- ICH GCP
- Registro degli studi clinici negli Stati Uniti
- Sperimentazione clinica NCT02161887
The Healing Context in Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM): Initial Validation Study (HEAL)
28 febbraio 2017 aggiornato da: Carol Greco, University of Pittsburgh
The Healing Context in CAM: Instrument Development and Initial Validation - Phase 3 Validation Study
The overall objective of this study is to develop and test an efficient set of self-report instruments to measure Complementary and Alternative Medicine(CAM)-relevant contextual factors important in healing.
The initial phase of the study involves developing and refining an item bank.
During the initial 'item bank development' phase, the investigators will run focus groups and cognitive interviews with individuals who participate in CAM and conventional medicine interventions.
The next step of instrument development is called Calibration, and involves administering the revised item bank to an internet sample and to persons who receive services in a CAM clinic and a conventional primary care setting.
The items will be calibrated using item response theory and classical test theory.
This will result in a computerized adaptive testing version of the instrument, as well as a static short form of the instrument.
This current protocol in ClinicalTrials.gov
pertains only to the final, Validation Phase of the study.
The final phase of the project will involve conducting initial validation studies of the set of instruments.
The set of instruments will be called the Healing Encounters and Attitudes Lists (HEAL).
The investigators will evaluate the convergent, discriminant, and predictive validity of the HEAL instruments in a sample of 200 persons with chronic low back pain or neck pain who are receiving physical therapy, chiropractic care, acupuncture, medical management, or mindfulness-based stress reduction.
For convergent validity, the HEAL is expected to display moderate to large correlations with measures of similar constructs.
The HEAL is expected to correlate modestly with self-report measures of general psychosocial functioning, in support of discriminant validity.
Finally, HEAL scores should account for a significant proportion of the variance in treatment outcome, supporting predictive validity.
Panoramica dello studio
Stato
Completato
Condizioni
Descrizione dettagliata
This project will develop and test a set of patient self-report measurement tools to assess the perceived contextual factors, such as patient attitudes and expectations, patient provider relationship factors, and environmental factors that contribute to healing.
This project is synergistic with the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Roadmap initiative, Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS), and will use the rigorous instrument development and validation methodology of PROMIS.
The overall objective of this study is to develop efficient self-report instruments to measure CAM-relevant contextual factors important in healing, hereafter referred to as the Healing Encounters and Attitudes Lists (HEAL), and conduct initial validation in persons seeking CAM and conventional treatment for pain.
Specific Aim 1: Develop item banks.
The investigators will employ several iterative steps used successfully in PROMIS to identify items that assess contextual factors of healing relevant to CAM.
Initial steps in developing item banks include: a) compilation and evaluation of existing instruments and relevant questions, b) consultation with experts, and c) focus groups with individuals who participate in CAM and conventional medicine interventions, and d) item editing.
During the initial phase of this study, the investigators expect to identify conceptual areas of potential importance to CAM interventions and patients, and identify and edit items to create item banks assessing these conceptual areas.
Specific Aim 2: Calibrate items.
The investigators will use item response theory (IRT) and classical test theory (CTT) to calibrate the items from Aim 1 on three samples: 1) an internet-based sample (n= 1400), 2) 125 outpatients participating in CAM interventions at the Center for Integrative Medicine (CIM), and 3) 125 outpatients at a General Internal Medicine clinic.
During year 3-4 the investigators will administer the items in the item banks to the 1650 persons, conduct IRT and CTT analyses and refine the item banks to only those items that best assess the constructs.
Specific aim 2 will result in Computerized Adaptive Testing (CAT) versions of the HEAL, which maximizes information while minimizing patient time burden.
Static short forms of the HEAL item banks will be derived from the HEAL CATs in Aim 2. Specific Aim 3: Conduct initial validation studies.
The investigators will evaluate convergent, discriminant, and predictive validity of the Healing Encounters and Attitudes List (HEAL) in a sample of chronic low back pain (CLBP) or neck pain patients receiving CAM and conventional medicine treatments.
The validity studies will use two samples of adults with CLBP: 100 persons receiving CAM treatments: chiropractic manipulation (CM), acupuncture, or mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) at the CIM, and 100 persons receiving conventional care (physical therapy or medical management) at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC).
The investigators will administer the CAT version of the HEAL questionnaire developed in aims 1 and 2 as well as conventional measures of treatment expectancy, confidence in treatment provider, psychosocial functioning, and pain and disability treatment outcome measures for CLBP and neck pain.
• Hypothesis 3a: Scores on the HEAL measures will display moderate to large correlations (r's > .50)
with similar self-report measures, supporting convergent validity.
• Hypothesis 3b: Scores on the HEAL measures will correlate modestly (r's = .20-.35) with self-report measures of general psychosocial functioning, supporting discriminant validity.
• Hypothesis 3c: HEAL scores will account for a significant proportion of variance in treatment outcome in both samples.
In addition, the investigators predict that HEAL scores will demonstrate incremental validity, i.e., the scores will account for significant incremental variance in outcome beyond that accounted for by existing measures of treatment expectancy and related constructs.
Tipo di studio
Osservativo
Iscrizione (Effettivo)
207
Contatti e Sedi
Questa sezione fornisce i recapiti di coloro che conducono lo studio e informazioni su dove viene condotto lo studio.
