The Healing Context in Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM): Initial Validation Study (HEAL)
2017年2月28日 更新者:Carol Greco、University of Pittsburgh
The Healing Context in CAM: Instrument Development and Initial Validation - Phase 3 Validation Study
The overall objective of this study is to develop and test an efficient set of self-report instruments to measure Complementary and Alternative Medicine(CAM)-relevant contextual factors important in healing.
The initial phase of the study involves developing and refining an item bank.
During the initial 'item bank development' phase, the investigators will run focus groups and cognitive interviews with individuals who participate in CAM and conventional medicine interventions.
The next step of instrument development is called Calibration, and involves administering the revised item bank to an internet sample and to persons who receive services in a CAM clinic and a conventional primary care setting.
The items will be calibrated using item response theory and classical test theory.
This will result in a computerized adaptive testing version of the instrument, as well as a static short form of the instrument.
This current protocol in ClinicalTrials.gov
pertains only to the final, Validation Phase of the study.
The final phase of the project will involve conducting initial validation studies of the set of instruments.
The set of instruments will be called the Healing Encounters and Attitudes Lists (HEAL).
The investigators will evaluate the convergent, discriminant, and predictive validity of the HEAL instruments in a sample of 200 persons with chronic low back pain or neck pain who are receiving physical therapy, chiropractic care, acupuncture, medical management, or mindfulness-based stress reduction.
For convergent validity, the HEAL is expected to display moderate to large correlations with measures of similar constructs.
The HEAL is expected to correlate modestly with self-report measures of general psychosocial functioning, in support of discriminant validity.
Finally, HEAL scores should account for a significant proportion of the variance in treatment outcome, supporting predictive validity.
研究概览
详细说明
This project will develop and test a set of patient self-report measurement tools to assess the perceived contextual factors, such as patient attitudes and expectations, patient provider relationship factors, and environmental factors that contribute to healing.
This project is synergistic with the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Roadmap initiative, Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS), and will use the rigorous instrument development and validation methodology of PROMIS.
The overall objective of this study is to develop efficient self-report instruments to measure CAM-relevant contextual factors important in healing, hereafter referred to as the Healing Encounters and Attitudes Lists (HEAL), and conduct initial validation in persons seeking CAM and conventional treatment for pain.
Specific Aim 1: Develop item banks.
The investigators will employ several iterative steps used successfully in PROMIS to identify items that assess contextual factors of healing relevant to CAM.
Initial steps in developing item banks include: a) compilation and evaluation of existing instruments and relevant questions, b) consultation with experts, and c) focus groups with individuals who participate in CAM and conventional medicine interventions, and d) item editing.
During the initial phase of this study, the investigators expect to identify conceptual areas of potential importance to CAM interventions and patients, and identify and edit items to create item banks assessing these conceptual areas.
Specific Aim 2: Calibrate items.
The investigators will use item response theory (IRT) and classical test theory (CTT) to calibrate the items from Aim 1 on three samples: 1) an internet-based sample (n= 1400), 2) 125 outpatients participating in CAM interventions at the Center for Integrative Medicine (CIM), and 3) 125 outpatients at a General Internal Medicine clinic.
During year 3-4 the investigators will administer the items in the item banks to the 1650 persons, conduct IRT and CTT analyses and refine the item banks to only those items that best assess the constructs.
Specific aim 2 will result in Computerized Adaptive Testing (CAT) versions of the HEAL, which maximizes information while minimizing patient time burden.
Static short forms of the HEAL item banks will be derived from the HEAL CATs in Aim 2. Specific Aim 3: Conduct initial validation studies.
The investigators will evaluate convergent, discriminant, and predictive validity of the Healing Encounters and Attitudes List (HEAL) in a sample of chronic low back pain (CLBP) or neck pain patients receiving CAM and conventional medicine treatments.
The validity studies will use two samples of adults with CLBP: 100 persons receiving CAM treatments: chiropractic manipulation (CM), acupuncture, or mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) at the CIM, and 100 persons receiving conventional care (physical therapy or medical management) at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC).
The investigators will administer the CAT version of the HEAL questionnaire developed in aims 1 and 2 as well as conventional measures of treatment expectancy, confidence in treatment provider, psychosocial functioning, and pain and disability treatment outcome measures for CLBP and neck pain.
• Hypothesis 3a: Scores on the HEAL measures will display moderate to large correlations (r's > .50)
with similar self-report measures, supporting convergent validity.
• Hypothesis 3b: Scores on the HEAL measures will correlate modestly (r's = .20-.35) with self-report measures of general psychosocial functioning, supporting discriminant validity.
• Hypothesis 3c: HEAL scores will account for a significant proportion of variance in treatment outcome in both samples.
In addition, the investigators predict that HEAL scores will demonstrate incremental validity, i.e., the scores will account for significant incremental variance in outcome beyond that accounted for by existing measures of treatment expectancy and related constructs.
研究类型
观察性的
注册 (实际的)
207
联系人和位置
本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。
学习地点
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Pittsburgh、Pennsylvania、美国、15213
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
-
Pittsburgh、Pennsylvania、美国、15232
- UPMC Shadyside Center for Integrative Medicine
-
Pittsburgh、Pennsylvania、美国、15213
- UPMC General Clinical Research Center
-
-
参与标准
研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
18年 及以上 (成人、年长者)
接受健康志愿者
不
有资格学习的性别
全部
取样方法
非概率样本
研究人群
Patients who are beginning or about to begin CAM or Conventional Medicine treatments for chronic back pain or chronic neck pain in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania at University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC).
描述
Inclusion Criteria:
- 18 years old or older; able to read and understand English; able to use a computer; starting a new treatment for back or neck pain, or started treatment within the past month.
Exclusion Criteria:
- psychotic disorders.
学习计划
本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。
研究是如何设计的?
设计细节
队列和干预
团体/队列 |
|---|
|
Complementary Medicine Group
Patients receiving chiropractic care, acupuncture, or meditation for chronic pain
|
|
Conventional Medicine Group
Patients receiving conventional medicine care (physical therapy, medication management) for chronic pain.
|
研究衡量的是什么?
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|
|
Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI)
大体时间:6 - 8 weeks, 4 months post study entry
|
6 - 8 weeks, 4 months post study entry
|
次要结果测量
结果测量 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|
|
Roland and Morris Disability Questionnaire
大体时间:Baseline, 6-8 weeks, 4 months post baseline
|
Baseline, 6-8 weeks, 4 months post baseline
|
其他结果措施
结果测量 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|
|
Neck Disability Index
大体时间:Baseline, 6-8 weeks, 4 months post baseline
|
Baseline, 6-8 weeks, 4 months post baseline
|
合作者和调查者
在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。
调查人员
- 首席研究员:Carol M Greco, Ph.D.、University of Pittsburgh
出版物和有用的链接
负责输入研究信息的人员自愿提供这些出版物。这些可能与研究有关。
一般刊物
- Greco CM, Glick RM, Morone NE, Schneider MJ. Addressing the "It Is Just Placebo" Pitfall in CAM: Methodology of a Project to Develop Patient-Reported Measures of Nonspecific Factors in Healing. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2013;2013:613797. doi: 10.1155/2013/613797. Epub 2013 Dec 19.
- Greco CM, Yu L, Johnston KL, Dodds NE, Morone NE, Glick RM, Schneider MJ, Klem ML, McFarland CE, Lawrence S, Colditz J, Maihoefer CC, Jonas WB, Ryan ND, Pilkonis PA. Measuring nonspecific factors in treatment: item banks that assess the healthcare experience and attitudes from the patient's perspective. Qual Life Res. 2016 Jul;25(7):1625-34. doi: 10.1007/s11136-015-1178-1. Epub 2015 Nov 12.
研究记录日期
这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。
研究主要日期
学习开始
2014年6月1日
初级完成 (实际的)
2016年12月1日
研究完成 (实际的)
2016年12月1日
研究注册日期
首次提交
2014年6月10日
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
2014年6月11日
首次发布 (估计)
2014年6月12日
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (实际的)
2017年3月3日
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
2017年2月28日
最后验证
2017年2月1日
更多信息
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.