Tapentadol (CG5503)

A Randomized Double-Blind, Placebo- and Active-Control, Parallel-arm, Phase III Trial With Controlled Adjustment of Dose to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of CG5503 Extended-Release (ER) in Patients With Moderate to Severe Chronic Pain Due to Osteoarthritis of the Knee

The purpose of this trial is to evaluate the effectiveness (level of pain control) and safety of orally administered tapentadol (CG5503) Extended Release (ER) (base) at doses of 100-250 mg twice daily in patients with moderate to severe chronic pain due to osteoarthritis of the knee, in comparison with placebo and Oxycodone Controlled Release (CR).

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Pain; Osteoarthritis, Knee
• Intervention / Treatment: Drug: tapentadol (CG5503); Drug: oxycodone; Drug: placebo

Detailed Description

The primary objective of this randomized (study medication assigned to patients by chance), double-blind (neither patient nor investigator knows the study medication) , phase III, placebo and active controlled trial is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of orally administered tapentadol (CG5503) Extended Release (ER) (base) at doses of 100-250 mg twice daily in patients with moderate to severe chronic pain from osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. The study is being conducted for registration and approval of tapentadol (CG5503) in the US and outside the US. The trial will consist of five periods: screening (to assess eligibility) , washout (3-7 days with determination of a baseline pain intensity), titration (of dose over 3 weeks to the optimal individual level) , maintenance (investigational drug intake for 12 weeks with adjustments allowed), and follow-up (2 weeks post treatment discontinuation). The study hypothesis is that the study drug will be more effective than placebo in reducing patients pain intensity. The Secondary objectives include the collection of pharmacokinetic (related to how the body uses the drug) information for dose verification. The trial objectives will be assessed by comparing the baseline pain level to the level of week 12 of the maintenance phase. This will be done by looking at the patient's pain diary information. Titrate tapentadol (CG5503) ER (extended release) 50mg to patient's optimal dose ranging between 100mg and 250mg twice a day; Oxycodone CR (controlled release) 10mg to 50mg twice a day; Placebo (no active ingredients). All doses of trial treatment will be taken orally with approximately 120 mL of water with or without food for a maximum timeframe of 15 weeks.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 1030
• Phase: Phase 3

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 40 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Patients diagnosed with osteoarthritis of the knee based on the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria and functional capacity class of I-III
• patients taking analgesic medications for at least 3 months prior to screening and/or dissatisfied with their current therapy
• Patients requiring opioid treatment must be taking daily doses of opioid-based analgesic, equivalent to <160 mg of oral morphine
• baseline score of greater than or equal to 5 on an 11-point numerical rating scale, calculated as the average pain intensity during the last 3 days prior to randomization.

Exclusion Criteria:

• History of alcohol and/or drug abuse in Investigator's judgement
• history of significant liver insufficiency
• chronic hepatitis B or C, or HIV, presence of active hepatitis B or C within the past 3 months
• life-long history of seizure disorder or epilepsy
• history of malignancy within past 2 years, with exception of basal cell carcinoma that has been successfully treated
• uncontrolled hypertension
• patients with severely impaired renal function
• patients with moderate to severly impaired hepatic function or with laboratory values reflecting inadequate hepatic function

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: Quadruple

Number of Arms

3

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 001; tapentadol (CG5503) 50 100 150 200 250mg twice a day (BID) during 15 weeks	Drug: tapentadol (CG5503); 50, 100, 150, 200, 250mg twice a day (BID) during 15 weeks
Active Comparator: 002; oxycodone 10 20 30 40 50mg twice a day (BID) during 15 weeks	Drug: oxycodone; 10, 20, 30, 40, 50mg twice a day (BID) during 15 weeks
Placebo Comparator: 003; placebo matching placebo twice a day (BID) during 15 weeks	Drug: placebo; matching placebo twice a day (BID) during 15 weeks

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Change From Baseline of the Average Pain Intensity Based on an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale(NRS) Over the Last Week of the Maintenance Period at Week 12.	For this twice daily pain assessment, the subjects were to indicate the level of pain experienced over the previous 12 hours on an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) where a score of 0 indicated "no pain" and a score of 10 indicated "pain as bad as you can imagine".	Baseline and 12 weeks (Primary endpoint is the average pain intensity score during the last week of the maintenance period).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario McMaster Questionnaire (WOMAC) Assessing Pain, Disability and Joint Stiffness of the Knee Over the Last Week of the Maintenance Period at Week 12	Change from baseline to Week 12 of WOMAC Global Score: WOMAC is measure with a Likert ordinal scale from 0-4 with lower scores indicating lower levels of symptoms or physical disability	Baseline and 12 week endpoint
Change From Baseline in Sleep Latency Time in Hours Over the Last Week of the Maintenance Period at Week 12.	A Sleep Questionniare addressed the following question: "How long after bedtime/lights out did you fall asleep last night (hours)?" 12 week endpoint-mean changes from baseline at endpoint for sleep latency. Decrease in time(hours) indicates improvement.	Baseline and 12 week endpoint
Percentage of Patients Who Reported Very Much Improved or Much Improved From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change Over the Last Week of the Maintenance Period at Week 12	Ordinal measure indicating change from start of treatment (on a scale of 7 = Very much worse to 1 = Very much improved)	Baseline and 12 week endpoint
Distribution of Time to Treatment Discontinuation Due to Lack of Efficacy	The median time to treatment discontinuation due to lack of efficacy from baseline to endpoint	Baseline to 12 weeks
Change From Baseline in EuroQol-5 (EQ-5D) Health Status Index to Week 12	Change from baseline to end point in EuroQol-5 (EQ-5D) Dimension Questionnaire. A higher score indicates an improvement in health in the Health Status Index. The EQ-5D is a five dimensional health state classification. Each dimension is assessed on a 3-point ordinal scale (1=no problems, 2=some problems, 3=extreme problems). The responses to the five EQ-5D dimensions were scored using a utility-weighted algorithm to derive an EQ-5D health status index score between 0 to 1, with 1.00 indicating "full health" and 0 representing dead	Baseline and 12 week endpoint
Change From Baseline in Responder Analysis 50% Improvement to Week 12	Defined by the percentage of subjects achieving at least 50% improvement from baseline in the primary endpoint based on the 11-point NRS at week 12. For this twice daily pain assessment, the subjects were to indicate the level of pain experienced over the previous 12 hours on an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) where a score of 0 indicated "no pain" and a score of 10 indicated "pain as bad as you can imagine".	Baseline and Week 12

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C.
• Collaborators: Grünenthal GmbH

Publications and helpful links

General Publications

• Etropolski M, Kuperwasser B, Flugel M, Haufel T, Lange B, Rauschkolb C, Laschewski F. Safety and tolerability of tapentadol extended release in moderate to severe chronic osteoarthritis or low back pain management: pooled analysis of randomized controlled trials. Adv Ther. 2014 Jun;31(6):604-20. doi: 10.1007/s12325-014-0128-6. Epub 2014 Jul 2.
• Afilalo M, Morlion B. Efficacy of tapentadol ER for managing moderate to severe chronic pain. Pain Physician. 2013 Jan;16(1):27-40.
• Biondi DM, Xiang J, Etropolski M, Moskovitz B. Evaluation of blood pressure and heart rate in patients with hypertension who received tapentadol extended release for chronic pain: a post hoc, pooled data analysis. Clin Drug Investig. 2014 Aug;34(8):565-76. doi: 10.1007/s40261-014-0209-y.
• Etropolski M, Lange B, Goldberg J, Steup A, Rauschkolb C. A pooled analysis of patient-specific factors and efficacy and tolerability of tapentadol extended release treatment for moderate to severe chronic pain. J Opioid Manag. 2013 Sep-Oct;9(5):343-56. doi: 10.5055/jom.2013.0177.
• Merchant S, Provenzano D, Mody S, Ho KF, Etropolski M. Composite measure to assess efficacy/gastrointestinal tolerability of tapentadol ER versus oxycodone CR for chronic pain: pooled analysis of randomized studies. J Opioid Manag. 2013 Jan-Feb;9(1):51-61. doi: 10.5055/jom.2013.0147.

Helpful Links

• A Randomized Double-Blind, Placebo & Active-Control, Parallel-Arm Phase 3 Study With Controlled Dose Adjustment to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Tapentadol Extended-Release (ER) in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Chronic Pain Due to OA of the Knee

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start: January 1, 2007
• Primary Completion (Actual): July 1, 2008
• Study Completion (Actual): December 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: January 12, 2007
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: January 12, 2007
• First Posted (Estimate): January 15, 2007

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Estimate): April 18, 2012
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: April 16, 2012
• Last Verified: April 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: Chronic Pain; Osteoarthritis, Knee; tapentadol; Pain Assessment
• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Joint Diseases; Musculoskeletal Diseases; Rheumatic Diseases; Arthritis; Osteoarthritis; Osteoarthritis, Knee; Physiological Effects of Drugs; Adrenergic Agents; Neurotransmitter Agents; Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action; Central Nervous System Depressants; Peripheral Nervous System Agents; Analgesics; Sensory System Agents; Analgesics, Opioid; Narcotics; Neurotransmitter Uptake Inhibitors; Membrane Transport Modulators; Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors; Oxycodone; Tapentadol
• Other Study ID Numbers: CR013402; R331333PAI3008 (Other Identifier: Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C.); KF11 (Other Identifier: Grunenthal GMBH)