Denna sida har översatts automatiskt och översättningens korrekthet kan inte garanteras. Vänligen se engelsk version för en källtext.

Efficacy and Safety of Flexible Ureteroscopy With Flexible Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath Versus Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy With Vacuum-Assisted Access Sheath

10 augusti 2026 uppdaterad av: Mohamed Ramadan, Ain Shams University

A Comparative Study on the Efficacy and Safety of Flexible Ureteroscopy With Flexible Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath Versus Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy With Vacuum-Assisted Access Sheath for the Management of Renal Stones 1- 2.5 cm in Pediatric Age Group

Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PCNL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) are both effective treatment modalities for renal calculi measuring up to 2.5 cm in pediatric patients, demonstrating similar efficacy and complication profiles.

Suction has emerged as a potentially transformative adjunct in both percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and RIRS. Recent studies evaluating various suction mechanisms during RIRS and mini-PCNL have demonstrated multiple benefits, including reduced operative time, higher stone-free rates (SFR), decreased intrarenal pressure (IRP) and temperature, as well as enhanced intraoperative visualization.

Both FANS-UAS in RIRS and VAAS in Mini-PCNL have shown promising outcomes in the pediatric population. Taken together, these findings suggest that suction-assisted technologies whether in RIRS or Mini-PCNL enhance both efficacy and safety in pediatric stone management.

Studieöversikt

Status

Rekrytering

Betingelser

Intervention / Behandling

Detaljerad beskrivning

In children, renal stones commonly result from congenital anatomical defects, metabolic abnormalities, or recurrent urinary tract infections. Consequently, urolithiasis is more frequent in this age group and often requires more than one surgical intervention for complete management.

Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PCNL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) are both effective treatment modalities for renal calculi measuring up to 2.5 cm in pediatric patients, demonstrating similar efficacy and complication profiles .

Currently, the majority of pediatric renal stones can be managed effectively using shock wave lithotripsy (SWL), retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS), or percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Surgical interventions such as open, laparoscopic, or robotic surgery are reserved for a minority of cases involving anatomical abnormalities. As spontaneous passage of residual fragments occurs in only 20-25% of cases, achieving complete stone clearance is essential to minimize the risk of recurrence and additional interventions.

Technological advancements in endourological instrumentation have primarily aimed at minimizing procedure-related morbidity, including blood loss, postoperative pain, and renal injury. Consequently, miniaturized endoscopes and reduced-caliber access tracts (11-20 Fr) were developed, leading to the emergence of Mini-PCNL techniques specifically adapted for the management of large renal stones in pediatric patients.

The use of retrograde surgical approaches has expanded the capability to treat larger renal stones, despite often resulting in extended operative times. Due to its favorable safety profile and reduced complication rates, RIRS has gained acceptance as a preferred option for managing larger stones in pediatric patients.

For stones larger than 20 mm, RIRS monotherapy is associated with lower stone-free rate (SFR) compared to Mini-PCNL. However, RIRS offers advantages including reduced radiation exposure, fewer complications, and shorter hospital stay.

The Mini-PCNL and RIRS provide comparable efficacy and complication rates in the treatment of pediatric renal stones up to 2.5 cm. Furthermore, the study found that RIRS was associated with significantly shorter hospital stays, reduced radiation exposure, and decreased fluoroscopy time compared to Mini-PCNL.

Suction has been utilized in endourology for over 25 years, primarily in conjunction with ultrasound and ballistic lithotripsy devices, and more recently through the use of suction sheaths during PCNL. Intraoperative suction has been introduced as an effective method to remove residual fragments (RFs), thereby reducing the need for manual extraction with baskets.

Suction has also been employed in RIRS, providing multiple advantages including improved stone fragmentation and dusting, enhanced removal of debris and fragments, reduction of intra-renal temperature and pressure, as well as better intraoperative visualization.

In a prospective multicenter trial, Gauhar et al. demonstrated that the flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath (FANS-UAS) is safe and effective for use in pediatric RIRS, yielding high stone-free rates with low complication rates. This supports its emerging role as a valuable innovation in pediatric endourological procedures.

The initial experience using a semi-closed-circuit vacuum-assisted mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (Mini-PCNL) system in pediatric patients, achieving an 80% stone-free rate with no intraoperative complications and only minor postoperative events. This technique, which integrates continuous irrigation inflow with suction-controlled outflow, was found to be a safe and effective option for managing complex renal stones in children while maintaining acceptable operative times.

