此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

Improving Care for Frail Older Adults Using a Digital Needs Assessment Tool (Frailty)

2026年5月5日 更新者:Angelique Chan、Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School

Integrating Health and Social Service Needs for Frail Elders at Point of Care: Development and Evaluation of an IT-based Digital Needs-assessment Tool

The goal of this trial is to evaluate whether a digital needs-assessment tool can improve care planning and outcomes for frail older adults (aged 60 years and above) hospitalized in Singapore. The tool is designed to identify patients' health and social service needs and support better care coordination after hospital discharge.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Does the use of a digital needs-assessment tool improve the identification and management of health and social service needs in frail older adults?
  • Does this approach improve patient outcomes, such as quality of life, care satisfaction, and healthcare utilization after discharge?

Participants will:

  • Respond to a baseline questionnaire
  • Receive a personalized care plan based on identified needs by the tool
  • Be followed up at 1 month and 3 months after discharge through surveys
  • Some participants will receive additional follow-up phone calls to review care needs and service use
  • A subset of participants will take part in interviews to share their care experiences

研究概览

详细说明

Older adults with frailty frequently experience multiple medical, functional, and social challenges following hospital discharge. Evidence from the Health and Social Service Needs study indicates that patients discharged with unmet health and health-related social service (HASS) needs have poorer post-discharge outcomes, including increased healthcare utilization. While frailty screening is commonly used to identify high-risk patients, frailty status alone does not identify the specific actionable needs that could mitigate health deterioration or support community living.

During hospitalization, assessments of these needs are typically conducted through referrals to medical social workers, patient navigators, case managers, or geriatricians. These referrals are discretionary and vary across providers and settings, contributing to inconsistent care delivery. Such approaches are resource-intensive and difficult to sustain under workforce constraints and may lead to missed identification of needs or delays in discharge, increasing the risk of unmet needs during care transitions.

This study evaluates the implementation of a needs-based assessment approach using the Simple Segmentation Tool (SST), a brief digital instrument developed in Singapore by Matchar et al. (2017). The SST is designed to rapidly identify likely actionable HASS needs and support care planning and referral processes. The tool can be completed in approximately 2-3 minutes by trained healthcare professionals, including physicians, nurses, and case managers, and is supported by an algorithm developed by a multidisciplinary expert panel.

Following enrollment, hospital staff will complete the SST based on participants' clinical and social circumstances. Care plans will be generated using outputs from the SST and reviewed with participants and/or their caregivers. If a participant is readmitted within three weeks of discharge, the SST assessment will be repeated following the subsequent discharge to ensure that care plans reflect updated or evolving needs. Participants who decline recommended services will remain enrolled in the study but will not be counted toward the target sample size of 200 participants.

Participants will complete a baseline questionnaire during hospitalization and will be followed after discharge with structured surveys administered at one month and three months. These surveys will assess post-discharge outcomes related to health status, care experiences, and healthcare utilization. Qualitative interviews will also be conducted with a subset of patients and healthcare staff to explore experiences, perceived value, and implementation challenges associated with SST-guided care planning.

To support care coordination, internal stakeholders and external community service providers, coordinated by the Agency for Integrated Care Care-Referral Team, will use a shared framework to facilitate service linkage and care transitions. Service activation and follow-up will be tracked, and any failures in linkage will be communicated to a central coordinating team to support resolution and continuity of care.

Prior to the main study, a pilot phase involving up to 10 patient volunteers will be conducted to assess workflow feasibility, clarity of study materials, and questionnaire length. Pilot participants will provide informed consent, and data collected during this phase will not be included in research analyses. Feedback from the pilot will be used to refine study procedures and materials prior to full implementation.

研究类型

介入性

注册 (估计的)

200

阶段

  • 不适用

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习联系方式

  • 姓名:Shenglin Zheng, Ph.D.
  • 电话号码:6580325886
  • 邮箱:sz61@nus.edu.sg

学习地点

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

  • 成人
  • 年长者

接受健康志愿者

不

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient participant: (i) Aged >= 60 years at the time of recruitment; (ii) identified as frail, with a CFS score >= 5 and/or modified HFRS intermediate and high frailty risk (mHFRS) score >=5; (iii) Singapore citizens or permanent residents; (iv) able to speak and understand English, Chinese or Malay.
  • Proxy (when responding on behalf of eligible patients): (i) Relative or friend of the patient participant; (ii) Aged 21 years or older; (iii) Familiar with the older adult's health and social situation.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient participant: (i) Currently involved in another study or (ii) residents of nursing homes, or (iii) patients known to home hospice or home palliative care services with a life expectancy of less than 6 months.
  • Proxy: primary caregivers who are foreign domestic workers will be excluded from the study.

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

  • 主要用途:卫生服务研究
  • 分配:随机化
  • 介入模型:并行分配
  • 屏蔽:单身的

武器和干预

参与者组/臂
干预/治疗
实验性的:SST + care coordination calls
Participants will receive a digital needs assessment during hospitalization and a personalized care plan. After discharge, participants will be randomized in a 1:3 ratio. Participants will receive two follow-up calls from care coordinators to review care needs and support care coordination.
The Simple Segmentation Tool (SST) is used to assess multidimensional needs and generate individualized care recommendations. Participants receive SST-informed care plan and referral to appropriate health and social services.
Participants will receive two structured post-discharge care coordination phone calls to support service uptake, address barriers, and facilitate follow-up on recommended services.
实验性的:SST only
Participants will receive a digital needs assessment during hospitalization and a personalized care plan.
The Simple Segmentation Tool (SST) is used to assess multidimensional needs and generate individualized care recommendations. Participants receive SST-informed care plan and referral to appropriate health and social services.

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Service initiation rate
大体时间:30 days after discharge
The proportion of enrolled participants who successfully initiate at least one recommended health or social support service
30 days after discharge

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Health-related quality of life
大体时间:Baseline, 1-month and 3-month follow-ups
Change in health-related quality of life measured using the 5-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). The EQ-5D-5L essentially consists of the EQ-5D descriptive system, where Index Score calculated based on country-specific preference (Singapore in this context) and the EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS) (range: 0 to 100) were reported. For both measures, higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life.
Baseline, 1-month and 3-month follow-ups
Healthcare Utilisation
大体时间:180 days and 360 days post-discharge
Healthcare service utilisation obtained from electronic medical records (EMR), including number of emergency department visits, hospital admissions, outpatient visits, and visits to healthcare professionals.
180 days and 360 days post-discharge
Usability of SST
大体时间:24 hours after the first administered SST
Usability was measured using the System Usability Scale (SUS), a 10-item instrument providing a global score from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better perceived usability.
24 hours after the first administered SST
Intervention appropriateness (implementation outcome)
大体时间:3-month follow-up
Assessed using the Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM) among staff involved in the care of patients using the SST, with total scores ranging from 4-20. Higher scores indicate greater appropriateness.
3-month follow-up
Quality of care and continuity
大体时间:1-month and 3-month follow-ups
Quality of care and continuity is measured using the adaptive Patient Continuity of Care Checklist (PCCQ). Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale and scores range from 5-30. Higher scores indicate a higher level of perceived continuity of care.
1-month and 3-month follow-ups
Mortality
大体时间:180 and 360 days post-discharge
All-cause mortality assessed using electronic medical records (EMR), defined as death occurring from the time of enrollment.
180 and 360 days post-discharge
Service quality of SST
大体时间:24 hours after the first administered SST
Perceived service quality was measured using an adaptive Electronic Service Quality Scale (E-S-QUAL) consisting of 19 items. Respondents first distributed 100 points across the four dimensions Efficiency, Fulfillment, System Availability, and Privacy, to reflect relative importance. Items were then rated on a 5-point Likert scale. Higher scores indicating a better perception of electronic service quality.
24 hours after the first administered SST
Care experience
大体时间:1-month and 3-month follow-ups
Patient-reported experience is measured using Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-4). Total scores range from 4 to 16, where higher scores indicate greater satisfaction with care.
1-month and 3-month follow-ups
Intervention feasibility (implementation outcome)
大体时间:3-month follow-up
Assessed using the Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) among staff involved in the care of patients using the SST. Total scores range from 4-20 and higher scores indicate greater feasibility.
3-month follow-up
Normalization process (implementation outcome)
大体时间:3-month follow-up
Assessed using the Normalisation Measure Development (NoMAD) among staff involved in the care of patients using the SST. Total scores range from 0-100. Higher scores indicate better normalization.
3-month follow-up
Intervention acceptability (implementation outcome)
大体时间:3-month follow-up
Measured by the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM)among staff involved in the care of patients using the SST, with a total score ranging from 4-20. Higher scores indicate greater acceptability.
3-month follow-up

其他结果措施

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Healthcare costs
大体时间:180 and 360 days post-discharge
Healthcare utilisation costs and billing data obtained from EMR, including hospital and outpatient service costs.
180 and 360 days post-discharge
Unmet needs and service utilization
大体时间:1-month and 3-month follow-ups
Assessment of assistance participants received since the last hospital discharge (18-item)
1-month and 3-month follow-ups
Caregiver burden (proxy participants only)
大体时间:Baseline, 1-month and 3-month follow-ups
Caregiver burden measured using the 4-item Zarit Burden Interview, administered to proxies who are primary caregivers.
Baseline, 1-month and 3-month follow-ups
Resilience
大体时间:Baseline, 1-month and 3-month follow-ups
Change in psychological resilience measured using the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC 10), with total scores ranging from 0 from 4. Higher scores indicate a higher level of psychological resilience.
Baseline, 1-month and 3-month follow-ups
Social support
大体时间:Baseline, 1-month and 3-month follow-ups
Change in social connectedness and support measured using the Lubben Social Network Scale-Revised (LSNS-R), with total scores ranging from 0 to 60. Higher scores indicate a larger and more robust social network.
Baseline, 1-month and 3-month follow-ups
Depressive symptoms
大体时间:Baseline, 1-month and 3-month follow-ups
Change in depressive symptoms measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2) with total scores ranging from 0 to 6. Higher scores indicate a greater likelihood of depressive symptoms.
Baseline, 1-month and 3-month follow-ups
Loneliness
大体时间:Baseline, 1-month and 3-month follow-ups
Change in loneliness using the Three-Item Loneliness Scale, with total scores ranging from 3 to 9. Higher scores indicate a greater perception of loneliness.
Baseline, 1-month and 3-month follow-ups
Physical activity
大体时间:Baseline, 1-month and 3-month follow-ups
Change in physical activity levels measured using the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE).
Baseline, 1-month and 3-month follow-ups
Instrumental Activities of Daily Living
大体时间:Baseline, 1-month and 3-month follow-ups
Change in functional ability measured using Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL), with total scores ranging from 0-16. Higher scores indicate greater functional independence.
Baseline, 1-month and 3-month follow-ups
Activities of Daily Living
大体时间:Baseline, 1-month and 3-month follow-ups
Change in functional ability measured using Katz Index of Independence in Activities of Daily Living (ADL), with total scores ranging from 0-12. Higher scores indicate greater functional independence.
Baseline, 1-month and 3-month follow-ups

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

调查人员

  • 首席研究员:Angelique Chan, Ph.D.、Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School

出版物和有用的链接

负责输入研究信息的人员自愿提供这些出版物。这些可能与研究有关。

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始 (估计的)

2026年5月1日

初级完成 (估计的)

2026年12月30日

研究完成 (估计的)

2027年12月30日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2026年4月14日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2026年5月5日

首次发布 (实际的)

2026年5月12日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2026年5月12日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2026年5月5日

最后验证

2026年5月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

其他研究编号

  • CIRB: 2024-2130
  • MOH-001199-00 (其他赠款/资助编号:National Research Foundation (NRF), Singapore)

计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)

计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)?

不

药物和器械信息、研究文件

研究美国 FDA 监管的药品

不

研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品

不

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

订阅