Prosthetic Components and Stability in Amputee Gait

July 28, 2014 updated by: US Department of Veterans Affairs

Turning Corners: Prosthetic Components and Stability in Amputee Gait

The biomechanics of changing direction while walking has been largely neglected despite its relevancy to functional mobility. In addition, an increased risk of injury can be associated with turning due to a decrease in stability. The objective of this study is to understand the biomechanics of turning gait in sample populations of intact and trans-tibial amputees and the capacity of prosthetic components to facilitate transverse plane movement. The clinical impact of this investigation is the development of interventions that increase functional mobility, stability and safety while turning.

The researchers propose to investigate three sets of hypotheses. The first set addresses the fundamental biomechanical mechanisms associated with walking along a circular trajectory, how intact subjects differ from amputees, and the effect of a rotation adaptor pylon. The second set of hypotheses addresses dynamic stability and the potential influence of prosthetic interventions. The third set of hypotheses addresses how the rotational properties of the prosthetic pylon can influence comfort and mobility during daily activities.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Most of what is known about how amputees walk and how the properties of prosthetic components affect their gait has been discovered through sagittal plane observations while amputees walk back and forth along a straight line. Abnormal limb loading, thought to be a principal factor in the occurrence of residual limb pain which in turn may cause instability and limit mobility, can certainly occur while walking in a straight line. However, the incidence of abnormal limb loading is likely amplified when performing more complex gait activities, such as turning or avoiding obstacles; activities that are so very common in everyday life.

The specific aims of this investigation are to:

  1. discover the biomechanical strategies used and the stability of both intact individuals and trans-tibial amputees walking along a circular trajectory and
  2. explore the effects of a prosthetic intervention on turning biomechanics, stability, comfort, and mobility.

We propose to investigate three sets of hypotheses:

The first set of hypotheses addresses the fundamental biomechanical mechanisms associated with walking along a circular trajectory, how intact subjects differ from amputees, and the effect of a rotation adaptor pylon. We will conduct experiments to test three hypotheses related to achieving a change of heading, orientation, and balancing of centripetal forces necessary to walk along a circular trajectory.

The second set of hypotheses seeks to identify whether trans-tibial amputees with a rigid pylon are more unstable during a turning task than non-amputees and whether or not the rotation adaptors enhance stability. We will conduct experiments to calculate an index of dynamic stability that measures the rate at which a person can respond to a perturbation and return to a stable gait pattern.

The third set of hypotheses addresses how the rotational properties of the prosthetic pylon can influence comfort and mobility during daily activities. To measure comfort and mobility, we will solicit questionnaire responses and step count measures from amputees after a one-month period of wearing a rigid pylon and after a one-month period of wearing a transverse plane rotation adaptor (within-subject comparison). In addition to these field measurements, we will also compare the distance traveled during a six-minute walk. Patient opinions about their prosthesis and mobility measures over long periods of time can play a significant role in prosthesis evaluation.

For veteran amputees who experience discomfort and increased risk for residual limb skin problems, it seems reasonable to suppose that these problems might occur when walking along a curved trajectory rather than just a straight line. The joint forces and moments of turning may differ significantly from those exhibited while walking in a straight line. The proposed research will create a new knowledge base with which to understand prosthetic intervention effectiveness. The immediate clinical impact for the trans-tibial amputee is the determination if transverse plane rotational adapter pylons can improve their comfort, mobility, and stability.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

12

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98108
        • VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Amputee Subjects:

    • be a unilateral trans-tibial amputee between the ages of 18 and 70,
    • weigh 220 pounds or less,
    • have been fit with a prosthesis and using a prosthesis for at least two years,
    • wear the prosthesis for at least 8 hours per day,
    • walk without crutches or a walker,
    • able to walk outside the home and in the community,
    • have not fallin within the last six months,
  • Non-amputee subjects participating in this investigation will meet similar inclusion criteria except for those related to prosthesis use.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Amputee Subjects:

    • amputation due to tumor, have an active tumor, or are undergoing treatment of a tumor,
    • have pain in legs or any condition that interferes with walking.
  • Non-amputee subjects participating in this investigation will meet similar exclusion criteria except for those related to cause of amputation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Arm 1
Novel prosthetic pylon
Potential future practice
Active Comparator: Arm 2
rigid pylon
Current clinical practice

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Local Dynamic Stability (Hip During Straight Walking)
Time Frame: Measurements were taken after wearing the study prostheses for three weeks.
Maximum finite-time Lyapunov exponents were used to estimate the local dynamic stability of the amputee's sagittal plane hip, knee and ankle angles for their prosthetic limb with and without the torsion adapter while walking straight, while turning with the prosthesis on the inside of the turn, and while turning with the prosthesis on the outside of the turn. Maximum finite-time Lyapunov exponents measure the rate of kinematic separation of a gait cycle trajectory perturbed by naturally occurring disturbances and neuromuscular control errors. A positive exponent indicates divergence of a system, with increasing values indicating a les stable system.
Measurements were taken after wearing the study prostheses for three weeks.
Local Dynamic Stability (Knee During Straight Walking)
Time Frame: Measurements were taken after wearing the study prostheses for three weeks.
Maximum finite-time Lyapunov exponents were used to estimate the local dynamic stability of the amputee's sagittal plane hip, knee and ankle angles for their prosthetic limb with and without the torsion adapter while walking straight, while turning with the prosthesis on the inside of the turn, and while turning with the prosthesis on the outside of the turn. Maximum finite-time Lyapunov exponents measure the rate of kinematic separation of a gait cycle trajectory perturbed by naturally occurring disturbances and neuromuscular control errors. A positive exponent indicates divergence of a system, with increasing values indicating a les stable system.
Measurements were taken after wearing the study prostheses for three weeks.
Local Dynamic Stability (Ankle During Straight Walking)
Time Frame: Measurements were taken after wearing the study prostheses for three weeks.
Maximum finite-time Lyapunov exponents were used to estimate the local dynamic stability of the amputee's sagittal plane hip, knee and ankle angles for their prosthetic limb with and without the torsion adapter while walking straight, while turning with the prosthesis on the inside of the turn, and while turning with the prosthesis on the outside of the turn. Maximum finite-time Lyapunov exponents measure the rate of kinematic separation of a gait cycle trajectory perturbed by naturally occurring disturbances and neuromuscular control errors. A positive exponent indicates divergence of a system, with increasing values indicating a les stable system.
Measurements were taken after wearing the study prostheses for three weeks.
Local Dynamic Stability (Hip During Turning With the Prosthesis on the Inside of the Turn)
Time Frame: Measurements were taken after wearing the study prostheses for three weeks.
Maximum finite-time Lyapunov exponents were used to estimate the local dynamic stability of the amputee's sagittal plane hip, knee and ankle angles for their prosthetic limb with and without the torsion adapter while walking straight, while turning with the prosthesis on the inside of the turn, and while turning with the prosthesis on the outside of the turn. Maximum finite-time Lyapunov exponents measure the rate of kinematic separation of a gait cycle trajectory perturbed by naturally occurring disturbances and neuromuscular control errors. A positive exponent indicates divergence of a system, with increasing values indicating a les stable system.
Measurements were taken after wearing the study prostheses for three weeks.
Local Dynamic Stability (Knee During Turning With the Prosthesis on the Inside of the Turn)
Time Frame: Measurements were taken after wearing the study prostheses for three weeks.
Maximum finite-time Lyapunov exponents were used to estimate the local dynamic stability of the amputee's sagittal plane hip, knee and ankle angles for their prosthetic limb with and without the torsion adapter while walking straight, while turning with the prosthesis on the inside of the turn, and while turning with the prosthesis on the outside of the turn. Maximum finite-time Lyapunov exponents measure the rate of kinematic separation of a gait cycle trajectory perturbed by naturally occurring disturbances and neuromuscular control errors. A positive exponent indicates divergence of a system, with increasing values indicating a les stable system.
Measurements were taken after wearing the study prostheses for three weeks.
Local Dynamic Stability (Ankle During Turning With the Prosthesis on the Inside of the Turn)
Time Frame: Measurements were taken after wearing the study prostheses for three weeks.
Maximum finite-time Lyapunov exponents were used to estimate the local dynamic stability of the amputee's sagittal plane hip, knee and ankle angles for their prosthetic limb with and without the torsion adapter while walking straight, while turning with the prosthesis on the inside of the turn, and while turning with the prosthesis on the outside of the turn. Maximum finite-time Lyapunov exponents measure the rate of kinematic separation of a gait cycle trajectory perturbed by naturally occurring disturbances and neuromuscular control errors. A positive exponent indicates divergence of a system, with increasing values indicating a les stable system.
Measurements were taken after wearing the study prostheses for three weeks.
Local Dynamic Stability (Hip During Turning With the Prosthesis on the Outside of the Turn)
Time Frame: Measurements were taken after wearing the study prostheses for three weeks.
Maximum finite-time Lyapunov exponents were used to estimate the local dynamic stability of the amputee's sagittal plane hip, knee and ankle angles for their prosthetic limb with and without the torsion adapter while walking straight, while turning with the prosthesis on the inside of the turn, and while turning with the prosthesis on the outside of the turn. Maximum finite-time Lyapunov exponents measure the rate of kinematic separation of a gait cycle trajectory perturbed by naturally occurring disturbances and neuromuscular control errors. A positive exponent indicates divergence of a system, with increasing values indicating a les stable system.
Measurements were taken after wearing the study prostheses for three weeks.
Local Dynamic Stability (Knee During Turning With the Prosthesis on the Outside of the Turn)
Time Frame: Measurements were taken after wearing the study prostheses for three weeks.
Maximum finite-time Lyapunov exponents were used to estimate the local dynamic stability of the amputee's sagittal plane hip, knee and ankle angles for their prosthetic limb with and without the torsion adapter while walking straight, while turning with the prosthesis on the inside of the turn, and while turning with the prosthesis on the outside of the turn. Maximum finite-time Lyapunov exponents measure the rate of kinematic separation of a gait cycle trajectory perturbed by naturally occurring disturbances and neuromuscular control errors. A positive exponent indicates divergence of a system, with increasing values indicating a les stable system.
Measurements were taken after wearing the study prostheses for three weeks.
Local Dynamic Stability (Ankle During Turning With the Prosthesis on the Outside of the Turn)
Time Frame: Measurements were taken after wearing the study prostheses for three weeks.
Maximum finite-time Lyapunov exponents were used to estimate the local dynamic stability of the amputee's sagittal plane hip, knee and ankle angles for their prosthetic limb with and without the torsion adapter while walking straight, while turning with the prosthesis on the inside of the turn, and while turning with the prosthesis on the outside of the turn. Maximum finite-time Lyapunov exponents measure the rate of kinematic separation of a gait cycle trajectory perturbed by naturally occurring disturbances and neuromuscular control errors. A positive exponent indicates divergence of a system, with increasing values indicating a les stable system.
Measurements were taken after wearing the study prostheses for three weeks.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Peak External Rotation Moment of the Outside Hip While Turning
Time Frame: Measurements were taken after wearing the study prostheses for three weeks.
Measurements were taken after wearing the study prostheses for three weeks.
Peak External Rotation Moment of the Outside Knee While Turning
Time Frame: Measurements were taken after wearing the study prostheses for three weeks.
Measurements were taken after wearing the study prostheses for three weeks.
Peak External Rotation Moment of the Outside Ankle While Turning
Time Frame: Measurements were taken after wearing the study prostheses for three weeks.
Measurements were taken after wearing the study prostheses for three weeks.
Peak External Rotation Moment of the Inside Hip While Turning
Time Frame: Measurements were taken after wearing the study prostheses for three weeks.
Measurements were taken after wearing the study prostheses for three weeks.
Peak External Rotation Moment of the Inside Knee While Turning
Time Frame: Measurements were taken after wearing the study prostheses for three weeks.
Measurements were taken after wearing the study prostheses for three weeks.
Peak External Rotation Moment of the Inside Ankle While Turning
Time Frame: Measurements were taken after wearing the study prostheses for three weeks.
Measurements were taken after wearing the study prostheses for three weeks.
Activity Level
Time Frame: One week
Average number of steps per day over a 1 week period ending in the fourth week of each study prosthesis (Rigid and Torsion adapter)
One week
Six-minute Walk Distance
Time Frame: Six minutes after wearing the study prostheses for four weeks.
Participants are asked to walk alone as far as possible without running for six minutes. This test is performed indoors along a long, flat straight hallway of approximately 30 meters in length with two orange cones marking the 180 degree turnaround points at each end of the corridor. Approximately 40 straight steps were taken for every four turning steps.
Six minutes after wearing the study prostheses for four weeks.
Residual Limb Pain at Present?
Time Frame: Measurements were taken after wearing the study prostheses for four weeks
The residual limb pain grade scores ranged from 0 "No Pain/ Interference" to 10 "Severe Pain/Interference."
Measurements were taken after wearing the study prostheses for four weeks
Average Residual Limb Pain?
Time Frame: Measurements were taken after wearing the study prostheses for four weeks.
The residual limb pain grade scores ranged from 0 "No Pain/ Interference" to 10 "Severe Pain/Interference."
Measurements were taken after wearing the study prostheses for four weeks.
Worst Residual Limb Pain?
Time Frame: Measurements were taken after wearing the study prostheses for four weeks.
The residual limb pain grade scores ranged from 0 "No Pain/ Interference" to 10 "Severe Pain/Interference."
Measurements were taken after wearing the study prostheses for four weeks.
Least Residual Limb Pain?
Time Frame: Measurements were taken after wearing the study prostheses for four weeks.
The residual limb pain grade scores ranged from 0 "No Pain/ Interference" to 10 "Severe Pain/Interference."
Measurements were taken after wearing the study prostheses for four weeks.
Pain Interference With Activities?
Time Frame: Measurements were taken after wearing the study prostheses for four weeks.
The residual limb pain grade scores ranged from 0 "No Pain/ Interference" to 10 "Severe Pain/Interference."
Measurements were taken after wearing the study prostheses for four weeks.
How Bothersome Was Your Pain?
Time Frame: Measurements were taken after wearing the study prostheses for four weeks.
The residual limb pain grade scores ranged from 0 "No Pain/ Interference" to 10 "Severe Pain/Interference."
Measurements were taken after wearing the study prostheses for four weeks.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Glenn K. Klute, PhD, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2005

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 1, 2005

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 9, 2005

First Posted (Estimate)

September 14, 2005

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

August 15, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 28, 2014

Last Verified

July 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • A3611-R

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Leg Injuries

Clinical Trials on Transverse plane rotation adaptor pylon

3
Subscribe