Studietyp

Interventionell

Inskrivning (Beräknad)

72

Fas

  • Inte tillämpbar

Kontakter och platser

Det här avsnittet innehåller kontaktuppgifter för dem som genomför studien och information om var denna studie genomförs.

Studiekontakt

Studera Kontakt Backup

Studieorter

Deltagandekriterier

Forskare letar efter personer som passar en viss beskrivning, så kallade behörighetskriterier. Några exempel på dessa kriterier är en persons allmänna hälsotillstånd eller tidigare behandlingar.

Urvalskriterier

Åldrar som är berättigade till studier

  • Barn

Tar emot friska volontärer

Nej

Beskrivning

Inclusion Criteria:

- Renal stone burden 1- 2.5 cm confirmed by imaging (CT or ultrasound).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who refuse to participate in the study.
  • Untreated Urinary tract infection (UTI) proved by urine culture and sensitivity.
  • Uncorrected coagulopathy.
  • Anatomical anomalies or ureteral stricture precluding either surgical approach.
  • Previous surgical intervention on the same kidney.

Studieplan

Det här avsnittet ger detaljer om studieplanen, inklusive hur studien är utformad och vad studien mäter.

Hur är studien utformad?

Designdetaljer

  • Primärt syfte: Behandling
  • Tilldelning: Randomiserad
  • Interventionsmodell: Parallellt uppdrag
  • Maskning: Ingen (Open Label)

Vapen och interventioner

Deltagargrupp / Arm
Intervention / Behandling
Aktiv komparator: Group A(Flexible Ureteroscopy with Flexible Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath )
About 36 pediatric patients suffering from Renal Stones 1- 2.5 cm will be treated by Flexible Ureteroscopy with Flexible Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath
To compare the efficacy and safety of flexible ureteroscopy using a flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath (FANS-UAS) versus mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (Mini-PCNL) using a vacuum-assisted access sheath (VAAS) in the management of pediatric renal stones 1-2.5 cm
Andra namn:
  • Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
Aktiv komparator: Group B(Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy with Vacuum-Assisted Access Sheath )
About 36 pediatric patients suffering from Renal Stones 1- 2.5 cm will be treated by Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy with Vacuum-Assisted Access Sheath
To compare the efficacy and safety of flexible ureteroscopy using a flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath (FANS-UAS) versus mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (Mini-PCNL) using a vacuum-assisted access sheath (VAAS) in the management of pediatric renal stones 1-2.5 cm
Andra namn:
  • Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy

Vad mäter studien?

Primära resultatmått

Resultatmått
Åtgärdsbeskrivning
Tidsram
Management of pediatric renal stones
Tidsram: 6 months
To compare stone-free rate (SFR) at 1 month after the procedure between RIRS using FURS-UAS and mini-PCNL using VASS in pediatric patients with renal stones 1-2.5 cm
6 months

Samarbetspartners och utredare

Det är här du hittar personer och organisationer som är involverade i denna studie.

Utredare

  • Studiestol: Youssef Mahmoud kotb, Professor, Urology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University

Studieavstämningsdatum

Dessa datum spårar framstegen för inlämningar av studieposter och sammanfattande resultat till ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieposter och rapporterade resultat granskas av National Library of Medicine (NLM) för att säkerställa att de uppfyller specifika kvalitetskontrollstandarder innan de publiceras på den offentliga webbplatsen.

Studera stora datum

Studiestart (Faktisk)

1 juni 2026

Primärt slutförande (Beräknad)

1 juni 2027

Avslutad studie (Beräknad)

10 juni 2027

Studieregistreringsdatum

Först inskickad

9 augusti 2026

Först inskickad som uppfyllde QC-kriterierna

10 augusti 2026

Första postat (Faktisk)

13 augusti 2026

Uppdateringar av studier

Senaste uppdatering publicerad (Faktisk)

13 augusti 2026

Senaste inskickade uppdateringen som uppfyllde QC-kriterierna

10 augusti 2026

Senast verifierad

1 juni 2026

Mer information

Termer relaterade till denna studie

Andra studie-ID-nummer

  • Management of Renal Stones

Läkemedels- och apparatinformation, studiedokument

Studerar en amerikansk FDA-reglerad läkemedelsprodukt

Nej

Studerar en amerikansk FDA-reglerad produktprodukt

Nej

Denna information hämtades direkt från webbplatsen clinicaltrials.gov utan några ändringar. Om du har några önskemål om att ändra, ta bort eller uppdatera dina studieuppgifter, vänligen kontakta register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ändring har implementerats på clinicaltrials.gov, kommer denna att uppdateras automatiskt även på vår webbplats .

Prenumerera