- ICH GCP
- Registre américain des essais cliniques
- Essai clinique NCT02161887
The Healing Context in Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM): Initial Validation Study (HEAL)
28 février 2017 mis à jour par: Carol Greco, University of Pittsburgh
The Healing Context in CAM: Instrument Development and Initial Validation - Phase 3 Validation Study
The overall objective of this study is to develop and test an efficient set of self-report instruments to measure Complementary and Alternative Medicine(CAM)-relevant contextual factors important in healing.
The initial phase of the study involves developing and refining an item bank.
During the initial 'item bank development' phase, the investigators will run focus groups and cognitive interviews with individuals who participate in CAM and conventional medicine interventions.
The next step of instrument development is called Calibration, and involves administering the revised item bank to an internet sample and to persons who receive services in a CAM clinic and a conventional primary care setting.
The items will be calibrated using item response theory and classical test theory.
This will result in a computerized adaptive testing version of the instrument, as well as a static short form of the instrument.
This current protocol in ClinicalTrials.gov
pertains only to the final, Validation Phase of the study.
The final phase of the project will involve conducting initial validation studies of the set of instruments.
The set of instruments will be called the Healing Encounters and Attitudes Lists (HEAL).
The investigators will evaluate the convergent, discriminant, and predictive validity of the HEAL instruments in a sample of 200 persons with chronic low back pain or neck pain who are receiving physical therapy, chiropractic care, acupuncture, medical management, or mindfulness-based stress reduction.
For convergent validity, the HEAL is expected to display moderate to large correlations with measures of similar constructs.
The HEAL is expected to correlate modestly with self-report measures of general psychosocial functioning, in support of discriminant validity.
Finally, HEAL scores should account for a significant proportion of the variance in treatment outcome, supporting predictive validity.
Aperçu de l'étude
Statut
Complété
Les conditions
Description détaillée
This project will develop and test a set of patient self-report measurement tools to assess the perceived contextual factors, such as patient attitudes and expectations, patient provider relationship factors, and environmental factors that contribute to healing.
This project is synergistic with the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Roadmap initiative, Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS), and will use the rigorous instrument development and validation methodology of PROMIS.
The overall objective of this study is to develop efficient self-report instruments to measure CAM-relevant contextual factors important in healing, hereafter referred to as the Healing Encounters and Attitudes Lists (HEAL), and conduct initial validation in persons seeking CAM and conventional treatment for pain.
Specific Aim 1: Develop item banks.
The investigators will employ several iterative steps used successfully in PROMIS to identify items that assess contextual factors of healing relevant to CAM.
Initial steps in developing item banks include: a) compilation and evaluation of existing instruments and relevant questions, b) consultation with experts, and c) focus groups with individuals who participate in CAM and conventional medicine interventions, and d) item editing.
During the initial phase of this study, the investigators expect to identify conceptual areas of potential importance to CAM interventions and patients, and identify and edit items to create item banks assessing these conceptual areas.
Specific Aim 2: Calibrate items.
The investigators will use item response theory (IRT) and classical test theory (CTT) to calibrate the items from Aim 1 on three samples: 1) an internet-based sample (n= 1400), 2) 125 outpatients participating in CAM interventions at the Center for Integrative Medicine (CIM), and 3) 125 outpatients at a General Internal Medicine clinic.
During year 3-4 the investigators will administer the items in the item banks to the 1650 persons, conduct IRT and CTT analyses and refine the item banks to only those items that best assess the constructs.
Specific aim 2 will result in Computerized Adaptive Testing (CAT) versions of the HEAL, which maximizes information while minimizing patient time burden.
Static short forms of the HEAL item banks will be derived from the HEAL CATs in Aim 2. Specific Aim 3: Conduct initial validation studies.
The investigators will evaluate convergent, discriminant, and predictive validity of the Healing Encounters and Attitudes List (HEAL) in a sample of chronic low back pain (CLBP) or neck pain patients receiving CAM and conventional medicine treatments.
The validity studies will use two samples of adults with CLBP: 100 persons receiving CAM treatments: chiropractic manipulation (CM), acupuncture, or mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) at the CIM, and 100 persons receiving conventional care (physical therapy or medical management) at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC).
The investigators will administer the CAT version of the HEAL questionnaire developed in aims 1 and 2 as well as conventional measures of treatment expectancy, confidence in treatment provider, psychosocial functioning, and pain and disability treatment outcome measures for CLBP and neck pain.
