Second Extension Study to Evaluate Safety and Tolerability of Influenza Vaccines in Adults and Elderly, and to Evaluate Immunogenicity and Concomitant Vaccination With Pneumococcal Vaccine in a Subgroup

November 30, 2016 updated by: Novartis

A Phase III, Single-Blind, Multi-Center, Extension Study to Evaluate Safety and Tolerability of a Trivalent Subunit Influenza Vaccine Produced Either in Mammalian Cell Culture or in Embryonated Hen Eggs in Adult and Elderly Subjects Who Participated in Study V58P4, With Subset Analyses of Immunogenicity and Evaluation of Concomitant Polysaccharide Pneumococcal Vaccine (Elderly).

The study primarily aims to evaluate immunogenicity and safety of influenza vaccines (cell culture derived seasonal trivalent influenza vaccine (cTIV) or influenza virus vaccine (egg-derived seasonal trivalent, thiomersal free; eTIV_a)) when administered alone and when administered concomitantly with pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PV) in elderly subjects. The study also aimed to evaluate safety and immunogenicity (subset) of annual vaccination with either cTIV or eTIV_a in adults and elderly subjects.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

1522

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Krakow, Poland, 25-381
        • 5
      • Krakow, Poland, 30-969
        • 1
      • Krakow, Poland, 31-115
        • 3
      • Krakow, Poland, 31-202
        • 2
      • Krakow, Poland, 31-832
        • 4

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • participation in the V58P4 study
  • mentally competent to understand the nature, the scope and the consequences of the study
  • able and willing to give written informed consent prior to study entry
  • available for all the visits scheduled in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • receipt of another investigational agent within 90 days prior to, or before completion of the safety follow-up period in another study, whichever is longer, prior to Visit 7 and unwilling to refuse participation in another clinical study through the end of the present study
  • history of any anaphylaxis, serious vaccine reactions, or allergy to any of the vaccine components
  • any acute respiratory disease or infections requiring systemic antibiotic or antiviral therapy (chronic antibiotic therapy for urinary tract prophylaxis was acceptable) or experienced fever (i.e., axillary temperature ≥ 38°C) within the 5 days prior to Visit 7
  • pregnant/breast feeding women, or women of childbearing potential who refuse to use a reliable contraceptive method during the three weeks after vaccination

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: cTIV
Cell culture derived seasonal trivalent influenza vaccine (cTIV)
cell cultured trivalent influenza vaccine (cTIV) vaccine administered as 0.5 mL single dose in the deltoid muscle, preferably of the non-dominant arm.
Active Comparator: eTIV_a
Influenza virus vaccine (egg-derived seasonal trivalent, thiomersal free; eTIV_a)
egg based trivalent influenza vaccine (eTIV_a) administered as 0.5 mL single dose in the deltoid muscle, preferably of the non-dominant arm.
Experimental: FLU (cTIV or eTIV_a)
Cell culture derived seasonal trivalent influenza vaccine (cTIV) or influenza virus vaccine (egg-derived seasonal trivalent, thiomersal free; eTIV_a).
0.5 mL, Single dose of either cell cultured trivalent influenza vaccine (cTIV) or egg based trivalent influenza vaccine eTIV_a administered.
Active Comparator: FLU (cTIV or eTIV_a) + PV
23-valent Pneumococcal vaccine (PV) concomitantly administered with cell culture derived seasonal trivalent influenza vaccine (cTIV) or influenza virus vaccine (egg-derived seasonal trivalent, thiomersal free; eTIV_a).
0.5 mL, Single dose of either cell culture derived seasonal trivalent influenza vaccine (cTIV) or influenza virus vaccine (egg-derived seasonal trivalent, thiomersal free; eTIV_a) administered concomitantly with 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PV).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Randomized Participants Reporting Local and Systemic Reactions.
Time Frame: One week postvaccination
Safety and tolerability evaluation of influenza vaccines, within one week of single intramuscular injection. Local reactions reported for Influenza Vaccine Injection site.
One week postvaccination
Immunogenicity Assessment by Geometric Mean Titers (GMT).
Time Frame: Three weeks postvaccination
Non-inferiority of the influenza vaccine FLU (cell-culture derived seasonal trivalent influenza vaccine (cTIV); and influenza virus vaccine (egg-derived seasonal trivalent, thiomersal free; eTIV_a)) when administered alone versus administered concomitantly with pneumococcal vaccine (FLU + PV) is met if lower limit of the 2-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) of postvaccination (Day 22) Geometric Mean Titer ratio (FLU+PV/FLU) is greater than 0.5.
Three weeks postvaccination

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Unrandomized Participants Reporting Local and Systemic Reactions.
Time Frame: One week postvaccination
Safety and tolerability evaluation of influenza vaccines, within one week of single intramuscular injection.
One week postvaccination
Number of Randomized Participants Reporting Local and Systemic Reactions.
Time Frame: One week postvaccination
Safety and tolerability evaluation, within one week of single intramuscular injection of influenza vaccines (cell-culture derived seasonal trivalent influenza vaccine (cTIV) or influenza virus vaccine (egg-derived seasonal trivalent, thiomersal free; eTIV_a) when administered alone or concomitantly with a pneumococcal vaccine (PV)). Local reactions reported for Influenza Vaccine Injection Site.
One week postvaccination
Number of Subjects With Antibody Response as Assessed by Hemagglutination Inhibition Assay.
Time Frame: Three weeks postvaccination

Immunogenicity (seroconversion or significant increase in antibody titer and HI titer ≥1:40) of cell cultured and egg based trivalent influenza vaccine three weeks after a single injection, by the measurement of strain-specific hemagglutination inhibition (HI) tests according to the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) criteria (CPMP/BWP/214/96).

Seroconversion was defined as negative pre-vaccination titer (<10)/postvaccination titer ≥40. Significant increase in antibody titer was defined as at least a fourfold increase from non-negative baseline (≥10).

Three weeks postvaccination
Geometric Mean Ratio (GMR Day 22/Day1) After Single Dose of Influenza Vaccine.
Time Frame: Three weeks postvaccination

Immunogenicity (geometric mean titer ratio) of cell cultured and egg based trivalent influenza vaccine three weeks after a single injection, by the measurement of strain-specific hemagglutination inhibition (HI) tests according to the CHMP criteria (CPMP/BWP/214/96).

CHMP Criteria fulfilled if the Geometric Mean titer Ratio (GMR) is > 2.5.

Three weeks postvaccination

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 19, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 21, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

December 24, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 27, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 30, 2016

Last Verified

October 1, 2012

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe