Assessing Efficacy and Safety of Lacosamide Compared to Placebo in Reducing Signs and Symptoms of Fibromyalgia Syndrome.

June 20, 2018 updated by: UCB Pharma

A Parallel, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Proof of Concept Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of 400 mg/Day Lacosamide Tablets in Subjects With Signs and Symptoms Associated With Fibromyalgia Syndrome

This trial investigated the efficacy and safety of 400mg/day of lacosamide as compared to placebo in reducing the signs and symptoms of fibromyalgia syndrome.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This was a proof-of-concept study and not powered for statistical comparisons.

The trial consisted of a 4-week Titration Phase, an 8-week Maintenance Phase, a 1-week Taper Phase, and a 2-week Safety Follow-Up Phase. If subjects met the eligibility criteria, they were randomized to receive either lacosamide 400mg/day or placebo during the Maintenance Phase. Subjects assigned to lacosamide were titrated from 100mg/day to 400mg/day at weekly intervals of 100mg. All subjects who completed the 4-week Titration Phase entered an 8-week Maintenance Phase. No dose adjustment was allowed during the Maintenance Phase. The Treatment Phase was defined as the combined Titration and Maintenance Phases.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

159

Phase

  • Phase 2

Expanded Access

No longer available outside the clinical trial. See expanded access record.

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Arizona
      • Litchfield Park, Arizona, United States
    • California
      • Santa Ana, California, United States, 92705
      • Walnut Creek, California, United States, 94598
    • Florida
      • Deerfield Beach, Florida, United States, 33064
      • Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States, 33334
      • Fort Myers, Florida, United States, 33916
      • Tampa, Florida, United States, 33614
    • Georgia
      • Athens, Georgia, United States
      • Decatur, Georgia, United States, 30033
    • Illinois
      • Peoria, Illinois, United States, 61614
    • Indiana
      • Evansville, Indiana, United States, 47714
    • Kentucky
      • Madisonville, Kentucky, United States, 42431
    • Maryland
      • Columbia, Maryland, United States, 21045
      • Frederick, Maryland, United States, 21702
    • Massachusetts
      • Brockton, Massachusetts, United States, 20301
    • North Carolina
      • Charlotte, North Carolina, United States, 28210
      • Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27103
    • Ohio
      • Mogadore, Ohio, United States, 44260
      • Toledo, Ohio, United States, 43623
    • South Carolina
      • Goose Creek, South Carolina, United States, 29445
    • Tennessee
      • Memphis, Tennessee, United States, 30033
    • Texas
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78213
    • Virginia
      • Richmond, Virginia, United States, 23294
    • Washington
      • Kirkland, Washington, United States, 98033

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Males or females, 18 to 65 years old
  • Fulfills all 3 points of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) definition for diagnosis of fibromyalgia
  • At least moderate pain (pain intensity ≥ 5 on Likert pain scale (0-10) during the 7 days prior to Baseline)
  • Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) total score ≥ 50
  • Completed an adequate washout period for excluded medications prior to beginning the Baseline Diary Phase

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Symptomatic regional or structural rheumatic disease
  • Diagnosed neuropathic pain syndrome
  • Receiving treatment with neurostimulating devices
  • Significant psychopathology
  • History of chronic alcohol or drug abuse within 6 months prior to Screening
  • Been hospitalized for psychiatric or behavioral reasons within 6 months prior to Screening
  • Clinically significant abnormal vitals, cardiac dysfunction and /or arrhythmias
  • Taken neuroleptics, serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) or tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs)
  • Other medical conditions that could compromise the subject's ability to participate in the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Placebo
Matching placebo tablet administered twice daily
EXPERIMENTAL: Lacosamide
Lacosamide Tablet 400mg daily
Tablet 400mg daily (200mg twice daily) during 8-week maintenance phase following 4-week titration phase starting at 100mg/day and increasing to 400mg/day at weekly intervals of 100mg
Other Names:
  • Harkoseride
  • Vimpat

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Average Daily Pain Score to the Last 2 Weeks of the 12-week Treatment Phase (Based on the Full Analysis Set)
Time Frame: Baseline, Last 2 weeks of the 12-week Treatment Phase
The average daily pain score is calculated using an 11-point Likert scale, ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain ever experienced).
Baseline, Last 2 weeks of the 12-week Treatment Phase
Change From Baseline in Average Daily Pain Score to the Last 2 Weeks of the 12-week Treatment Phase (Based on the Per Protocol Set)
Time Frame: Baseline, Last 2 weeks of the 12-week Treatment Phase
The average daily pain score is calculated using an 11-point Likert scale, ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain ever experienced).
Baseline, Last 2 weeks of the 12-week Treatment Phase

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) Total Score to the Last Assessment in the 12-week Treatment Phase
Time Frame: Baseline, Last assessment in the 12-week Treatment Phase
The Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) Total Score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores corresponding to a greater impact of fibromyalgia
Baseline, Last assessment in the 12-week Treatment Phase
Change From Baseline in Total Myalgic Score to the Last Assessment in the 12-week Treatment Phase
Time Frame: Baseline, Last assessment in the 12-week Treatment Phase
Total Myalgic Score ranges from 0 to 54 with higher scores corresponding to a greater level of pain.
Baseline, Last assessment in the 12-week Treatment Phase
Change From Baseline in Average Daily Interference With Sleep to the Last 2 Weeks of the 12-week Treatment Phase
Time Frame: Baseline, Last 2 weeks of the 12-week Treatment Phase
Sleep scale - the subject rated quality of sleep, from 0 (very good sleep) to 10 (very poor sleep)
Baseline, Last 2 weeks of the 12-week Treatment Phase
Change From Baseline in Daily Interference With General Activity to the Last 2 Weeks of the 12-week Treatment Phase
Time Frame: Baseline, Last 2 weeks of the 12-week Treatment Phase
General activity scale - the subject rated how the pain had interfered with general activity, from 0 (did not interfere) to 10 (completely interfered)
Baseline, Last 2 weeks of the 12-week Treatment Phase
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Assessment From Baseline to the Last Assessment in the 12-week Treatment Phase
Time Frame: Baseline, Last assessment in the 12-week Treatment Phase
The PGIC is a 7-point self-administered categorical rating scale in which the subject rated the change in pain since starting trial medication (from much worse [score of 1] to much better [score of 7]).
Baseline, Last assessment in the 12-week Treatment Phase
Change From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Scores to the Last Assessment in the 12-week Treatment Phase
Time Frame: Baseline, Last assessment in the 12-week Treatment Phase
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) is a self-administered instrument for detecting anxiety and depression in medical outpatients. Scores range from 0 to 21 for each subscale with higher scores reflecting a greater level of anxiety or depression.
Baseline, Last assessment in the 12-week Treatment Phase
Change From Baseline in Fibromyalgia Symptom Scores to the Last Assessment in the 12-week Treatment Phase
Time Frame: Baseline, Last assessment in the 12-week Treatment Phase
All scores range from 0 to 10 with higher scores corresponding to a greater level of symptom severity.
Baseline, Last assessment in the 12-week Treatment Phase
Change From Baseline in Morning Pain Score to the Last 2 Weeks of the 12-week Treatment Phase
Time Frame: Baseline, Last 2 weeks of the 12 week Treatment Phase
An 11-point Likert scale was used for subjects to assess pain, from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain ever experienced).
Baseline, Last 2 weeks of the 12 week Treatment Phase
Change From Baseline in Evening Pain Score to the Last 2 Weeks of the 12-week Treatment Phase
Time Frame: Baseline, Last 2 weeks of the 12 week Treatment Phase
An 11-point Likert scale was used for subjects to assess pain, from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain ever experienced).
Baseline, Last 2 weeks of the 12 week Treatment Phase
Percentage of Patients Using Rescue Medication During the 12-week Treatment Phase
Time Frame: 12-week Treatment Phase
Subjects recorded use of rescue medication for pain in the diary daily in the evening with a Yes/No response.
12-week Treatment Phase
Percentage of Patients Using Alcohol for Pain During the 12-week Treatment Phase
Time Frame: 12-week Treatment Phase
Use of alcohol to treat pain in the past 24 hours was recorded (Yes/No response).
12-week Treatment Phase
Lacosamide Plasma Concentration at the End of the Maintenance Phase/ Week 12
Time Frame: End of the Maintenance Phase/Week 12
End of the Maintenance Phase/Week 12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2006

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

February 1, 2008

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

February 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 9, 2006

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 20, 2006

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

November 22, 2006

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

July 18, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 20, 2018

Last Verified

July 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Fibromyalgia Syndrome

Clinical Trials on Placebo

Subscribe