Questa pagina è stata tradotta automaticamente e l'accuratezza della traduzione non è garantita. Si prega di fare riferimento al Versione inglese per un testo di partenza.

Improving Care for Frail Older Adults Using a Digital Needs Assessment Tool (Frailty)

5 maggio 2026 aggiornato da: Angelique Chan, Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School

Integrating Health and Social Service Needs for Frail Elders at Point of Care: Development and Evaluation of an IT-based Digital Needs-assessment Tool

The goal of this trial is to evaluate whether a digital needs-assessment tool can improve care planning and outcomes for frail older adults (aged 60 years and above) hospitalized in Singapore. The tool is designed to identify patients' health and social service needs and support better care coordination after hospital discharge.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Does the use of a digital needs-assessment tool improve the identification and management of health and social service needs in frail older adults?
  • Does this approach improve patient outcomes, such as quality of life, care satisfaction, and healthcare utilization after discharge?

Participants will:

  • Respond to a baseline questionnaire
  • Receive a personalized care plan based on identified needs by the tool
  • Be followed up at 1 month and 3 months after discharge through surveys
  • Some participants will receive additional follow-up phone calls to review care needs and service use
  • A subset of participants will take part in interviews to share their care experiences

Panoramica dello studio

Descrizione dettagliata

Older adults with frailty frequently experience multiple medical, functional, and social challenges following hospital discharge. Evidence from the Health and Social Service Needs study indicates that patients discharged with unmet health and health-related social service (HASS) needs have poorer post-discharge outcomes, including increased healthcare utilization. While frailty screening is commonly used to identify high-risk patients, frailty status alone does not identify the specific actionable needs that could mitigate health deterioration or support community living.

During hospitalization, assessments of these needs are typically conducted through referrals to medical social workers, patient navigators, case managers, or geriatricians. These referrals are discretionary and vary across providers and settings, contributing to inconsistent care delivery. Such approaches are resource-intensive and difficult to sustain under workforce constraints and may lead to missed identification of needs or delays in discharge, increasing the risk of unmet needs during care transitions.

This study evaluates the implementation of a needs-based assessment approach using the Simple Segmentation Tool (SST), a brief digital instrument developed in Singapore by Matchar et al. (2017). The SST is designed to rapidly identify likely actionable HASS needs and support care planning and referral processes. The tool can be completed in approximately 2-3 minutes by trained healthcare professionals, including physicians, nurses, and case managers, and is supported by an algorithm developed by a multidisciplinary expert panel.

Following enrollment, hospital staff will complete the SST based on participants' clinical and social circumstances. Care plans will be generated using outputs from the SST and reviewed with participants and/or their caregivers. If a participant is readmitted within three weeks of discharge, the SST assessment will be repeated following the subsequent discharge to ensure that care plans reflect updated or evolving needs. Participants who decline recommended services will remain enrolled in the study but will not be counted toward the target sample size of 200 participants.

Participants will complete a baseline questionnaire during hospitalization and will be followed after discharge with structured surveys administered at one month and three months. These surveys will assess post-discharge outcomes related to health status, care experiences, and healthcare utilization. Qualitative interviews will also be conducted with a subset of patients and healthcare staff to explore experiences, perceived value, and implementation challenges associated with SST-guided care planning.

To support care coordination, internal stakeholders and external community service providers, coordinated by the Agency for Integrated Care Care-Referral Team, will use a shared framework to facilitate service linkage and care transitions. Service activation and follow-up will be tracked, and any failures in linkage will be communicated to a central coordinating team to support resolution and continuity of care.

Prior to the main study, a pilot phase involving up to 10 patient volunteers will be conducted to assess workflow feasibility, clarity of study materials, and questionnaire length. Pilot participants will provide informed consent, and data collected during this phase will not be included in research analyses. Feedback from the pilot will be used to refine study procedures and materials prior to full implementation.

Tipo di studio

Interventistico

Iscrizione (Stimato)

200

Fase

  • Non applicabile

Contatti e Sedi

Questa sezione fornisce i recapiti di coloro che conducono lo studio e informazioni su dove viene condotto lo studio.

Contatto studio

  • Nome: Shenglin Zheng, Ph.D.
  • Numero di telefono: 6580325886
  • Email: sz61@nus.edu.sg

Luoghi di studio

Criteri di partecipazione

I ricercatori cercano persone che corrispondano a una certa descrizione, chiamata criteri di ammissibilità. Alcuni esempi di questi criteri sono le condizioni generali di salute di una persona o trattamenti precedenti.

Criteri di ammissibilità

Età idonea allo studio

  • Adulto
  • Adulto più anziano

Accetta volontari sani

No

Descrizione

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient participant: (i) Aged >= 60 years at the time of recruitment; (ii) identified as frail, with a CFS score >= 5 and/or modified HFRS intermediate and high frailty risk (mHFRS) score >=5; (iii) Singapore citizens or permanent residents; (iv) able to speak and understand English, Chinese or Malay.
  • Proxy (when responding on behalf of eligible patients): (i) Relative or friend of the patient participant; (ii) Aged 21 years or older; (iii) Familiar with the older adult's health and social situation.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient participant: (i) Currently involved in another study or (ii) residents of nursing homes, or (iii) patients known to home hospice or home palliative care services with a life expectancy of less than 6 months.
  • Proxy: primary caregivers who are foreign domestic workers will be excluded from the study.

Piano di studio

Questa sezione fornisce i dettagli del piano di studio, compreso il modo in cui lo studio è progettato e ciò che lo studio sta misurando.

Come è strutturato lo studio?

Dettagli di progettazione

  • Scopo principale: Ricerca sui servizi sanitari
  • Assegnazione: Randomizzato
  • Modello interventistico: Assegnazione parallela
  • Mascheramento: Separare

Armi e interventi

Gruppo di partecipanti / Arm
Intervento / Trattamento
Sperimentale: SST + care coordination calls
Participants will receive a digital needs assessment during hospitalization and a personalized care plan. After discharge, participants will be randomized in a 1:3 ratio. Participants will receive two follow-up calls from care coordinators to review care needs and support care coordination.
The Simple Segmentation Tool (SST) is used to assess multidimensional needs and generate individualized care recommendations. Participants receive SST-informed care plan and referral to appropriate health and social services.
Participants will receive two structured post-discharge care coordination phone calls to support service uptake, address barriers, and facilitate follow-up on recommended services.
Sperimentale: SST only
Participants will receive a digital needs assessment during hospitalization and a personalized care plan.
The Simple Segmentation Tool (SST) is used to assess multidimensional needs and generate individualized care recommendations. Participants receive SST-informed care plan and referral to appropriate health and social services.

Cosa sta misurando lo studio?

Misure di risultato primarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Service initiation rate
Lasso di tempo: 30 days after discharge
The proportion of enrolled participants who successfully initiate at least one recommended health or social support service
30 days after discharge

Misure di risultato secondarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Health-related quality of life
Lasso di tempo: Baseline, 1-month and 3-month follow-ups
Change in health-related quality of life measured using the 5-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). The EQ-5D-5L essentially consists of the EQ-5D descriptive system, where Index Score calculated based on country-specific preference (Singapore in this context) and the EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS) (range: 0 to 100) were reported. For both measures, higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life.
Baseline, 1-month and 3-month follow-ups
Healthcare Utilisation
Lasso di tempo: 180 days and 360 days post-discharge
Healthcare service utilisation obtained from electronic medical records (EMR), including number of emergency department visits, hospital admissions, outpatient visits, and visits to healthcare professionals.
180 days and 360 days post-discharge
Usability of SST
Lasso di tempo: 24 hours after the first administered SST
Usability was measured using the System Usability Scale (SUS), a 10-item instrument providing a global score from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better perceived usability.
24 hours after the first administered SST
Intervention appropriateness (implementation outcome)
Lasso di tempo: 3-month follow-up
Assessed using the Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM) among staff involved in the care of patients using the SST, with total scores ranging from 4-20. Higher scores indicate greater appropriateness.
3-month follow-up
Quality of care and continuity
Lasso di tempo: 1-month and 3-month follow-ups
Quality of care and continuity is measured using the adaptive Patient Continuity of Care Checklist (PCCQ). Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale and scores range from 5-30. Higher scores indicate a higher level of perceived continuity of care.
1-month and 3-month follow-ups
Mortality
Lasso di tempo: 180 and 360 days post-discharge
All-cause mortality assessed using electronic medical records (EMR), defined as death occurring from the time of enrollment.
180 and 360 days post-discharge
Service quality of SST
Lasso di tempo: 24 hours after the first administered SST
Perceived service quality was measured using an adaptive Electronic Service Quality Scale (E-S-QUAL) consisting of 19 items. Respondents first distributed 100 points across the four dimensions Efficiency, Fulfillment, System Availability, and Privacy, to reflect relative importance. Items were then rated on a 5-point Likert scale. Higher scores indicating a better perception of electronic service quality.
24 hours after the first administered SST
Care experience
Lasso di tempo: 1-month and 3-month follow-ups
Patient-reported experience is measured using Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-4). Total scores range from 4 to 16, where higher scores indicate greater satisfaction with care.
1-month and 3-month follow-ups
Intervention feasibility (implementation outcome)
Lasso di tempo: 3-month follow-up
Assessed using the Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) among staff involved in the care of patients using the SST. Total scores range from 4-20 and higher scores indicate greater feasibility.
3-month follow-up
Normalization process (implementation outcome)
Lasso di tempo: 3-month follow-up
Assessed using the Normalisation Measure Development (NoMAD) among staff involved in the care of patients using the SST. Total scores range from 0-100. Higher scores indicate better normalization.
3-month follow-up
Intervention acceptability (implementation outcome)
Lasso di tempo: 3-month follow-up
Measured by the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM)among staff involved in the care of patients using the SST, with a total score ranging from 4-20. Higher scores indicate greater acceptability.
3-month follow-up

Altre misure di risultato

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Healthcare costs
Lasso di tempo: 180 and 360 days post-discharge
Healthcare utilisation costs and billing data obtained from EMR, including hospital and outpatient service costs.
180 and 360 days post-discharge
Unmet needs and service utilization
Lasso di tempo: 1-month and 3-month follow-ups
Assessment of assistance participants received since the last hospital discharge (18-item)
1-month and 3-month follow-ups
Caregiver burden (proxy participants only)
Lasso di tempo: Baseline, 1-month and 3-month follow-ups
Caregiver burden measured using the 4-item Zarit Burden Interview, administered to proxies who are primary caregivers.
Baseline, 1-month and 3-month follow-ups
Resilience
Lasso di tempo: Baseline, 1-month and 3-month follow-ups
Change in psychological resilience measured using the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC 10), with total scores ranging from 0 from 4. Higher scores indicate a higher level of psychological resilience.
Baseline, 1-month and 3-month follow-ups
Social support
Lasso di tempo: Baseline, 1-month and 3-month follow-ups
Change in social connectedness and support measured using the Lubben Social Network Scale-Revised (LSNS-R), with total scores ranging from 0 to 60. Higher scores indicate a larger and more robust social network.
Baseline, 1-month and 3-month follow-ups
Depressive symptoms
Lasso di tempo: Baseline, 1-month and 3-month follow-ups
Change in depressive symptoms measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2) with total scores ranging from 0 to 6. Higher scores indicate a greater likelihood of depressive symptoms.
Baseline, 1-month and 3-month follow-ups
Loneliness
Lasso di tempo: Baseline, 1-month and 3-month follow-ups
Change in loneliness using the Three-Item Loneliness Scale, with total scores ranging from 3 to 9. Higher scores indicate a greater perception of loneliness.
Baseline, 1-month and 3-month follow-ups
Physical activity
Lasso di tempo: Baseline, 1-month and 3-month follow-ups
Change in physical activity levels measured using the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE).
Baseline, 1-month and 3-month follow-ups
Instrumental Activities of Daily Living
Lasso di tempo: Baseline, 1-month and 3-month follow-ups
Change in functional ability measured using Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL), with total scores ranging from 0-16. Higher scores indicate greater functional independence.
Baseline, 1-month and 3-month follow-ups
Activities of Daily Living
Lasso di tempo: Baseline, 1-month and 3-month follow-ups
Change in functional ability measured using Katz Index of Independence in Activities of Daily Living (ADL), with total scores ranging from 0-12. Higher scores indicate greater functional independence.
Baseline, 1-month and 3-month follow-ups

Collaboratori e investigatori

Qui è dove troverai le persone e le organizzazioni coinvolte in questo studio.

Investigatori

  • Investigatore principale: Angelique Chan, Ph.D., Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School

Pubblicazioni e link utili

La persona responsabile dell'inserimento delle informazioni sullo studio fornisce volontariamente queste pubblicazioni. Questi possono riguardare qualsiasi cosa relativa allo studio.

Studiare le date dei record

Queste date tengono traccia dell'avanzamento della registrazione dello studio e dell'invio dei risultati di sintesi a ClinicalTrials.gov. I record degli studi e i risultati riportati vengono esaminati dalla National Library of Medicine (NLM) per assicurarsi che soddisfino specifici standard di controllo della qualità prima di essere pubblicati sul sito Web pubblico.

Studia le date principali

Inizio studio (Stimato)

1 maggio 2026

Completamento primario (Stimato)

30 dicembre 2026

Completamento dello studio (Stimato)

30 dicembre 2027

Date di iscrizione allo studio

Primo inviato

14 aprile 2026

Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità

5 maggio 2026

Primo Inserito (Effettivo)

12 maggio 2026

Aggiornamenti dei record di studio

Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)

12 maggio 2026

Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC

5 maggio 2026

Ultimo verificato

1 maggio 2026

Maggiori informazioni

Termini relativi a questo studio

Altri numeri di identificazione dello studio

  • CIRB: 2024-2130
  • MOH-001199-00 (Altro numero di sovvenzione/finanziamento: National Research Foundation (NRF), Singapore)

Piano per i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)

Hai intenzione di condividere i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)?

NO

Informazioni su farmaci e dispositivi, documenti di studio

Studia un prodotto farmaceutico regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Studia un dispositivo regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .

Prove cliniche su Anziani fragili

Prove cliniche su Core: SST-informed care planning

Sottoscrivi