此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

Evaluation of the Efficiency of Word Prediction Software to Text Input Speed for Tetraplegia (Smartwrite)

2018年9月4日 更新者:Pouplin Samuel、Centre d'Investigation Clinique et Technologique 805

Phase 1 Evaluation of the Influence of Settings of Word Prediction Software (Phase 1)and the Efficiency of Rehabilitation Programm (Phase 2)to Text Input Speed for People With Spinal Cord Injury

Computers now play an important role in the lives of most individuals.Access to computers is crucial for people with disabilities and may improve their quality of life. The use of computers can facilitate mainstreaming at school, for example, and the Internet may provide a valuable means of communication. However, the use of computers requires a certain degree of motor ability. People with motor disabilities frequently experience difficulties using a standard keyboard and standard pointing input systems such as a mouse. Many solutions exist to facilitate computer access, depending on the person's specific impairments and the purpose for which the computer is used. The most common solution relies on the use of a virtual keyboard which is directly displayed on the computer screen. The selection of the desired key on the virtual keyboard can be handled by a large variety of input devices, from a microgravity mouse to single switch devices supplemented by a process of dynamic scanning of the keyboard.Although such assistive devices render computers accessible to people with disabilities, the actual inputting of text can be very slow. A method to increase text input speed is to display words which are predicted from the letters previously typed. Word prediction reduces the number of necessary key strokes by avoiding having to type the whole word. The effect on text input speed is, however uncertain and results in the literature are inconclusive. Indeed, word prediction software provide a enhancement of cognitive load which decrease text input speed.The reduction of cognitive load could therefore be based in part on the optimization settings of the software and / or achievement of a rehabilitation program.Our hypothesis are for people with spinal cord injury : i) optimization settings word prediction software and ii) a rehabilitation program could improve the text input speed.The investigators propose to study the influence of settings word prediction software on text input speed and the influence of a rehabilitation program provided by a therapist, focused on word prediction software to help integrate them. The aim is to increase the performance of people with spinal cord injury and their satisfaction.

The first phase of this research is to select the word prediction software and configuration that provides the best user support.The second phase corresponds to the objective of evaluating the efficiency of a rehabilitation program .

研究概览

详细说明

PHASE 1 : The first phase studied the repeated measurement of the efficiency of typing text topics in various situations. Each subject will copy a text different in each test and in a random order. Similarly, if the word prediction software has a capacity for self-improvement the internal dictionary, it will be disabled.

the investigators will study one setting of the configuration word prediction software. Are available the length of the list of proposals for which three options are selected: 1, 3 or 5 words, according to the literature and to the results of a questionnaire.This questionnaire was sent to identify the use of people with spinal cord injury and professionals about word prediction software.

The list of words is in the upper position of the screen based on the results of the questionnaire.

Four combinations will be tested on each subject. Twelve Tetraplegics will be required in each group (one group using a virtual keyboard and one group using the physical keyboard) Each combination will be tried for 10 minutes.

PHASE 2 :

The second phase will evaluate the effeciency of a rehabilitation program reduced cognitive load generated by the software predictions words.

The investigators propose an evaluation of the effects of 12 training sessions in a controlled, randomized, three parallel groups (experimental group : rehabilitation program, a group : a self-learning and a group : no learning).

Text input tests will be performed before and after the training sessions for people who have rehabilitation program. For the other two groups, those will be reviewed one month after the first test.

For this evaluation, a different text but with the same difficulty will be used. The order of execution will be randomized.

At the end of the month the three groups will be evaluated according to the same procedures for the firts test.

研究类型

介入性

注册 (实际的)

42

阶段

  • 不适用

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习地点

      • Garches、法国、92380
        • Hôpital Raymond Poincaré

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

18年 至 70年 (成人、年长者)

接受健康志愿者

是的

有资格学习的性别

全部

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Tetraplegia (between C4 and C8 ASIA) more than 6 months.
  • Can read and write
  • No visual problems preventing the use of computers.
  • Recipient of a Health Insurance Plan
  • Having read information note.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Moving in progress or predictable

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

  • 主要用途:治疗
  • 分配:随机化
  • 介入模型:并行分配
  • 屏蔽:单身的

武器和干预

参与者组/臂
干预/治疗
实验性的:Rehabilitation Group
People with spinal cord injury who have a rehabilitation program on a word prediction software with an occupational therapist.

Rehabilitation program with an occupational therpasit

3 training sessions (one hour) per week for a month (12 sessions)

有源比较器:Self Training at Home Group
People with spinal cord injury who don't have a rehabilitation program with an occupational therapist but who have instructions for learning at home on a word prediction software
Only instructions for a self - training at home
无干预:No treatment Group
People with spinal cord injury who don't have instructions, rehabilitation programm on word prediction software. They have no treatment.

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Change from Text Input Speed at 1 month
大体时间:Phase 1 After every test (10 minutes) Phase 2 : 1 months
text input speed (characters/minute)
Phase 1 After every test (10 minutes) Phase 2 : 1 months

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Change from Errors at 1 month
大体时间:Phase 1 After every test (10 minutes) Phase 2 : 1 month
We record errors in text entry test
Phase 1 After every test (10 minutes) Phase 2 : 1 month
Change from Prediction use at 1 month
大体时间:Phase after every test (10 minutes) Phase 2 : 1 month
Number of use of word prediction software
Phase after every test (10 minutes) Phase 2 : 1 month
Change from Satisfaction
大体时间:Phase 1 After every test (10 minutes) Phase 2 : 1 month
Satisfaction of people with spinal cord injury about word prediction software (visual analogue scale)
Phase 1 After every test (10 minutes) Phase 2 : 1 month
Change from Cognitive load at 1 month
大体时间:Phase 1 After every test (10 minutes) Phase 2 : 1 month
Cognitive load of people with spinal cord injury (visual analogue scale)
Phase 1 After every test (10 minutes) Phase 2 : 1 month
Change from Speed sensation at 1 month
大体时间:Phase 1 After every test (10 minutes) Phase 2 : 1 month
speed sensation of people with spinal cord injury with word prediction software (visual analogue scale)
Phase 1 After every test (10 minutes) Phase 2 : 1 month

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

调查人员

  • 研究主任:Djamel Bensmail, MDPHD、Hôpital Raymond Poincaré

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始

2013年9月1日

初级完成 (实际的)

2015年9月1日

研究完成 (实际的)

2017年7月1日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2013年9月17日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2013年9月26日

首次发布 (估计)

2013年10月1日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2018年9月6日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2018年9月4日

最后验证

2018年9月1日

更多信息

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

订阅