- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT00605722
A Study of Tarceva (Erlotinib) and Avastin (Bevacizumab) in Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Liver Cancer.
June 12, 2014 updated by: Hoffmann-La Roche
A Single Arm, Open Label Study of First Line Treatment With Tarceva Plus Avastin on Progression-free Survival in Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Liver Cancer
This single arm study evaluated the efficacy and safety of a combination of Tarceva and Avastin in patients with advanced or metastatic liver cancer.
Patients were treated with Tarceva 150 mg po daily plus Avastin 5 mg/kg intravenous (iv) every 2 weeks.
The anticipated time on study treatment was until disease progression, and the target sample size was <100 individuals.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
51
Phase
- Phase 2
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 138-736
-
-
-
-
-
Manila, Philippines, 1000
-
-
-
-
-
Kueishan, Taiwan, 333
-
Tainan, Taiwan, 704
-
Taipei, Taiwan, 00112
-
Taipei, Taiwan, 106
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- adult patients, ≥ 18 years of age;
- advanced or metastatic liver cancer;
- ≥ 1 measurable lesion, not previously treated with local therapy within 4 weeks of enrollment.
Exclusion Criteria:
- prior or concomitant systemic anti-cancer treatment for advanced disease;
- patients at high risk of variceal bleeding;
- clinically significant cardiovascular disease;
- major surgery, open biopsy, or significant traumatic injury within 4 weeks of study start.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: bevacizumab + erlotinib
Participants received bevacizumab (Avastin) 5 mg/kg intravenous (iv) on day 1 of each 2 week cycle plus erlotinib (Tarceva) 150 mg orally once a day until disease progression or unmanageable toxicity.
|
5 mg/kg iv on day 1 of each 2 week cycle.
150 mg orally (po) daily.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Progression-free Survival (PFS)
Time Frame: Week 16
|
Percentage of participants who were alive and without documented progressive disease 16 weeks after their first dose of study drug.
Diagnosis of Progressive Disease was made by objective criteria (RECIST criteria) on the target lesion(s), or by documenting, with Computerised Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging (CT/MRI) scans, the presence of newly occurring lesion(s) arising outside the scanned areas of the target lesions.
PD required at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions.
|
Week 16
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Response Rate (ORR)
Time Frame: Event driven (median follow-up 12 months)
|
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR).
Analysis of tumor response was based on the best overall response according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), which was defined as the best response recorded from the start of trial treatment until disease progression/recurrence (or death), taking as reference for progressive disease (PD) the smallest measurements recorded since the treatment started.
CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions; for non-target lesions disappearance of lesions and normal tumour marker levels.
PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, using as reference the Baseline sum LD.
PD required at least a 20% increase in the sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions.
|
Event driven (median follow-up 12 months)
|
|
Disease Control Rate (DCR)
Time Frame: Event driven (median follow-up 12 months)
|
Disease Control Rate was defined as the percentage of participants with Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR) or Stable Disease (SD) for at least 8 weeks by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST).
CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions; for non-target lesions disappearance of lesions and normal tumour marker levels.
PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, using as reference the Baseline sum LD.
SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum LD since the treatment started; for non-target lesions persistence of one or more non-target lesion(s) and/or maintenance of tumour marker level above the normal limits.
|
Event driven (median follow-up 12 months)
|
|
Time to Tumor Progression
Time Frame: Event driven (median follow-up 12 months)
|
Time to tumor progression was defined as the time period in months from the start of study drug treatment to disease progression.
Progressive disease required at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions.
|
Event driven (median follow-up 12 months)
|
|
Progression-free Survival (PFS)
Time Frame: Event driven (median follow-up 12 months)
|
PFS was defined as the time period in months from the start of study drug treatment to the first of either progression or death.
Progressive disease required at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions.
|
Event driven (median follow-up 12 months)
|
|
Overall Survival (OS)
Time Frame: Event driven (median follow-up 12 months)
|
OS was defined as the time period in months from the start of study drug treatment to death.
|
Event driven (median follow-up 12 months)
|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Time Frame: Up to 107 Weeks
|
An AE was considered any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease associated with the use of the study drug, whether or not considered related to the study drug.
Preexisting conditions that worsened during the study and laboratory or clinical tests that resulted in a change in treatment or discontinuation from study drug were reported as adverse events.
A SAE was any experience that suggests a significant hazard, contraindication, side effect or precaution that: results in death, is life-threatening, required in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or is medically significant.
|
Up to 107 Weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
March 1, 2008
Primary Completion (Actual)
September 1, 2010
Study Completion (Actual)
September 1, 2010
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
January 18, 2008
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 18, 2008
First Posted (Estimate)
January 31, 2008
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
July 14, 2014
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
June 12, 2014
Last Verified
June 1, 2014
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Digestive System Diseases
- Neoplasms
- Neoplasms by Site
- Digestive System Neoplasms
- Liver Diseases
- Liver Neoplasms
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Enzyme Inhibitors
- Antineoplastic Agents
- Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological
- Angiogenesis Inhibitors
- Angiogenesis Modulating Agents
- Growth Substances
- Growth Inhibitors
- Protein Kinase Inhibitors
- Erlotinib Hydrochloride
- Bevacizumab
Other Study ID Numbers
- ML21213
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.