Evaluation of a Decision-Support Tool for Blood Biomarker Testing for Alzheimer's Disease in Primary Care
2026年9月3日 更新者：University of Wisconsin, Madison
Pilot Evaluation of a Tool to Support Communication About Blood Biomarker Testing for Cognitive Complaints in Primary Care
The goal of the current study is to evaluate a decision-support tool intended to help primary care providers (PCPs) communicate with patients about blood biomarker testing for Alzheimer's Disease, enhancing shared-decision making and information sharing in the clinical space. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Is the decision-support tool accepted and easy to use for PCPs?
- Does using the tool improve shared decision-making during clinical encounters? Researchers will compare clinical encounters between PCPs who do not use the tool to discuss blood biomarker testing for Alzheimer's Disease, versus PCPs who have been trained to utilize the tool during clinical encounters to see whether the tool effectively facilitates shared-decision making.
研究概览
详细说明
This pilot study will determine the acceptability and usability of a decision-support tool for primary care providers (PCPs) and assess the feasibility of recruitment techniques in preparation for a later trial. The study includes two high-fidelity simulation components.
Simulation 1: The investigators will assess the usability and acceptability of the decision-support tool through direct observation and surveys of PCPs participating in high-fidelity simulations of clinical encounters (N=15). The hypothesis is that the decision-support tool will be acceptable and usable by PCPs.
Simulation 2: The investigators will compare the effect of the decision-support tool on shared decision-making (SDM) in high-fidelity simulated clinical encounters conducted with the tool versus without the tool (N=25 per arm). The hypothesis is that shared decision-making will increase in encounters using the intervention.
研究类型
介入性
注册 (估计的)
70
阶段
- 不适用
联系人和位置
本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息，以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。
学习联系方式
- 姓名：Fred Ketchum, M.D., Ph.D.
- 电话号码：608-265-5523
- 邮箱：BiomarkersInPrimarycare@neurology.wisc.edu
学习地点
-
-
Wisconsin
-
Madison、Wisconsin、美国、53705
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin
-
接触：
- Fred Ketchum, M.D., PhD
- 电话号码：608-265-5523
- 邮箱：fketchum@wisc.edu
-
-
参与标准
研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人，称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
- 成人
- 年长者
接受健康志愿者
是的
描述
Inclusion Criteria:
- Simulation 1 and Simulation 2: PCPs with experience and interest in cognitive diagnosis.
- Simulation 2: community dwelling older adults age 50 or older are eligible.
Exclusion Criteria (PCP): none
Participant Exclusion Criteria:
- Not fluent in English
- age <50 years
- pre-existing diagnosis of cognitive impairment
- having an activated medical decision-make r or not living independently in the community.
There will be no exclusion based upon sex/gender, race, or ethnicity.
学习计划
本节提供研究计划的详细信息，包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。
研究是如何设计的？
设计细节
- 主要用途：卫生服务研究
- 分配：不适用
- 介入模型：单组作业
- 屏蔽：无（打开标签）
武器和干预
参与者组/臂 |
干预/治疗 |
|---|---|
|
实验性的：Simulation clinical encounters
In Simulation 1, 15 PCPs will complete simulated clinical encounters with standardized patients after completing trainings on how to use the decision-support tool.
In Simulation 2, a different group of 3-5 PCPs will see patients during simulated clinical encounters without using the decision-support too for the first half.
In the second half, these PCPs will complete trainings on how to use the tool and then see the second half of the participants using the tool.
|
Based on previous data analysis, the decision-support tool is intended to facilitate discussions between the patients and their providers regarding the Phospho-Tau blood test.
It functions as a flowchart to provide clear, accessible information about the blood test that will assist providers in discussions around guide the patients through navigating a diagnostic workups for memory problems.
|
研究衡量的是什么？
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Effectiveness of the tool on shared decision-making as measured by OPTION-5 Score
大体时间：This is a single time point outcome measure. In Simulation 2, providers participants will complete OPTION-5 immediately after they participate in the high fidelity clinical encounter session.
|
Effectiveness of the tool on shared decision-making will be measured by OPTION-5 score, a validated measurement to quantitatively evaluated shared decision-making process from the observers' perspective.
The total range of scores is from 0-100 where higher scores indicate greater patient involvement
|
This is a single time point outcome measure. In Simulation 2, providers participants will complete OPTION-5 immediately after they participate in the high fidelity clinical encounter session.
|
|
Effectiveness of the tool on shared decision-making assessed by SDM-Q-9.
大体时间：This is a single time point outcome measure. In Simulation 2, patients participants will complete SDM-Q-9 immediately after they participate in the high fidelity clinical encounter session.
|
SDM-Q-9 is a 9-item questionnaire that evaluates the shared decision-making (SDM) process from the patient's perspective.
Individual items range from "completely disagree" (0) to "completely agree" (5), yielding a raw sum score between 0 and 45, where higher scores demonstrate increased effectiveness.
|
This is a single time point outcome measure. In Simulation 2, patients participants will complete SDM-Q-9 immediately after they participate in the high fidelity clinical encounter session.
|
次要结果测量
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Acceptability and usability of the tool as measured by an adapted System Usability Scale (SUS)
大体时间：In both simulation 1 and simulation 2, provider participants complete the SUS immediately after they have completed the high fidelity clinical encounter session with a patient participant or a standardized patient.
|
The System Usability Scale (SUS) is a short 10-item questionnaire that presents a subjective assessments of usability.
The scores are calculated by adjusting odd- and even-numbered item responses, summing the adjusted scores (0-40), and multiplying the total by 2.5 to produce a final score ranging from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate increased acceptability and usability.
|
In both simulation 1 and simulation 2, provider participants complete the SUS immediately after they have completed the high fidelity clinical encounter session with a patient participant or a standardized patient.
|
|
Acceptability and usability of the tool as measured by Practitioner Opinion Survey
大体时间：In both simulation 1 and simulation 2, provider participants complete the POS immediately after they have completed the high fidelity clinical encounter session with a patient participant or a standardized patient.
|
The Practitioner opinion survey (POS) is a questionnaire that contains 15 items that assess the usability and acceptability of the shared decision-making tool.
The total score range is from 15-75, with higher summed score indicating higher usability and acceptability from the perspective of the providers.
|
In both simulation 1 and simulation 2, provider participants complete the POS immediately after they have completed the high fidelity clinical encounter session with a patient participant or a standardized patient.
|
合作者和调查者
在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。
调查人员
- 首席研究员：Fred Ketchum, M.D., Ph.D.、University of Wisconsin, Madison
出版物和有用的链接
负责输入研究信息的人员自愿提供这些出版物。这些可能与研究有关。
一般刊物
- Kriston L, Scholl I, Holzel L, Simon D, Loh A, Harter M. The 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9). Development and psychometric properties in a primary care sample. Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Jul;80(1):94-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.09.034. Epub 2009 Oct 30.
- Barr PJ, O'Malley AJ, Tsulukidze M, Gionfriddo MR, Montori V, Elwyn G. The psychometric properties of Observer OPTION(5), an observer measure of shared decision making. Patient Educ Couns. 2015 Aug;98(8):970-6. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.04.010. Epub 2015 Apr 29.
- Brooke, John. (1995). SUS: A quick and dirty usability scale. Usability Eval. Ind.. 189.
研究记录日期
这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查，以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。
研究主要日期
学习开始 (估计的)
2026年10月1日
初级完成 (估计的)
2027年11月15日
研究完成 (估计的)
2027年11月15日
研究注册日期
首次提交
2026年8月18日
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
2026年9月3日
首次发布 (实际的)
2026年9月10日
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (实际的)
2026年9月10日
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
2026年9月3日
最后验证
2026年9月1日
更多信息
与本研究相关的术语
其他研究编号
- 2026-1045
- R00AG083131 (美国 NIH 拨款/合同)
- NRL Neurology (其他标识符：UW Madison)
- Protocol Version 8/14/26 (其他标识符：UW Madison)
计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)
计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)？
不
IPD 计划说明
There is currently not a plan to make IPD available.
药物和器械信息、研究文件
研究美国 FDA 监管的药品
不
研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品
不
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索，没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求，请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改，我们的网站上也会自动更新.