- ICH GCP
- Registro degli studi clinici negli Stati Uniti
- Sperimentazione clinica NCT03281161
Sun Safe Workplaces: Assessment of Benefits and Costs of a Policy Intervention (SSW2)
24 ottobre 2017 aggiornato da: Klein Buendel, Inc.
Sun Safe Workplaces (SSW), a comprehensive occupational sun safety program, promoted education and policy to 98 cities, counties, and special districts in Colorado.
In a two-year follow-up study, Klein Buendel, Inc. (KB) proposes to examine the effectiveness of SSW on employee sun protection practices by employers and return on investment in an economic evaluation of the cost of the SSW intervention.
The results of this follow-up study will provide critical information on effective approaches to increasing sun protection across a wide range of employment sectors with outdoor workers.
Panoramica dello studio
Stato
Completato
Condizioni
Intervento / Trattamento
Descrizione dettagliata
Workers in the United States spend large amounts of time on the job, making the workplace a key venue for preventive health programs.
A workplace risk that has received limited attention is solar ultraviolet radiation (UVR).
Unprotected exposure to solar UVR of outdoor workers can produce both an immediate acute harm (i.e., severe sunburn) and long-term skin damage that can elevate the risk of developing skin cancers.
Preventing skin cancer is a priority due to its high prevalence; tendency to recur; association with other cancers; and lost productivity ($66.9 billion in losses were attributed to melanoma-related mortality from 1990-2008).
Sun Safe Workplaces (SSW) is a comprehensive occupational sun safety education and policy intervention that was tested by Klein Buendel, Inc.'s (KB) research team in a randomized control trial with 98 cities, counties, and special districts in Colorado.
Posttesting was completed in November 2013.
The SSW intervention focused on three sectors in the organizations: public works, public safety, and parks and recreation.
Half of the employers received the SSW intervention, with the remaining employers in the control condition receiving basic sun safety information.
Preliminary analyses indicate that 80% of employers in the SSW intervention condition provided sun safety education to employees and 36% adopted formal sun protection policies.
No control organizations reported policy adoption.
KB will conduct a two-year follow-up study on the benefits of the SSW intervention (i.e., increasing employees' sun protection) and return on investment (ROI; benefits relative to intervention costs).
Employee behavior was not assessed in the current SSW trial because it was uncertain whether the SSW intervention would result in uptake of education and policy and thus have the potential to influence their sun protection practices.
The proposed two-year follow-up of the 98 organizations in the SSW trial will include: (1) surveys with employees (n=10,787) and front line supervisors (n=767) to assess employees' sun protection practices and workplace actions to support employee sun safety; (2) on-site observations of sun protection actions by the employers (e.g., posters, sunscreen, shade structures); and (3) tracking of the costs of implementing the SSW intervention and induced employer costs.
The proposed analyses will compare the sun protection practices of employees a) between workplaces that received the SSW intervention and controls and b) among workplaces that provided education and adopted policy, provided education only, and control workplaces.
Analyses will determine if the extent of sun protection actions by employers influences employees' sun safety practices.
The economic evaluation will estimate the ROI (i.e., comparison of the estimated program benefits to combined cost elements).
The proposed study is significant and innovative because it provides critical information applicable to a wide range of industrial sectors with outdoor workers on a workplace risk that has received scant attention.
Determining the effectiveness and ROI of prevention programs is essential for national and local resource investment.
Tipo di studio
Interventistico
Iscrizione (Effettivo)
1990
Fase
- Non applicabile
Contatti e Sedi
Questa sezione fornisce i recapiti di coloro che conducono lo studio e informazioni su dove viene condotto lo studio.
Luoghi di studio
-
-
California
-
Oakland, California, Stati Uniti, 94612-3466
- Kaiser Foundation Research Institute
-
-
Colorado
-
Aurora, Colorado, Stati Uniti, 80045-0508
- University of Colorado Denver
-
-
Criteri di partecipazione
I ricercatori cercano persone che corrispondano a una certa descrizione, chiamata criteri di ammissibilità. Alcuni esempi di questi criteri sono le condizioni generali di salute di una persona o trattamenti precedenti.
Criteri di ammissibilità
Età idonea allo studio
18 anni e precedenti (Adulto, Adulto più anziano)
Accetta volontari sani
Sì
Sessi ammissibili allo studio
Tutto
Descrizione
Inclusion Criteria:
- Participation in the prior Sun Safe Workplaces: A Campaign on Sun Protection Policies for Outdoor Workers.
- A local government organization with employees who worked outdoors in at least one of the following service areas: public works, public safety, and parks and recreation,
- Having a full time executive
- Having a population of at least 3000 residents
- Being employed at a participating local government organization as a manager or employee?
- Being employed at a participating local government organization in a job requiring outdoor work at least part of the time.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Organization had participated in the authors' previous occupational sun protection project.
Piano di studio
Questa sezione fornisce i dettagli del piano di studio, compreso il modo in cui lo studio è progettato e ciò che lo studio sta misurando.
Come è strutturato lo studio?
Dettagli di progettazione
- Scopo principale: Prevenzione
- Assegnazione: Randomizzato
- Modello interventistico: Assegnazione parallela
- Mascheramento: Separare
Armi e interventi
Gruppo di partecipanti / Arm |
Intervento / Trattamento |
|---|---|
|
Sperimentale: Sun Safe Workplaces Program
A follow up to the previous study that promoted the adoption of occupational sun protection policies by the local government organization comprised of personal visits with senior managers to promote policy adoption, promotional materials for sun safety, and in-person training of outdoor workers by research staff over two years.
The follow up program consists of an analysis of sun safe practices by employees and an economic evaluation of the SSW intervention completed 2 years after the initial intervention.
|
A follow-up analysis of sun safe practices by employees and an economic evaluation of the SSW intervention was conducted with the work-sites who received occupational sun protection policy promotion materials in the prior trial.
The analysis of sun safety practices of employees was done by preparing the protocols and measures for surveying employees and front-line supervisors by online and paper methods.
The economic evaluation was a retrospective collection of cost information from the prior project ledgers and an in depth interview with the key contact manager at each work-site.
No additional treatment was provided and the groups were evaluated based on their prior condition assignment.
|
|
Comparatore attivo: Attention Control
A follow up to the previous study that promoted occupational sun protection practices by employees in local government organizations through two mailings containing educational materials and presentations at state professional meetings by project staff.
The follow up program consists of an analysis of sun safe practices by employees and an economic evaluation of SSW completed 2 years after the initial program contact.
|
A follow-up analysis of sun safe practices by employees and an economic evaluation of the SSW intervention was conducted with the work-sites who received occupational sun protection practice promotion materials in the prior trial.
The analysis of sun safety practices of employees was done by preparing the protocols and measures for surveying employees and front-line supervisors by online and paper methods.
The economic evaluation was a retrospective collection of cost information from the prior project ledgers and an in depth interview with the key contact manager at each work-site.
No additional treatment was provided and the groups were evaluated based on their prior condition assignment.
|
Cosa sta misurando lo studio?
Misure di risultato primarie
Misura del risultato |
Misura Descrizione |
Lasso di tempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Survey of sun protection practices by employees.
Lasso di tempo: 9 Months
|
Quantitative research in the form of a posttest survey was conducted to examine the sun safety practices by employees among workplaces that received education but did not adopt written policies, those workplaces that received education and adopted written policies and those that were in the control group.safety
practices by employees among workplaces that received education but did not adopt written policies.
|
9 Months
|
Misure di risultato secondarie
Misura del risultato |
Misura Descrizione |
Lasso di tempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Observational checklist to review sun protections items within the workplace.
Lasso di tempo: 9 months
|
An observational visit checklist was used to review sun protection items within the environment to assess employer actions to improve worker sun safety in the SSW parent study project.
This checklist accounted for program materials (posters, tip cards, brochures, policy tool box items) and other sun safety protective items such as sunscreen and portable and permanent shade provided by the workplace for employees.
|
9 months
|
|
In-depth manager interview to assess relationship of employer sun safety actions to employee sun safety.
Lasso di tempo: 9 Months
|
Analysis of the association of employer actions (education only vs. education plus policy) on sun safety with employee's sun protection practices.
|
9 Months
|
|
In-depth manager survey to assess relationship of employer sun safety actions to employee sun safety.
Lasso di tempo: 9 Months
|
Analysis of the association of employer actions (education only vs. education plus policy) on sun safety with employee's sun protection practices.
|
9 Months
|
|
Extraction of costs from parent study ledgers to conduct economic analysis of the SSW intervention.
Lasso di tempo: 9 Months
|
Cost information from the SSW parent study project ledgers was extracted for the economic evaluation of the benefits and costs of the intervention.
|
9 Months
|
|
In-depth manager interview to conduct economic analysis of the SSW intervention.
Lasso di tempo: 9 Months
|
An In-depth manger interview was conducted with managers to determine what sun safety items and practices the worksite was doing before and after the program and the costs associated with those practices.
|
9 Months
|
|
Analysis of employee surveys to compare the impact of workplaces implementing education-only versus education plus policy adoption on employee sun safety practices.
Lasso di tempo: 9 Months
|
To compare the actions of intervention employers implementing education, intervention employers implementing education and adopting policy on employee sun safety.
|
9 Months
|
Collaboratori e investigatori
Qui è dove troverai le persone e le organizzazioni coinvolte in questo studio.
Sponsor
Collaboratori
Investigatori
- Investigatore principale: David Buller, PhD, Klein Buendel, Inc.
Studiare le date dei record
Queste date tengono traccia dell'avanzamento della registrazione dello studio e dell'invio dei risultati di sintesi a ClinicalTrials.gov. I record degli studi e i risultati riportati vengono esaminati dalla National Library of Medicine (NLM) per assicurarsi che soddisfino specifici standard di controllo della qualità prima di essere pubblicati sul sito Web pubblico.
Studia le date principali
Inizio studio (Effettivo)
27 febbraio 2015
Completamento primario (Effettivo)
30 aprile 2017
Completamento dello studio (Effettivo)
31 luglio 2017
Date di iscrizione allo studio
Primo inviato
6 settembre 2017
Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità
8 settembre 2017
Primo Inserito (Effettivo)
13 settembre 2017
Aggiornamenti dei record di studio
Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)
26 ottobre 2017
Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC
24 ottobre 2017
Ultimo verificato
1 ottobre 2017
Maggiori informazioni
Termini relativi a questo studio
Parole chiave
Termini MeSH pertinenti aggiuntivi
Altri numeri di identificazione dello studio
- 5R01CA187191-02 (Sovvenzione/contratto NIH degli Stati Uniti)
- 0284 (Altro identificatore: Klein Buendel, Inc.)
Piano per i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)
Hai intenzione di condividere i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)?
NO
Informazioni su farmaci e dispositivi, documenti di studio
Studia un prodotto farmaceutico regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti
No
Studia un dispositivo regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti
No
Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .
Prove cliniche su Cancro della pelle
-
University of ArizonaNon ancora reclutamentoGruppo 1: Carrier Care (CC) seguito da Skin-to-Skin Care (SSC) seguito dalla scelta della famiglia | Gruppo 2: cura della pelle a pelle (SSC) seguito da Carrier Care (CC) seguito dalla scelta della famiglia
-
Zeba Ahmad, Ph.D.American Cancer Society, Inc.ReclutamentoCaregiving for CancerStati Uniti
-
Aalborg UniversityCompletatoPrurito | Papaina | Skin Prick Test (SPT)Danimarca
-
M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletatoAdenocarcinoma dell'intestino tenue | Adenocarcinoma dell'intestino tenue in stadio III AJCC v8 | Adenocarcinoma dell'intestino tenue in stadio IIIA AJCC v8 | Adenocarcinoma dell'intestino tenue in stadio IIIB AJCC v8 | Adenocarcinoma dell'intestino tenue stadio IV AJCC v8 | Ampolla di Vater... e altre condizioniStati Uniti
-
Mastelli S.r.l1MedReclutamentoElasticità della pelle | Idratazione della pelle in volontari sani | Miglioramento estetico della pelle | Skin Turgor | Soddisfazione del soggettoItalia
-
Georgetown UniversityNational Cancer Institute (NCI); American Cancer Society, Inc.; Susan G. Komen...CompletatoStudio delle donne cinesi che non hanno aderito alle linee guida per lo screening mammografico dell'American Cancer SocietyStati Uniti
-
Institut Cancerologie de l'OuestAttivo, non reclutanteQualità della vita al lavoro | Professionisti paramedici | Toccare Massaggio | Cancer CenterFrancia
-
Emory UniversityNational Cancer Institute (NCI)RitiratoCancro al seno in stadio IV prognostico AJCC v8 | Neoplasia maligna metastatica nel cervello | Carcinoma mammario metastatico | Anatomic Stage IV Breast Cancer American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) v8
-
Yonsei UniversityNon ancora reclutamentoRAS/BRAF Wild-Type Advanced Cancer MathementCorea, Repubblica di
-
NRG OncologyNational Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletatoCancro al seno in stadio anatomico IV AJCC v8 | Cancro al seno in stadio IV prognostico AJCC v8 | Neoplasia maligna metastatica nell'osso | Neoplasia maligna metastatica nei linfonodi | Neoplasia maligna metastatica nel fegato | Carcinoma mammario metastatico | Neoplasia maligna metastatica nel... e altre condizioniStati Uniti, Canada, Arabia Saudita, Corea del Sud
Prove cliniche su Sun Safe Workplaces Program
-
Klein Buendel, Inc.University of Colorado, Denver; Kaiser Foundation Research InstituteCompletatoCancro della pelleStati Uniti
-
Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyCompletatoPrevenzione del cancro della pelleStati Uniti
-
University of OsloCompletato