Effect of Respiratory Motion on Positron Emission Tomography Imaging

The Effects of Respiratory Motion on CT Based Attenuation Correction of Positron Emission Tomography Data: Liver and Heart Studies

This study will determine how breathing motions may affect positron emission tomography (PET) scans. It has been discovered that the quality of PET scans varies according to which part of the breathing cycle patients hold their breath.

NIH Clinical Center patients 12 years of age and older who are scheduled to have PET and computed tomography (CT) scans as part of their standard medical care may be eligible for this study.

Participants have their scheduled PET or CT scan as they normally would and are asked to hold their breath after breathing out, as is usual. In addition, for this study, patients are also asked hold their breath after breathing in and again at a point between breathing in and out. Each breath-hold is for around 15 seconds. The scans for each of the three different breath-holds are examined for differences.

Some patients may also be asked to breathe through a tube called a pneumotachometer, or spirometer, to determine their normal breathing pattern. This involves breathing through a mouthpiece similar to a snorkel mouthpiece and takes about 2 minutes.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Current clinical FDG imaging with the NIH's PET/CT machine (and in fact with most commercial PET/CT machines) requires a CT scan be acquired prior to the PET scan. This CT scan is used for attenuation correction of the PET data and to permit fusion of anatomical and metabolic image data.

One difficulty with use of the CT scan for attenuation correction ('CTAC') is that the CT scan is rapid compared to the breathing cycle. Each CT slice captures the lungs at one (usually arbitrary) phase of the respiratory cycle. The PET data on the other hand take many minutes to acquire, and so average the motion effects of the entire respiratory cycle together. This 'freezing' of the respiratory cycle by the CT, and blurring of the respiratory cycle during PET produces a mis-match between the PET and CT data. This mis-match can produce improper attenuation correction during PET reconstruction, especially at soft tissue/lung interfaces. The existence of this phenomenon has been reported in the literature [1-7], especially at the dome of the liver, but it has not been thoroughly quantified. Little or no data is available to indicate the quantitative errors the effect produces in cardiac imaging[8]. This despite the fact that the myocardium is only about 10mm thick, and it has been reported that the heart moves on average 9mm (and as much as 14mm) during a single average respiratory cycle[9].

The purpose of this protocol is to determine the degree to which respiratory motion may influence quantitative PET imaging, especially at the lung/liver interface and free wall of myocardium. By characterizing the magnitude of the effect, we hope to gain knowledge about when correction for the effect is and is not necessary. It is hoped that the information gained will also allow us to suggest potential methods to perform such corrections.

To gain the above information we will modify the CT acquisition protocol for subjects already scheduled to undergo a whole body FDG PET/CT scan. In summary, rather than acquiring the usual single full radiation exposure CT (taking approx 20-30 seconds), we will acquire 3 CT scans (each taking approximately 20-30 seconds), each at 1/3 the usual radiation exposure. Each CT will be acquired at a different phase of the respiratory cycle (as opposed to current acquisition, which is only at end-expiration). The subsequent PET data will be acquired as usual, but will be processed and analyzed separately with each of the CT scans and also with a summed CT scan.

Note that subjects agreeing to participate in this protocol will receive no additional radiation exposure. Participation in the protocol will extend the current overall scan time (typically greater than 45 minutes) a very small amount (about 40-60 additional seconds for imaging, and about 60 additional seconds for patient set up, etc).

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment

30

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Maryland
      • Bethesda, Maryland, United States, 20892
        • National Institutes of Health Clinical Center (CC)

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

7 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

  • INCLUSION CRITERIA

Up to 30 subjects will take part in the study, chosen from sequential incoming clinical patients who are scheduled for PET/CT studies of the torso and who have had or will have a diagnostic CT within one week of the PET/CT study, without regard to disease. The number of subjects selected for study per week will depend on patient load and availability of scanner and technologist). Approximately an equal number of males and females will be selected by alternating each selection between male and female. The selection of subjects asked to participate will be random, in the sense that whenever technologist and analysis time is available, the next subject scheduled for a whole body scan will be asked to participate.

EXCLUSION CRITERIA

The only exclusion criteria will be subjects with respiratory difficulties.

Children under the age of 12.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2004

Study Completion

June 1, 2006

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 23, 2004

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 23, 2004

First Posted (Estimate)

July 26, 2004

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 4, 2008

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 3, 2008

Last Verified

June 1, 2006

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 040237
  • 04-CC-0237

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe