Predicting Allograft Volume in Orthopedic Oncology: Hemielipsoid Formula vs Intraoperative Fluid-Fill Measurement (PREDALL)
Preoperative Bone Defect Volume Estimation Using the Hemielipsoid Formula for Allograft Planning in Musculoskeletal Tumor Surgery: A Prospective Validation Study Against Intraoperative Fluid Displacement Measurement
Bone defects following primary musculoskeletal tumor resection are frequently reconstructed using structural allografts. Allograft availability is limited, and intraoperative waste due to oversized graft selection remains a practical challenge in orthopedic oncology. Accurate preoperative estimation of the expected defect volume is therefore critical not only for surgical planning but also for minimizing unnecessary allograft use.
This prospective study aims to evaluate the accuracy of the preoperative hemielipsoid formula in estimating bone defect volume after primary musculoskeletal tumor resection, using intraoperative fluid displacement as the reference standard. A secondary aim is to determine whether preoperative CT-based hemielipsoid volume calculation can reliably guide allograft selection and reduce intraoperative graft waste.
Patients scheduled for primary musculoskeletal tumor resection with structural allograft reconstruction at Sakarya University Training and Research Hospital will be enrolled. Preoperative defect volume will be estimated using the hemielipsoid formula (V = 4/3 × π × a × b × c / 2) derived from preoperative CT measurements. Intraoperative defect volume will be measured by fluid displacement as the reference standard. Agreement between methods will be assessed by Bland-Altman analysis and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).
研究概览
地位
详细说明
**Background:** In orthopedic oncology, structural allograft reconstruction following primary musculoskeletal tumor resection requires precise preoperative planning. Currently, allograft selection at our institution relies on the surgeon's intraoperative visual estimation, with no standardized preoperative volumetric assessment protocol in place. This approach may result in allograft waste due to oversized graft selection, which is particularly problematic given the limited availability of allograft bank resources.
**Rationale:** The hemielipsoid formula (V = 4/3 × π × a × b × c / 2) offers a simple, reproducible method for estimating irregular bone defect volumes from standard cross-sectional imaging. If validated against an intraoperative reference standard, this formula could serve as a practical preoperative planning tool to guide allograft selection and minimize unnecessary graft use.
**Study Design:** This is a single-center prospective observational study conducted at Sakarya University Training and Research Hospital, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology.
**Preoperative Assessment:** Defect volume will be estimated by the operating surgeon using the hemielipsoid formula applied to routine preoperative CT imaging. The three principal dimensions of the anticipated resection defect (length, width, and depth) will be measured on axial, coronal, and sagittal CT reconstructions, and volume will be calculated accordingly.
**Intraoperative Assessment:** Following tumor resection, the actual bone defect volume will be measured by direct cavity fluid displacement as the intraoperative reference standard. The resection cavity will be filled with a measured volume of saline to determine the true defect volume.
**Outcome Assessment:** The primary outcome is the agreement between preoperative hemielipsoid-estimated volume and intraoperative fluid displacement-measured volume, assessed by Bland-Altman analysis and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The secondary outcome is the correlation between preoperative volume estimation and actual allograft volume used, to evaluate the utility of the hemielipsoid formula in reducing intraoperative allograft waste.
**Sample Size:** A priori power analysis was performed based on intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) estimation (H0: ICC = 0.70; H1: ICC = 0.90; two-tailed alpha = 0.05; power = 0.80) using the Fisher z-transformation method, indicating a minimum required sample size of 25 patients. Target enrollment was set at 40 patients to account for a 10% dropout rate and to allow for potential subgroup analyses.
研究类型
注册 (估计的)
联系人和位置
学习地点
-
-
-
Sakarya、土耳其(türkiye)
- Sakarya University Training and Research Hospital
-
-
参与标准
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
- 成人
- 年长者
接受健康志愿者
取样方法
研究人群
描述
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients diagnosed with a primary musculoskeletal tumor requiring surgical resection
- Structural allograft reconstruction planned following resection
- Routine preoperative CT imaging available for hemielipsoid measurements
- Age ≥ 18 years
- Written informed consent obtained
Exclusion Criteria:
- Metastatic bone tumors
- Pathological fracture at the resection site precluding accurate volume estimation
- Prior surgery at the same anatomical site
- Unavailability of adequate preoperative CT imaging
- Reconstruction planned with implant or autograft only (no structural allograft)
学习计划
研究是如何设计的?
设计细节
队列和干预
团体/队列 |
干预/治疗 |
|---|---|
|
Hemielipsoid Volume Estimation Group
atients undergoing primary musculoskeletal tumor resection with structural allograft reconstruction.
Preoperative bone defect volume is estimated using the hemielipsoid formula from CT imaging.
Intraoperative defect volume is measured by saline cavity fill displacement as the reference standard.
|
Preoperative bone defect volume is estimated by the operating surgeon using the hemielipsoid formula (V = 4/3 × π × a × b × c / 2) applied to routine preoperative CT imaging.
The three principal dimensions of the anticipated resection defect are measured on axial, coronal, and sagittal CT reconstructions.
Intraoperative defect volume is measured by saline cavity fill displacement as the reference standard.
No additional procedures beyond standard surgical care are performed.
其他名称:
|
研究衡量的是什么?
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Agreement between preoperative hemielipsoid-estimated and intraoperative fluid displacement-measured bone defect volume
大体时间:Intraoperative (Day 1)
|
Assessed by Bland-Altman analysis and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) between the two volumetric measurement methods
|
Intraoperative (Day 1)
|
次要结果测量
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Allograft waste volume
大体时间:Intraoperative (Day 1)
|
Difference between allograft volume prepared and actual volume used, compared between hemielipsoid-guided and historical surgeon estimation
|
Intraoperative (Day 1)
|
合作者和调查者
研究记录日期
研究主要日期
学习开始 (实际的)
初级完成 (估计的)
研究完成 (估计的)
研究注册日期
首次提交
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
首次发布 (实际的)
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (实际的)
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
最后验证
更多信息
与本研究相关的术语
其他研究编号
- E-43012747-050.04-543070-646
计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)
计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)?
IPD 计划说明
药物和器械信息、研究文件
研究美国 FDA 监管的药品
研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.