• Hypothesis 3a: Scores on the HEAL measures will display moderate to large correlations (r's > .50)
with similar self-report measures, supporting convergent validity.
• Hypothesis 3b: Scores on the HEAL measures will correlate modestly (r's = .20-.35) with self-report measures of general psychosocial functioning, supporting discriminant validity.
• Hypothesis 3c: HEAL scores will account for a significant proportion of variance in treatment outcome in both samples.
In addition, the investigators predict that HEAL scores will demonstrate incremental validity, i.e., the scores will account for significant incremental variance in outcome beyond that accounted for by existing measures of treatment expectancy and related constructs.
Type d'étude
Observationnel
Inscription (Réel)
207
Contacts et emplacements
Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.
Lieux d'étude
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, États-Unis, 15213
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
-
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, États-Unis, 15232
- UPMC Shadyside Center for Integrative Medicine
-
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, États-Unis, 15213
- UPMC General Clinical Research Center
-
-
Critères de participation
Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.
Critère d'éligibilité
Âges éligibles pour étudier
18 ans et plus (Adulte, Adulte plus âgé)
Accepte les volontaires sains
Non
Sexes éligibles pour l'étude
Tout
Méthode d'échantillonnage
Échantillon non probabiliste
Population étudiée
Patients who are beginning or about to begin CAM or Conventional Medicine treatments for chronic back pain or chronic neck pain in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania at University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC).
La description
Inclusion Criteria:
- 18 years old or older; able to read and understand English; able to use a computer; starting a new treatment for back or neck pain, or started treatment within the past month.
Exclusion Criteria:
- psychotic disorders.
Plan d'étude
Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.
Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?
Détails de conception
Cohortes et interventions
Groupe / Cohorte |
|---|
|
Complementary Medicine Group
Patients receiving chiropractic care, acupuncture, or meditation for chronic pain
|
|
Conventional Medicine Group
Patients receiving conventional medicine care (physical therapy, medication management) for chronic pain.
|
Que mesure l'étude ?
Principaux critères de jugement
Mesure des résultats |
Délai |
|---|---|
|
Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI)
Délai: 6 - 8 weeks, 4 months post study entry
|
6 - 8 weeks, 4 months post study entry
|
Mesures de résultats secondaires
Mesure des résultats |
Délai |
|---|---|
|
Roland and Morris Disability Questionnaire
Délai: Baseline, 6-8 weeks, 4 months post baseline
|
Baseline, 6-8 weeks, 4 months post baseline
|
Autres mesures de résultats
Mesure des résultats |
Délai |
|---|---|
|
Neck Disability Index
Délai: Baseline, 6-8 weeks, 4 months post baseline
|
Baseline, 6-8 weeks, 4 months post baseline
|
Collaborateurs et enquêteurs
C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.
Parrainer
Les enquêteurs
- Chercheur principal: Carol M Greco, Ph.D., University of Pittsburgh
Publications et liens utiles
La personne responsable de la saisie des informations sur l'étude fournit volontairement ces publications. Il peut s'agir de tout ce qui concerne l'étude.
Publications générales
- Greco CM, Glick RM, Morone NE, Schneider MJ. Addressing the "It Is Just Placebo" Pitfall in CAM: Methodology of a Project to Develop Patient-Reported Measures of Nonspecific Factors in Healing. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2013;2013:613797. doi: 10.1155/2013/613797. Epub 2013 Dec 19.
- Greco CM, Yu L, Johnston KL, Dodds NE, Morone NE, Glick RM, Schneider MJ, Klem ML, McFarland CE, Lawrence S, Colditz J, Maihoefer CC, Jonas WB, Ryan ND, Pilkonis PA. Measuring nonspecific factors in treatment: item banks that assess the healthcare experience and attitudes from the patient's perspective. Qual Life Res. 2016 Jul;25(7):1625-34. doi: 10.1007/s11136-015-1178-1. Epub 2015 Nov 12.
Dates d'enregistrement des études
Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.
Dates principales de l'étude
Début de l'étude
1 juin 2014
Achèvement primaire (Réel)
1 décembre 2016
Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)
1 décembre 2016
Dates d'inscription aux études
Première soumission
10 juin 2014
Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
11 juin 2014
Première publication (Estimation)
12 juin 2014
Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude
Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)
3 mars 2017
Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
28 février 2017
Dernière vérification
1 février 2017
Plus d'information
Termes liés à cette étude
Termes MeSH pertinents supplémentaires
Autres numéros d'identification d'étude
- AT006453-3
Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .