BNP Measurement Reduces Resource Utilization for Patients With CHF Admitted Thorough the ED

December 26, 2007 updated by: Mayo Clinic

BNP Measurement Reduces Resource Utilization for Patients With CHF Admitted Thorough the ED: A Clinical Development Project

Measurement of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) in dyspneic patients increases diagnostic accuracy for congestive heart failure (CHF). Limited information is available regarding economic outcomes attributable to BNP assay. The aim of this study was to assess the economic impact of BNP assay in elderly dyspneic patients presenting to the emergency department (ED).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Dyspneic patients 65 years were enrolled in a randomized, controlled trial; hemodynamically unstable patients were excluded. BNP (Biosite assay) levels were measured prior to physician assessment with randomization in 1:1 ratio to either BNP 1) level reported or 2) level not reported. ED physicians made triage decisions guided by clinical judgment and nomogram to aid in interpretation of BNP level. Primary outcome was mean total hospital cost per subject. Secondary outcomes included admission rate, service assignment, discharge diagnosis and length of stay. Differences between groups were compared by t-test with bootstrap. Costs reflect 2005 constant dollars.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

200

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Minnesota
      • Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905
        • Saint Marys Hospital, Mayo Clinic

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Dyspneic patients:65 years or older presenting to the ED with chief complaint of shortness of breath, were enrolled in a randomized, controlled trial.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Dyspneic patients 65 years or older presenting to the ED with chief complaint of shortness of breath.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • hemodynamically unstability

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
A
BNP level from protocol blood tests initiated in the ED, reported to ED physician prior to ED disposition.
B
BNP level from protocol blood tests initiated in the ED, NOT reported to ED physician prior to ED disposition.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Mean total hospital cost per subject
Time Frame: spans from ED eval through hospitalization discharge
spans from ED eval through hospitalization discharge

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Included admission rate, service assignment, discharge diagnosis, and length of stay.
Time Frame: from ED evaluation through hospitalization discharge
from ED evaluation through hospitalization discharge

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Raquel M Schears, MD, MPH, Mayo Clinic
  • Principal Investigator: Alfredo L Clavell, MD, Mayo Clinic
  • Study Chair: Lyle J Olsen, MD, Mayo Clinic
  • Study Director: Paula J Santrach, MD, Mayo Clinic

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2003

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2005

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2005

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 26, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 26, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

January 8, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 8, 2008

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 26, 2007

Last Verified

December 1, 2007

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe