Esta página foi traduzida automaticamente e a precisão da tradução não é garantida. Por favor, consulte o versão em inglês para um texto fonte.

Evaluation of the Efficiency of Word Prediction Software to Text Input Speed for Tetraplegia (Smartwrite)

4 de setembro de 2018 atualizado por: Pouplin Samuel, Centre d'Investigation Clinique et Technologique 805

Phase 1 Evaluation of the Influence of Settings of Word Prediction Software (Phase 1)and the Efficiency of Rehabilitation Programm (Phase 2)to Text Input Speed for People With Spinal Cord Injury

Computers now play an important role in the lives of most individuals.Access to computers is crucial for people with disabilities and may improve their quality of life. The use of computers can facilitate mainstreaming at school, for example, and the Internet may provide a valuable means of communication. However, the use of computers requires a certain degree of motor ability. People with motor disabilities frequently experience difficulties using a standard keyboard and standard pointing input systems such as a mouse. Many solutions exist to facilitate computer access, depending on the person's specific impairments and the purpose for which the computer is used. The most common solution relies on the use of a virtual keyboard which is directly displayed on the computer screen. The selection of the desired key on the virtual keyboard can be handled by a large variety of input devices, from a microgravity mouse to single switch devices supplemented by a process of dynamic scanning of the keyboard.Although such assistive devices render computers accessible to people with disabilities, the actual inputting of text can be very slow. A method to increase text input speed is to display words which are predicted from the letters previously typed. Word prediction reduces the number of necessary key strokes by avoiding having to type the whole word. The effect on text input speed is, however uncertain and results in the literature are inconclusive. Indeed, word prediction software provide a enhancement of cognitive load which decrease text input speed.The reduction of cognitive load could therefore be based in part on the optimization settings of the software and / or achievement of a rehabilitation program.Our hypothesis are for people with spinal cord injury : i) optimization settings word prediction software and ii) a rehabilitation program could improve the text input speed.The investigators propose to study the influence of settings word prediction software on text input speed and the influence of a rehabilitation program provided by a therapist, focused on word prediction software to help integrate them. The aim is to increase the performance of people with spinal cord injury and their satisfaction.

The first phase of this research is to select the word prediction software and configuration that provides the best user support.The second phase corresponds to the objective of evaluating the efficiency of a rehabilitation program .

Visão geral do estudo

Descrição detalhada

PHASE 1 : The first phase studied the repeated measurement of the efficiency of typing text topics in various situations. Each subject will copy a text different in each test and in a random order. Similarly, if the word prediction software has a capacity for self-improvement the internal dictionary, it will be disabled.

the investigators will study one setting of the configuration word prediction software. Are available the length of the list of proposals for which three options are selected: 1, 3 or 5 words, according to the literature and to the results of a questionnaire.This questionnaire was sent to identify the use of people with spinal cord injury and professionals about word prediction software.

The list of words is in the upper position of the screen based on the results of the questionnaire.

Four combinations will be tested on each subject. Twelve Tetraplegics will be required in each group (one group using a virtual keyboard and one group using the physical keyboard) Each combination will be tried for 10 minutes.

PHASE 2 :

The second phase will evaluate the effeciency of a rehabilitation program reduced cognitive load generated by the software predictions words.

The investigators propose an evaluation of the effects of 12 training sessions in a controlled, randomized, three parallel groups (experimental group : rehabilitation program, a group : a self-learning and a group : no learning).

Text input tests will be performed before and after the training sessions for people who have rehabilitation program. For the other two groups, those will be reviewed one month after the first test.

For this evaluation, a different text but with the same difficulty will be used. The order of execution will be randomized.

At the end of the month the three groups will be evaluated according to the same procedures for the firts test.

Tipo de estudo

Intervencional

Inscrição (Real)

42

Estágio

  • Não aplicável

Contactos e Locais

Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.

Locais de estudo

      • Garches, França, 92380
        • Hôpital Raymond Poincaré

Critérios de participação

Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.

Critérios de elegibilidade

Idades elegíveis para estudo

18 anos a 70 anos (Adulto, Adulto mais velho)

Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis

Sim

Gêneros Elegíveis para o Estudo

Tudo

Descrição

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Tetraplegia (between C4 and C8 ASIA) more than 6 months.
  • Can read and write
  • No visual problems preventing the use of computers.
  • Recipient of a Health Insurance Plan
  • Having read information note.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Moving in progress or predictable

Plano de estudo

Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.

Como o estudo é projetado?

Detalhes do projeto

  • Finalidade Principal: Tratamento
  • Alocação: Randomizado
  • Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição Paralela
  • Mascaramento: Solteiro

Armas e Intervenções

Grupo de Participantes / Braço
Intervenção / Tratamento
Experimental: Rehabilitation Group
People with spinal cord injury who have a rehabilitation program on a word prediction software with an occupational therapist.

Rehabilitation program with an occupational therpasit

3 training sessions (one hour) per week for a month (12 sessions)

Comparador Ativo: Self Training at Home Group
People with spinal cord injury who don't have a rehabilitation program with an occupational therapist but who have instructions for learning at home on a word prediction software
Only instructions for a self - training at home
Sem intervenção: No treatment Group
People with spinal cord injury who don't have instructions, rehabilitation programm on word prediction software. They have no treatment.

O que o estudo está medindo?

Medidas de resultados primários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Change from Text Input Speed at 1 month
Prazo: Phase 1 After every test (10 minutes) Phase 2 : 1 months
text input speed (characters/minute)
Phase 1 After every test (10 minutes) Phase 2 : 1 months

Medidas de resultados secundários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Change from Errors at 1 month
Prazo: Phase 1 After every test (10 minutes) Phase 2 : 1 month
We record errors in text entry test
Phase 1 After every test (10 minutes) Phase 2 : 1 month
Change from Prediction use at 1 month
Prazo: Phase after every test (10 minutes) Phase 2 : 1 month
Number of use of word prediction software
Phase after every test (10 minutes) Phase 2 : 1 month
Change from Satisfaction
Prazo: Phase 1 After every test (10 minutes) Phase 2 : 1 month
Satisfaction of people with spinal cord injury about word prediction software (visual analogue scale)
Phase 1 After every test (10 minutes) Phase 2 : 1 month
Change from Cognitive load at 1 month
Prazo: Phase 1 After every test (10 minutes) Phase 2 : 1 month
Cognitive load of people with spinal cord injury (visual analogue scale)
Phase 1 After every test (10 minutes) Phase 2 : 1 month
Change from Speed sensation at 1 month
Prazo: Phase 1 After every test (10 minutes) Phase 2 : 1 month
speed sensation of people with spinal cord injury with word prediction software (visual analogue scale)
Phase 1 After every test (10 minutes) Phase 2 : 1 month

Colaboradores e Investigadores

É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.

Investigadores

  • Diretor de estudo: Djamel Bensmail, MDPHD, Hôpital Raymond Poincaré

Datas de registro do estudo

Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados ​​pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.

Datas Principais do Estudo

Início do estudo

1 de setembro de 2013

Conclusão Primária (Real)

1 de setembro de 2015

Conclusão do estudo (Real)

1 de julho de 2017

Datas de inscrição no estudo

Enviado pela primeira vez

17 de setembro de 2013

Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ

26 de setembro de 2013

Primeira postagem (Estimativa)

1 de outubro de 2013

Atualizações de registro de estudo

Última Atualização Postada (Real)

6 de setembro de 2018

Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade

4 de setembro de 2018

Última verificação

1 de setembro de 2018

Mais Informações

Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .

Se inscrever