Denne siden ble automatisk oversatt og nøyaktigheten av oversettelsen er ikke garantert. Vennligst referer til engelsk versjon for en kildetekst.

Evaluation of the Efficiency of Word Prediction Software to Text Input Speed for Tetraplegia (Smartwrite)

4. september 2018 oppdatert av: Pouplin Samuel, Centre d'Investigation Clinique et Technologique 805

Phase 1 Evaluation of the Influence of Settings of Word Prediction Software (Phase 1)and the Efficiency of Rehabilitation Programm (Phase 2)to Text Input Speed for People With Spinal Cord Injury

Computers now play an important role in the lives of most individuals.Access to computers is crucial for people with disabilities and may improve their quality of life. The use of computers can facilitate mainstreaming at school, for example, and the Internet may provide a valuable means of communication. However, the use of computers requires a certain degree of motor ability. People with motor disabilities frequently experience difficulties using a standard keyboard and standard pointing input systems such as a mouse. Many solutions exist to facilitate computer access, depending on the person's specific impairments and the purpose for which the computer is used. The most common solution relies on the use of a virtual keyboard which is directly displayed on the computer screen. The selection of the desired key on the virtual keyboard can be handled by a large variety of input devices, from a microgravity mouse to single switch devices supplemented by a process of dynamic scanning of the keyboard.Although such assistive devices render computers accessible to people with disabilities, the actual inputting of text can be very slow. A method to increase text input speed is to display words which are predicted from the letters previously typed. Word prediction reduces the number of necessary key strokes by avoiding having to type the whole word. The effect on text input speed is, however uncertain and results in the literature are inconclusive. Indeed, word prediction software provide a enhancement of cognitive load which decrease text input speed.The reduction of cognitive load could therefore be based in part on the optimization settings of the software and / or achievement of a rehabilitation program.Our hypothesis are for people with spinal cord injury : i) optimization settings word prediction software and ii) a rehabilitation program could improve the text input speed.The investigators propose to study the influence of settings word prediction software on text input speed and the influence of a rehabilitation program provided by a therapist, focused on word prediction software to help integrate them. The aim is to increase the performance of people with spinal cord injury and their satisfaction.

The first phase of this research is to select the word prediction software and configuration that provides the best user support.The second phase corresponds to the objective of evaluating the efficiency of a rehabilitation program .

Studieoversikt

Detaljert beskrivelse

PHASE 1 : The first phase studied the repeated measurement of the efficiency of typing text topics in various situations. Each subject will copy a text different in each test and in a random order. Similarly, if the word prediction software has a capacity for self-improvement the internal dictionary, it will be disabled.

the investigators will study one setting of the configuration word prediction software. Are available the length of the list of proposals for which three options are selected: 1, 3 or 5 words, according to the literature and to the results of a questionnaire.This questionnaire was sent to identify the use of people with spinal cord injury and professionals about word prediction software.

The list of words is in the upper position of the screen based on the results of the questionnaire.

Four combinations will be tested on each subject. Twelve Tetraplegics will be required in each group (one group using a virtual keyboard and one group using the physical keyboard) Each combination will be tried for 10 minutes.

PHASE 2 :

The second phase will evaluate the effeciency of a rehabilitation program reduced cognitive load generated by the software predictions words.

The investigators propose an evaluation of the effects of 12 training sessions in a controlled, randomized, three parallel groups (experimental group : rehabilitation program, a group : a self-learning and a group : no learning).

Text input tests will be performed before and after the training sessions for people who have rehabilitation program. For the other two groups, those will be reviewed one month after the first test.

For this evaluation, a different text but with the same difficulty will be used. The order of execution will be randomized.

At the end of the month the three groups will be evaluated according to the same procedures for the firts test.

Studietype

Intervensjonell

Registrering (Faktiske)

42

Fase

  • Ikke aktuelt

Kontakter og plasseringer

Denne delen inneholder kontaktinformasjon for de som utfører studien, og informasjon om hvor denne studien blir utført.

