Sun Safe Workplaces: Assessment of Benefits and Costs of a Policy Intervention (SSW2)
2017年10月24日 更新者:Klein Buendel, Inc.
Sun Safe Workplaces (SSW), a comprehensive occupational sun safety program, promoted education and policy to 98 cities, counties, and special districts in Colorado.
In a two-year follow-up study, Klein Buendel, Inc. (KB) proposes to examine the effectiveness of SSW on employee sun protection practices by employers and return on investment in an economic evaluation of the cost of the SSW intervention.
The results of this follow-up study will provide critical information on effective approaches to increasing sun protection across a wide range of employment sectors with outdoor workers.
研究概览
详细说明
Workers in the United States spend large amounts of time on the job, making the workplace a key venue for preventive health programs.
A workplace risk that has received limited attention is solar ultraviolet radiation (UVR).
Unprotected exposure to solar UVR of outdoor workers can produce both an immediate acute harm (i.e., severe sunburn) and long-term skin damage that can elevate the risk of developing skin cancers.
Preventing skin cancer is a priority due to its high prevalence; tendency to recur; association with other cancers; and lost productivity ($66.9 billion in losses were attributed to melanoma-related mortality from 1990-2008).
Sun Safe Workplaces (SSW) is a comprehensive occupational sun safety education and policy intervention that was tested by Klein Buendel, Inc.'s (KB) research team in a randomized control trial with 98 cities, counties, and special districts in Colorado.
Posttesting was completed in November 2013.
The SSW intervention focused on three sectors in the organizations: public works, public safety, and parks and recreation.
Half of the employers received the SSW intervention, with the remaining employers in the control condition receiving basic sun safety information.
Preliminary analyses indicate that 80% of employers in the SSW intervention condition provided sun safety education to employees and 36% adopted formal sun protection policies.
No control organizations reported policy adoption.
KB will conduct a two-year follow-up study on the benefits of the SSW intervention (i.e., increasing employees' sun protection) and return on investment (ROI; benefits relative to intervention costs).
Employee behavior was not assessed in the current SSW trial because it was uncertain whether the SSW intervention would result in uptake of education and policy and thus have the potential to influence their sun protection practices.
The proposed two-year follow-up of the 98 organizations in the SSW trial will include: (1) surveys with employees (n=10,787) and front line supervisors (n=767) to assess employees' sun protection practices and workplace actions to support employee sun safety; (2) on-site observations of sun protection actions by the employers (e.g., posters, sunscreen, shade structures); and (3) tracking of the costs of implementing the SSW intervention and induced employer costs.
The proposed analyses will compare the sun protection practices of employees a) between workplaces that received the SSW intervention and controls and b) among workplaces that provided education and adopted policy, provided education only, and control workplaces.
Analyses will determine if the extent of sun protection actions by employers influences employees' sun safety practices.
The economic evaluation will estimate the ROI (i.e., comparison of the estimated program benefits to combined cost elements).
The proposed study is significant and innovative because it provides critical information applicable to a wide range of industrial sectors with outdoor workers on a workplace risk that has received scant attention.
Determining the effectiveness and ROI of prevention programs is essential for national and local resource investment.
研究类型
介入性
注册 (实际的)
1990
阶段
- 不适用
联系人和位置
本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。
学习地点
-
-
California
-
Oakland、California、美国、94612-3466
- Kaiser Foundation Research Institute
-
-
Colorado
-
Aurora、Colorado、美国、80045-0508
- University of Colorado Denver
-
-
参与标准
研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
18年 及以上 (成人、年长者)
接受健康志愿者
是的
有资格学习的性别
全部
描述
Inclusion Criteria:
- Participation in the prior Sun Safe Workplaces: A Campaign on Sun Protection Policies for Outdoor Workers.
- A local government organization with employees who worked outdoors in at least one of the following service areas: public works, public safety, and parks and recreation,
- Having a full time executive
- Having a population of at least 3000 residents
- Being employed at a participating local government organization as a manager or employee?
- Being employed at a participating local government organization in a job requiring outdoor work at least part of the time.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Organization had participated in the authors' previous occupational sun protection project.
学习计划
本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。
研究是如何设计的?
设计细节
- 主要用途:预防
- 分配:随机化
- 介入模型:并行分配
- 屏蔽:单身的
武器和干预
参与者组/臂 |
干预/治疗 |
|---|---|
|
实验性的:Sun Safe Workplaces Program
A follow up to the previous study that promoted the adoption of occupational sun protection policies by the local government organization comprised of personal visits with senior managers to promote policy adoption, promotional materials for sun safety, and in-person training of outdoor workers by research staff over two years.
The follow up program consists of an analysis of sun safe practices by employees and an economic evaluation of the SSW intervention completed 2 years after the initial intervention.
|
A follow-up analysis of sun safe practices by employees and an economic evaluation of the SSW intervention was conducted with the work-sites who received occupational sun protection policy promotion materials in the prior trial.
The analysis of sun safety practices of employees was done by preparing the protocols and measures for surveying employees and front-line supervisors by online and paper methods.
The economic evaluation was a retrospective collection of cost information from the prior project ledgers and an in depth interview with the key contact manager at each work-site.
No additional treatment was provided and the groups were evaluated based on their prior condition assignment.
|
|
有源比较器:Attention Control
A follow up to the previous study that promoted occupational sun protection practices by employees in local government organizations through two mailings containing educational materials and presentations at state professional meetings by project staff.
The follow up program consists of an analysis of sun safe practices by employees and an economic evaluation of SSW completed 2 years after the initial program contact.
|
A follow-up analysis of sun safe practices by employees and an economic evaluation of the SSW intervention was conducted with the work-sites who received occupational sun protection practice promotion materials in the prior trial.
The analysis of sun safety practices of employees was done by preparing the protocols and measures for surveying employees and front-line supervisors by online and paper methods.
The economic evaluation was a retrospective collection of cost information from the prior project ledgers and an in depth interview with the key contact manager at each work-site.
No additional treatment was provided and the groups were evaluated based on their prior condition assignment.
|
研究衡量的是什么?
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Survey of sun protection practices by employees.
大体时间:9 Months
|
Quantitative research in the form of a posttest survey was conducted to examine the sun safety practices by employees among workplaces that received education but did not adopt written policies, those workplaces that received education and adopted written policies and those that were in the control group.safety
practices by employees among workplaces that received education but did not adopt written policies.
|
9 Months
|
次要结果测量
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Observational checklist to review sun protections items within the workplace.
大体时间:9 months
|
An observational visit checklist was used to review sun protection items within the environment to assess employer actions to improve worker sun safety in the SSW parent study project.
This checklist accounted for program materials (posters, tip cards, brochures, policy tool box items) and other sun safety protective items such as sunscreen and portable and permanent shade provided by the workplace for employees.
|
9 months
|
|
In-depth manager interview to assess relationship of employer sun safety actions to employee sun safety.
大体时间:9 Months
|
Analysis of the association of employer actions (education only vs. education plus policy) on sun safety with employee's sun protection practices.
|
9 Months
|
|
In-depth manager survey to assess relationship of employer sun safety actions to employee sun safety.
大体时间:9 Months
|
Analysis of the association of employer actions (education only vs. education plus policy) on sun safety with employee's sun protection practices.
|
9 Months
|
|
Extraction of costs from parent study ledgers to conduct economic analysis of the SSW intervention.
大体时间:9 Months
|
Cost information from the SSW parent study project ledgers was extracted for the economic evaluation of the benefits and costs of the intervention.
|
9 Months
|
|
In-depth manager interview to conduct economic analysis of the SSW intervention.
大体时间:9 Months
|
An In-depth manger interview was conducted with managers to determine what sun safety items and practices the worksite was doing before and after the program and the costs associated with those practices.
|
9 Months
|
|
Analysis of employee surveys to compare the impact of workplaces implementing education-only versus education plus policy adoption on employee sun safety practices.
大体时间:9 Months
|
To compare the actions of intervention employers implementing education, intervention employers implementing education and adopting policy on employee sun safety.
|
9 Months
|
合作者和调查者
在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。
合作者
调查人员
- 首席研究员:David Buller, PhD、Klein Buendel, Inc.
研究记录日期
这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。
研究主要日期
学习开始 (实际的)
2015年2月27日
初级完成 (实际的)
2017年4月30日
研究完成 (实际的)
2017年7月31日
研究注册日期
首次提交
2017年9月6日
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
2017年9月8日
首次发布 (实际的)
2017年9月13日
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (实际的)
2017年10月26日
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
2017年10月24日
最后验证
2017年10月1日
更多信息
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.