2021 uppdaterad av: Chia-Wen,Chuang, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

Department of Nursing, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital-Kaohsiung Medical Center,RN, MSN

To develop application-enabled shared decision-making among patients with early breast cancer and evaluate the preliminary effects of the interventions.

Studieöversikt

Status

Avslutad

Intervention / Behandling

Detaljerad beskrivning

Female breast is an amazing organ that it symbolizes not only the female gender, but also the continuity of human race. In the past treating breast cancer may signal a termination of the breast's predestined role in a woman or a mother. Nowadays, surgical treatment of early breast cancer has two options, one is breast-conserving surgery and the other one is total mastectomy. The former treatment option preserves most of the breast tissue but may spare dormant cancer cells in the preserved tissue. The latter treatment option spares no breast tissue and as a result no dormant cancer cells would remain. This treatment dilemma may bother most of the patients especially when they are still under the shade of the bad news. Many women are reluctant to discuss their diseased breasts with their folks or even their doctors because of privacy; instead they would seek information through internet. Unfortunately, most of their final decision is doctor's preferred choice despite they may have doubts or concerns on doctor's choice of treatment.

Share decision making (SDM) is a recently developed strategy that allows patients taking part in their treatment plan. Patients are invited to join the meeting where doctors explain the latest treatment options and patients express their concerns and finally a decision, both doctors' and patients' concerns well integrated, is reached. One of the drawbacks of SDM is too time consuming; doctors have to prepare a lot of pertinent information, while patients have to try their best to understand the provided information, though many patients may not fully understand their treatment options. It has been reported that a well designed patient decision aids (PDAs) could serve as a virtue connection between patients and doctors. Instead of merely taking information from the PDAs, it allows patients to know all the possible options of treatment and the side effects in an interactive way. It is supposed that patients could be well prepared to discuss with their doctors after interaction with the customized PDAs. In Taiwan, decision conflict and decision regret are commonly encountered among most cancer patients. The impetus for developing a PDAs for female breast cancer patients and evaluating its role on lowering decision conflict and decision regret among these patients comes from the high rates of decision conflict and decision regret among cancer patients in Taiwan.

Studietyp

Interventionell

Inskrivning (Faktisk)

31

Fas

  • Inte tillämpbar

Kontakter och platser

Det här avsnittet innehåller kontaktuppgifter för dem som genomför studien och information om var denna studie genomförs.

Studieorter

      • Taipei, Taiwan
        • Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

Deltagandekriterier

Forskare letar efter personer som passar en viss beskrivning, så kallade behörighetskriterier. Några exempel på dessa kriterier är en persons allmänna hälsotillstånd eller tidigare behandlingar.

Urvalskriterier

Åldrar som är berättigade till studier

16 år och äldre (Vuxen, Äldre vuxen)

Tar emot friska volontärer

Nej

Kön som är behöriga för studier

Kvinna

Beskrivning

Inclusion Criteria:

  • women, aged >20 years
  • newly diagnosed early breast cancer (stages 0-II)
  • no surgery yet
  • no metastases
  • tumor size <3 cm

Exclusion Criteria:

•tumor located <2 cm from the nipple

Studieplan

Det här avsnittet ger detaljer om studieplanen, inklusive hur studien är utformad och vad studien mäter.

Hur är studien utformad?

Designdetaljer

  • Primärt syfte: Hälsovårdsforskning
  • Tilldelning: Randomiserad
  • Interventionsmodell: Parallellt uppdrag
  • Maskning: Enda

Vapen och interventioner

Deltagargrupp / Arm
Intervention / Behandling
Experimentell: shared decision-making group (SDMG)
Receiving mobile application( BC-SDM)
The mobile application (BC-SDM)includes four functions to support SDM activity: "Understanding breast cancer," "Surgical approach," "Choose the right breast cancer knowledge," and "Let's make a decision for myself". Patients first read the information in "Understanding breast cancer" and "Surgical approach" to receive a tailored education in breast cancer
Inget ingripande: usual care group (UCG)
Receiving material health education

Vad mäter studien?

Primära resultatmått

Resultatmått
Åtgärdsbeskrivning
Tidsram
knowledge tests
Tidsram: immediately after the intervention
The knowledge tests included five items,1. Are the survival rates of breast cancer the same with conserving surgery and total mastectomy? 2. Breast-conserving surgery has a higher local-regional recurrence rate? 3. Is radiation therapy required for Breast-conserving surgery? 4. Does total mastectomy require longer recovery time? 5. Do both total mastectomy and breast-conserving surgery have the same bleeding and infection rate? The knowledge tests included five items, such as "Are the survival rates of breast cancer the same with conserving surgery and total mastectomy?" The correct answer was coded as one point. The scores of the knowledge tests ranged from zero to five points. Higher scores indicated more correct knowledge.
immediately after the intervention
decision conflict-sure
Tidsram: immediately after the intervention
The Decision Conflict Scale (DCS_SURE) included four items: uncertainty, information, values clarity, and support and effective decision. On the scale, "Yes" answers scored one point, while "No" responses were zero points. The higher score, the lesser conflict.
immediately after the intervention
Decision Regret Scale DRS
Tidsram: immediately after the intervention
The Decision Regret Scale was composed of five items: "It was the right decision," "I regret the choice that was made," "I would go for the same choices if I had to do it over again," "The choices did me a lot of harm," and "The decision was a wise one." Items were scored using a five-point Likert scale, ranging from very agreed (1 point) to very disagreed (5 points), but two items were reversely scored. The higher score, the more regret.
immediately after the intervention

Samarbetspartners och utredare

Det är här du hittar personer och organisationer som är involverade i denna studie.

Studieavstämningsdatum

Dessa datum spårar framstegen för inlämningar av studieposter och sammanfattande resultat till ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieposter och rapporterade resultat granskas av National Library of Medicine (NLM) för att säkerställa att de uppfyller specifika kvalitetskontrollstandarder innan de publiceras på den offentliga webbplatsen.

Studera stora datum

Studiestart (Faktisk)

1 augusti 2019

Primärt slutförande (Faktisk)

31 juli 2020

Avslutad studie (Faktisk)

31 juli 2020

Studieregistreringsdatum

Först inskickad

16 april 2021

Först inskickad som uppfyllde QC-kriterierna

21 april 2021

Första postat (Faktisk)

26 april 2021

Uppdateringar av studier

Senaste uppdatering publicerad (Faktisk)

26 april 2021

Senaste inskickade uppdateringen som uppfyllde QC-kriterierna

21 april 2021

Senast verifierad

1 april 2021

Mer information

Termer relaterade till denna studie

Plan för individuella deltagardata (IPD)

Planerar du att dela individuella deltagardata (IPD)?

Nej

Läkemedels- och apparatinformation, studiedokument

Studerar en amerikansk FDA-reglerad läkemedelsprodukt

Nej

Studerar en amerikansk FDA-reglerad produktprodukt

Nej

Denna information hämtades direkt från webbplatsen clinicaltrials.gov utan några ändringar. Om du har några önskemål om att ändra, ta bort eller uppdatera dina studieuppgifter, vänligen kontakta register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ändring har implementerats på clinicaltrials.gov, kommer denna att uppdateras automatiskt även på vår webbplats .

Prenumerera