- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT00262899
Genetic Counseling or Usual Care in Helping Women With Newly Diagnosed Ductal Carcinoma In Situ or Stage I, Stage II, or Stage IIIA Breast Cancer Make Treatment Decisions
Genetic Counseling for Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer Patients
RATIONALE: Genetics education and counseling may help patients make treatment decisions. It is not yet known how genetic counseling or usual care influence patient treatment decisions for breast cancer.
PURPOSE: This randomized clinical trial is studying how well genetic counseling works compared to usual care in helping patients with newly diagnosed ductal carcinoma in situ, stage I, stage II, or stage IIIA breast cancer make treatment decisions.
Study Overview
Status
Detailed Description
OBJECTIVES:
- Compare the impact of rapid genetic counseling (RGC) vs usual care on the medical decisions of women with newly diagnosed ductal carcinoma in situ or stage I-IIIA breast cancer.
- Compare the impact of these interventions on the quality of life and psychological well being of these patients.
- Determine baseline factors that predict who is most and least likely to benefit from RGC in patients undergoing these interventions.
- Compare the cost per quality adjusted life year saved from a societal perspective in patients undergoing these interventions.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to participating site. Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 interventional arms.
- Arm I (rapid genetic counseling): Patients undergo a 1½ hour genetic counseling session either in person or by telephone. Patients who undergo telephone counseling receive a booklet of visual aids and educational materials. Patient preferences and values are assessed immediately after counseling. Some patients may undergo BRCA1/2 status determination. Patients undergo follow-up telephone interviews at 1, 6, and 12 months.
- Arm II (usual care): Patients receive a packet of breast cancer treatment educational materials. Patient preferences and values are assessed 2 weeks later. Patients undergo follow-up telephone interviews as in arm I.
In both arms, quality of life is assessed at baseline and at 1, 6, and 12 months.
After completion of the study, patients are followed periodically for 1 year.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 360 patients will be accrued for this study.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
District of Columbia
-
Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 20007
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center at Georgetown University Medical Center
-
-
Maryland
-
Chevy Chase, Maryland, United States, 20815
-
-
New Jersey
-
Hackensack, New Jersey, United States, 07601
- Hackensack University Medical Center Cancer Center
-
-
New York
-
New York, New York, United States, 10029
- Mount Sinai School of Medicine
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:
Newly diagnosed breast cancer, meeting 1 of the following criteria:
- Stage 0 disease (ductal carcinoma in situ only)
- Stage I-IIIA disease
Must meet 1 of the following criteria:
- Diagnosis before 50 years of age
Diagnosis after 50 years of age AND has 1 of the following:
- First or second degree relative diagnosed with breast cancer before 50 years of age
- First or second degree relative diagnosed with ovarian cancer at any age
- First or second degree relative diagnosed with male breast cancer at any age
- Must not have initiated definitive treatment for breast cancer
- No bilateral, metastatic, or inflammatory breast cancer
- No prior BRCA1/2 counseling or testing
- No prior diagnosis of metastatic cancer of any type
Hormone receptor status:
- Not specified
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:
Sex
- Female
Menopausal status
- Not specified
Performance status
- Not specified
Life expectancy
- Not specified
Hematopoietic
- Not specified
Hepatic
- Not specified
Renal
- Not specified
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
Surgery
- No prior bilateral mastectomy for breast cancer
Other
- No concurrent treatment for cancer
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Rapid genetic counseling
Following randomization, participants will be informed about whether they are assigned to Usual Care (UC) or Rapid Genetic Counseling (RGC).
Participants in the UC arm can schedule a genetic counseling appointment at any time during the study if they wish.
Participants in the RGC agree to obtain genetic counseling as soon as possible, before they make a definitive surgery decision.
RGC can be accomplished by telephone or in-person.
The RGC intervention is delivered by highly experienced genetic counselors at each site.
This counseling is identical to our standard genetic counseling procedure for newly diagnosed patients.
Immediate DNA collection via blood or buccal cell collection is available following counseling.
Phone counseling participants will be been mailed a kit for DNA collection or have the option of having the sample collected at at LCCC.
|
|
|
No Intervention: Usual Care
Usual Care (UC) for newly diagnosed breast cancer patients does not typically include a pre-surgical genetic referral.
These patients may obtain genetic counseling at their own discretion.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Definitive surgery choice as measured by self-reported and medical record verification at 6 months after randomization
Time Frame: 1, 6, and 12 months
|
1, 6, and 12 months
|
|
Quality of life as measured by functional assessment of cancer therapy for breast cancer (FACT-B) at 1, 6, and 12 months after randomization
Time Frame: 1, 6, and 12 months
|
1, 6, and 12 months
|
|
Distress as measured by Impact of Events Scale Brief Symptom Inventory at 1, 6, and 12 months after randomization
Time Frame: 1, 6, and 12 months
|
1, 6, and 12 months
|
|
Knowledge as assessed by Genetic Testing Knowledge Measure at 1 month after randomization
Time Frame: 1 month
|
1 month
|
|
Decision outcomes as assessed by Decisional Conflict Scale Satisfaction with Decision Scale at 1 and 6 months after randomization
Time Frame: 1 and 6 months
|
1 and 6 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Cost effectiveness as measured by quality adjusted life years saved at 12 months after randomization
Time Frame: 12 months
|
12 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Study Chair: Marc Schwartz, PhD, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- CDR0000450155
- P30CA051008 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
- R01CA108933 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
- R01CA074861 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
- GUMC-2004-212
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.