Clofarabine, Cytarabine, and Thymoglobulin for Allogeneic Transplantation

September 5, 2014 updated by: Washington University School of Medicine

A Non-Myeloablative Conditioning Regimen for Allogeneic Transplantation With Clofarabine, Cytarabine, and Thymoglobulin for Myelodysplastic Syndrome and Acute Myeloid Leukemia

This study will test the combination of clofarabine, cytarabine, and thymoglobulin as a non-myeloablative conditioning regimen for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes or acute myeloid leukemia undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplant.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Current reduced intensity conditioning regimens have been able to decrease TRM (treatment related mortality) but suffer from increased rates of disease relapse. Disease burden at transplantation, as measured by percent myeloblasts, predicts relapse. Current regimens employ fludarabine and busulfan with various adjutants, but these agents are not part of the usual armamentarium used versus leukemia and have questionable anti-leukemic activity. By substituting clofarabine and cytarabine, a combination with proven anti-leukemic activity in the relapsed and refractory setting as well as activity versus MDS, as the back bone of the regimen we hope overcome residual disease and improve post-transplant relapse rates. Furthermore the principal toxicity of this regimen is myelosuppression, which should be abrogated by the infusion of stem cells. Thymoglobulin is included due to its minimal contribution to toxicity but significant benefits in engraftment, and controlling acute and chronic GVHD, which are major contributors to TRM and disease specific activity in MDS.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

7

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Missouri
      • St. Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
        • Ravi Vij, M.D.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria (Patient):

  1. Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS), as defined by the World Health Organization criteria, OR Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (CMML) as defined by the French American British classification OR Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) in complete remission [excluding FAB-M3] diagnosed by standard criteria and meet the criteria below:

    1. Patients may be in any CR
    2. No more than 2 cycles of consolidation. Any consolidation regimen may be used.
    3. No more than 6 months from documented CR to transplant.
  2. Age 18 years or older.
  3. ECOG performance status <=2
  4. Identification of suitable donor
  5. DLCO >=40% with no symptomatic pulmonary disease
  6. LVEF by MUGA >= 30%
  7. Serum creatinine <=1.0 mg/dL; if serum creatinine >1.0 mg/dL, then the estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) must be >60 mL/min/1.73 m2 as calculated by the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation where Predicted GFR (ml/min/1.73 m2) = 186 x (Serum Creatinine)-1.154 x (age in years)-0.023 x (0.742 if patient is female) x (1.212 if patient is black).
  8. Bilirubin <=2 times the upper limit of normal
  9. AST <=3 times the upper limit of normal

Donor criteria:

  1. HLA-Matched Sibling: The donor must be an adequate HLA match as determined by serologic typing for class (A, B) and low resolution molecular typing for class II (DRB1) as defined by institutional standards.
  2. Matched Unrelated Donor: An acceptable match per NMDP standards based on high resolution molecular typing.
  3. The donor must be healthy and must be an acceptable donor as per institutional standards for stem cell collection.
  4. The donor must have no significant cardiopulmonary, renal, endocrine, or hepatic disease.
  5. There is no upper age restriction for donors, but they must be at least 18 years of age.
  6. Syngeneic donors are not eligible.
  7. No known HIV.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Pregnant or nursing.
  2. Active systemic infection considered opportunistic, life threatening or clinically significant at the time of treatment.
  3. Severe concurrent disease, including severe insulin-dependent diabetes, uncontrolled hypertension, transient ischemic attacks, uncontrolled symptomatic coronary artery disease, or symptomatic CNS involvement or psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit compliance with study requirements.
  4. Known HIV disease.
  5. History of other malignancy except for basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin or carcinoma in situ of the cervix or breast unless the subject has been off treatment and free from disease for > 3 years.
  6. Active disease at the time of transplant.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Arm 1: Non-myeloablative conditioning regimen
  • Clofarabine 40mg/m2/day IV over two hours daily x 5 days on Days -6 thru -2
  • Cytarabine 1gm/m2/day IV over two hours daily x 5 days on Days -6 thru -2 after the START of Clofarabine.
  • Thymoglobulin 1.0mg/kg IV over 6 hours X 1 day on Day -4, then 2.5mg/kg/day x 2 days on Days -3 and -2.
  • Stem Cell Transplant - On day 0 a minimum of total CD34+ cell dose of 2 x10E6/kg (actual weight of recipient) will be infused.
Other Names:
  • Clolar
Other Names:
  • Anti-thymocyte globulin
Other Names:
  • Ara-C
  • Cytosar
Other Names:
  • Bone marrow transplant
  • Stem cell transplant
  • Hematopoietic stem cell transplant
  • Peripheral blood stem cell transplant

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Six-month Treatment Related Mortality
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Disease Specific Response Rates
Time Frame: One, three, six and twelve months.
Disease-specific partial response and complete response.
One, three, six and twelve months.
Engraftment as Measured by Percent Donor Chimerism
Time Frame: Day +30
Day +30
Engraftment as Measured by Percent Donor Chimerism
Time Frame: Day +40-+60
Day +40-+60
Engraftment as Measured by Percent Donor Chimerism
Time Frame: Day +80-+90
Day +80-+90
Overall Survival
Time Frame: 5 years from time of restaging
5 years from time of restaging
Disease-free Survival
Time Frame: 5 years from time of restaging
Disease-free survival is defined as the length of time after treatment ends that the participant survives without any signs or symptoms of that cancer.
5 years from time of restaging
Rate of Acute Graft-versus-host Disease (GVHD)
Time Frame: Up to 100 days after transplant
Acute GVHD occurs within 100 days of transplant.
Up to 100 days after transplant
Rate of Chronic Graft-versus-host Disease (GVHD)
Time Frame: 100 days-1 year after transplant
100 days-1 year after transplant
Use Conventional STR-PCR Method for Monitoring Engraftment
Time Frame: Up to 1 year after transplant
Includes assessment of mixed chimerism in the whole blood, myeloid cells, T cells, and B cells.
Up to 1 year after transplant
Median Time to Progression
Time Frame: 5 years from time of restaging
Time to progression is defined as the length of time from the start of treatment until the disease starts to get worse or spread to other parts of the body.
5 years from time of restaging

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ravi Vij, M.D., Washington Universtiy of St. Louis

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 2, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 14, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

January 15, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

September 12, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 5, 2014

Last Verified

September 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe