此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

Rhythmic Auditory Stimulation and Dual-task Gait Training in Chronic Stroke

2026年7月11日 更新者:Seda Karaca、Recep Tayyip Erdogan University

Combined Rhythmic Auditory Stimulation and Dual-task Gait Training in Individuals With Chronic Stroke: a Pre-post Study With Exploratory Age-stratified Analyses

Rhythmic auditory stimulation and dual-task gait training may improve post-stroke mobility, but evidence regarding integrated programmes and age-related differences in treatment response remains limited. The aim of the study is to evaluate changes in mobility, balance, motor dual-task performance, concern about falling, and health-related quality of life after a six-week combined programme, and to explore whether responses differed across age strata.

研究概览

详细说明

This prospective single-group pre-post study included individuals with chronic stroke. Participants completed supervised rhythmic auditory stimulation and progressively intensified motor dual-task gait training three times weekly for six weeks. Outcomes included motor dual-task performance, Timed Up and Go, bilateral single-leg stance, Mini-BESTest, Falls Efficacy Scale-International, and SF-36. An independent assessor, unaware of previous scores and age-stratum allocation, conducted baseline and post-intervention assessments. Prespecified exploratory analyses compared changes across age strata.

研究类型

介入性

注册 (实际的)

46

阶段

  • 不适用

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习地点

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

  • 孩子
  • 成人
  • 年长者

接受健康志愿者

不

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age ≥45 years
  • stroke ≥6 months previously
  • ability to walk at least 10 m independently or with minimal assistance
  • sufficient hearing to follow rhythmic auditory cues

Exclusion Criteria:

  • advanced aphasia
  • severe neglect, cognitive impairment,
  • marked visual impairment,
  • severe spasticity (Modified Ashworth Scale score15 ≥3)
  • severe cardiopulmonary disease
  • vestibular dysfunction
  • an orthopaedic condition limiting walking
  • progressive neurological disease

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

  • 主要用途:卫生服务研究
  • 分配:不适用
  • 介入模型:单组作业
  • 屏蔽:无(打开标签)

武器和干预

参与者组/臂
干预/治疗
实验性的:Stroke Group
Participants completed a supervised six-week programme comprising three 30-minute sessions per week (18 sessions; planned dose, 540 minutes). During each session, they synchronized their steps with a metronome while performing tandem walking with progressively demanding object-carrying tasks. Participants maintained their usual walking speed and were instructed to give equal attention to gait and the concurrent motor task. Progression was designed by the research team in accordance with general motor-learning principles and involved predefined weekly increases in metronome tempo and concurrent motor-task complexity.
The intervention combined RAS with progressively intensified motor dual-task gait training.6 Participants completed a supervised six-week programme comprising three 30-minute sessions per week (18 sessions; planned dose, 540 minutes). During each session, they synchronized their steps with a metronome while performing tandem walking with progressively demanding object-carrying tasks. Participants maintained their usual walking speed and were instructed to give equal attention to gait and the concurrent motor task. Progression was designed by the research team in accordance with general motor-learning principles and involved predefined weekly increases in metronome tempo and concurrent motor-task complexity. provided that the preceding stage had been completed safely. All sessions were delivered individually by the same licensed physiotherapist experienced in neurology.

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Motor dual-task performance
大体时间:at baseline and after the six-week programme
Participants completed a 10-m walk at their comfortable speed under single-task and motor dual-task conditions. In the dual-task condition, they carried a ball while walking and were instructed to give equal attention to both tasks. Three trials were performed under each condition, and mean completion time was used in the analysis. Positive values indicated greater dual-task interference.
at baseline and after the six-week programme
Functional mobility
大体时间:at baseline and after the six-week programme
Functional mobility was assessed using the Timed Up and Go test, with shorter completion times indicating better performance. One familiarization trial preceded the timed assessment.
at baseline and after the six-week programme
Balance
大体时间:at baseline and after the six-week programme
Dynamic balance was assessed using the 14-item Mini-BESTest, which evaluates anticipatory postural adjustments, reactive postural control, sensory orientation, and dynamic gait. Total scores range from 0 to 28, with higher scores indicating better balance. Static balance was assessed bilaterally using the Single-Leg Stance Test. Two trials were performed on each side, and the longest duration before foot contact, stance-foot movement, or loss of balance was recorded.
at baseline and after the six-week programme

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始 (实际的)

2026年1月15日

初级完成 (实际的)

2026年5月15日

研究完成 (实际的)

2026年5月15日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2026年7月11日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2026年7月11日

首次发布 (实际的)

2026年7月16日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2026年7月16日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2026年7月11日

最后验证

2026年7月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

其他研究编号

  • 2026/01-1781

计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)

计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)?

不

IPD 计划说明

I do not prefer.

药物和器械信息、研究文件

研究美国 FDA 监管的药品

不

研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品

不

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

订阅