Studiesteder

      • Garches, Frankrike, 92380
        • Hôpital Raymond Poincaré

Deltakelseskriterier

Forskere ser etter personer som passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kalt kvalifikasjonskriterier. Noen eksempler på disse kriteriene er en persons generelle helsetilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Kvalifikasjonskriterier

Alder som er kvalifisert for studier

18 år til 70 år (Voksen, Eldre voksen)

Tar imot friske frivillige

Ja

Kjønn som er kvalifisert for studier

Alle

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Tetraplegia (between C4 and C8 ASIA) more than 6 months.
  • Can read and write
  • No visual problems preventing the use of computers.
  • Recipient of a Health Insurance Plan
  • Having read information note.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Moving in progress or predictable

Studieplan

Denne delen gir detaljer om studieplanen, inkludert hvordan studien er utformet og hva studien måler.

Hvordan er studiet utformet?

Designdetaljer

  • Primært formål: Behandling
  • Tildeling: Randomisert
  • Intervensjonsmodell: Parallell tildeling
  • Masking: Enkelt

Våpen og intervensjoner

Deltakergruppe / Arm
Intervensjon / Behandling
Eksperimentell: Rehabilitation Group
People with spinal cord injury who have a rehabilitation program on a word prediction software with an occupational therapist.

Rehabilitation program with an occupational therpasit

3 training sessions (one hour) per week for a month (12 sessions)

Aktiv komparator: Self Training at Home Group
People with spinal cord injury who don't have a rehabilitation program with an occupational therapist but who have instructions for learning at home on a word prediction software
Only instructions for a self - training at home
Ingen inngripen: No treatment Group
People with spinal cord injury who don't have instructions, rehabilitation programm on word prediction software. They have no treatment.

Hva måler studien?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Tiltaksbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Change from Text Input Speed at 1 month
Tidsramme: Phase 1 After every test (10 minutes) Phase 2 : 1 months
text input speed (characters/minute)
Phase 1 After every test (10 minutes) Phase 2 : 1 months

Sekundære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Tiltaksbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Change from Errors at 1 month
Tidsramme: Phase 1 After every test (10 minutes) Phase 2 : 1 month
We record errors in text entry test
Phase 1 After every test (10 minutes) Phase 2 : 1 month
Change from Prediction use at 1 month
Tidsramme: Phase after every test (10 minutes) Phase 2 : 1 month
Number of use of word prediction software
Phase after every test (10 minutes) Phase 2 : 1 month
Change from Satisfaction
Tidsramme: Phase 1 After every test (10 minutes) Phase 2 : 1 month
Satisfaction of people with spinal cord injury about word prediction software (visual analogue scale)
Phase 1 After every test (10 minutes) Phase 2 : 1 month
Change from Cognitive load at 1 month
Tidsramme: Phase 1 After every test (10 minutes) Phase 2 : 1 month
Cognitive load of people with spinal cord injury (visual analogue scale)
Phase 1 After every test (10 minutes) Phase 2 : 1 month
Change from Speed sensation at 1 month
Tidsramme: Phase 1 After every test (10 minutes) Phase 2 : 1 month
speed sensation of people with spinal cord injury with word prediction software (visual analogue scale)
Phase 1 After every test (10 minutes) Phase 2 : 1 month

Samarbeidspartnere og etterforskere

Det er her du vil finne personer og organisasjoner som er involvert i denne studien.

Etterforskere

  • Studieleder: Djamel Bensmail, MDPHD, Hôpital Raymond Poincaré

Studierekorddatoer

Disse datoene sporer fremdriften for innsending av studieposter og sammendragsresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieposter og rapporterte resultater gjennomgås av National Library of Medicine (NLM) for å sikre at de oppfyller spesifikke kvalitetskontrollstandarder før de legges ut på det offentlige nettstedet.

Studer hoveddatoer

Studiestart

1. september 2013

Primær fullføring (Faktiske)

1. september 2015

Studiet fullført (Faktiske)

1. juli 2017

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først innsendt

17. september 2013

Først innsendt som oppfylte QC-kriteriene

26. september 2013

Først lagt ut (Anslag)

1. oktober 2013

Oppdateringer av studieposter

Sist oppdatering lagt ut (Faktiske)

6. september 2018

Siste oppdatering sendt inn som oppfylte QC-kriteriene

4. september 2018

Sist bekreftet

1. september 2018

Mer informasjon

Denne informasjonen ble hentet direkte fra nettstedet clinicaltrials.gov uten noen endringer. Hvis du har noen forespørsler om å endre, fjerne eller oppdatere studiedetaljene dine, vennligst kontakt register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en endring er implementert på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også bli oppdatert automatisk på nettstedet vårt. .

Abonnere