Comparative Outcomes of Mammary Artery Harvesting: Infection, Occlusion Rates and Thoracic Pain Assessment (COMFORT)

The COMFORT trial is an international, multicentre, blinded, expertise-based randomized controlled trial evaluating two commonly used techniques for harvesting the left internal mammary artery (LIMA) during coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG): skeletonized and non-skeletonized (pedicled) harvesting.

Although skeletonized harvesting has been associated with reduced sternal wound complications and postoperative pain, concerns have emerged regarding its potential impact on graft patency and long-term cardiovascular outcomes. Existing evidence is largely derived from observational studies and post hoc analyses, and no adequately powered randomized trial has prospectively compared these techniques using systematic imaging-based graft assessment.

The COMFORT trial will enroll approximately 1,116 patients undergoing isolated CABG with a planned LIMA-to-LAD graft. Participants will be randomly assigned to undergo either skeletonized or non-skeletonized LIMA harvesting performed by surgeons experienced in both techniques. Participants and outcome assessors will remain blinded to treatment allocation.

Participants will undergo protocol-mandated coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) at 1.5 years after surgery, with follow-up extending to 2 years. Independent blinded committees and a central CTA core laboratory will adjudicate imaging and clinical outcomes. In addition to graft assessment, the study will evaluate the effects of harvesting technique on cardiovascular outcomes, sternal wound complications, chronic postoperative pain, quality of life, and healthcare resource utilization.

The findings of COMFORT are expected to provide definitive evidence to guide surgical practice and inform future guidelines regarding the optimal method of internal mammary artery harvesting during CABG surgery.