Luoghi di studio
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Stati Uniti, 15213
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
-
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Stati Uniti, 15232
- UPMC Shadyside Center for Integrative Medicine
-
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Stati Uniti, 15213
- UPMC General Clinical Research Center
-
-
Criteri di partecipazione
I ricercatori cercano persone che corrispondano a una certa descrizione, chiamata criteri di ammissibilità. Alcuni esempi di questi criteri sono le condizioni generali di salute di una persona o trattamenti precedenti.
Criteri di ammissibilità
Età idonea allo studio
18 anni e precedenti (Adulto, Adulto più anziano)
Accetta volontari sani
No
Sessi ammissibili allo studio
Tutto
Metodo di campionamento
Campione non probabilistico
Popolazione di studio
Patients who are beginning or about to begin CAM or Conventional Medicine treatments for chronic back pain or chronic neck pain in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania at University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC).
Descrizione
Inclusion Criteria:
- 18 years old or older; able to read and understand English; able to use a computer; starting a new treatment for back or neck pain, or started treatment within the past month.
Exclusion Criteria:
- psychotic disorders.
Piano di studio
Questa sezione fornisce i dettagli del piano di studio, compreso il modo in cui lo studio è progettato e ciò che lo studio sta misurando.
Come è strutturato lo studio?
Dettagli di progettazione
Coorti e interventi
Gruppo / Coorte |
|---|
|
Complementary Medicine Group
Patients receiving chiropractic care, acupuncture, or meditation for chronic pain
|
|
Conventional Medicine Group
Patients receiving conventional medicine care (physical therapy, medication management) for chronic pain.
|
Cosa sta misurando lo studio?
Misure di risultato primarie
Misura del risultato |
Lasso di tempo |
|---|---|
|
Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI)
Lasso di tempo: 6 - 8 weeks, 4 months post study entry
|
6 - 8 weeks, 4 months post study entry
|
Misure di risultato secondarie
Misura del risultato |
Lasso di tempo |
|---|---|
|
Roland and Morris Disability Questionnaire
Lasso di tempo: Baseline, 6-8 weeks, 4 months post baseline
|
Baseline, 6-8 weeks, 4 months post baseline
|
Altre misure di risultato
Misura del risultato |
Lasso di tempo |
|---|---|
|
Neck Disability Index
Lasso di tempo: Baseline, 6-8 weeks, 4 months post baseline
|
Baseline, 6-8 weeks, 4 months post baseline
|
Collaboratori e investigatori
Qui è dove troverai le persone e le organizzazioni coinvolte in questo studio.
Sponsor
Investigatori
- Investigatore principale: Carol M Greco, Ph.D., University of Pittsburgh
Pubblicazioni e link utili
La persona responsabile dell'inserimento delle informazioni sullo studio fornisce volontariamente queste pubblicazioni. Questi possono riguardare qualsiasi cosa relativa allo studio.
Pubblicazioni generali
- Greco CM, Glick RM, Morone NE, Schneider MJ. Addressing the "It Is Just Placebo" Pitfall in CAM: Methodology of a Project to Develop Patient-Reported Measures of Nonspecific Factors in Healing. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2013;2013:613797. doi: 10.1155/2013/613797. Epub 2013 Dec 19.
- Greco CM, Yu L, Johnston KL, Dodds NE, Morone NE, Glick RM, Schneider MJ, Klem ML, McFarland CE, Lawrence S, Colditz J, Maihoefer CC, Jonas WB, Ryan ND, Pilkonis PA. Measuring nonspecific factors in treatment: item banks that assess the healthcare experience and attitudes from the patient's perspective. Qual Life Res. 2016 Jul;25(7):1625-34. doi: 10.1007/s11136-015-1178-1. Epub 2015 Nov 12.
Studiare le date dei record
Queste date tengono traccia dell'avanzamento della registrazione dello studio e dell'invio dei risultati di sintesi a ClinicalTrials.gov. I record degli studi e i risultati riportati vengono esaminati dalla National Library of Medicine (NLM) per assicurarsi che soddisfino specifici standard di controllo della qualità prima di essere pubblicati sul sito Web pubblico.
Studia le date principali
Inizio studio
1 giugno 2014
Completamento primario (Effettivo)
1 dicembre 2016
Completamento dello studio (Effettivo)
1 dicembre 2016
Date di iscrizione allo studio
Primo inviato
10 giugno 2014
Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità
11 giugno 2014
Primo Inserito (Stima)
12 giugno 2014
Aggiornamenti dei record di studio
Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)
3 marzo 2017
Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC
28 febbraio 2017
Ultimo verificato
1 febbraio 2017
Maggiori informazioni
Termini relativi a questo studio
Termini MeSH pertinenti aggiuntivi
Altri numeri di identificazione dello studio
- AT006453-3
Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .
Prove cliniche su Dolore al collo
-
Istanbul Arel UniversityBahçeşehir UniversityNon ancora reclutamentoText Neck | Nomofobia | Autosufficienza accademicaTurchia (Türkiye)
-
Cairo UniversityCompletatoSCOPO PAIN (VAS) a 24 ore dopo l'interventoEgitto
-
University of OklahomaThe Children's Hospital at OU Medical CenterCompletatoDolore addominale funzionale | Crisi falciforme | Pazienti seguiti dal Pain Team
-
King Abdulaziz UniversityReclutamentoDisturbi temporomandibolari (TMD) | Dolore dell'ATM | Arteterapia | TMJ - orale & amp; chirurgia maxillofaciale | Wilkes 1 e 2 | TMD Art Pain StudyArabia Saudita