Study of CE-224,535 A Twice Daily Pill To Control Rheumatoid Arthritis In Patients Who Have Not Totally Improved With Methotrexate

March 9, 2022 updated by: Pfizer

A PHASE 2A, RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, PARALLEL-GROUP STUDY OF CE-224,535, AN ANTAGONIST OF THE P2X7 RECEPTOR, IN THE TREATMENT OF THE SIGNS AND SYMPTOMS OF RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS IN SUBJECTS WHO ARE INADEQUATELY CONTROLLED ON METHOTREXATE

CE-224,535 is known to block a chemical that acts as a gateway to some of your immune cells. Blocking this gateway prevents the cells from pushing out 2 chemicals called IL-1 and IL-18 that are known to cause some of the inflammation seen in rheumatoid arthritis. It is hoped that taking this drug will reduce the symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Santiago, RM
      • Providencia, Santiago, RM, Chile, 7530206
        • Clínica Santa María, Sección Reumatología
      • Ceska Lipa, Czechia, 470 01
        • Revmatologicka ambulance
      • Praha 2, Czechia, 128 50
        • Revmatologicky Ustav
      • Praha 4, Czechia, 140 00
        • Revmatologicka ambulance
      • Incheon, Korea, Republic of, 400-711
        • Inha University Hospital, Medicine/Rheumatology
      • Pusan, Korea, Republic of, 602-739
        • Pusan National University Hospital, Rheumatology, Internal Medicine
    • D.f.
      • Mexico, D.f., Mexico, 03300
        • Investigadores Clinicos Asociados
      • Krakow, Poland, 31-501
        • Krakowskie Centrum Medyczne NZOZ
      • Poznan, Poland, 60-356
        • Zaklad Reumatologii i Immunologii Klinicznej
      • Poznan, Poland, 61-545
        • Oddzial Reumatologiczno-Rehabilitacyjny IIR Ortopedyczno-Rehabilitacyjny
      • A Coruña, Spain, 15006
        • Complexo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña
      • Madrid, Spain, 28007
        • Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón
    • A Coruña
      • Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain, 15705
        • Hospital Nuestra Señora de La Esperanza
    • Arizona
      • Mesa, Arizona, United States, 85202
        • Arizona Arthritis & Rheumatology Associates, P.C.
    • Florida
      • DeBary, Florida, United States, 32713
        • Omega Research Consultants LLC
      • Lake Mary, Florida, United States, 32746
        • Florida Arthritis Center
      • Tampa, Florida, United States, 33614
        • Tampa Medical Group, PA
    • Indiana
      • Avon, Indiana, United States, 46123
        • American Health Network
    • Louisiana
      • New Orleans, Louisiana, United States, 70115
        • George Stanley Walker, MD
      • New Orleans, Louisiana, United States, 70115
        • Best Clinical Trials, LLC (Administrative Only)
      • New Orleans, Louisiana, United States, 70115
        • Majid Abdul Jawad, MD
    • Maryland
      • Frederick, Maryland, United States, 21702
        • The Arthritis and Osteoporosis Center of Maryland
    • Missouri
      • Columbia, Missouri, United States, 65212
        • University of Missouri-Columbia
      • Columbia, Missouri, United States, 65203
        • University Physicians
    • Nevada
      • Reno, Nevada, United States, 89502
        • Arthritis Center of Reno
    • Ohio
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45242
        • New Horizons Clinical Research
    • Washington
      • Spokane, Washington, United States, 99204-2336
        • Arthritis Northwest

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 99 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Active rheumatoid arthritis
  • Incomplete response to methotrexate

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Must not be on biologic therapies
  • No recent infections

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
no active ingredient
Experimental: Active
500 mg po BID

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 12
Time Frame: Week 12
ACR20 response: compared to baseline, greater than or equal to (>=) 20 percent (%) improvement in tender joint count; >= 20% improvement in swollen joint count; and >= 20% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire [HAQ]); and C-Reactive Protein (CRP).
Week 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 2, 4 and 8
Time Frame: Week 2, 4, 8
ACR20 response: compared to baseline, >=20% improvement in tender joint count; >= 20% improvement in swollen joint count; and >= 20% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire [HAQ]); and C-Reactive Protein (CRP).
Week 2, 4, 8
Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response
Time Frame: Week 2, 4, 8, 12
ACR50 response: compared to baseline, >=50% improvement in tender joint count; >= 50% improvement in swollen joint count; and >= 50% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire [HAQ]); and C-Reactive Protein (CRP).
Week 2, 4, 8, 12
Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response
Time Frame: Week 2, 4, 8, 12
ACR70 response: compared to baseline, >=70% improvement in tender joint count; >= 70% improvement in swollen joint count; and >= 70% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire [HAQ]); and C-Reactive Protein (CRP).
Week 2, 4, 8, 12
Number of Tender/Painful and Swollen Joints
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8, 12
Number of tender/painful joints was determined by examining 28 joints and identified the joints that were painful under pressure or to passive motion. The number of tender joints was recorded on the joint assessment form at each visit, no tenderness = 0, tenderness = 1. Number of swollen joints was determined by examination of 28 joints and identifying when swelling was present. The number of swollen joints was recorded on the joint assessment form at each visit, no swelling = 0, swelling =1.
Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8, 12
Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Arthritis
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8, 12
Physician global assessment of arthritis was measured on a 0 to 100 millimeter (mm) Visual Analog Scale (VAS), with 0 mm= very good and 100 mm= very poor. This was an evaluation based on the participant's disease signs, functional capacity and physical examination.
Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8, 12
Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8, 12
Participants answered: "Considering all the ways your arthritis affects you, how are you feeling today?" Participants responded by using a 0 to 100 mm VAS, with 0 mm= very well and 100 mm= very poorly.
Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8, 12
Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritic Pain
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8, 12
Participants measured their pain at the time of assessment on a 0 to 100 mm VAS, with 0 mm= no pain and 100 mm= most severe pain.
Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8, 12
Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8, 12
Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI): participant-reported assessment of ability to perform tasks in 8 categories of daily living activities: dress/groom; arise; eat; walk; reach; grip; hygiene; and common activities over past week. Each item scored on 4-point scale from 0 to 3: 0= no difficulty; 1= some difficulty; 2= much difficulty; 3= unable to do. Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score range 0-3 where 0= least difficulty and 3= extreme difficulty.
Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8, 12
Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count and C-Reactive Protein (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [CRP])
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8, 12
DAS28-3 (CRP) was calculated from the swollen joint count and tender joint count using the 28 joints count and CRP (milligram per liter [mg/L]). Total score range: 0 to 9.4, higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-3 (CRP) less than or equal to (<=) 3.2 implied low disease activity and >3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity, and DAS28-3 (CRP) <2.6 = remission.
Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8, 12
C-Reactive Protein (CRP)
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8, 12
The test for CRP is a laboratory measurement for evaluation of an acute phase reactant of inflammation through the use of an ultrasensitive assay. A decrease in the level of CRP indicates reduction in inflammation and therefore improvement.
Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8, 12
Incidence of Withdrawal Due to Lack of Efficacy
Time Frame: Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 14
Number of participants who withrew due to lack of efficacy were reported.
Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 14
Time to Withdrawal Due to Lack of Efficacy
Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 14
Baseline up to Week 14

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
CE-224,535 Plasma Concentrations
Time Frame: 0 hour (pre-dose), 2 hours post-dose at Day 1; 1, 3 hours post-dose at Week 2; 0 hour (pre-dose), 3 hours post-dose at Week 4
Nominal times were used for summarizing the pharmacokinetic results (0 hours at randomization [Day 1] and Week 4 [pre-dose]; 1 hour at Week 2 [post-dose]; 2 hours at randomization [post-dose on Day 1]; and 3 hours at Week 2 [post-dose] and Week 4 [post-dose]).
0 hour (pre-dose), 2 hours post-dose at Day 1; 1, 3 hours post-dose at Week 2; 0 hour (pre-dose), 3 hours post-dose at Week 4

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 7, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 4, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

February 4, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 25, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 25, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

March 4, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 4, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 9, 2022

Last Verified

March 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe