이 페이지는 자동 번역되었으며 번역의 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다. 참조하십시오 영문판 원본 텍스트의 경우.

Improving Care for Frail Older Adults Using a Digital Needs Assessment Tool (Frailty)

2026년 5월 5일 업데이트: Angelique Chan, Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School

Integrating Health and Social Service Needs for Frail Elders at Point of Care: Development and Evaluation of an IT-based Digital Needs-assessment Tool

The goal of this trial is to evaluate whether a digital needs-assessment tool can improve care planning and outcomes for frail older adults (aged 60 years and above) hospitalized in Singapore. The tool is designed to identify patients' health and social service needs and support better care coordination after hospital discharge.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Does the use of a digital needs-assessment tool improve the identification and management of health and social service needs in frail older adults?
  • Does this approach improve patient outcomes, such as quality of life, care satisfaction, and healthcare utilization after discharge?

Participants will:

  • Respond to a baseline questionnaire
  • Receive a personalized care plan based on identified needs by the tool
  • Be followed up at 1 month and 3 months after discharge through surveys
  • Some participants will receive additional follow-up phone calls to review care needs and service use
  • A subset of participants will take part in interviews to share their care experiences

연구 개요

상세 설명

Older adults with frailty frequently experience multiple medical, functional, and social challenges following hospital discharge. Evidence from the Health and Social Service Needs study indicates that patients discharged with unmet health and health-related social service (HASS) needs have poorer post-discharge outcomes, including increased healthcare utilization. While frailty screening is commonly used to identify high-risk patients, frailty status alone does not identify the specific actionable needs that could mitigate health deterioration or support community living.

During hospitalization, assessments of these needs are typically conducted through referrals to medical social workers, patient navigators, case managers, or geriatricians. These referrals are discretionary and vary across providers and settings, contributing to inconsistent care delivery. Such approaches are resource-intensive and difficult to sustain under workforce constraints and may lead to missed identification of needs or delays in discharge, increasing the risk of unmet needs during care transitions.

This study evaluates the implementation of a needs-based assessment approach using the Simple Segmentation Tool (SST), a brief digital instrument developed in Singapore by Matchar et al. (2017). The SST is designed to rapidly identify likely actionable HASS needs and support care planning and referral processes. The tool can be completed in approximately 2-3 minutes by trained healthcare professionals, including physicians, nurses, and case managers, and is supported by an algorithm developed by a multidisciplinary expert panel.

Following enrollment, hospital staff will complete the SST based on participants' clinical and social circumstances. Care plans will be generated using outputs from the SST and reviewed with participants and/or their caregivers. If a participant is readmitted within three weeks of discharge, the SST assessment will be repeated following the subsequent discharge to ensure that care plans reflect updated or evolving needs. Participants who decline recommended services will remain enrolled in the study but will not be counted toward the target sample size of 200 participants.

Participants will complete a baseline questionnaire during hospitalization and will be followed after discharge with structured surveys administered at one month and three months. These surveys will assess post-discharge outcomes related to health status, care experiences, and healthcare utilization. Qualitative interviews will also be conducted with a subset of patients and healthcare staff to explore experiences, perceived value, and implementation challenges associated with SST-guided care planning.

To support care coordination, internal stakeholders and external community service providers, coordinated by the Agency for Integrated Care Care-Referral Team, will use a shared framework to facilitate service linkage and care transitions. Service activation and follow-up will be tracked, and any failures in linkage will be communicated to a central coordinating team to support resolution and continuity of care.

Prior to the main study, a pilot phase involving up to 10 patient volunteers will be conducted to assess workflow feasibility, clarity of study materials, and questionnaire length. Pilot participants will provide informed consent, and data collected during this phase will not be included in research analyses. Feedback from the pilot will be used to refine study procedures and materials prior to full implementation.

연구 유형

중재적

등록 (추정된)

200

단계

  • 해당 없음

연락처 및 위치

이 섹션에서는 연구를 수행하는 사람들의 연락처 정보와 이 연구가 수행되는 장소에 대한 정보를 제공합니다.

연구 연락처

  • 이름: Shenglin Zheng, Ph.D.
  • 전화번호: 6580325886
  • 이메일: sz61@nus.edu.sg

연구 장소

참여기준

연구원은 적격성 기준이라는 특정 설명에 맞는 사람을 찾습니다. 이러한 기준의 몇 가지 예는 개인의 일반적인 건강 상태 또는 이전 치료입니다.

자격 기준

공부할 수 있는 나이

  • 성인
  • 고령자

건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다

아니

설명

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient participant: (i) Aged >= 60 years at the time of recruitment; (ii) identified as frail, with a CFS score >= 5 and/or modified HFRS intermediate and high frailty risk (mHFRS) score >=5; (iii) Singapore citizens or permanent residents; (iv) able to speak and understand English, Chinese or Malay.
  • Proxy (when responding on behalf of eligible patients): (i) Relative or friend of the patient participant; (ii) Aged 21 years or older; (iii) Familiar with the older adult's health and social situation.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient participant: (i) Currently involved in another study or (ii) residents of nursing homes, or (iii) patients known to home hospice or home palliative care services with a life expectancy of less than 6 months.
  • Proxy: primary caregivers who are foreign domestic workers will be excluded from the study.

공부 계획

이 섹션에서는 연구 설계 방법과 연구가 측정하는 내용을 포함하여 연구 계획에 대한 세부 정보를 제공합니다.

연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?

디자인 세부사항

  • 주 목적: 건강 서비스 연구
  • 할당: 무작위
  • 중재 모델: 병렬 할당
  • 마스킹: 하나의

무기와 개입

참가자 그룹 / 팔
개입 / 치료
실험적: SST + care coordination calls
Participants will receive a digital needs assessment during hospitalization and a personalized care plan. After discharge, participants will be randomized in a 1:3 ratio. Participants will receive two follow-up calls from care coordinators to review care needs and support care coordination.
The Simple Segmentation Tool (SST) is used to assess multidimensional needs and generate individualized care recommendations. Participants receive SST-informed care plan and referral to appropriate health and social services.
Participants will receive two structured post-discharge care coordination phone calls to support service uptake, address barriers, and facilitate follow-up on recommended services.
실험적: SST only
Participants will receive a digital needs assessment during hospitalization and a personalized care plan.
The Simple Segmentation Tool (SST) is used to assess multidimensional needs and generate individualized care recommendations. Participants receive SST-informed care plan and referral to appropriate health and social services.

연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?

주요 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Service initiation rate
기간: 30 days after discharge
The proportion of enrolled participants who successfully initiate at least one recommended health or social support service
30 days after discharge

2차 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Health-related quality of life
기간: Baseline, 1-month and 3-month follow-ups
Change in health-related quality of life measured using the 5-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). The EQ-5D-5L essentially consists of the EQ-5D descriptive system, where Index Score calculated based on country-specific preference (Singapore in this context) and the EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS) (range: 0 to 100) were reported. For both measures, higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life.
Baseline, 1-month and 3-month follow-ups
Healthcare Utilisation
기간: 180 days and 360 days post-discharge
Healthcare service utilisation obtained from electronic medical records (EMR), including number of emergency department visits, hospital admissions, outpatient visits, and visits to healthcare professionals.
180 days and 360 days post-discharge
Usability of SST
기간: 24 hours after the first administered SST
Usability was measured using the System Usability Scale (SUS), a 10-item instrument providing a global score from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better perceived usability.
24 hours after the first administered SST
Intervention appropriateness (implementation outcome)
기간: 3-month follow-up
Assessed using the Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM) among staff involved in the care of patients using the SST, with total scores ranging from 4-20. Higher scores indicate greater appropriateness.
3-month follow-up
Quality of care and continuity
기간: 1-month and 3-month follow-ups
Quality of care and continuity is measured using the adaptive Patient Continuity of Care Checklist (PCCQ). Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale and scores range from 5-30. Higher scores indicate a higher level of perceived continuity of care.
1-month and 3-month follow-ups
Mortality
기간: 180 and 360 days post-discharge
All-cause mortality assessed using electronic medical records (EMR), defined as death occurring from the time of enrollment.
180 and 360 days post-discharge
Service quality of SST
기간: 24 hours after the first administered SST
Perceived service quality was measured using an adaptive Electronic Service Quality Scale (E-S-QUAL) consisting of 19 items. Respondents first distributed 100 points across the four dimensions Efficiency, Fulfillment, System Availability, and Privacy, to reflect relative importance. Items were then rated on a 5-point Likert scale. Higher scores indicating a better perception of electronic service quality.
24 hours after the first administered SST
Care experience
기간: 1-month and 3-month follow-ups
Patient-reported experience is measured using Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-4). Total scores range from 4 to 16, where higher scores indicate greater satisfaction with care.
1-month and 3-month follow-ups
Intervention feasibility (implementation outcome)
기간: 3-month follow-up
Assessed using the Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) among staff involved in the care of patients using the SST. Total scores range from 4-20 and higher scores indicate greater feasibility.
3-month follow-up
Normalization process (implementation outcome)
기간: 3-month follow-up
Assessed using the Normalisation Measure Development (NoMAD) among staff involved in the care of patients using the SST. Total scores range from 0-100. Higher scores indicate better normalization.
3-month follow-up
Intervention acceptability (implementation outcome)
기간: 3-month follow-up
Measured by the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM)among staff involved in the care of patients using the SST, with a total score ranging from 4-20. Higher scores indicate greater acceptability.
3-month follow-up

기타 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Healthcare costs
기간: 180 and 360 days post-discharge
Healthcare utilisation costs and billing data obtained from EMR, including hospital and outpatient service costs.
180 and 360 days post-discharge
Unmet needs and service utilization
기간: 1-month and 3-month follow-ups
Assessment of assistance participants received since the last hospital discharge (18-item)
1-month and 3-month follow-ups
Caregiver burden (proxy participants only)
기간: Baseline, 1-month and 3-month follow-ups
Caregiver burden measured using the 4-item Zarit Burden Interview, administered to proxies who are primary caregivers.
Baseline, 1-month and 3-month follow-ups
Resilience
기간: Baseline, 1-month and 3-month follow-ups
Change in psychological resilience measured using the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC 10), with total scores ranging from 0 from 4. Higher scores indicate a higher level of psychological resilience.
Baseline, 1-month and 3-month follow-ups
Social support
기간: Baseline, 1-month and 3-month follow-ups
Change in social connectedness and support measured using the Lubben Social Network Scale-Revised (LSNS-R), with total scores ranging from 0 to 60. Higher scores indicate a larger and more robust social network.
Baseline, 1-month and 3-month follow-ups
Depressive symptoms
기간: Baseline, 1-month and 3-month follow-ups
Change in depressive symptoms measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2) with total scores ranging from 0 to 6. Higher scores indicate a greater likelihood of depressive symptoms.
Baseline, 1-month and 3-month follow-ups
Loneliness
기간: Baseline, 1-month and 3-month follow-ups
Change in loneliness using the Three-Item Loneliness Scale, with total scores ranging from 3 to 9. Higher scores indicate a greater perception of loneliness.
Baseline, 1-month and 3-month follow-ups
Physical activity
기간: Baseline, 1-month and 3-month follow-ups
Change in physical activity levels measured using the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE).
Baseline, 1-month and 3-month follow-ups
Instrumental Activities of Daily Living
기간: Baseline, 1-month and 3-month follow-ups
Change in functional ability measured using Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL), with total scores ranging from 0-16. Higher scores indicate greater functional independence.
Baseline, 1-month and 3-month follow-ups
Activities of Daily Living
기간: Baseline, 1-month and 3-month follow-ups
Change in functional ability measured using Katz Index of Independence in Activities of Daily Living (ADL), with total scores ranging from 0-12. Higher scores indicate greater functional independence.
Baseline, 1-month and 3-month follow-ups

공동 작업자 및 조사자

여기에서 이 연구와 관련된 사람과 조직을 찾을 수 있습니다.

수사관

  • 수석 연구원: Angelique Chan, Ph.D., Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School

간행물 및 유용한 링크

연구에 대한 정보 입력을 담당하는 사람이 자발적으로 이러한 간행물을 제공합니다. 이것은 연구와 관련된 모든 것에 관한 것일 수 있습니다.

연구 기록 날짜

이 날짜는 ClinicalTrials.gov에 대한 연구 기록 및 요약 결과 제출의 진행 상황을 추적합니다. 연구 기록 및 보고된 결과는 공개 웹사이트에 게시되기 전에 특정 품질 관리 기준을 충족하는지 확인하기 위해 국립 의학 도서관(NLM)에서 검토합니다.

연구 주요 날짜

연구 시작 (추정된)

2026년 5월 1일

기본 완료 (추정된)

2026년 12월 30일

연구 완료 (추정된)

2027년 12월 30일

연구 등록 날짜

최초 제출

2026년 4월 14일

QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출

2026년 5월 5일

처음 게시됨 (실제)

2026년 5월 12일

연구 기록 업데이트

마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)

2026년 5월 12일

QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출

2026년 5월 5일

마지막으로 확인됨

2026년 5월 1일

추가 정보

이 연구와 관련된 용어

기타 연구 ID 번호

  • CIRB: 2024-2130
  • MOH-001199-00 (기타 보조금/기금 번호: National Research Foundation (NRF), Singapore)

개별 참가자 데이터(IPD) 계획

개별 참가자 데이터(IPD)를 공유할 계획입니까?

아니요

약물 및 장치 정보, 연구 문서

미국 FDA 규제 의약품 연구

아니

미국 FDA 규제 기기 제품 연구

아니

이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .

Core: SST-informed care planning에 대한 임상 시험

구독하다