Estrogen and Cooperation, Competitiveness, and Risk Preferences (FELICIA)
The Effect of Estrogen Levels on Cooperative and Competitive Decision Making and Risk Preferences
研究概览
地位
详细说明
Behavioural theories assume that, as a result of natural selection, women undergo a brief, unconscious change in some psychological aspects during ovulation. This short-term change, "ovulatory shift", is assumed to aim to increase the probability of successful reproduction in the decisive days of the female cycle. Amongst others, it is assumed that women behave particularly uncooperatively and particularly competitively towards other women during the fertile days. Though, empirical evidence is ambiguous.
The effect on risk preferences is unclear. Theory generally assumes that female risk aversion increases in the fertile days. However, empirical studies find partly positive and partly negative correlations.
Within the scope of this study, estradiol levels which are collected in the clinical treatment of patients in the Clinic for Gynaecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine are to be linked with the behavioural economic measures of cooperation, competitiveness, and risk preferences, which are collected using questionnaires or a computer-based decision task.
The aim of the research project is to quasi-experimentally isolate the effect of estradiol on competitiveness, cooperation and risk preferences of women.
No study known to us has ever been able to realize a comparable quasi-experimental design which is necessary to isolate the causal effect of estradiol on different behavioural measures.
In the experimental group, a sample of approx. 50 women in fertility treatment (In Vitro Fertilization/Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection (IVF/ICSI), long Gonadotropin releasing Hormone (GnRH) agonist protocol) is surveyed. This allows us to create a quasi-experimental design in which the estradiol level is exogenously manipulated and regularly measured.
A random sample of 30 male students of Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule (RWTH) Aachen University serves as a control group.
We realize a longitudinal section design with measurement repetitions, which allows inter- and intrapersonal comparisons. A three-stage procedure with two measuring points and a preliminary clarification meeting is planned.
The following measuring instruments are used to record competitiveness, cooperation and risk preference: SOEP Risk Attitude, Social Value Orientation German A, The cooperative and competitive Personality Scale German, Risk aversion, Willingness to compete.
研究类型
注册 (预期的)
联系人和位置
学习地点
-
-
-
Aachen、德国、52074
- 招聘中
- RWTH Aachen University Hospital
-
接触：
- Jan Frederik Graff, Dr.
- 电话号码：+492418027066 +492418093341
- 邮箱：Frederik.Graff@org.rwth-aachen.de
-
接触：
- Benjamin Rösing, Dr.
- 电话号码：+492418027066 +492418027066
- 邮箱：broesing@ukaachen.de
-
首席研究员：
- Benjamin Rösing
-
-
参与标准
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
接受健康志愿者
有资格学习的性别
取样方法
研究人群
描述
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients
- female
- patient in fertility treatment according to Long GnRH Agonist Protocol
- 18 years and older
- written declaration of consent
- persons who are contractually capable and mentally able and willing to follow the instructions of the study staff
- understanding of the German language (written and spoken)
Control group
- male
- 18 Years and older
- written declaration of consent
- persons who are contractually capable and mentally able and willing to follow the instructions of the study staff
- understanding of the German language (written and spoken)
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients
- Illiterate
- pregnant and breastfeeding women
- persons who are accommodated in an institution on official or court order
- persons in a dependent or employment relationship with the auditor
- simultaneous participation in another clinical trial
Control group
- Illiterate
- persons who are accommodated in an institution on official or court order
- persons in a dependent or employment relationship with the auditor
- simultaneous participation in another clinical trial
学习计划
研究是如何设计的？
设计细节
- 观测模型：其他
- 时间观点：预期
队列和干预
团体/队列 |
|---|
|
female patients
women in fertility treatment according to Long GnRH Agonist Protocol
|
|
control group
random sample of male students
|
研究衡量的是什么？
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Change of E2 [mg/l]
大体时间：Approx. 10 days after application of GnRH agonist and again approx. 14 days later
|
Change of blood concentration of estradiol (E2) in mg/l
|
Approx. 10 days after application of GnRH agonist and again approx. 14 days later
|
|
Change of LH [mg/l]
大体时间：Approx. 10 days after application of GnRH agonist and again approx. 14 days later
|
Change of blood concentration of the luteinizing hormone (LH) in mg/l
|
Approx. 10 days after application of GnRH agonist and again approx. 14 days later
|
|
Change of Prog [mg/l]
大体时间：Approx. 10 days after application of GnRH agonist and again approx. 14 days later
|
Change of blood concentration of progesterone (Prog) in mg/l
|
Approx. 10 days after application of GnRH agonist and again approx. 14 days later
|
|
Change of Cooperation 1
大体时间：Approx. 10 days after application of GnRH agonist and again approx. 14 days later
|
Change of willingness to cooperate measured via the Social Value Orientation German A (Murphy et al. 2011)
|
Approx. 10 days after application of GnRH agonist and again approx. 14 days later
|
|
Change of Competitiveness 1
大体时间：Approx. 10 days after application of GnRH agonist and again approx. 14 days later
|
Change of willingness to compete measured via the cooperative and competitive Personality Scale German (Lu et al. 2006)
|
Approx. 10 days after application of GnRH agonist and again approx. 14 days later
|
|
Change of Risk Preference 1
大体时间：Approx. 10 days after application of GnRH agonist and again approx. 14 days later
|
Change of Risk preferences measured via the SOEP Risk Attitude (DIW Berlin)
|
Approx. 10 days after application of GnRH agonist and again approx. 14 days later
|
|
Change of Cooperation 2
大体时间：Approx. 10 days after application of GnRH agonist and again approx. 14 days later
|
Change of willingness to cooperate measured via the cooperative and competitive Personality Scale German (Lu et al. 2006)
|
Approx. 10 days after application of GnRH agonist and again approx. 14 days later
|
|
Change of Competitiveness 2
大体时间：Approx. 10 days after application of GnRH agonist and again approx. 14 days later
|
Change of willingness to compete measured via the Willingness to compete measure based on Niederle & Vesterlund (2007)
|
Approx. 10 days after application of GnRH agonist and again approx. 14 days later
|
|
Change of Risk Preference 2
大体时间：Approx. 10 days after application of GnRH agonist and again approx. 14 days later
|
Change of Risk preferences measured via the Risk aversion measure by Holt & Laury (2002)
|
Approx. 10 days after application of GnRH agonist and again approx. 14 days later
|
合作者和调查者
调查人员
- 首席研究员：Benjamin Rösing, Dr.、RWTH Aachen
出版物和有用的链接
一般刊物
- Ranehill, E., Zethraeus, N., Blomberg, L., von Schoultz, B., Hirschberg, A. L., Johannesson, M., & Dreber, A. (2017). Hormonal Contraceptives Do Not Impact Economic Preferences: Evidence from a Randomized Trial. Management Science.
- Durante, K. M., Griskevicius, V., Hill, S. E., Perilloux, C., & Li, N. P. (2010). Ovulation, female competition, and product choice: Hormonal influences on consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(6), 921-934.
- Gangestad SW, Thornhill R. Menstrual cycle variation in women's preferences for the scent of symmetrical men. Proc Biol Sci. 1998 May 22;265(1399):927-33. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1998.0380.
- Buser, T. (2012a). Digit ratios, the menstrual cycle and social preferences. Games and Economic Behavior, 76(2), 457-470.
- Buser, T. (2012b). The impact of the menstrual cycle and hormonal contraceptives on competitiveness. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 83(1), 1-10.
- Wozniak, D., Harbaugh, W. T., & Mayr, U. (2014). The menstrual cycle and performance feedback alter gender differences in competitive choices. Journal of Labor Economics, 32(1), 161-198.
- Pearson, M., & Schipper, B. C. (2013). Menstrual cycle and competitive bidding. Games and Economic Behavior, 78, 1-20.
- Drichoutis, A. C., & Nayga, R. M. (2015). Do risk and time preferences have biological roots?. Southern Economic Journal, 82(1), 235-256.
- Lazzaro SC, Rutledge RB, Burghart DR, Glimcher PW. The Impact of Menstrual Cycle Phase on Economic Choice and Rationality. PLoS One. 2016 Jan 29;11(1):e0144080. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144080. eCollection 2016.
- Murphy RO, Ackermann KA. Social value orientation: theoretical and measurement issues in the study of social preferences. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2014 Feb;18(1):13-41. doi: 10.1177/1088868313501745. Epub 2013 Sep 23.
- Lu S, Au WT, Jiang F, Xie X, Yam P. Cooperativeness and competitiveness as two distinct constructs: validating the Cooperative and Competitive Personality Scale in a social dilemma context. Int J Psychol. 2013;48(6):1135-47. doi: 10.1080/00207594.2012.743666. Epub 2012 Nov 12.
- Holt, C. A., & Laury, S. K. (2002). Risk aversion and incentive effects. American economic review, 92(5), 1644-1655.
- Niederle, M., & Vesterlund, L. (2007). Do women shy away from competition? Do men compete too much?. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1067-1101.
研究记录日期
研究主要日期
学习开始 (实际的)
初级完成 (预期的)
研究完成 (预期的)
研究注册日期
首次提交
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
首次发布 (实际的)
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (实际的)
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
最后验证
更多信息
与本研究相关的术语
其他研究编号
- 18-053
计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)
计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)？
药物和器械信息、研究文件
研究美国 FDA 监管的药品
研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品
在美国制造并从美国出口的产品
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索，没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求，请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改，我们的网站上也会自动更新.