- ICH GCP
- Registro de ensayos clínicos de EE. UU.
- Ensayo clínico NCT02161887
The Healing Context in Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM): Initial Validation Study (HEAL)
28 de febrero de 2017 actualizado por: Carol Greco, University of Pittsburgh
The Healing Context in CAM: Instrument Development and Initial Validation - Phase 3 Validation Study
The overall objective of this study is to develop and test an efficient set of self-report instruments to measure Complementary and Alternative Medicine(CAM)-relevant contextual factors important in healing.
The initial phase of the study involves developing and refining an item bank.
During the initial 'item bank development' phase, the investigators will run focus groups and cognitive interviews with individuals who participate in CAM and conventional medicine interventions.
The next step of instrument development is called Calibration, and involves administering the revised item bank to an internet sample and to persons who receive services in a CAM clinic and a conventional primary care setting.
The items will be calibrated using item response theory and classical test theory.
This will result in a computerized adaptive testing version of the instrument, as well as a static short form of the instrument.
This current protocol in ClinicalTrials.gov
pertains only to the final, Validation Phase of the study.
The final phase of the project will involve conducting initial validation studies of the set of instruments.
The set of instruments will be called the Healing Encounters and Attitudes Lists (HEAL).
The investigators will evaluate the convergent, discriminant, and predictive validity of the HEAL instruments in a sample of 200 persons with chronic low back pain or neck pain who are receiving physical therapy, chiropractic care, acupuncture, medical management, or mindfulness-based stress reduction.
For convergent validity, the HEAL is expected to display moderate to large correlations with measures of similar constructs.
The HEAL is expected to correlate modestly with self-report measures of general psychosocial functioning, in support of discriminant validity.
Finally, HEAL scores should account for a significant proportion of the variance in treatment outcome, supporting predictive validity.
Descripción general del estudio
Estado
Terminado
Condiciones
Descripción detallada
This project will develop and test a set of patient self-report measurement tools to assess the perceived contextual factors, such as patient attitudes and expectations, patient provider relationship factors, and environmental factors that contribute to healing.
This project is synergistic with the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Roadmap initiative, Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS), and will use the rigorous instrument development and validation methodology of PROMIS.
The overall objective of this study is to develop efficient self-report instruments to measure CAM-relevant contextual factors important in healing, hereafter referred to as the Healing Encounters and Attitudes Lists (HEAL), and conduct initial validation in persons seeking CAM and conventional treatment for pain.
Specific Aim 1: Develop item banks.
The investigators will employ several iterative steps used successfully in PROMIS to identify items that assess contextual factors of healing relevant to CAM.
Initial steps in developing item banks include: a) compilation and evaluation of existing instruments and relevant questions, b) consultation with experts, and c) focus groups with individuals who participate in CAM and conventional medicine interventions, and d) item editing.
During the initial phase of this study, the investigators expect to identify conceptual areas of potential importance to CAM interventions and patients, and identify and edit items to create item banks assessing these conceptual areas.
Specific Aim 2: Calibrate items.
The investigators will use item response theory (IRT) and classical test theory (CTT) to calibrate the items from Aim 1 on three samples: 1) an internet-based sample (n= 1400), 2) 125 outpatients participating in CAM interventions at the Center for Integrative Medicine (CIM), and 3) 125 outpatients at a General Internal Medicine clinic.
During year 3-4 the investigators will administer the items in the item banks to the 1650 persons, conduct IRT and CTT analyses and refine the item banks to only those items that best assess the constructs.
Specific aim 2 will result in Computerized Adaptive Testing (CAT) versions of the HEAL, which maximizes information while minimizing patient time burden.
Static short forms of the HEAL item banks will be derived from the HEAL CATs in Aim 2. Specific Aim 3: Conduct initial validation studies.
The investigators will evaluate convergent, discriminant, and predictive validity of the Healing Encounters and Attitudes List (HEAL) in a sample of chronic low back pain (CLBP) or neck pain patients receiving CAM and conventional medicine treatments.
The validity studies will use two samples of adults with CLBP: 100 persons receiving CAM treatments: chiropractic manipulation (CM), acupuncture, or mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) at the CIM, and 100 persons receiving conventional care (physical therapy or medical management) at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC).
The investigators will administer the CAT version of the HEAL questionnaire developed in aims 1 and 2 as well as conventional measures of treatment expectancy, confidence in treatment provider, psychosocial functioning, and pain and disability treatment outcome measures for CLBP and neck pain.
• Hypothesis 3a: Scores on the HEAL measures will display moderate to large correlations (r's > .50)
with similar self-report measures, supporting convergent validity.
• Hypothesis 3b: Scores on the HEAL measures will correlate modestly (r's = .20-.35) with self-report measures of general psychosocial functioning, supporting discriminant validity.
• Hypothesis 3c: HEAL scores will account for a significant proportion of variance in treatment outcome in both samples.
In addition, the investigators predict that HEAL scores will demonstrate incremental validity, i.e., the scores will account for significant incremental variance in outcome beyond that accounted for by existing measures of treatment expectancy and related constructs.
Tipo de estudio
De observación
Inscripción (Actual)
207
Contactos y Ubicaciones
Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.
Ubicaciones de estudio
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Estados Unidos, 15213
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
-
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Estados Unidos, 15232
- UPMC Shadyside Center for Integrative Medicine
-
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Estados Unidos, 15213
- UPMC General Clinical Research Center
-
-
Criterios de participación
Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.
Criterio de elegibilidad
Edades elegibles para estudiar
18 años y mayores (Adulto, Adulto Mayor)
Acepta Voluntarios Saludables
No
Géneros elegibles para el estudio
Todos
Método de muestreo
Muestra no probabilística
Población de estudio
Patients who are beginning or about to begin CAM or Conventional Medicine treatments for chronic back pain or chronic neck pain in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania at University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC).
Descripción
Inclusion Criteria:
- 18 years old or older; able to read and understand English; able to use a computer; starting a new treatment for back or neck pain, or started treatment within the past month.
Exclusion Criteria:
- psychotic disorders.
Plan de estudios
Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.
¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?
Detalles de diseño
Cohortes e Intervenciones
Grupo / Cohorte |
|---|
|
Complementary Medicine Group
Patients receiving chiropractic care, acupuncture, or meditation for chronic pain
|
|
Conventional Medicine Group
Patients receiving conventional medicine care (physical therapy, medication management) for chronic pain.
|
¿Qué mide el estudio?
Medidas de resultado primarias
Medida de resultado |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|
|
Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI)
Periodo de tiempo: 6 - 8 weeks, 4 months post study entry
|
6 - 8 weeks, 4 months post study entry
|
Medidas de resultado secundarias
Medida de resultado |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|
|
Roland and Morris Disability Questionnaire
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline, 6-8 weeks, 4 months post baseline
|
Baseline, 6-8 weeks, 4 months post baseline
|
Otras medidas de resultado
Medida de resultado |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|
|
Neck Disability Index
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline, 6-8 weeks, 4 months post baseline
|
Baseline, 6-8 weeks, 4 months post baseline
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.
Patrocinador
Investigadores
- Investigador principal: Carol M Greco, Ph.D., University of Pittsburgh
Publicaciones y enlaces útiles
La persona responsable de ingresar información sobre el estudio proporciona voluntariamente estas publicaciones. Estos pueden ser sobre cualquier cosa relacionada con el estudio.
Publicaciones Generales
- Greco CM, Glick RM, Morone NE, Schneider MJ. Addressing the "It Is Just Placebo" Pitfall in CAM: Methodology of a Project to Develop Patient-Reported Measures of Nonspecific Factors in Healing. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2013;2013:613797. doi: 10.1155/2013/613797. Epub 2013 Dec 19.
- Greco CM, Yu L, Johnston KL, Dodds NE, Morone NE, Glick RM, Schneider MJ, Klem ML, McFarland CE, Lawrence S, Colditz J, Maihoefer CC, Jonas WB, Ryan ND, Pilkonis PA. Measuring nonspecific factors in treatment: item banks that assess the healthcare experience and attitudes from the patient's perspective. Qual Life Res. 2016 Jul;25(7):1625-34. doi: 10.1007/s11136-015-1178-1. Epub 2015 Nov 12.
Fechas de registro del estudio
Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.
Fechas importantes del estudio
Inicio del estudio
1 de junio de 2014
Finalización primaria (Actual)
1 de diciembre de 2016
Finalización del estudio (Actual)
1 de diciembre de 2016
Fechas de registro del estudio
Enviado por primera vez
10 de junio de 2014
Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
11 de junio de 2014
Publicado por primera vez (Estimar)
12 de junio de 2014
Actualizaciones de registros de estudio
Última actualización publicada (Actual)
3 de marzo de 2017
Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
28 de febrero de 2017
Última verificación
1 de febrero de 2017
Más información
Términos relacionados con este estudio
Términos MeSH relevantes adicionales
Otros números de identificación del estudio
- AT006453-3
Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .