Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

Improving Care for Frail Older Adults Using a Digital Needs Assessment Tool (Frailty)

5. Mai 2026 aktualisiert von: Angelique Chan, Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School

Integrating Health and Social Service Needs for Frail Elders at Point of Care: Development and Evaluation of an IT-based Digital Needs-assessment Tool

The goal of this trial is to evaluate whether a digital needs-assessment tool can improve care planning and outcomes for frail older adults (aged 60 years and above) hospitalized in Singapore. The tool is designed to identify patients' health and social service needs and support better care coordination after hospital discharge.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Does the use of a digital needs-assessment tool improve the identification and management of health and social service needs in frail older adults?
  • Does this approach improve patient outcomes, such as quality of life, care satisfaction, and healthcare utilization after discharge?

Participants will:

  • Respond to a baseline questionnaire
  • Receive a personalized care plan based on identified needs by the tool
  • Be followed up at 1 month and 3 months after discharge through surveys
  • Some participants will receive additional follow-up phone calls to review care needs and service use
  • A subset of participants will take part in interviews to share their care experiences

Studienübersicht

Detaillierte Beschreibung

Older adults with frailty frequently experience multiple medical, functional, and social challenges following hospital discharge. Evidence from the Health and Social Service Needs study indicates that patients discharged with unmet health and health-related social service (HASS) needs have poorer post-discharge outcomes, including increased healthcare utilization. While frailty screening is commonly used to identify high-risk patients, frailty status alone does not identify the specific actionable needs that could mitigate health deterioration or support community living.

During hospitalization, assessments of these needs are typically conducted through referrals to medical social workers, patient navigators, case managers, or geriatricians. These referrals are discretionary and vary across providers and settings, contributing to inconsistent care delivery. Such approaches are resource-intensive and difficult to sustain under workforce constraints and may lead to missed identification of needs or delays in discharge, increasing the risk of unmet needs during care transitions.

This study evaluates the implementation of a needs-based assessment approach using the Simple Segmentation Tool (SST), a brief digital instrument developed in Singapore by Matchar et al. (2017). The SST is designed to rapidly identify likely actionable HASS needs and support care planning and referral processes. The tool can be completed in approximately 2-3 minutes by trained healthcare professionals, including physicians, nurses, and case managers, and is supported by an algorithm developed by a multidisciplinary expert panel.

Following enrollment, hospital staff will complete the SST based on participants' clinical and social circumstances. Care plans will be generated using outputs from the SST and reviewed with participants and/or their caregivers. If a participant is readmitted within three weeks of discharge, the SST assessment will be repeated following the subsequent discharge to ensure that care plans reflect updated or evolving needs. Participants who decline recommended services will remain enrolled in the study but will not be counted toward the target sample size of 200 participants.

Participants will complete a baseline questionnaire during hospitalization and will be followed after discharge with structured surveys administered at one month and three months. These surveys will assess post-discharge outcomes related to health status, care experiences, and healthcare utilization. Qualitative interviews will also be conducted with a subset of patients and healthcare staff to explore experiences, perceived value, and implementation challenges associated with SST-guided care planning.

To support care coordination, internal stakeholders and external community service providers, coordinated by the Agency for Integrated Care Care-Referral Team, will use a shared framework to facilitate service linkage and care transitions. Service activation and follow-up will be tracked, and any failures in linkage will be communicated to a central coordinating team to support resolution and continuity of care.

Prior to the main study, a pilot phase involving up to 10 patient volunteers will be conducted to assess workflow feasibility, clarity of study materials, and questionnaire length. Pilot participants will provide informed consent, and data collected during this phase will not be included in research analyses. Feedback from the pilot will be used to refine study procedures and materials prior to full implementation.

Studientyp

Interventionell

Einschreibung (Geschätzt)

200

Phase

  • Unzutreffend

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienkontakt

  • Name: Shenglin Zheng, Ph.D.
  • Telefonnummer: 6580325886
  • E-Mail: sz61@nus.edu.sg

Studienorte

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

  • Erwachsene
  • Älterer Erwachsener

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Nein

Beschreibung

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient participant: (i) Aged >= 60 years at the time of recruitment; (ii) identified as frail, with a CFS score >= 5 and/or modified HFRS intermediate and high frailty risk (mHFRS) score >=5; (iii) Singapore citizens or permanent residents; (iv) able to speak and understand English, Chinese or Malay.
  • Proxy (when responding on behalf of eligible patients): (i) Relative or friend of the patient participant; (ii) Aged 21 years or older; (iii) Familiar with the older adult's health and social situation.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient participant: (i) Currently involved in another study or (ii) residents of nursing homes, or (iii) patients known to home hospice or home palliative care services with a life expectancy of less than 6 months.
  • Proxy: primary caregivers who are foreign domestic workers will be excluded from the study.

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

  • Hauptzweck: Versorgungsforschung
  • Zuteilung: Zufällig
  • Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
  • Maskierung: Single

Waffen und Interventionen

Teilnehmergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandlung
Experimental: SST + care coordination calls
Participants will receive a digital needs assessment during hospitalization and a personalized care plan. After discharge, participants will be randomized in a 1:3 ratio. Participants will receive two follow-up calls from care coordinators to review care needs and support care coordination.
The Simple Segmentation Tool (SST) is used to assess multidimensional needs and generate individualized care recommendations. Participants receive SST-informed care plan and referral to appropriate health and social services.
Participants will receive two structured post-discharge care coordination phone calls to support service uptake, address barriers, and facilitate follow-up on recommended services.
Experimental: SST only
Participants will receive a digital needs assessment during hospitalization and a personalized care plan.
The Simple Segmentation Tool (SST) is used to assess multidimensional needs and generate individualized care recommendations. Participants receive SST-informed care plan and referral to appropriate health and social services.

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Service initiation rate
Zeitfenster: 30 days after discharge
The proportion of enrolled participants who successfully initiate at least one recommended health or social support service
30 days after discharge

Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Health-related quality of life
Zeitfenster: Baseline, 1-month and 3-month follow-ups
Change in health-related quality of life measured using the 5-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). The EQ-5D-5L essentially consists of the EQ-5D descriptive system, where Index Score calculated based on country-specific preference (Singapore in this context) and the EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS) (range: 0 to 100) were reported. For both measures, higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life.
Baseline, 1-month and 3-month follow-ups
Healthcare Utilisation
Zeitfenster: 180 days and 360 days post-discharge
Healthcare service utilisation obtained from electronic medical records (EMR), including number of emergency department visits, hospital admissions, outpatient visits, and visits to healthcare professionals.
180 days and 360 days post-discharge
Usability of SST
Zeitfenster: 24 hours after the first administered SST
Usability was measured using the System Usability Scale (SUS), a 10-item instrument providing a global score from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better perceived usability.
24 hours after the first administered SST
Intervention appropriateness (implementation outcome)
Zeitfenster: 3-month follow-up
Assessed using the Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM) among staff involved in the care of patients using the SST, with total scores ranging from 4-20. Higher scores indicate greater appropriateness.
3-month follow-up
Quality of care and continuity
Zeitfenster: 1-month and 3-month follow-ups
Quality of care and continuity is measured using the adaptive Patient Continuity of Care Checklist (PCCQ). Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale and scores range from 5-30. Higher scores indicate a higher level of perceived continuity of care.
1-month and 3-month follow-ups
Mortality
Zeitfenster: 180 and 360 days post-discharge
All-cause mortality assessed using electronic medical records (EMR), defined as death occurring from the time of enrollment.
180 and 360 days post-discharge
Service quality of SST
Zeitfenster: 24 hours after the first administered SST
Perceived service quality was measured using an adaptive Electronic Service Quality Scale (E-S-QUAL) consisting of 19 items. Respondents first distributed 100 points across the four dimensions Efficiency, Fulfillment, System Availability, and Privacy, to reflect relative importance. Items were then rated on a 5-point Likert scale. Higher scores indicating a better perception of electronic service quality.
24 hours after the first administered SST
Care experience
Zeitfenster: 1-month and 3-month follow-ups
Patient-reported experience is measured using Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-4). Total scores range from 4 to 16, where higher scores indicate greater satisfaction with care.
1-month and 3-month follow-ups
Intervention feasibility (implementation outcome)
Zeitfenster: 3-month follow-up
Assessed using the Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) among staff involved in the care of patients using the SST. Total scores range from 4-20 and higher scores indicate greater feasibility.
3-month follow-up
Normalization process (implementation outcome)
Zeitfenster: 3-month follow-up
Assessed using the Normalisation Measure Development (NoMAD) among staff involved in the care of patients using the SST. Total scores range from 0-100. Higher scores indicate better normalization.
3-month follow-up
Intervention acceptability (implementation outcome)
Zeitfenster: 3-month follow-up
Measured by the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM)among staff involved in the care of patients using the SST, with a total score ranging from 4-20. Higher scores indicate greater acceptability.
3-month follow-up

Andere Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Healthcare costs
Zeitfenster: 180 and 360 days post-discharge
Healthcare utilisation costs and billing data obtained from EMR, including hospital and outpatient service costs.
180 and 360 days post-discharge
Unmet needs and service utilization
Zeitfenster: 1-month and 3-month follow-ups
Assessment of assistance participants received since the last hospital discharge (18-item)
1-month and 3-month follow-ups
Caregiver burden (proxy participants only)
Zeitfenster: Baseline, 1-month and 3-month follow-ups
Caregiver burden measured using the 4-item Zarit Burden Interview, administered to proxies who are primary caregivers.
Baseline, 1-month and 3-month follow-ups
Resilience
Zeitfenster: Baseline, 1-month and 3-month follow-ups
Change in psychological resilience measured using the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC 10), with total scores ranging from 0 from 4. Higher scores indicate a higher level of psychological resilience.
Baseline, 1-month and 3-month follow-ups
Social support
Zeitfenster: Baseline, 1-month and 3-month follow-ups
Change in social connectedness and support measured using the Lubben Social Network Scale-Revised (LSNS-R), with total scores ranging from 0 to 60. Higher scores indicate a larger and more robust social network.
Baseline, 1-month and 3-month follow-ups
Depressive symptoms
Zeitfenster: Baseline, 1-month and 3-month follow-ups
Change in depressive symptoms measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2) with total scores ranging from 0 to 6. Higher scores indicate a greater likelihood of depressive symptoms.
Baseline, 1-month and 3-month follow-ups
Loneliness
Zeitfenster: Baseline, 1-month and 3-month follow-ups
Change in loneliness using the Three-Item Loneliness Scale, with total scores ranging from 3 to 9. Higher scores indicate a greater perception of loneliness.
Baseline, 1-month and 3-month follow-ups
Physical activity
Zeitfenster: Baseline, 1-month and 3-month follow-ups
Change in physical activity levels measured using the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE).
Baseline, 1-month and 3-month follow-ups
Instrumental Activities of Daily Living
Zeitfenster: Baseline, 1-month and 3-month follow-ups
Change in functional ability measured using Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL), with total scores ranging from 0-16. Higher scores indicate greater functional independence.
Baseline, 1-month and 3-month follow-ups
Activities of Daily Living
Zeitfenster: Baseline, 1-month and 3-month follow-ups
Change in functional ability measured using Katz Index of Independence in Activities of Daily Living (ADL), with total scores ranging from 0-12. Higher scores indicate greater functional independence.
Baseline, 1-month and 3-month follow-ups

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Ermittler

  • Hauptermittler: Angelique Chan, Ph.D., Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School

Publikationen und hilfreiche Links

Die Bereitstellung dieser Publikationen erfolgt freiwillig durch die für die Eingabe von Informationen über die Studie verantwortliche Person. Diese können sich auf alles beziehen, was mit dem Studium zu tun hat.

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn (Geschätzt)

1. Mai 2026

Primärer Abschluss (Geschätzt)

30. Dezember 2026

Studienabschluss (Geschätzt)

30. Dezember 2027

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

14. April 2026

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

5. Mai 2026

Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)

12. Mai 2026

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)

12. Mai 2026

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

5. Mai 2026

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. Mai 2026

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Andere Studien-ID-Nummern

  • CIRB: 2024-2130
  • MOH-001199-00 (Andere Zuschuss-/Finanzierungsnummer: National Research Foundation (NRF), Singapore)

Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)

Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?

NEIN

Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt

Nein

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt

Nein

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .

Klinische Studien zur Gebrechliche ältere Erwachsene

Abonnieren