The Effectiveness of FMPO in Improving the Quality of Care for Persons With Severe Mental Illness.

April 6, 2015 updated by: US Department of Veterans Affairs

The Effectiveness of FMPO in Improving the Quality of Care for Persons With Severe Mental Illness

The purpose of this study is to learn how to help veterans play a stronger role in shaping their mental health care. Specifically we want to see if we can help veterans improve their mental health treatment by helping them decide if they want to involve family in their mental health treatment, and if so, how. The study will compare a "family member provider" program to an "enhanced treatment as usual approach" in achieving these goals.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Previous research demonstrates that when families are active participants in the clinical care of persons with SMI, veterans experience improved outcomes, including treatment retention, vocational services participation, and empowerment. Numerous controlled trials show that when family involvement achieves the level of intensity and family psychoeducation (FPE), relapse rates are cut in half, and treatment adherence, clinical symptoms, and patient functioning are improved. However, despite these demonstrated benefits, rates of family involvement in the VA are unacceptably low. Even minimal family-clinician contact occurs for only one third of VA SMI patients, a lower rate than in non-VA systems of care. Therefore, it is not surprising that FPE, an intensive form of family-clinician contact, is almost never offered in the VA. In fact, a national VA survey conducted within the last three years indicated that 0% of VAs offer FPE programs conforming to EBP guidelines. Our previous experience further suggests that these deficits in care are due to combinations of provider, patient, and family factors, and that the VA presents specific challenges to implementing existing model programs, including FPE. We therefore believe it is necessary to approach the challenge of increasing family involvement in a step-wise fashion, first by engaging families in the processes of care, before trying to enlist them in more intensive programs such as FPE. Further, family engagement would likely be most effective if it builds on a foundation that empowers consumers to make informed choices regarding the involvement of relatives in care. Our group has developed and piloted a new, family-engagement approach that is gradual, patient-centered, recovery-based, and can address various barriers to improving care. It is manualized and thus replicable. The proposed study will implement and further evaluate this intervention, the brief Family Member Provider Outreach (FMPO).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

238

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • West Los Angeles, California, United States, 90073
        • VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, West Los Angeles, CA
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21201
        • Baltimore VA Medical Center VA Maryland Health Care System, Baltimore, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18-70 years
  • Diagnosis of a psychotic disorder in keeping with criteria established by the Serious Mental Illness Treatment Research and Evaluation Center (SMITREC){{646}} (schizophrenic disorders (295.0-295.9), affective psychoses (296.1, 296.4-296.8) and other psychotic diagnoses (297.0-298.9)) or diagnosis of Major Depression with psychotic features (296.xx)
  • Decisional capacity to provide informed consent
  • At least two outpatient visits within last six months
  • At least monthly face-to-face contact for one hour or more with a patient-identified family member or caregiver
  • Assessment by the treating therapist or psychiatrist that the patient is clinically stable enough to participate in the program.

Family Member/Caregiver Inclusion Criteria

  • Age 18-80 years
  • Decisional capacity to provide informed consent
  • Permission from veteran to be contacted

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients whose families have attended the FPE group within the last six months
  • Patients whose families have had at least monthly clinician contact in the last six months
  • Patients who are currently homeless
  • Patients who participated in the FMPO pilot.

Family Member/Caregiver Exclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals who do not meet the inclusion criteria
  • Individuals who participated in the FMPO pilot.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: FMPO Condition
Family Member Provider Outreach is a brief recovery oriented model. THe FMPO meets with the consumer for 2-3 sessions and with the family for 2-3 sessions with the consumer's permission.
Family Member Provider Outreach is a brief recovery oriented model. THe FMPO meets with the consumer for 2-3 sessions and with the family for 2-3 sessions with the consumer's permission.
Active Comparator: Enhanced treatment as usual (e-TAU)
Enhanced treatment as usual. In this condition, the consumer is given a list of family services available including the family intervention team.
Enhanced treatment as usual. In this condition, the consumer is given a list of family services available including the family intervention team.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Family-Clinician Contact (Including Contact With FMPO Clinician)
Time Frame: Within 6 months of intervention
Chart review looking at the any clinician contact with veteran's family members
Within 6 months of intervention
Family-Clinician Contact (Not Including Notes From FMPO Clinicians)
Time Frame: Within 6 months of intervention
Chart review looking at the any clinician contact with veteran's family members
Within 6 months of intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Consumer's Recovery Rating - MHRM Total Score
Time Frame: Within 6 months of intervention
We measured recovery attitudes and beliefs with the Mental Health Recovery Measure (MHRM), a 30-item self-report measure that has a total score and eight subscales.The MHRM scales range from 0-120, with a higher score indicating better recovery.
Within 6 months of intervention
Consumer's Recovery Rating - MHRM - Overcoming Stuckness Sub Score
Time Frame: Within 6 month of the intervention
We measured recovery attitudes and beliefs with the Mental Health Recovery Measure (MHRM), a 30-item self-report measure that has a total score and eight subscales. This sub score is Overcoming Stuckness.The MHRM sub scales range from 0-16, with a higher score indicating better recovery.
Within 6 month of the intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Lisa B Dixon, MD MPH, Baltimore VA Medical Center VA Maryland Health Care System, Baltimore, MD

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 24, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 25, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

April 27, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 24, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 6, 2015

Last Verified

August 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IIR 04-255
  • H-28791 (Other Identifier: UMB IRB)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Schizophrenia

Clinical Trials on Family Member Provider Outreach

Subscribe