此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

Compare the Efficacy of Cinacalcet vs Traditional Vitamin D for Secondary Hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) Among Subjects Undergoing Hemodialysis

2018年9月20日 更新者:Amgen

A Multicenter, Randomized, Open Label Study to Compare the Efficacy of Cinacalcet Versus Traditional Vitamin D Therapy for Management of Secondary Hyperparathyroidism Among Subjects Undergoing Hemodialysis

The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy of treatment with cinacalcet to manage plasma parathyroid levels as to compared traditional vitamin D therapy, whether given orally or intravenously, among hemodialysis subjects with secondary hyperparathyroidism when the doses are adjusted appropriately to maintain serum calcium and phosphorous levels with currently recommended ranges.

研究概览

研究类型

介入性

注册 (实际的)

312

阶段

  • 第四阶段

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

18年 及以上 (成人、年长者)

接受健康志愿者

不

有资格学习的性别

全部

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years at screening
  • Treated with maintenance hemodialysis 3 times a week for ≥ 3 months prior to screening
  • Informed consent provided by the study candidate
  • For subjects NOT receiving cinacalcet and/or vitamin D therapy for SHPT within 60 days prior to enrollment: Plasma PTH levels ≥ 450 pg/mL (50 pmol/L) during screening, as obtained from the central laboratory and, Serum corrected total calcium ≥ 8.4 mg/dL (2.1 mmol/L) and < 10.2 mg/dL (2.55 mmol/L) during screening, as obtained from the central laboratory

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Parathyroidectomy in the 12 weeks before the date of informed consent
  • History of seizure within 12 weeks prior to randomization
  • Scheduled for kidney transplant
  • Parathyroidectomy anticipated within the next 6 months
  • Liver function tests > than 2 x the Upper Limit of Normal
  • Prior use of bisphosphonates, or expected to receive bisphosphonates during the trial
  • Subject has previously enrolled in this study
  • General
  • Other investigational procedures are excluded
  • Currently enrolled in another investigational device or drug study, or less than 30 days since ending another investigational device or drug study(s), or receiving other investigational agent(s)
  • Subject (male or female) is not willing to use highly effective contraception during treatment and for at least one month (women) and 3 months (men) after the end of treatment
  • Subject is pregnant or breast feeding, or planning to become pregnant during study or within 1 month after the end of treatment Male subject with a pregnant partner who is not willing to use a condom during treatment and for at least 1 month after the end of treatment
  • Subject has known sensitivity or intolerance to any of the protocol required therapies
  • Subject will not be available for protocol-required study visits, to the best of the subject and investigator's knowledge
  • Subject has any kind of disorder that, in the opinion of the investigator, may compromise the ability of the subject to give written informed consent and/or to comply with all required study procedures

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

  • 主要用途:治疗
  • 分配:随机化
  • 介入模型:并行分配
  • 屏蔽:无(打开标签)

武器和干预

参与者组/臂
干预/治疗
实验性的:西那卡塞
Subjects randomized to treatment with cinacalcet will receive an initial oral dose of 30 mg once daily. Doses will be titrated incrementally to 60, 90,120, and 180 mg per day based upon periodic measurements of serum calcium and plasma PTH levels. Cinacalcet is formulated as light green tablets in 30, 60, and 90 mg free-based equivalents. Tablets will be 30, 60, and 90 mg, graduated in size, smallest to largest. Combinations of these 3 fixed dosage formulations will be used to achieve the 120 and 180 mg daily doses.
有源比较器:Traditional Vitamin D Therapy
Traditional vitamin D therapy (eg, calcitriol, paricalcitol, alfacalcidol, doxercalciferol), to manage secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) in this study will be administered according to strategies that have been used in clinical practice and that conform to current therapeutic recommendations and available clinical practice guidelines and product labeling.

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Percent Change From Baseline in Mean PTH During Efficacy Assessment Phase (EAP)
大体时间:Baseline to week 40-52
Mean PTH during EAP is defined as the mean of values at study weeks 40, 44, 48 and 52
Baseline to week 40-52

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Treatment Comparison of >=30% Reduction From Baseline in Mean PTH During the Efficacy Assessment Phase (EAP)
大体时间:Baseline to week 40-52
Number of participants achieving a >=30% Reduction From Baseline in Mean PTH During Efficacy Assessment Phase (EAP)
Baseline to week 40-52
Treatment Comparison of Plasma PTH < 300 pg/mL During Efficacy Assessment Phase (EAP)
大体时间:week 40-52
Number of participants achieving Plasma PTH < 300 pg/mL During Efficacy Assessment Phase (EAP)
week 40-52

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

赞助

出版物和有用的链接

负责输入研究信息的人员自愿提供这些出版物。这些可能与研究有关。

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始 (实际的)

2010年10月1日

初级完成 (实际的)

2012年7月17日

研究完成 (实际的)

2012年8月14日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2010年8月12日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2010年8月12日

首次发布 (估计)

2010年8月13日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2018年10月17日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2018年9月20日

最后验证

2018年9月1日

更多信息

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

订阅