Exploring the Group Visit Model for Pediatric ADHD Management in the Medical Home
研究概览
详细说明
The specific research aims of this proposal are:
Aim 1: Develop and test a group curriculum for parents of children (age 6 to 18 years) with ADHD to increase parental knowledge about ADHD and self-confidence in managing issues related to their child's functioning in school and home.
Aim 2: Develop and test a group curriculum for children (age 6 to 18 years) with ADHD to teach social and educational skills to improve adaptive functioning at home and school.
Aim 3: To assess any added benefits to the parents, children and providers (related to group visit logistics and satisfaction) the group visit model has over usual care.
Aim 4: To assess whether the group visit model can be done efficiently and effectively in the setting of an actual general pediatric practice.
研究类型
注册 (实际的)
阶段
- 不适用
联系人和位置
学习地点
-
-
Indiana
-
Indianapolis、Indiana、美国、46202
- General Pediatrics Clinic Medical Service Area 1 in Riley Hospital for Children at IU Health
-
-
参与标准
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
接受健康志愿者
有资格学习的性别
描述
Inclusion Criteria:
- children with ADHD and their parents
- children receiving routine ADHD follow-up care at the study clinic
- if on medication, must be "stable" for 3 months and therefore not needing monthly clinic appointments to titrate medication
Exclusion Criteria:
- conduct disorder
- autism
- moderate to severe intellectual disability
学习计划
研究是如何设计的?
设计细节
- 主要用途:卫生服务研究
- 分配:随机化
- 介入模型:单组作业
- 屏蔽:无(打开标签)
武器和干预
参与者组/臂 |
干预/治疗 |
|---|---|
|
有源比较器:ADHD Group Curriculum
Participants assigned to the group visit intervention agree to participate in 5 group visits every 3 months rather than individual ADHD follow-up visits to the clinic.
Parents and children participate in separate but simultaneously run groups.
Group portion is 60 minutes and then parent-child dyads complete individual visits for medication titration and physical exam.
|
Study specific ADHD Group curriculum was designed and implemented for the study.
Parent curriculum included the following topics: What is ADHD, medications, educational advocacy, how to prevent behavioral issues and how to defuse common behavioral challenges and manage stress.
Child curriculum included the following topics: what is ADHD, social skills and friendships, handling school and organization skills, understanding feelings and managing negative emotions
|
|
无干预:Control
Participants continue to go to the clinic for 5 routine ADHD follow-up visits to the clinic every 3 months as usual clinical protocol.
|
研究衡量的是什么?
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of clinic visits during study period
大体时间:12 months
|
Feasibility of group visit model was measured as number of visits to the clinic by chart review.
We also looked at the number of group visits a family attended based on the sign in sheet provided at the beginning of each session.
|
12 months
|
次要结果测量
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Parent-rated ADHD symptoms
大体时间:Baseline
|
Parents completed validated Vanderbilt Rating Scale regarding child's ADHD symptoms.
Measures response to ADHD treatment, primarily medication.
|
Baseline
|
|
Parent-rated ADHD symptoms
大体时间:12 months
|
Parents complete validated Vanderbilt Rating Scale to report child symptoms of ADHD.
Used to assess response to treatment, usually medication.
|
12 months
|
|
Child functioning at home
大体时间:Baseline
|
Parent report of adaptive functioning of child in the home setting using the Home Situations Questionnaire
|
Baseline
|
|
Child functioning at home
大体时间:12 months
|
Parents report of child's adaptive functioning in the home setting using the Home Situations Questionnaire.
|
12 months
|
|
Teacher report of child's ADHD symptoms
大体时间:baseline
|
teachers received the validated Vanderbilt rating scale to rate student's ADHD symptoms in the classroom.
Parents were given the tool at time of enrollment and asked to give to teacher as per clinical care guidelines.
Monitors impact of ADHD treatment, usually medication.
|
baseline
|
|
teacher report of child's ADHD symptoms in school
大体时间:12 months
|
teachers received the validated Vanderbilt rating scale to rate student's ADHD symptoms in the classroom.
Parents were given the tool at time of enrollment and asked to give to teacher as per clinical care guidelines.
Monitors impact of ADHD treatment, usually medication.
|
12 months
|
|
Child functioning at school
大体时间:baseline
|
teachers were invited to provide rating of child's adaptive functioning at school.
Parent given the tool at time of enrollment and instructed to give to teacher as per clinical care guidelines.
|
baseline
|
|
teacher rating of child's functioning in school
大体时间:12 months
|
teachers were invited to provide rating of child's adaptive functioning at school.
Parent given the tool at time of enrollment and instructed to give to teacher as per clinical care guidelines.
|
12 months
|
|
Quality of Life
大体时间:baseline
|
Capture parent rating of quality of life related to ADHD using the Child Health Questionnaire-28 validated tool.
|
baseline
|
|
Quality of Life
大体时间:12 months
|
Capture parent rating of quality of life related to ADHD using the Child Health Questionnaire-28 validated tool.
|
12 months
|
|
Parenting self-efficacy
大体时间:Baseline
|
Parent reported sense of confidence using the Parenting Sense of Confidence Scale
|
Baseline
|
|
Parenting Self-efficacy
大体时间:12 months
|
Parent-reported sense of confidence using Parenting Sense of Confidence scale
|
12 months
|
|
Parental knowledge, satisfaction towards medication treatment
大体时间:baseline
|
Parent report of knowledge, attitudes and satisfaction towards medication experiences with ADHD medication treatment
|
baseline
|
|
Parent knowledge and satisfaction towards medication treatment
大体时间:12 months
|
Parent report of knowledge, attitudes and satisfaction towards medication experiences with ADHD medication treatment
|
12 months
|
其他结果措施
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Participant feedback about the curriculum
大体时间:after each group visit over 365 days
|
parents and children separately complete a short 4 question survey about what they liked, what they did not like, what they are excited about doing after the group visit and suggestions for improvement.
Data used to continually refine the curriculum.
At the 5th group visit, participants participated in informal discussion about the group visit model and overall satisfaction with the intervention
|
after each group visit over 365 days
|
|
Pediatric facilitator and staff feedback
大体时间:at the end of each group visit over 365 days
|
collected informal feedback and reflection about the process, barriers and positive experiences overall about the group visit model and impact on the clinical workflow, suggestions for improvement that was used to continually refine the model for quality improvement
|
at the end of each group visit over 365 days
|
合作者和调查者
调查人员
- 首席研究员:Nerissa S Bauer, MD, MPH、Indiana University School of Medicine
出版物和有用的链接
研究记录日期
研究主要日期
学习开始
初级完成 (实际的)
研究完成 (实际的)
研究注册日期
首次提交
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
首次发布 (估计)
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (估计)
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
最后验证
更多信息
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.