Intervention to Improve Care at Life's End (BEACON)

April 23, 2015 updated by: US Department of Veterans Affairs

Intervention to Improve Care at Life's End in VA Medical Centers

The BEACON trial (Best Practices for End-of-Life Care for Our Nations' Veterans) was a six-site implementation study to evaluate a multi-component, education-based intervention to improve the quality of end-of-life care provided in VA Medical Centers.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

The BEACON trial (Best Practices for End-of-Life Care for Our Nations' Veterans) was a six-site, real-world implementation trial of a multi-component, education-based intervention to improve the quality of end-of-life care conducted in VA Medical Centers (VAMCs).

The primary aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of a multi-component intervention for improving processes of care provided in the last days of life in VAMCs. The second aim was to conduct after-death interviews with next-of-kin and qualitative analysis of their perceptions of the care provided to the veteran and family.

The multi-component intervention targeted VAMC inpatient providers, including physician, nursing, and ancillary staff. It consisted of preparatory site visits, a staff training program, a newly developed Comfort Care order set decision support tool built into the CPRS, and follow-up consultation. The intervention team travelled to each site to conduct two weeks of comprehensive in-service training. Staff were trained to identify actively-dying patients and implement a set of best practices of traditionally home-based hospice care for dying patients. The team provided assistance with policies, procedures, and skill training needed to implement comfort care interventions. Introduction of the intervention at each VAMC was staggered across time at six-month intervals using a multiple-baseline, stepped wedge design.

Data on processes of end-of-life care (last 7 days) were abstracted from the CPRS medical records of all veterans who died before, during, and after the intervention (January 2005-February 2011). A priori, five processes of care were identified as primary endpoints to indicate quality of end-of-life care: 1) presence of an order for opioid pain medication at time of death; 2) a do-not-resuscitate (DNR) order in place at time of death; 3) location of death; 4) presence of enteral feeding tube or intravenous line at time of death; and 5) physical restraints in place at or near time of death.

In addition, in-depth, face-to-face interviews were conducted with 78 bereaved next-of-kin.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

78

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35233
        • Birmingham VA Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aim 1: Not applicable. Patients were deceased.
  • Aim 2: After-death interviews with next of kin: must be willing and able to participate in after-death interview at local VA Medical Center.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • N/A

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Arm 1
Comfort care education intervention, consisting of intensive, on-site staff training together with an electronic order set for palliative care and educational materials
Comfort care education intervention, consisting of intensive, on-site staff training together with an electronic order set for palliative care and educational materials

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Presence of Order for Opioid Pain Medication
Time Frame: Pre and Post Intervention
Presence of order for opioid pain medication at time of death based on abstraction of electronic medical record
Pre and Post Intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Do Not Resuscitate Order
Time Frame: Pre and Post Intervention
Presence of a Do Not Resuscitate order at time of death based on abstraction of electronic medical record
Pre and Post Intervention
Number of Patients Who Died in ICU
Time Frame: Pre and Post Intervention
Location of death (ICU vs. other) based on abstraction of electronic medical record
Pre and Post Intervention
Individuals With a Nasogastric Tube
Time Frame: Pre and Post Intervention
Presence of nasogastric tube based on abstraction of electronic medical record
Pre and Post Intervention
Individuals With an Intravenous Line
Time Frame: Pre and Post Intervention
Presence of intravenous line infusing at time of death based on abstraction of electronic medical record
Pre and Post Intervention
Number of Individuals Who Died in Restraints
Time Frame: Pre and Post Intervention
Presence of restraints at or near time of death at time of death based on abstraction of electronic medical record
Pre and Post Intervention
Individuals Administered of Opioid Medication
Time Frame: Pre and Post Intervention
Administration of opioid medication based on abstraction of medical record
Pre and Post Intervention
Individuals With an Order for Antipsychotic Medication
Time Frame: Pre and Post Intervention
Order for antipsychotic medication based on abstraction of medical record
Pre and Post Intervention
Individuals Administered Antipsychotic Medication
Time Frame: Pre and Post Intervention
Administration of antipsychotic medication based on abstraction of medical record
Pre and Post Intervention
Individuals With an Order for Benzodiazepine Medication
Time Frame: Pre and Post Intervention
Order for benzodiazepine medication based on abstraction of medical record
Pre and Post Intervention
Individuals Who Received Benzodiazepine Medication
Time Frame: Pre and Post Intervention
Administration of benzodiazepine medication based on abstraction of medical record
Pre and Post Intervention
Individuals Who Received Scopolamine
Time Frame: Pre and Post Intervention
Administration of scopolamine (for death rattle) based on abstraction of medical record
Pre and Post Intervention
Sublingual Administration
Time Frame: Pre and Post Intervention
Sublingual administration of medication based on abstraction of medical record
Pre and Post Intervention
Individuals With Pastoral Care Visit
Time Frame: Pre and Post Intervention
Pastoral Care Visit based on abstraction of medical record
Pre and Post Intervention
Individuals With an Advance Directive
Time Frame: Pre and Post Intervention
Presence of advance directive based on abstraction of medical record
Pre and Post Intervention
Individuals With a Palliative Care Consultation
Time Frame: Pre and Post Intervention
Palliative Care Consultation based on abstraction of medical record
Pre and Post Intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kathryn L Burgio, PhD MA BA, Birmingham, Alabama VA Medical Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2005

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 4, 2005

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 4, 2005

First Posted (Estimate)

October 6, 2005

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 27, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 23, 2015

Last Verified

April 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe