Does the Order in Which Vaccines Are Administered Affect Pain Response?

November 10, 2013 updated by: Moshe Ipp, The Hospital for Sick Children

Does the Order in Which Vaccines Are Administered Affect Pain Response? A Randomized, Double-blind, Clinical Trial of Pentacel vs. Prevnar

The objective of this study is to determine whether there should be a predetermined sequence recommended for administering these two vaccines, with the less painful vaccine being given first.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Childhood vaccination is one of the most effective public health measures worldwide, with few serious adverse effects reported. However, pain on vaccination continues to be a frequent occurrence and is the most common cause of childhood iatrogenic pain. In a recent study of paediatricians in the USA, more than ninety percent reported at least one parental vaccine refusal in the past year. The most common concerns cited by parents were short-term reactions and pain from multiple injections.

One of the factors responsible for vaccination pain is the vaccine material itself. Even the same vaccine, when made by different pharmaceutical companies may produce different pain responses. Anecdotal reports from doctors and nurses indicate that Pentacel (DPTaP+Hib) is a relatively painless vaccine to administer whereas Prevnar (conjugated pneumococcal vaccine) causes significant pain on injection and severe distress to the infant being vaccinated. For this reason, many vaccinators administer Pentacel [DPT] prior to Prevnar [PCV] when providing both vaccines in one visit. However, the difference in infant pain responses has not been documented. Although it has been shown that very early pain events affect infants' later experience of pain, it has not been demonstrated that the sequence in which vaccines are administered affects pain response. This study will assess whether there should be a predetermined sequence recommended for administering these two vaccines, with the less painful vaccine (Pentacel) being given first.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

120

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 1X8
        • The Hospital for Sick Children

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

2 months to 6 months (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Healthy infant
  • 2 - 6 months of age
  • receiving primary DPT and PCV vaccinations

Exclusion Criteria:

  • chronic illness
  • immune deficiency
  • immunosuppression
  • a history of allergy to DPT or PCV or any of its components
  • fever
  • any acute illness that prevents the administration of the vaccine

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Pentacel
The subjects in this arm will be vaccinated with Pentacel
Active Comparator: Prevnar
The subjects in this arm will be vaccinated with Prevnar

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
pain response to vaccination with Prevnar and Pentacel, as measured by The Modified Behavioral Pain Scale (MBPS) and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: Immediately after vaccination
Immediately after vaccination

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Moshe Ipp, MD, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto Canada

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2007

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 17, 2006

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 17, 2006

First Posted (Estimate)

October 19, 2006

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

November 13, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 10, 2013

Last Verified

November 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 1000009089

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe