CT Scans in Screening for Lung Cancer in Current and Former Smokers

September 22, 2023 updated by: University of Nebraska

Development of a Lung Cancer-Screening Program at the University of Nebraska Medical Center: A Feasibility Study

RATIONALE: Screening tests, such as CT scanning, may help doctors find cancer cells early and plan better treatment for lung cancer.

PURPOSE: This clinical trial is studying how well a lung cancer screening program using CT scanning works in current and former smokers.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

OBJECTIVES:

  • To assess the feasibility of establishing a lung cancer screening program at the University of Nebraska Medical Center using CT scanning in normal study participants with at least a 30 pack-year history of cigarette smoking.
  • To determine if it is possible to screen 100 high-risk individuals with high-resolution CT scanning for the presence of suspicious pulmonary nodules.
  • To compare an effective and definitive work-up on all study participants with abnormal results within a defined time period from initial screening.

OUTLINE: Study participants complete a detailed questionnaire (paper or electronic version) at baseline to provide personal and family information for inclusion in the registry database. Registry data includes information on participants' medical history, diet, lifestyle habits, and any past or current environmental exposures, as well as family history of cancer within each participant's extended family tree. An instruction manual on completing the questionnaires is provided to all study participants. The System Coordinator of the registry may provide additional information or clarification of the information provided in the questionnaires via a structured telephone interview. Data on study participants and their families is entered into the registry database either manually via the paper-based questionnaires or electronically via interactive Web-based questionnaires completed by participants through the registry website.

Study participants also undergo a low-dose spiral CT scan at baseline. The resulting images are stored electronically and linked to the web-based participant registry. A radiologist then reviews the images, reports on any abnormalities, and renders an interpretation of the scan as being positive or negative for lung nodules. The radiologist's findings are then conveyed to the study participant's primary care physician and the following determinations are made: participants with negative findings (i.e., non-calcified solid nodules < 5 mm or non-solid nodules < 8 mm) are returned home and scheduled for a repeat CT scan in 1 year; participants with abnormalities not related to lung cancer are referred to their primary care physician for further action; and participants with positive findings undergo additional diagnostic work-up and treatment* as described below.

  • Non-calcified solid nodules ≥ 5 and ≤ 15 mm: Study participants undergo a course of antibiotics followed by a high-resolution CT scan at 3 months. If the CT findings are stable, then participants return for a repeat CT scan in 1 year. If the nodules are growing, participants undergo additional diagnostic work-up, which may include biopsy of the positive nodule by their treating clinician.
  • Non-solid nodule ≥ 8 mm: Study participants undergo treatment with an antibiotic, CT follow-up, and additional diagnostic work-up, if appropriate, as described previously.
  • Non-calcified solid nodules > 15 mm: Study participants undergo work-up for a positive nodule, as above.

NOTE: *Study participants who demonstrate radiographic abnormalities that are suspected to be of an inflammatory nature are given a 10-day course of a broad spectrum respiratory antibiotic, preferably a fluoroquinolone, by the participating physician who enrolled that participant into the study.

Study participants with negative CT findings undergo CT screening once yearly for up to five years, in the absence of a diagnosed malignancy. Diagnostic work-up for repeat CT scans is as follows:

  • Any new lesion: Study participants undergo a work-up as previously described for non-calcified solid or non-solid nodules.
  • Any non-calcified nodule that was present earlier and grew in size:

    • Growth < 3 mm: Study participants undergo a repeat CT scan in 6 months. If there is further growth, participants are worked-up for a positive nodule, or, if the scan is stable, participants undergo a repeat scan 1 year after the most recent scan.
    • Growth between 3 mm and 5 mm: Study participants undergo a high-resolution CT scan in 3 months and further diagnostic work-up for a positive nodule, as described previously, if there is growth. If there is complete resolution of the nodule, participants undergo repeat screening CT scan in 1 year after the most recent scan. If there is partial resolution of the nodule, another high-resolution CT scan is performed 3 months later. Participants with a stable nodule undergo repeat screening CT scan 1 year after the most recent scan.
    • Growth ≥ 5 mm: Study participants receive a course of an antibiotic and undergo high-resolution CT scanning after 1 month. The following assessments are also performed: work-up for a positive nodule, if there is further growth; repeat screening CT scan in 1 year after the most recent scan, if there is complete resolution of the nodule; high-resolution CT scan in 3 months, if there is partial resolution of the nodule; and repeat screening CT scan 1 year after the most recent scan, if the nodule is stable.

All study participants undergo blood sample collection at baseline for use in future studies. Additional blood samples are obtained from study participants with positive CT scans for future research on smoking-related diseases. Tissue samples obtained from diagnostic biopsy or surgical specimens are also stored for future research.

Once a malignancy is diagnosed and a definitive intervention is performed, study participants are followed periodically thereafter.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Nebraska
      • Omaha, Nebraska, United States, 68198-6805
        • Eppley Cancer Center, University of Nebraska Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years to 120 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Normal subjects with at least a 30 pack-year history of cigarette smoking.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Current and former smokers with at least a 30 pack-year history of smoking
  • Body weight less than 140 kg (308 pounds)
  • Able to lie flat
  • Able to comply with long-term follow-up
  • Functional capacity and willingness to undergo diagnostic work-up of suspicious nodules and curative therapy if lung cancer is detected
  • Nursing mothers allowed
  • Able to come to clinic for screening

Exclusion Criteria:

  • No cognitive impairment that would preclude providing informed consent
  • No other concurrent or prior malignancy within the past five years except superficial basal cell carcinoma or nonmelanoma skin cancer
  • No condition that would preclude screening, diagnosis, or surgical treatment
  • Not pregnant/negative pregnancy test

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility of establishing a lung cancer screening program at the University of Nebraska Medical Center
Time Frame: Upon the approximately 5-year establishment of normative parameters in regard to screening efficiency.
Frequency of suspicious nodules on baseline CT; Frequency of invasive procedures for diagnosis; Frequency of surgical evaluation; Complication rates with diagnostic work up as well as surgical management.
Upon the approximately 5-year establishment of normative parameters in regard to screening efficiency.
Feasibility of screening 100 high-risk individuals with high-resolution CT scanning for the presence of suspicious pulmonary nodules
Time Frame: Upon the approximately 5-year establishment of normative parameters in regard to screening efficiency.
Enrollment of 100 subjects; Baseline and yearly CT evaluations for 4 more years.
Upon the approximately 5-year establishment of normative parameters in regard to screening efficiency.
Comparison of work-up on all study participants with abnormal results within a defined time period from initial screening
Time Frame: Upon the approximately 5-year establishment of normative parameters in regard to screening efficiency.
Participants with abnormalities not related to lung cancer are referred to their primary care physician for further action; and participants with positive findings undergo additional diagnostic work-up and treatment. NOTE: Study participants who demonstrate radiographic abnormalities that are suspected to be of an inflammatory nature are given a 10-day course of a broad spectrum respiratory antibiotic, preferably a fluoroquinolone, by the participating physician who enrolled that participant into the study.
Upon the approximately 5-year establishment of normative parameters in regard to screening efficiency.
Frequency of suspicious nodules at baseline
Time Frame: Upon the approximately 5-year establishment of normative parameters.
Study participants undergo a low-dose spiral CT scan at baseline. A radiologist then reviews the images, reports on any abnormalities, and renders an interpretation of the scan as being positive or negative for lung nodules. The radiologist's findings are then conveyed to the study participant's primary care physician.
Upon the approximately 5-year establishment of normative parameters.
Frequency of invasive procedures for diagnosis
Time Frame: Upon the approximately 5-year establishment of normative parameters.

Non-calcified solid nodules ≥ 5 and ≤ 15 mm: If the nodules are growing, participants undergo additional diagnostic work-up, which may include biopsy of the positive nodule by their treating clinician.

Non-solid nodule ≥ 8 mm: Additional diagnostic work-up, if appropriate, as described previously.

Non-calcified solid nodules > 15 mm: Work-up for a positive nodule, as above.

Upon the approximately 5-year establishment of normative parameters.
Frequency of surgical evaluation
Time Frame: Upon the approximately 5-year establishment of normative parameters

Non-calcified solid nodules ≥ 5 and ≤ 15 mm: If the nodules are growing, participants undergo additional diagnostic work-up, which may include biopsy of the positive nodule by their treating clinician.

Non-solid nodule ≥ 8 mm: Additional diagnostic work-up, if appropriate, as described previously.

Non-calcified solid nodules > 15 mm: Work-up for a positive nodule, as above.

Upon the approximately 5-year establishment of normative parameters
Complication rates with diagnostic work-up
Time Frame: Upon the approximately 5-year establishment of normative parameters.
All study participants undergo blood sample collection at baseline for use in future studies. Additional blood samples are obtained from study participants with positive CT scans for future research on smoking-related diseases. Tissue samples obtained from diagnostic biopsy or surgical specimens are also stored for future research.
Upon the approximately 5-year establishment of normative parameters.
Surgical management
Time Frame: Upon the approximately 5-year establishment of normative parameters.
If malignancy is diagnosed, that patient after definitive intervention will be followed for progression-free survival and cancer-related mortality. In case the subject develops any malignancy, the subject will be taken off study but the course of the malignancy, including survival will be monitored.
Upon the approximately 5-year establishment of normative parameters.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Apar K Ganti, MD, University of Nebraska

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 19, 2005

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 27, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 27, 2008

First Posted (Estimated)

February 28, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 26, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 22, 2023

Last Verified

September 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 0064-05-FB
  • P30CA036727 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lung Cancer

Clinical Trials on questionnaire administration

3
Subscribe