Genetic Counseling or Usual Care in Helping Women With Newly Diagnosed Ductal Carcinoma In Situ or Stage I, Stage II, or Stage IIIA Breast Cancer Make Treatment Decisions

January 4, 2013 updated by: Marc D Schwartz, Georgetown University

Genetic Counseling for Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer Patients

RATIONALE: Genetics education and counseling may help patients make treatment decisions. It is not yet known how genetic counseling or usual care influence patient treatment decisions for breast cancer.

PURPOSE: This randomized clinical trial is studying how well genetic counseling works compared to usual care in helping patients with newly diagnosed ductal carcinoma in situ, stage I, stage II, or stage IIIA breast cancer make treatment decisions.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

OBJECTIVES:

  • Compare the impact of rapid genetic counseling (RGC) vs usual care on the medical decisions of women with newly diagnosed ductal carcinoma in situ or stage I-IIIA breast cancer.
  • Compare the impact of these interventions on the quality of life and psychological well being of these patients.
  • Determine baseline factors that predict who is most and least likely to benefit from RGC in patients undergoing these interventions.
  • Compare the cost per quality adjusted life year saved from a societal perspective in patients undergoing these interventions.

OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to participating site. Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 interventional arms.

  • Arm I (rapid genetic counseling): Patients undergo a 1½ hour genetic counseling session either in person or by telephone. Patients who undergo telephone counseling receive a booklet of visual aids and educational materials. Patient preferences and values are assessed immediately after counseling. Some patients may undergo BRCA1/2 status determination. Patients undergo follow-up telephone interviews at 1, 6, and 12 months.
  • Arm II (usual care): Patients receive a packet of breast cancer treatment educational materials. Patient preferences and values are assessed 2 weeks later. Patients undergo follow-up telephone interviews as in arm I.

In both arms, quality of life is assessed at baseline and at 1, 6, and 12 months.

After completion of the study, patients are followed periodically for 1 year.

PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 360 patients will be accrued for this study.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

331

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • District of Columbia
      • Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 20007
        • Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center at Georgetown University Medical Center
    • Maryland
      • Chevy Chase, Maryland, United States, 20815
    • New Jersey
      • Hackensack, New Jersey, United States, 07601
        • Hackensack University Medical Center Cancer Center
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10029
        • Mount Sinai School of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:

  • Newly diagnosed breast cancer, meeting 1 of the following criteria:

    • Stage 0 disease (ductal carcinoma in situ only)
    • Stage I-IIIA disease
  • Must meet 1 of the following criteria:

    • Diagnosis before 50 years of age
    • Diagnosis after 50 years of age AND has 1 of the following:

      • First or second degree relative diagnosed with breast cancer before 50 years of age
      • First or second degree relative diagnosed with ovarian cancer at any age
      • First or second degree relative diagnosed with male breast cancer at any age
  • Must not have initiated definitive treatment for breast cancer
  • No bilateral, metastatic, or inflammatory breast cancer
  • No prior BRCA1/2 counseling or testing
  • No prior diagnosis of metastatic cancer of any type
  • Hormone receptor status:

    • Not specified

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:

Sex

  • Female

Menopausal status

  • Not specified

Performance status

  • Not specified

Life expectancy

  • Not specified

Hematopoietic

  • Not specified

Hepatic

  • Not specified

Renal

  • Not specified

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:

Surgery

  • No prior bilateral mastectomy for breast cancer

Other

  • No concurrent treatment for cancer

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Rapid genetic counseling
Following randomization, participants will be informed about whether they are assigned to Usual Care (UC) or Rapid Genetic Counseling (RGC). Participants in the UC arm can schedule a genetic counseling appointment at any time during the study if they wish. Participants in the RGC agree to obtain genetic counseling as soon as possible, before they make a definitive surgery decision. RGC can be accomplished by telephone or in-person. The RGC intervention is delivered by highly experienced genetic counselors at each site. This counseling is identical to our standard genetic counseling procedure for newly diagnosed patients. Immediate DNA collection via blood or buccal cell collection is available following counseling. Phone counseling participants will be been mailed a kit for DNA collection or have the option of having the sample collected at at LCCC.
No Intervention: Usual Care
Usual Care (UC) for newly diagnosed breast cancer patients does not typically include a pre-surgical genetic referral. These patients may obtain genetic counseling at their own discretion.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Definitive surgery choice as measured by self-reported and medical record verification at 6 months after randomization
Time Frame: 1, 6, and 12 months
1, 6, and 12 months
Quality of life as measured by functional assessment of cancer therapy for breast cancer (FACT-B) at 1, 6, and 12 months after randomization
Time Frame: 1, 6, and 12 months
1, 6, and 12 months
Distress as measured by Impact of Events Scale Brief Symptom Inventory at 1, 6, and 12 months after randomization
Time Frame: 1, 6, and 12 months
1, 6, and 12 months
Knowledge as assessed by Genetic Testing Knowledge Measure at 1 month after randomization
Time Frame: 1 month
1 month
Decision outcomes as assessed by Decisional Conflict Scale Satisfaction with Decision Scale at 1 and 6 months after randomization
Time Frame: 1 and 6 months
1 and 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Cost effectiveness as measured by quality adjusted life years saved at 12 months after randomization
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Marc Schwartz, PhD, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2005

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 6, 2005

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 6, 2005

First Posted (Estimate)

December 7, 2005

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 7, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 4, 2013

Last Verified

January 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe