Denne side blev automatisk oversat, og nøjagtigheden af ​​oversættelsen er ikke garanteret. Der henvises til engelsk version for en kildetekst.

Predicting Allograft Volume in Orthopedic Oncology: Hemielipsoid Formula vs Intraoperative Fluid-Fill Measurement (PREDALL)

11. juni 2026 opdateret af: Sakarya University

Preoperative Bone Defect Volume Estimation Using the Hemielipsoid Formula for Allograft Planning in Musculoskeletal Tumor Surgery: A Prospective Validation Study Against Intraoperative Fluid Displacement Measurement

Bone defects following primary musculoskeletal tumor resection are frequently reconstructed using structural allografts. Allograft availability is limited, and intraoperative waste due to oversized graft selection remains a practical challenge in orthopedic oncology. Accurate preoperative estimation of the expected defect volume is therefore critical not only for surgical planning but also for minimizing unnecessary allograft use.

This prospective study aims to evaluate the accuracy of the preoperative hemielipsoid formula in estimating bone defect volume after primary musculoskeletal tumor resection, using intraoperative fluid displacement as the reference standard. A secondary aim is to determine whether preoperative CT-based hemielipsoid volume calculation can reliably guide allograft selection and reduce intraoperative graft waste.

Patients scheduled for primary musculoskeletal tumor resection with structural allograft reconstruction at Sakarya University Training and Research Hospital will be enrolled. Preoperative defect volume will be estimated using the hemielipsoid formula (V = 4/3 × π × a × b × c / 2) derived from preoperative CT measurements. Intraoperative defect volume will be measured by fluid displacement as the reference standard. Agreement between methods will be assessed by Bland-Altman analysis and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

Studieoversigt

Detaljeret beskrivelse

**Background:** In orthopedic oncology, structural allograft reconstruction following primary musculoskeletal tumor resection requires precise preoperative planning. Currently, allograft selection at our institution relies on the surgeon's intraoperative visual estimation, with no standardized preoperative volumetric assessment protocol in place. This approach may result in allograft waste due to oversized graft selection, which is particularly problematic given the limited availability of allograft bank resources.

**Rationale:** The hemielipsoid formula (V = 4/3 × π × a × b × c / 2) offers a simple, reproducible method for estimating irregular bone defect volumes from standard cross-sectional imaging. If validated against an intraoperative reference standard, this formula could serve as a practical preoperative planning tool to guide allograft selection and minimize unnecessary graft use.

**Study Design:** This is a single-center prospective observational study conducted at Sakarya University Training and Research Hospital, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology.

**Preoperative Assessment:** Defect volume will be estimated by the operating surgeon using the hemielipsoid formula applied to routine preoperative CT imaging. The three principal dimensions of the anticipated resection defect (length, width, and depth) will be measured on axial, coronal, and sagittal CT reconstructions, and volume will be calculated accordingly.

**Intraoperative Assessment:** Following tumor resection, the actual bone defect volume will be measured by direct cavity fluid displacement as the intraoperative reference standard. The resection cavity will be filled with a measured volume of saline to determine the true defect volume.

**Outcome Assessment:** The primary outcome is the agreement between preoperative hemielipsoid-estimated volume and intraoperative fluid displacement-measured volume, assessed by Bland-Altman analysis and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The secondary outcome is the correlation between preoperative volume estimation and actual allograft volume used, to evaluate the utility of the hemielipsoid formula in reducing intraoperative allograft waste.

**Sample Size:** A priori power analysis was performed based on intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) estimation (H0: ICC = 0.70; H1: ICC = 0.90; two-tailed alpha = 0.05; power = 0.80) using the Fisher z-transformation method, indicating a minimum required sample size of 25 patients. Target enrollment was set at 40 patients to account for a 10% dropout rate and to allow for potential subgroup analyses.

Undersøgelsestype

Observationel

Tilmelding (Anslået)

40

Kontakter og lokationer

Dette afsnit indeholder kontaktoplysninger for dem, der udfører undersøgelsen, og oplysninger om, hvor denne undersøgelse udføres.

Studiesteder

      • Sakarya, Tyrkiet (Türkiye)
        • Sakarya University Training and Research Hospital

Deltagelseskriterier

Forskere leder efter personer, der passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kaldet berettigelseskriterier. Nogle eksempler på disse kriterier er en persons generelle helbredstilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Berettigelseskriterier

Aldre berettiget til at studere

  • Voksen
  • Ældre voksen

Tager imod sunde frivillige

Ingen

Prøveudtagningsmetode

Ikke-sandsynlighedsprøve

Studiebefolkning

Patients scheduled for primary musculoskeletal tumor resection with structural allograft reconstruction at the Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Sakarya University Training and Research Hospital. All patients are evaluated by a multidisciplinary oncology team prior to surgical planning.

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients diagnosed with a primary musculoskeletal tumor requiring surgical resection
  2. Structural allograft reconstruction planned following resection
  3. Routine preoperative CT imaging available for hemielipsoid measurements
  4. Age ≥ 18 years
  5. Written informed consent obtained

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Metastatic bone tumors
  2. Pathological fracture at the resection site precluding accurate volume estimation
  3. Prior surgery at the same anatomical site
  4. Unavailability of adequate preoperative CT imaging
  5. Reconstruction planned with implant or autograft only (no structural allograft)

Studieplan

Dette afsnit indeholder detaljer om studieplanen, herunder hvordan undersøgelsen er designet, og hvad undersøgelsen måler.

Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?

Design detaljer

Kohorter og interventioner

Gruppe / kohorte
Intervention / Behandling
Hemielipsoid Volume Estimation Group
atients undergoing primary musculoskeletal tumor resection with structural allograft reconstruction. Preoperative bone defect volume is estimated using the hemielipsoid formula from CT imaging. Intraoperative defect volume is measured by saline cavity fill displacement as the reference standard.
Preoperative bone defect volume is estimated by the operating surgeon using the hemielipsoid formula (V = 4/3 × π × a × b × c / 2) applied to routine preoperative CT imaging. The three principal dimensions of the anticipated resection defect are measured on axial, coronal, and sagittal CT reconstructions. Intraoperative defect volume is measured by saline cavity fill displacement as the reference standard. No additional procedures beyond standard surgical care are performed.
Andre navne:
  • Fluid Displacement Intraoperative Measurement

Hvad måler undersøgelsen?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Agreement between preoperative hemielipsoid-estimated and intraoperative fluid displacement-measured bone defect volume
Tidsramme: Intraoperative (Day 1)
Assessed by Bland-Altman analysis and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) between the two volumetric measurement methods
Intraoperative (Day 1)

Sekundære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Allograft waste volume
Tidsramme: Intraoperative (Day 1)
Difference between allograft volume prepared and actual volume used, compared between hemielipsoid-guided and historical surgeon estimation
Intraoperative (Day 1)

Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere

Det er her, du vil finde personer og organisationer, der er involveret i denne undersøgelse.

Datoer for undersøgelser

Disse datoer sporer fremskridtene for indsendelser af undersøgelsesrekord og resumeresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieregistreringer og rapporterede resultater gennemgås af National Library of Medicine (NLM) for at sikre, at de opfylder specifikke kvalitetskontrolstandarder, før de offentliggøres på den offentlige hjemmeside.

Studer store datoer

Studiestart (Faktiske)

1. juni 2026

Primær færdiggørelse (Anslået)

1. juni 2027

Studieafslutning (Anslået)

1. juli 2027

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først indsendt

11. juni 2026

Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier

11. juni 2026

Først opslået (Faktiske)

17. juni 2026

Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler

Sidste opdatering sendt (Faktiske)

17. juni 2026

Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier

11. juni 2026

Sidst verificeret

1. juni 2026

Mere information

Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse

Plan for individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)

Planlægger du at dele individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)?

INGEN

IPD-planbeskrivelse

Individual participant data will not be shared publicly due to patient privacy considerations and institutional policy.

Lægemiddel- og udstyrsoplysninger, undersøgelsesdokumenter

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret lægemiddelprodukt

Ingen

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret enhedsprodukt

Ingen

Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .

Kliniske forsøg med Knogleneoplasmer

Abonner